Re: [flexcoders] FABridge Problem - Please help!

2010-08-27 Thread Brian J. Ackermann
http://code.google.com/p/flex-iframe/source/browse/trunk/examples/IFrameCommTest/src/com/google/code/flexiframe/examples/IFrameCommTest.mxml


lines 80 & 81

in the original example, there was no ID

Thanks

--
Brian J. Ackermann
brian.ackerm...@gmail.com
952.373.1626
--





On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Alex Harui  wrote:

>
>
> I just noticed you didn’t specify an id=”FABridge” in your
> 
>
> What was the equivalent statement in Flex 3?
>
>
>
> On 8/26/10 10:45 AM, "Brian J. Ackermann" 
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From my testing, I believe the problem is on the JS side of thing, and that
> the FABridge doesn't 'live' in the same location in the DOM in flex4, as
> compared with flex3.
>
> But we're both reasonably novice flex developers, so we could be
> mis-interpreting what we're seeing.  In another version of the project, I
> have added some debugging to a text area on screen, and
> "this.parent.FABridge" and "parent.FABridge" and "FABridge" all return
> 'undefined'.  Since that used to work just fine in flex3, it seems like
> maybe I just need to find the new 'path' in the DOM
>
> for example:
>
> this.parent.foo.bar.blah.FABridge
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian
>
>
> --
> Brian J. Ackermann
>  brian.ackerm...@gmail.com
>  952.373.1626
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Alex Harui  wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I don’t have time right now to look and I don’t deal much with FABridge,
> but are you now saying that parent.FABridge is now the issue?  The OP said
> it was FABridge.flex.  Is this on the JS side or AS side?  In Flex 4, a
> child component’s parent is not the main app, they get shoveled down into
> the skin.  It think the document or parentDocument properties or
> FlexGlobals.topLevelApplication can access the main app.
>
>
>
>
> On 8/26/10 9:10 AM, "Brian J. Ackermann"  http://brian.ackerm...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I'm trying to get the IFrameCommTest example (from
> http://code.google.com/p/flex-iframe/) to work in Flex 4, and, while the
> IFrame itself works, the communication does not. In particular, I need to
> get the included HTML page to call functions from the flex app (I already
> have a way to get the Flex app to talk to the HTML).
>
> I've exported the project to facilitate your help.
> http://www.mediafire.com/file/172448jkkgva4ki/iframeCommTest.fxp
>
> The problem, is that the "parent.FABridge" doesn't exist. My guess is that
> something in flex4 changed with regard to how things are located in the DOM.
>
> (This post is directly related to the original.  I just thought this would
> be a clearer example of the problem. )
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> --
> Brian J. Ackermann
>  brian.ackerm...@gmail.com 
>  952.373.1626
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe System, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>  
>


Re: [flexcoders] FABridge Problem - Please help!

2010-08-26 Thread Alex Harui
I just noticed you didn’t specify an id=”FABridge” in your 

What was the equivalent statement in Flex 3?


On 8/26/10 10:45 AM, "Brian J. Ackermann"  wrote:






>From my testing, I believe the problem is on the JS side of thing, and that 
>the FABridge doesn't 'live' in the same location in the DOM in flex4, as 
>compared with flex3.

But we're both reasonably novice flex developers, so we could be 
mis-interpreting what we're seeing.  In another version of the project, I have 
added some debugging to a text area on screen, and "this.parent.FABridge" and 
"parent.FABridge" and "FABridge" all return 'undefined'.  Since that used to 
work just fine in flex3, it seems like maybe I just need to find the new 'path' 
in the DOM

for example:

this.parent.foo.bar.blah.FABridge

Thanks,

Brian



Brian J. Ackermann
 brian.ackerm...@gmail.com
 952.373.1626






On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Alex Harui  wrote:





I don’t have time right now to look and I don’t deal much with FABridge, but 
are you now saying that parent.FABridge is now the issue?  The OP said it was 
FABridge.flex.  Is this on the JS side or AS side?  In Flex 4, a child 
component’s parent is not the main app, they get shoveled down into the skin.  
It think the document or parentDocument properties or 
FlexGlobals.topLevelApplication can access the main app.




