RE: [flexcoders] Re: Adding AS3 support to 3rd party editors - legal question

2006-08-04 Thread Matt Chotin












I see what youre saying now. Im
not sure that would be the end of the world (the lawyer canceled the meeting so
I wont get to talk to him till next week) but a more traditional
approach would be to get your editor to understand the AS3 source format. Since
we ship the source in the SDK you could just parse that and get all the
information you need. I think understanding the source format is going to be more
flexible than manually entering information from livedocs. Of course the real
thing to do is understand the bytecode format, but we havent documented
that as of yet.



I have asked legal for help in getting an
official answer to What can I use from the SDK if I wanted to write my
own IDE?. It will be a few days before I can answer that, but I can
tell you that the spirit of our EULA is not meant to prevent you from doing
that. So we are not trying to throw up legal roadblocks to you building an
editor. Which is not to say were actively looking for competitors to
start up when were still trying to sell Flex Builder ;-)



Matt 











From:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006
1:33 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Adding
AS3 support to 3rd party editors - legal question











I see what you mean, I guess I am just confused on why
it would matter
if someone went through the site and manually typed out all the info
or if they were able to write a script that could do it automatically.
The information is there, why would it matter who/what accesses it?

Also just to clarify, the way I understand it the files would only
need to be generated once; the screen scraping would not be something
the app did as part of its operation.

Thanks,
Ben

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com,
Adam Dorritie [EMAIL PROTECTED].. wrote:

 On 8/3/06, ben.clinkinbeard ben.clinkinbeard@... wrote:
  Thanks for the reply, Matt. If this is not ok, what would be
  acceptable methods for accomplishing things like code completion in
  third party editors? Obviously, doing this requires knowledge of the
  structure of all AS3 classes and Livedocs seems like the best/only
  'open' and free to the public source of this information. I really
  don't think any serious developer would consider an editor adequate
  without this functionality.
 
 I think that you're confusing 2 separate issues. The first is whether
 you can configure an editor to recognize (highlight, complete,
 whatever) ActionScript code using information obtained from publicly
 available documentation. The answer to this, as far as I know, is
 absolutely. The second issue, and the one which I believe that Matt
 has concerns about, is whether or not you can obtain the data you need
 to enable this feature by screen-scraping Adobe documentation. I can
 see potential issues with that. Manually enter the AS3 information
 into your editor and I would bet that you would be fine.
 
 Adam







__._,_.___





--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com








   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Web site design development
  
  
Computer software development
  
  
Software design and development
  
  


Macromedia flex
  
  
Software development best practice
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___






[flexcoders] Re: Adding AS3 support to 3rd party editors - legal question

2006-08-04 Thread ben.clinkinbeard
Thanks Matt,

The goal is definitely to have the editor understand the AS3 format,
but in the discussion we had, the problem we saw was the lack of
source for the top-level and flash.* classes. As far as I can tell,
the only source provided with the SDK is the mx.* packages and
classes. Am I missing something?

I don't think the editor's developers (I am not one of them) have any
desire to compete with Flex Builder, they simply want to provide AS3
coding support. As far as I know, they have no plans to integrate MXML
support into the editor.

Thanks again for your replies and I will look forward to any further
clarifications you can provide.

Ben


--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Matt Chotin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I see what you're saying now.  I'm not sure that would be the end of the
 world (the lawyer canceled the meeting so I won't get to talk to him
 till next week) but a more traditional approach would be to get your
 editor to understand the AS3 source format.  Since we ship the source in
 the SDK you could just parse that and get all the information you need.
 I think understanding the source format is going to be more flexible
 than manually entering information from livedocs.  Of course the real
 thing to do is understand the bytecode format, but we haven't documented
 that as of yet.
 
  
 
 I have asked legal for help in getting an official answer to What can I
 use from the SDK if I wanted to write my own IDE?.  It will be a few
 days before I can answer that, but I can tell you that the spirit of our
 EULA is not meant to prevent you from doing that.  So we are not trying
 to throw up legal roadblocks to you building an editor.  Which is not to
 say we're actively looking for competitors to start up when we're still
 trying to sell Flex Builder ;-)
 
  
 
 Matt 
 
  
 
 
 
 From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
 Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 1:33 PM
 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Adding AS3 support to 3rd party editors -
 legal question
 
  
 
 I see what you mean, I guess I am just confused on why it would matter
 if someone went through the site and manually typed out all the info
 or if they were able to write a script that could do it automatically.
 The information is there, why would it matter who/what accesses it?
 
