RE: [flexcoders] No more posts re: moderation / yahoogroups pls

2006-06-18 Thread Vinny Timmermans





Steven, 

It does not make a lot of sense to defend again and 
againwhathas beenright for a few 100 flexcoders two years ago, 
while so many community members have new ideas to make things better. Embrace 
complaints and suggestions instead of asking people not to post their ideas 
anymore on how to improve this community. This request soundsweird from an 
innovative guy like you. This is a community, you cannot dictate the topics on 
the agenda.

Times change, new members arrive, people are getting used 
to better experiences, this means flexcoders need to adapt to these changes as 
well, especially now we are going to see an increase in the amountof 
people working with Flex.

Where do you see room for improvement? What are your plans 
for flexcoders?. Show us your roadmap for flexcoders 2.0?

Vinny


From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven 
WebsterSent: zondag 18 juni 2006 6:52To: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] No more posts re: 
moderation / yahoogroups pls



Guys,

Post will be much easier to find, and the list much easier 
to read, if there aren't 30+ posts a day with various opinions on how the list 
could be different or better ! We've had a successful community running 
here on yahoogroups since day zero of Flex's launch ... we'll keep a very close 
eye on whether there's a compelling need to make changes to the way the list 
operates, but for the time being, it's satisfying the aims of the silent 
majority. For many of us, yahoogroups *is* the flex coding community - if 
you've joined recently, I'd urge you to get to know the community here, rather 
than call for it's fragmentation. 

There's a depth of resource on this list like few others - 
newcomers arrive in waves, and with each wave, those who have come before them 
are doing a tremendous job of answering the questions that they themselves were 
asking only a few months ago. With the depth of experience on the list 
going all the way back to the community who were using Flex during it's advisory 
board/alpha/beta before the Flex 1.0 release, the Adobe Consultants who are 
helping customers and partners in their success with Flex, and a great number of 
the Adobe Engineers who unofficially hang out here to make sure that the fruits 
of their labor become the enabling technology for the fruits of yours, you're 
not going to struggle to have your questions answered here.

There's an archive search of the list here - http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
- if anyone requires it, and as so many of you have pointed out, there are a 
number of strategies of using your various and favourite mail clients to find a 
way of using and contributing to the list in a manner that suits your 
needs.

Can I ask that we 
move the conversation on from the technical infrastrcture behind the list - as 
with a community of ~4000 people, there are always going to be opinions on how 
things could be done differently, that will match some needs but not 
others. Instead, can I ask that we return our focus back to ensuring that 
flexcoders continue to be the high-value resource and focalpoint of the Flex 
development community that it has successfully been for almost two and half 
years.

Let's hear about the web-changing experiences you're 
delivering with Flex, the challenges you faced building them, and the solutions 
you innovated to address them.

Best wishes,

Steven
( List administrator )

__._,_.___





--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com








   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Web site design development
  
  
Computer software development
  
  
Software design and development
  
  


Macromedia flex
  
  
Software development best practice
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___



RE: [flexcoders] No more posts re: moderation / yahoogroups pls

2006-06-18 Thread Steven Webster





Vinny,

Honestly, I'd love for this to be the last post on the 
subject; not to censor or to stifle information, but because for the vast 
majority of the list, this is a topic that they are using their delete key 
for.

The purpose of flexcoders is not to be a forum, is not to 
be a resource of articles, is not to be a knowledge base, is not to be a 
community site as such. The purpose of flexcoders is to provide a mailing list 
where people can email questions, and where people can email responses. 
There are numerous solutions to providing a mailing list, and we've chosen 
yahoogroups. 

Others have sought to have more of a web-based community, 
and have responded to that - Tariq's efforts with cfflex would be a great 
example of this. If anyone feels there is a gap in the community - 
an online chat, a place for posting and sharing code snippets, a knowledge base 
of articles, and they don't feel that things like labs, adobe forums, blogs, 
cfflex,etc, are covering those gaps, I'd encourage you to innovate and 
deliver.

This is a mailing list, not a software product - we don't 
have a team "publishing a roadmap for flexcoders 2". Rather we'd devote 
our time to supporting the mailing list as best we can, by keeping the signal to 
noise ratio high through the minimum amount of moderation, and contributing 
knowledge to the list where the gaps exist. We have a team of moderators 
who have the sole aim of ensuring that this list is as spam free as possible 
(and I'd hope you feel that we're achieving that) and who try to step in as 
little as possible when the content on the list is deviating from the core 
subject as much as possible. If we're achieving both these aims, we're 
achieving our ambition with flexcoders.

If - with the release of Flex 2 - there is an 
explosive growth in the community, and a need to split into separate lists, we 
will entertain that option. However, this option can create as many problems as 
it solves - people cross-posting to lists and the volume of emails increasing 
rather than becoming more managable, or the reaching of a tipping point whereby 
those who hang out on the list to "give more than they receive" find the effort 
has reached the point of overwhelming, and the fragmentation drives down the 
value of content. But we are users as well as moderators of the 
list, and as soon as it becomes unusable for us, we'll be sure to entertain the 
next logical options.