On 8/26/10 9:10 AM, "Brian J. Ackermann" http://brian.ackerm...@gmail.com> > wrote:






I'm trying to get the IFrameCommTest example (from 
http://code.google.com/p/flex-iframe/) to work in Flex 4, and, while the IFrame 
itself works, the communication does not. In particular, I need to get the 
included HTML page to call functions from the flex app (I already have a way to 
get the Flex app to talk to the HTML).

I've exported the project to facilitate your 
help.http://www.mediafire.com/file/172448jkkgva4ki/iframeCommTest.fxp

The problem, is that the "parent.FABridge" doesn't exist. My guess is that 
something in flex4 changed with regard to how things are located in the DOM.

(This post is directly related to the original.  I just thought this would be a 
clearer example of the problem. )

Thanks,



Brian J. Ackermann
 brian.ackerm...@gmail.com 
 952.373.1626











--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe System, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui


Re: [flexcoders] FABridge Problem - Please help!

2010-08-26 Thread Brian J. Ackermann
>From my testing, I believe the problem is on the JS side of thing, and that
the FABridge doesn't 'live' in the same location in the DOM in flex4, as
compared with flex3.

But we're both reasonably novice flex developers, so we could be
mis-interpreting what we're seeing.  In another version of the project, I
have added some debugging to a text area on screen, and
"this.parent.FABridge" and "parent.FABridge" and "FABridge" all return
'undefined'.  Since that used to work just fine in flex3, it seems like
maybe I just need to find the new 'path' in the DOM

for example:

this.parent.foo.bar.blah.FABridge

Thanks,

Brian

--
Brian J. Ackermann
brian.ackerm...@gmail.com
952.373.1626
--





On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Alex Harui  wrote:

>
>
> I don’t have time right now to look and I don’t deal much with FABridge,
> but are you now saying that parent.FABridge is now the issue?  The OP said
> it was FABridge.flex.  Is this on the JS side or AS side?  In Flex 4, a
> child component’s parent is not the main app, they get shoveled down into
> the skin.  It think the document or parentDocument properties or
> FlexGlobals.topLevelApplication can access the main app.
>
>
>
> On 8/26/10 9:10 AM, "Brian J. Ackermann" 
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I'm trying to get the IFrameCommTest example (from
> http://code.google.com/p/flex-iframe/) to work in Flex 4, and, while the
> IFrame itself works, the communication does not. In particular, I need to
> get the included HTML page to call functions from the flex app (I already
> have a way to get the Flex app to talk to the HTML).
>
> I've exported the project to facilitate your help.
> http://www.mediafire.com/file/172448jkkgva4ki/iframeCommTest.fxp
>
> The problem, is that the "parent.FABridge" doesn't exist. My guess is that
> something in flex4 changed with regard to how things are located in the DOM.
>
> (This post is directly related to the original.  I just thought this would
> be a clearer example of the problem. )
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> --
> Brian J. Ackermann
>  brian.ackerm...@gmail.com
>  952.373.1626
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe System, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>  
>


Re: [flexcoders] FABridge Problem - Please help!

2010-08-26 Thread Alex Harui
I don’t have time right now to look and I don’t deal much with FABridge, but 
are you now saying that parent.FABridge is now the issue?  The OP said it was 
FABridge.flex.  Is this on the JS side or AS side?  In Flex 4, a child 
component’s parent is not the main app, they get shoveled down into the skin.  
It think the document or parentDocument properties or 
FlexGlobals.topLevelApplication can access the main app.


On 8/26/10 9:10 AM, "Brian J. Ackermann"  wrote:






I'm trying to get the IFrameCommTest example (from 
http://code.google.com/p/flex-iframe/) to work in Flex 4, and, while the IFrame 
itself works, the communication does not. In particular, I need to get the 
included HTML page to call functions from the flex app (I already have a way to 
get the Flex app to talk to the HTML).

I've exported the project to facilitate your 
help.http://www.mediafire.com/file/172448jkkgva4ki/iframeCommTest.fxp

The problem, is that the "parent.FABridge" doesn't exist. My guess is that 
something in flex4 changed with regard to how things are located in the DOM.