 Also just to clarify, the way I understand it the files would only
 need to be generated once; the screen scraping would not be something
 the app did as part of its operation.
 
 Thanks,
 Ben
 
 --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
 , Adam Dorritie adorritie@ wrote:
 
  On 8/3/06, ben.clinkinbeard ben.clinkinbeard@ wrote:
   Thanks for the reply, Matt. If this is not ok, what would be
   acceptable methods for accomplishing things like code completion in
   third party editors? Obviously, doing this requires knowledge of the
   structure of all AS3 classes and Livedocs seems like the best/only
   'open' and free to the public source of this information. I really
   don't think any serious developer would consider an editor adequate
   without this functionality.
  
  I think that you're confusing 2 separate issues. The first is whether
  you can configure an editor to recognize (highlight, complete,
  whatever) ActionScript code using information obtained from publicly
  available documentation. The answer to this, as far as I know, is
  absolutely. The second issue, and the one which I believe that Matt
  has concerns about, is whether or not you can obtain the data you need
  to enable this feature by screen-scraping Adobe documentation. I can
  see potential issues with that. Manually enter the AS3 information
  into your editor and I would bet that you would be fine.
  
  Adam
 








--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [flexcoders] Re: Adding AS3 support to 3rd party editors - legal question

2006-08-04 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Friday 04 August 2006 06:55, Matt Chotin wrote:
 the SDK you could just parse that and get all the information you need.

The soon-to-be-release AS3Doc tool may help here, of course.

-- 
Tom Chiverton



This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.

Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and 
Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St 
James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF.  A list of members is available 
for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation 
to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law 
Society.

CONFIDENTIALITY

This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be 
confidential or legally privileged.  If you are not the addressee you must not 
read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform 
any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or 
contents.  If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify 
Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008.

For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com.



--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [flexcoders] Re: Adding AS3 support to 3rd party editors - legal question

2006-08-03 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Thursday 03 August 2006 05:45, Matt Chotin wrote:
 don't think scraping the livedocs is kosher, but let me get back to you.

But providing a tool that lets users generate their own documentation (for a 
3rd party editor or whatever) by scraping the livedocs site, might be ?
Or just pointing to a local copy of the downloaded docs ?

-- 
Tom Chiverton



This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.

Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and 
Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St 
James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF.  A list of members is available 
for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation 
to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law 
Society.

CONFIDENTIALITY

This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be 
confidential or legally privileged.  If you are not the addressee you must not 
read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform 
any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or 
contents.  If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify 
Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008.

For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com.



--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [flexcoders] Re: Adding AS3 support to 3rd party editors - legal question

2006-08-03 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Thursday 03 August 2006 05:45, Matt Chotin wrote:
 don't think scraping the livedocs is kosher, but let me get back to you.

But providing a tool that lets users generate their own documentation (for a 
3rd party editor or whatever) by scraping the livedocs site, might be ?

-- 
Tom Chiverton



This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.

Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and 
Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St 
James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF.  A list of members is available 
for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation 
to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law 
Society.

CONFIDENTIALITY

This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be 
confidential or legally privileged.  If you are not the addressee you must not 
read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform 
any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or 
contents.  If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify 
Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008.

For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com.



--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[flexcoders] Re: Adding AS3 support to 3rd party editors - legal question

2006-08-03 Thread ben.clinkinbeard
Thanks for the reply, Matt. If this is not ok, what would be
acceptable methods for accomplishing things like code completion in
third party editors? Obviously, doing this requires knowledge of the
structure of all AS3 classes and Livedocs seems like the best/only
'open' and free to the public source of this information. I really
don't think any serious developer would consider an editor adequate
without this functionality.

Thanks,
Ben

--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Matt Chotin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have a phone call with our lawyer tomorrow, I'll ask him.  Offhand I
 don't think scraping the livedocs is kosher, but let me get back to you.
 
  
 
 Matt
 
  
 
 
 
 From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
 Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 5:34 AM
 To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Adding AS3 support to 3rd party editors -
 legal question
 
  
 
 Anyone? Is there a different place I should be asking this?
 
