[flexcoders] Re: Using mxml without flex framework (Flex 2 Beta 1 and 2)
Yes and if i would actually buy Flex Builder, i really would like to use the tool to my own needs. When making up the architecture of my app, i want to be able to decide a - if i want to use the flex framework b - if i want to use mxml or if i just want to make an actionscript project And i want to be able to make those two decisions separately. --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Johannes Nel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in the context of the current topic i still don't get what you mean. paying for an ide is not a problem, its to be expected. about the topic at hand: it would have been nice if i could have used mxml to layout any type of app. -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
RE: [flexcoders] Re: Using mxml without flex framework (Flex 2 Beta 1 and 2)
It is a long-term goal to have MXML only require some interfaces and not the current framework implementation. However we won't accomplish that for Flex 2.0. Matt -Original Message- From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bussesven Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:30 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Using mxml without flex framework (Flex 2 Beta 1 and 2) Yes and if i would actually buy Flex Builder, i really would like to use the tool to my own needs. When making up the architecture of my app, i want to be able to decide a - if i want to use the flex framework b - if i want to use mxml or if i just want to make an actionscript project And i want to be able to make those two decisions separately. --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Johannes Nel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in the context of the current topic i still don't get what you mean. paying for an ide is not a problem, its to be expected. about the topic at hand: it would have been nice if i could have used mxml to layout any type of app. -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[flexcoders] Re: Using mxml without flex framework (Flex 2 Beta 1 and 2)
lol. .Obvious Adobe is not do development to serve people for free
of cost..
On 3/28/06, Matt Chotin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI I checked and we're not planning on supporting MXML apps that don't
use the framework for version 2.0. However we will investigate to see
if the case like this can at least not cause such a horrible error.
Matt
On 3/24/06, bussesven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
in the alpha version of Flex 2 i was able to remove the framework.swc
from a flex project and still use mxml with only my own classes. In
beta 1 and beta 2 this doesn't work anymore, because mxmlc by default
generates several import statements and other stuff in the generated
classes, which leads to errors of course, since i have removed the
framework.swc .
Even if i leave the framework.swc in, but use only my own classes, it
doesn't work, since there is an error with the StyleManager.
I made a simple example. I have a very simple class:
package com {
import flash.util.trace;
import flash.display.Sprite;
public class Sample extends Sprite {
public var myvalue:String;
public function Sample() {
trace(Hello World!);
}
}
}
And a very simple mxml:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
sb:Sample xmlns:sb=com.* myvalue=Test /
It doesn't work, i get the error:
TypeError: Error #1009: null has no properties.
at
mx.styles::StyleManager$/http://www.adobe.com/2006/flex/mx/internal::i
nitProtoChainRoots()[C:\dev\beta2
\sdk\frameworks\mx\styles\StyleManager.as:240]
at
MyTest/http://www.adobe.com/2006/flex/mx/internal::_MyTest_StylesInit
()
at MyTest$iinit()
What is going wrong here? How can i use mxml with just my own classes
without the flex framework?
Thanx and cheers.
--
jignesh dodiya
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [flexcoders] Re: Using mxml without flex framework (Flex 2 Beta 1 and 2)
since flex is free(of cost) i wonder what you mean byt this.On 3/28/06, Jignesh Dodiya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lol. .Obvious Adobe is not do development to serve people for freeof cost..
On 3/28/06, Matt Chotin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FYI I checked and we're not planning on supporting MXML apps that don't use the framework for version
2.0.However we will investigate to see if the case like this can at least not cause such a horrible error. Matt
On 3/24/06, bussesven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, in the alpha version of Flex 2 i was able to remove the framework.swc
from a flex project and still use mxml with only my own classes. In beta 1 and beta 2 this doesn't work anymore, because mxmlc by default generates several import statements and other stuff in the generated
classes, which leads to errors of course, since i have removed the framework.swc . Even if i leave the framework.swc in, but use only my own classes, it doesn't work, since there is an error with the StyleManager.
I made a simple example. I have a very simple class: package com {import flash.util.trace;import flash.display.Sprite;public class Sample extends Sprite {
public var myvalue:String;public function Sample() {trace(Hello
World!);}} } And a very simple mxml: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8? sb:Sample xmlns:sb=com.* myvalue=Test /
It doesn't work, i get the error: TypeError: Error #1009: null has no properties.at mx.styles::StyleManager$/http://www.adobe.com/2006/flex/mx/internal::i nitProtoChainRoots()[C:\dev\beta2
\sdk\frameworks\mx\styles\StyleManager.as:240]at MyTest/http://www.adobe.com/2006/flex/mx/internal::_MyTest_StylesInit ()at MyTest$iinit() What is going wrong here? How can i use mxml with just my own classes
without the flex framework? Thanx and cheers.--jignesh dodiya--Flexcoders Mailing ListFAQ:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txtSearch Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
-- j:pn http://www.lennel.org
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
SPONSORED LINKS
Web site design development
Computer software development
Software design and development
Macromedia flex
Software development best practice
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [flexcoders] Re: Using mxml without flex framework (Flex 2 Beta 1 and 2)
Of Cource Flex framework and compiler is free.. but not everything
On 3/29/06, Johannes Nel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
since flex is free(of cost) i wonder what you mean byt this.
On 3/28/06, Jignesh Dodiya
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lol. .Obvious Adobe is not do development to serve people for freeof cost.. On 3/28/06, Matt Chotin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FYI I checked and we're not planning on supporting MXML apps that don't use the framework for version 2.0.However we will investigate to see if the case like this can at least not cause such a horrible error.
Matt On 3/24/06, bussesven
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, in the alpha version of Flex 2 i was able to remove the framework.swc from a flex project and still use mxml with only my own classes. In beta 1 and beta 2 this doesn't work anymore, because mxmlc by default
generates several import statements and other stuff in the generated classes, which leads to errors of course, since i have removed the framework.swc . Even if i leave the framework.swc
in, but use only my own classes, it doesn't work, since there is an error with the StyleManager. I made a simple example. I have a very simple class: package com {import
flash.util.trace;import flash.display.Sprite;public class Sample extends Sprite { public var myvalue:String;public function Sample() {
trace(Hello World!);}} } And a very simple mxml: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
sb:Sample xmlns:sb=com.* myvalue=Test / It doesn't work, i get the error: TypeError: Error #1009: null has no properties.at
mx.styles::StyleManager$/http://www.adobe.com/2006/flex/mx/internal::i nitProtoChainRoots()[C:\dev\beta2 \sdk\frameworks\mx\styles\StyleManager.as:240]at MyTest/http://www.adobe.com/2006/flex/mx/internal::_MyTest_StylesInit
()at MyTest$iinit() What is going wrong here? How can i use mxml with just my own classes without the flex framework? Thanx and cheers.
--jignesh dodiya
--Flexcoders Mailing ListFAQ:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txtSearch Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
-- j:pn http://www.lennel.org
--Flexcoders Mailing ListFAQ:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txtSearch Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
SPONSORED LINKS
Web site design development
Computer software development
Software design and development
Macromedia flex
Software development best practice
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group flexcoders on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
-- jignesh dodiya
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [flexcoders] Re: Using mxml without flex framework (Flex 2 Beta 1 and 2)
in the context of the current topic i still don't get what you mean. paying for an ide is not a problem, its to be expected. about the topic at hand: it would have been nice if i could have used mxml to layout any type of app. -- Flexcoders Mailing List FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com SPONSORED LINKS Web site design development Computer software development Software design and development Macromedia flex Software development best practice YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "flexcoders" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