(This post is directly related to the original.  I just thought this would be a 
clearer example of the problem. )

Thanks,



Brian J. Ackermann
 brian.ackerm...@gmail.com
 952.373.1626











--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe System, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui


Re: [flexcoders] FABridge Problem - Please help!

2010-08-26 Thread Brian J. Ackermann
I'm trying to get the IFrameCommTest example (from
http://code.google.com/p/flex-iframe/) to work in Flex 4, and, while the
IFrame itself works, the communication does not. In particular, I need to
get the included HTML page to call functions from the flex app (I already
have a way to get the Flex app to talk to the HTML).

I've exported the project to facilitate your help.
http://www.mediafire.com/file/172448jkkgva4ki/iframeCommTest.fxp

The problem, is that the "parent.FABridge" doesn't exist. My guess is that
something in flex4 changed with regard to how things are located in the DOM.

(This post is directly related to the original.  I just thought this would
be a clearer example of the problem. )

Thanks,

--
Brian J. Ackermann
brian.ackerm...@gmail.com
952.373.1626
--



>


[flexcoders] FABridge Problem - Please help!

2010-08-25 Thread crackedcornjimmy17

I'm working with a team to put together a repeatable checkout
process.



We are using a Flex shopping cart and then opening up an IFrame using
flexiframe to capitalize on our ASP.net secure checkout server.  This
works like a charm until we click on a simple button in ASP.net that
does one thing - and one thing only.  It's supposed to trigger a
process, using FABridge, to get us back to the first `page' in
the Flex application so as to run another transaction.A few things I
have done, and please let me know if you need more data, code, or
whatever.



I put FABridge.js in the Flex project's html-template folder.

I put FABridge.as in the a `bridge' package in the Flex project.



I put FABridge.js in the ASP.net project.

I declare this file on the aspx page like so:



 



Then, I declared the ASP.net button like so:



 



The newOrder function is written like so:





 function newOrder() {

 var flexApp = FABridge('AdminTrak',
'flex');

 flexApp.setPage(0);

 }





The setPage function in Flex looks like so:



 public function setPage(pageNum:int):void {


model.pageSetter(pageNum, 2)

 }



Now, I added a namespace on the view where this function resides like
so:



 xmlns:bridge="bridge.*" as well as the following
declaration:



 

 

 

 



Also, I added the following line in my index.template.html file:



 flashvars.bridgeName = "flex";



So, I run a transaction and then click on the button to place a new
order.  All I get is an error that tells me that FABridge.flex is not
defined.



Please help.









[flexcoders] FABridge Debugging

2008-11-24 Thread Kevin Bowers
Hi,

 

I'm trying to find a tool which will let me debug apps that are largely
written in JavaScript but use FABridge to control my Flex Application.
Ideally something that will allow debugging of both sides of the app at the
same time, or as part of the same process.

 

Any suggestions most welcome.

 

Kevin

 

  _  

From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Simon Bailey
Sent: 24 November 2008 08:44
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] DataGrid itemRenderer Woes

 

Just a checkbox inside of it in answer to your first question.  

 

The reason I am using a column to ascertain visibility of the check box is
due to using a vo to populate the header renderer and I need to make a
comparison between the grid renderer current item and it corresponding
column header vo.

 

Cheers,

 

Si

 

On 24 Nov 2008, at 06:33, Alex Harui wrote:





 

Are you changing the visibility of the entire renderer or just a checkbox
inside it?  Renderers on the recycle list get visible=false and set back to
true when used again.  If you  completely hide a renderer, I'm not sure what
would happen.

 

Other than that, I would find a way to introspect the renderers and see if
they did compute visible correctly for their data.  It seems odd that your
lookup of data.val is based on a column.

 

From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Simon Bailey
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2008 11:24 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] DataGrid itemRenderer Woes

 

Ok I have stopped all the errors and essentially integrated your (Alex's)
logic into my application after some serious hair pulling.  