 Thanks,
 Ben
 
 --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
 , ben.clinkinbeard
 ben.clinkinbeard@ wrote:
 
  Dear Adobe,
  
  I was recently having a discussion about adding AS3 support (code
  completion, type checking, etc) to a 3rd party editor and a
  legal/copyright/license question came up that I am hoping to get a
  definitive answer to. The question is basically whether or not its ok
  to create files required by the editor by scraping the language ref
  pages available on LiveDocs.
  
  It seems to me that this would be fine since (a) the pages are freely
  available to the public and (b) the SDK was released for free to
  encourage adoption and things like code completion are more or less
  requirements for an editor to be considered a legitimate development
  environment.
  
  Is my thinking correct?
  
  Thanks,
  Ben
  http://www.returnundefined.com/ http://www.returnundefined.com/ 
 








--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [flexcoders] Re: Adding AS3 support to 3rd party editors - legal question

2006-08-03 Thread Adam Dorritie
On 8/3/06, ben.clinkinbeard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thanks for the reply, Matt. If this is not ok, what would be
 acceptable methods for accomplishing things like code completion in
 third party editors? Obviously, doing this requires knowledge of the
 structure of all AS3 classes and Livedocs seems like the best/only
 'open' and free to the public source of this information. I really
 don't think any serious developer would consider an editor adequate
 without this functionality.

I think that you're confusing 2 separate issues.  The first is whether
you can configure an editor to recognize (highlight, complete,
whatever) ActionScript code using information obtained from publicly
available documentation.  The answer to this, as far as I know, is
absolutely.  The second issue, and the one which I believe that Matt
has concerns about, is whether or not you can obtain the data you need
to enable this feature by screen-scraping Adobe documentation.  I can
see potential issues with that.  Manually enter the AS3 information
into your editor and I would bet that you would be fine.

Adam


--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[flexcoders] Re: Adding AS3 support to 3rd party editors - legal question

2006-08-02 Thread ben.clinkinbeard
Anyone? Is there a different place I should be asking this?

Thanks,
Ben

--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, ben.clinkinbeard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Dear Adobe,
 
 I was recently having a discussion about adding AS3 support (code
 completion, type checking, etc) to a 3rd party editor and a
 legal/copyright/license question came up that I am hoping to get a
 definitive answer to. The question is basically whether or not its ok
 to create files required by the editor by scraping the language ref
 pages available on LiveDocs.
 
 It seems to me that this would be fine since (a) the pages are freely
 available to the public and (b) the SDK was released for free to
 encourage adoption and things like code completion are more or less
 requirements for an editor to be considered a legitimate development
 environment.
 
 Is my thinking correct?
 
 Thanks,
 Ben
 http://www.returnundefined.com/








--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [flexcoders] Re: Adding AS3 support to 3rd party editors - legal question

2006-08-02 Thread Rick Root
ben.clinkinbeard wrote:
 
 Anyone? Is there a different place I should be asking this?

Given that this isn't an Adobe sponsored list, and I doubt even the 
adobe people on this list are willing to answer legal questions.. 
probably not :)  But you can always hope for an answer.

Otherwise, a phone call to Adobe's legal department might yield better 
results.

Maybe someone will release a tag library for homesite.  hah :)

Rick


--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





RE: [flexcoders] Re: Adding AS3 support to 3rd party editors - legal question

2006-08-02 Thread Matt Chotin












I have a phone call with our lawyer
tomorrow, Ill ask him. Offhand I dont think scraping the
livedocs is kosher, but let me get back to you.



Matt











From:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006
5:34 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Adding
AS3 support to 3rd party editors - legal question











Anyone? Is there a different place I should be asking
this?

Thanks,
Ben

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ups.com,
ben.clinkinbeard
ben.clinkinbeard@... wrote:

 Dear Adobe,
 
 I was recently having a discussion about adding AS3 support (code
 completion, type checking, etc) to a 3rd party editor and a
 legal/copyright/license question came up that I am hoping to get a
 definitive answer to. The question is basically whether or not its ok
 to create files required by the editor by scraping the language ref
 pages available on LiveDocs.
 
 It seems to me that this would be fine since (a) the pages are freely
 available to the public and (b) the SDK was released for free to
 encourage adoption and things like code completion are more or less
 requirements for an editor to be considered a legitimate development
 environment.
 
 Is my thinking correct?
 
 Thanks,
 Ben
 http://www.returnundefined.com/







__._,_.___





--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com








   






  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Web site design development
  
  
Computer software development
  
  
Software design and development
  
  


Macromedia flex
  
  
Software development best practice
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___