We are keeping flexcoders the way it is right now not 
because we don't care, but because we care passionately.

It is never our intention to offer web-based forums, wikis, 
blogs, knowledge bases or any of these other things. There are other 
resources for doing so, or the community is able to respond accordingly. 
Perhaps you are volunteering ? :)

Flexcoders is a mailing list, and the primary interaction 
is intended by design to be people posting emails to the list, and these emails 
hitting the inbox of every other member, with a digest for those who wish to 
scan on a more irregular basis. This enables the quickest responses to 
solutions, so that the list becomes an enabling means of making the growing 
flexcoders community as successful as possible. This is a forum where 
those learning and pushing the technology, can hit a brick wall several times a 
day, and have that wall removed for them by someone else. That carries 
immeasurable value to me.

I stress again; we have close to 4000 members who are using 
the list regularly, and there are less than 10-15 members who regularly post 
about alternatives (more often that not, moving the list to their own site or 
servers). 

We're only trying to be a mailing list, and the volume and 
value that the community are finding from the emails here, would suggest we're 
still doing a decent job of being just that.

Now please, if people want to discuss alternatives, can we 
take the discussion off-list, rather than frustrate those here, who are happy 
with the solution as is, and who are more interested in 
"flexcoding".

Thanks for your passionate support; that's a great measure 
of community.

Best,

Steven
__._,_.___





--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com








   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Web site design development
  
  
Computer software development
  
  
Software design and development
  
  


Macromedia flex
  
  
Software development best practice
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! 

RE: [flexcoders] No more posts re: moderation / yahoogroups pls

2006-06-18 Thread Vinny Timmermans





Steven, agreed. A final puzzle 
for you. 

Given Adobe's target to attract hundreds of 
thousandsnew Flex developerswhich mayleadto 
15.000members ofFlexcodersin2007. In 2007 how many times 
do you thinka member willhaveto hit the delete keya day 
for flexcoders alone when flexcoders does not offer categorization? And 
how much timedo members wasteeveryday reading flexcoders subject 
linesthey arenot interested in?

Last word from me on this topic!

Vinny

P.S. If you are looking for people to help you transform 
flexcoders into a full blown community with all the bells and whistles, yes you 
can count on my contribution. And if you need more HBR articles, i'll provide 
those too :-)


From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven 
WebsterSent: zondag 18 juni 2006 11:58To: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: RE: [flexcoders] No more posts re: 
moderation / yahoogroups pls



Vinny,

Honestly, I'd love for this to be the last post on the 
subject; not to censor or to stifle information, but because for the vast 
majority of the list, this is a topic that they are using their delete key 
for.

The purpose of flexcoders is not to be a forum, is not to 
be a resource of articles, is not to be a knowledge base, is not to be a 
community site as such. The purpose of flexcoders is to provide a mailing list 
where people can email questions, and where people can email responses. 
There are numerous solutions to providing a mailing list, and we've chosen 
yahoogroups. 

Others have sought to have more of a web-based community, 
and have responded to that - Tariq's efforts with cfflex would be a great 
example of this. If anyone feels there is a gap in the community - 
an online chat, a place for posting and sharing code snippets, a knowledge base 
of articles, and they don't feel that things like labs, adobe forums, blogs, 
cfflex,etc, are covering those gaps, I'd encourage you to innovate and 
deliver.

This is a mailing list, not a software product - we don't 
have a team "publishing a roadmap for flexcoders 2". Rather we'd devote 
our time to supporting the mailing list as best we can, by keeping the signal to 
noise ratio high through the minimum amount of moderation, and contributing 
knowledge to the list where the gaps exist. We have a team of moderators 
who have the sole aim of ensuring that this list is as spam free as possible 
(and I'd hope you feel that we're achieving that) and who try to step in as 
little as possible when the content on the list is deviating from the core 
subject as much as possible. If we're achieving both these aims, we're 
achieving our ambition with flexcoders.

If - with the release of Flex 2 - there is an 
explosive growth in the community, and a need to split into separate lists, we 
will entertain that option. However, this option can create as many problems as 
it solves - people cross-posting to lists and the volume of emails increasing 
rather than becoming more managable, or the reaching of a tipping point whereby 
those who hang out on the list to "give more than they receive" find the effort 
has reached the point of overwhelming, and the fragmentation drives down the 
value of content. But we are users as well as moderators of the 
list, and as soon as it becomes unusable for us, we'll be sure to entertain the 
next logical options.

We are keeping flexcoders the way it is right now not 
because we don't care, but because we care passionately.

It is never our intention to offer web-based forums, wikis, 
blogs, knowledge bases or any of these other things. There are other 
resources for doing so, or the community is able to respond accordingly. 
Perhaps you are volunteering ? :)

Flexcoders is a mailing list, and the primary interaction 
is intended by design to be people posting emails to the list, and these emails 
hitting the inbox of every other member, with a digest for those who wish to 
scan on a more irregular basis. This enables the quickest responses to 
solutions, so that the list becomes an enabling means of making the growing 
flexcoders community as successful as possible. This is a forum where 
those learning and pushing the technology, can hit a brick wall several times a 
day, and have that wall removed for them by someone else. That carries 
immeasurable value to me.