 

The responsibility lies now with the method below for showing or hiding the
check box:

 

override protected function commitProperties():void   

{ 

super.commitProperties();


var row:int = listData.rowIndex+1;


visible = false;


for( var i:int = 0; i < data.ff.length; i++ )


{ 

if( data.val[listData.columnIndex-1] != undefined &&
data.val[listData.columnIndex-1].option[i] == row )


{


visible = true; 

} 

} 

if (owner is ListBase) 

selected = ListBase(owner).isItemSelected(data);


}

 

And dammit if its still doing exactly the same as before?!?

 

On 23 Nov 2008, at 04:48, Alex Harui wrote:






 

Read the item renderers section on my blog (blogs.adobe.com/aharui).  Start
with the oldest posting.

 

From: < /span>flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Simon Bailey
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2008 2:37 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] DataGrid itemRenderer Woes

 

Hi,

I have seen through google that this has been an issue but 
implementing various solutions still l! eaves my existing problem.

Essentially I have a DataGrid with a custom itemRenderer displaying 
CheckBoxes.
Within the renderer I am running a comparison on a value within the 
renderers data i.e. data.my_val and the current grid row and column 
values.
Depending on whether the data value equals a specific row I show or 
hide the check box.
I achieve this by running the comparison logic with the overridden 
updateDisplayList method below which works fine until scrolled.

override protected function updateDisplayList( unscaledWidth:Number, 
unscaledHeight:Number ):void
{
super.updateDisplayList( unscaledWidth, unscaledHeight );
var row:int = listData.rowIndex+1;

for( var! i:int = 0; i < data.ff.length; i++ )
{
if( data.val[listData.columnIndex-1] != undefined && 
data.val[listData.columnIndex-1].option[i] == row )
{
btn.visible = true;
}
}
}

The issue is on scroll all of the check boxes are displayed/hidden 
incorrectly and the whole grid messes right up!

Any ideas pls would be appreciated.

Si

 

 

 

 

 



[flexcoders] FABridge and Safari

2007-09-16 Thread Richard Rodseth
I'm taking baby steps with FABridge, and I'm not a JavaScript
developer, so bear with me please. The following works in Firefox, but
not in Safari (I don't see the second alert)

alert("hello"); 

 var flexApp = FABridge.flash.root();

 var appWidth = flexApp.getWidth();

alert("hello again " + appWidth);   

Any ideas or comments about the viability of the bridge?


Re: [flexcoders] FABridge aclarations...

2007-02-23 Thread Matias Nicolas Sommi

Thanks for the explanation of the html template Karl, I will try it as you
say.
--
Matías Nicolás Sommi


2007/2/23, Karl Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


   At compile time, FlexBuilder generates your hosting HTML file based on
the HTML template in html-template/index.template.html

The easiest option right now is to take your generated html file and add
in the javascript methods that you need, and save it off as a different html
file. Then after you compile, just hit your new html file instead of the
generated file (if you want, you can set FB to open to a specific HTML file
so it always uses your other file).

Does that make sense? The SWF will get regenerated with each compile and
if you have added the FABridge component, it will always be in there -
regardless of what HTML file hosts that swf.

Karl

Cynergy

--
*From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Matias Nicolas Sommi
*Sent:* Fri 2/23/2007 10:25 AM
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] FABridge aclarations...



Thanks Karl, but i think that I don't explain me very good.
Flex generate an MXML app, and, only in the bin folder, autogenerate the
swf file.
The Javascript code is included in a HTML page.
Flex generate an HTML page only in the bin folder containing the
javascript methods for history and other thinks like the "get plugin". The
think that I want to know is if I need touch these HTML generated by flex,
or generate one myself, but in this last case, I need the swf file... I must
use the bin/swf file?  This comment is because in the fabridge example, the
html embedd the swf file from a src, and in the html generated by flex, the
swf is embbeded "on the fly" or something like this.
If you have a very simple example (the most simple as possible) of one
flex project using fabridge I appreciate it very much.

Thanks again.
--
Matías Nicolás Sommi


2007/2/23, Karl Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>What part are you asking if it needs to be embedded? The javascript
> side that lives in the HTML definitely does not get embedded. You can launch
> your app that is using the FABrdige from your next HTML file or you can
> modify the HTML template file in FB to use the JS code from the FABridge
> html examples. Does that make sense? You still need the ActionScript side of
> things embedded in the swf to act as your component or proxy that links your
> AS methods throughout your app to your JS methods in the parent html file
> that is hosting the swf.
>
> Karl
>
> Cynergy
>
> --
> *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Matias Nicolas Sommi
> *Sent:* Fri 2/23/2007 8:35 AM
> *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* [flexcoders] FABridge aclarations...
>
>
>
> Hello, I'm working in one app and I want to call a method of javascript
> from actionscript and viceversa. When I download the fabridge from adobe
> labs, I read the doc, and I don't understand one thing, what are the first
> steps (in configuration), I say, I need to create a new HTML, and embed into
> it the swf compiled? Or I can use the html generated by the flex builder?
> I try to copy as the example but I don't get it works.
>
> Thanks a lot.
> Regards.
> --
> Matías Nicolás Sommi
>
> 



RE: [flexcoders] FABridge aclarations...

2007-02-23 Thread Karl Johnson
At compile time, FlexBuilder generates your hosting HTML file based on the HTML 
template in html-template/index.template.html
 
The easiest option right now is to take your generated html file and add in the 
javascript methods that you need, and save it off as a different html file. 
Then after you compile, just hit your new html file instead of the generated 
file (if you want, you can set FB to open to a specific HTML file so it always 
uses your other file).
 
Does that make sense? The SWF will get regenerated with each compile and if you 
have added the FABridge component, it will always be in there - regardless of 
what HTML file hosts that swf.
 
Karl
 
Cynergy



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Matias Nicolas Sommi
Sent: Fri 2/23/2007 10:25 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] FABridge aclarations...



Thanks Karl, but i think that I don't explain me very good.
Flex generate an MXML app, and, only in the bin folder, autogenerate the swf 
file.
The Javascript code is included in a HTML page.
Flex generate an HTML page only in the bin folder containing the javascript 
methods for history and other thinks like the "get plugin". The think that I 
want to know is if I need touch these HTML generated by flex, or generate one 
myself, but in this last case, I need the swf file... I must use the bin/swf 
file?  This comment is because in the fabridge example, the html embedd the swf 
file from a src, and in the html generated by flex, the swf is embbeded "on the 
fly" or something like this. 
If you have a very simple example (the most simple as possible) of one flex 
project using fabridge I appreciate it very much.
 
Thanks again.
-- 
Matías Nicolás Sommi 

 
2007/2/23, Karl Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >: 


What part are you asking if it needs to be embedded? The javascript 
side that lives in the HTML definitely does not get embedded. You can launch 
your app that is using the FABrdige from your next HTML file or you can modify 
the HTML template file in FB to use the JS code from the FABridge html 
examples. Does that make sense? You still need the ActionScript side of things 
embedded in the swf to act as your component or proxy that links your AS 
methods throughout your app to your JS methods in the parent html file that is 
hosting the swf. 
 
Karl
 
Cynergy



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <http://ups.com/>  on behalf of Matias 
Nicolas Sommi
Sent: Fri 2/23/2007 8:35 AM 
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <http://ups.com/> 
Subject: [flexcoders] FABridge aclarations...

 



Hello, I'm working in one app and I want to call a method of javascript 
from actionscript and viceversa. When I download the fabridge from adobe labs, 
I read the doc, and I don't understand one thing, what are the first steps (in 
configuration), I say, I need to create a new HTML, and embed into it the swf 
compiled? Or I can use the html generated by the flex builder? 
I try to copy as the example but I don't get it works.
 
Thanks a lot.
Regards.
--
Matías Nicolás Sommi















 


Re: [flexcoders] FABridge aclarations...