I stress again; we have close to 4000 members who are using 
the list regularly, and there are less than 10-15 members who regularly post 
about alternatives (more often that not, moving the list to their own site or 
servers). 

We're only trying to be a mailing list, and the volume and 
value that the community are finding from the emails here, would suggest we're 
still doing a decent job of being just that.

Now please, if people want to discuss alternatives, can we 
take the discussion off-list, rather than frustrate those here, who are happy 
with the solution as is, and who are more interested in 
"flexcoding"

RE: [flexcoders] No more posts re: moderation / yahoogroups pls

2006-06-18 Thread Steven Webster







  
  
  
  Steven, agreed. A final puzzle for 
  you. 
  
  Given Adobe's target to attract hundreds of thousandsnew 
  Flex developerswhich mayleadto 15.000members 
  ofFlexcodersin2007.
  
  
  
  
  

Vinny, 
as you know, I'm also a big proponent of agilemethods - so I'm a big 
believer in "the simplest thing that works" and "no bigup-front 
design". Sowhen the situation you described happens, the cost of us 
switching then will be no greater than the cost of us switching now, and who 
knows, by the time we actually have to make that decision, there may be a better 
solution that isn't available to us at present.

Best,

Steven
__._,_.___





--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com








   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Web site design development
  
  
Computer software development
  
  
Software design and development
  
  


Macromedia flex
  
  
Software development best practice
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___



Re: [flexcoders] No more posts re: moderation / yahoogroups pls

2006-06-18 Thread Michael Schmalle



Steven, I was nieve when I posted a couple things also but,

 by the time we actually have to make that decision, there may be a better 
solution that isn't available to us at present.

I am sure this type of thinking for you got you to where you are today.

Peace, Mike
On 6/18/06, Steven Webster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:









  








  
  
  
  Steven, agreed. A final puzzle for 
  you. 
  
  Given Adobe's target to attract hundreds of thousandsnew 
  Flex developerswhich mayleadto 15.000members 
  ofFlexcodersin2007.
  
  
  
  
  

Vinny, 
as you know, I'm also a big proponent of agilemethods - so I'm a big 
believer in the simplest thing that works and no bigup-front 
design. Sowhen the situation you described happens, the cost of us 
switching then will be no greater than the cost of us switching now, and who 
knows, by the time we actually have to make that decision, there may be a better 
solution that isn't available to us at present.

Best,

Steven

  













-- What goes up, does come down.

__._,_.___





--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com








   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Web site design development
  
  
Computer software development
  
  
Software design and development
  
  


Macromedia flex
  
  
Software development best practice
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___



[flexcoders] No more posts re: moderation / yahoogroups pls

2006-06-17 Thread Steven Webster





Guys,

Post will be much easier to find, and the list much easier 
to read, if there aren't 30+ posts a day with various opinions on how the list 
could be different or better ! We've had a successful community running 
here on yahoogroups since day zero of Flex's launch ... we'll keep a very close 
eye on whether there's a compelling need to make changes to the way the list 
operates, but for the time being, it's satisfying the aims of the silent 
majority. For many of us, yahoogroups *is* the flex coding community - if 
you've joined recently, I'd urge you to get to know the community here, rather 
than call for it's fragmentation. 

There's a depth of resource on this list like few others - 
newcomers arrive in waves, and with each wave, those who have come before them 
are doing a tremendous job of answering the questions that they themselves were 
asking only a few months ago. With the depth of experience on the list 
going all the way back to the community who were using Flex during it's advisory 
board/alpha/beta before the Flex 1.0 release, the Adobe Consultants who are 
helping customers and partners in their success with Flex, and a great number of 
the Adobe Engineers who unofficially hang out here to make sure that the fruits 
of their labor become the enabling technology for the fruits of yours, you're 
not going to struggle to have your questions answered here.

There's an archive search of the list here - http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
- if anyone requires it, and as so many of you have pointed out, there are a 
number of strategies of using your various and favourite mail clients to find a 
way of using and contributing to the list in a manner that suits your 
needs.

Can I ask that we 
move the conversation on from the technical infrastrcture behind the list - as 
with a community of ~4000 people, there are always going to be opinions on how 
things could be done differently, that will match some needs but not 
others. Instead, can I ask that we return our focus back to ensuring that 
flexcoders continue to be the high-value resource and focalpoint of the Flex 
development community that it has successfully been for almost two and half 
years.

Let's hear about the web-changing experiences you're 
delivering with Flex, the challenges you faced building them, and the solutions 
you innovated to address them.

Best wishes,

Steven
( List administrator )
__._,_.___





--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com








   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Web site design development
  
  
Computer software development
  
  
Software design and development
  
  


Macromedia flex
  
  
Software development best practice
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___