2007-02-23 Thread Matias Nicolas Sommi

Thanks Karl, but i think that I don't explain me very good.
Flex generate an MXML app, and, only in the bin folder, autogenerate the swf
file.
The Javascript code is included in a HTML page.
Flex generate an HTML page only in the bin folder containing the javascript
methods for history and other thinks like the "get plugin". The think that I
want to know is if I need touch these HTML generated by flex, or generate
one myself, but in this last case, I need the swf file... I must use the
bin/swf file?  This comment is because in the fabridge example, the html
embedd the swf file from a src, and in the html generated by flex, the swf
is embbeded "on the fly" or something like this.
If you have a very simple example (the most simple as possible) of one flex
project using fabridge I appreciate it very much.

Thanks again.
--
Matías Nicolás Sommi


2007/2/23, Karl Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


   What part are you asking if it needs to be embedded? The javascript
side that lives in the HTML definitely does not get embedded. You can launch
your app that is using the FABrdige from your next HTML file or you can
modify the HTML template file in FB to use the JS code from the FABridge
html examples. Does that make sense? You still need the ActionScript side of
things embedded in the swf to act as your component or proxy that links your
AS methods throughout your app to your JS methods in the parent html file
that is hosting the swf.

Karl

Cynergy

--
*From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Matias Nicolas Sommi
*Sent:* Fri 2/23/2007 8:35 AM
*To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* [flexcoders] FABridge aclarations...



Hello, I'm working in one app and I want to call a method of javascript
from actionscript and viceversa. When I download the fabridge from adobe
labs, I read the doc, and I don't understand one thing, what are the first
steps (in configuration), I say, I need to create a new HTML, and embed into
it the swf compiled? Or I can use the html generated by the flex builder?
I try to copy as the example but I don't get it works.

Thanks a lot.
Regards.
--
Matías Nicolás Sommi

 



RE: [flexcoders] FABridge aclarations...

2007-02-23 Thread Karl Johnson
What part are you asking if it needs to be embedded? The javascript side that 
lives in the HTML definitely does not get embedded. You can launch your app 
that is using the FABrdige from your next HTML file or you can modify the HTML 
template file in FB to use the JS code from the FABridge html examples. Does 
that make sense? You still need the ActionScript side of things embedded in the 
swf to act as your component or proxy that links your AS methods throughout 
your app to your JS methods in the parent html file that is hosting the swf.
 
Karl
 
Cynergy



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com on behalf of Matias Nicolas Sommi
Sent: Fri 2/23/2007 8:35 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] FABridge aclarations...



Hello, I'm working in one app and I want to call a method of javascript from 
actionscript and viceversa. When I download the fabridge from adobe labs, I 
read the doc, and I don't understand one thing, what are the first steps (in 
configuration), I say, I need to create a new HTML, and embed into it the swf 
compiled? Or I can use the html generated by the flex builder? 
I try to copy as the example but I don't get it works.
 
Thanks a lot.
Regards.
--
Matías Nicolás Sommi

 


[flexcoders] FABridge aclarations...

2007-02-23 Thread Matias Nicolas Sommi

Hello, I'm working in one app and I want to call a method of javascript from
actionscript and viceversa. When I download the fabridge from adobe labs, I
read the doc, and I don't understand one thing, what are the first steps (in
configuration), I say, I need to create a new HTML, and embed into it the
swf compiled? Or I can use the html generated by the flex builder?
I try to copy as the example but I don't get it works.

Thanks a lot.
Regards.
--
Matías Nicolás Sommi


RE: [flexcoders] FABridge

2007-01-09 Thread David Mendels
Hi,
 
expect a new build on labs very soon (within a week it is expected, but
not guaranteed.)
 
-David



From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of john_69_11
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 11:38 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] FABridge



Is anyone else out there using FABridge? I'm testing it out on Safari
and getting js errors, has anyone else ran into this and possible
solutions? The exception I get is:

Value undefined (result of expression this.target.getRoot) is not
object.
FABridge.js, line 191

If I could get any help at all with this I would really apprechiate it.

-John



 


[flexcoders] FABridge

2007-01-09 Thread john_69_11
Is anyone else out there using FABridge?  I'm testing it out on Safari
and getting js errors, has anyone else ran into this and possible
solutions? The exception I get is:

Value undefined (result of expression this.target.getRoot) is not object.
FABridge.js, line 191

If I could get any help at all with this I would really apprechiate it.

-John