RE: [flexcoders] Flex and Load Balancing

[Alistair McLeod]

Hi Leif,

All Flex remoting calls are AMF over HTTP/S, so should 
seamlessly integrate with your load balancer. The problem with RMI will have 
been was that it wasnot going over HTTP.

I've not actually used Flex with Radware, but I'd be very 
surprised if there were any issues.

Regards,

Alistair




--
Alistair 
McLeodDevelopmentDirector
iteration::two[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Office: +44 (0)131 338 
6108

This e-mail and any associated attachments 
transmitted with it may contain confidential information and must not be copied, 
or disclosed, or used by anyone other than the intended recipient(s). If you are 
not the intended recipient(s) please destroy this e-mail, and any copies of it, 
immediately.Please also note that while software systems have been 
used to try to ensure that this e-mail has been swept for viruses, 
iteration::two do not accept responsibility for any damage or loss caused in 
respect of any viruses transmitted by the e-mail. Please ensure your own checks 
are carried out before any attachments are 
opened.




From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leif 
WellsSent: 25 May 2005 15:34To: 
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] Flex and Load 
Balancing
We'd like to use Flex in an enterprise deployment, where all HTTP requests are handled and dispatched by a Radware load balancer.We are getting a bit of push-back from our client. Our client has seen in the past that the Radware load balancers don't work exactly as expected when tunnelling other protocols over HTTP (
e.g. Java RMI).  We want to make sure that the Radware load balancers can handle Flex invocations over HTTP without any problems. These guys need pertinent information to relieve risk-based stress. ;-)Do any of you have any data that indicates that Radware load balancers are fully compatible with Flex remoting?
Special thanks,Leifa.k.a., JesterXL's manager







Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

RE: [flexcoders] Flex and Load Balancing

[Matt Chotin]

RemoteObject uses HTTP and should work fine
in a load-balanced environment. The other services (HTTPService and
WebService) also do their work over HTTP. Do you anticipate needing stateful
Java classes or will everything work in a stateless environment? The only
thing I can imagine is if somehow the Radware balancers require url-rewriting
or some mechanism for supporting sticky sessions that we wouldnt
automatically support, but I tend to think wed be fine. Dont
have anything official for you though or actual experience with Radware.



Matt











From:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leif Wells
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005
10:34 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Flex and
Load Balancing





We'd like to use Flex in an enterprise deployment, where all HTTP requests are handled and dispatched by a Radware load balancer.

We are getting a bit of push-back from our client. Our client has seen in the past that the Radware load balancers don't work exactly as expected when tunnelling other protocols over HTTP (e.g. Java RMI). We want to make sure that the Radware load balancers can handle Flex invocations over HTTP without any problems. These guys need pertinent information to relieve risk-based stress. ;-)

Do any of you have any data that indicates that Radware load balancers are fully compatible with Flex remoting?

Special thanks,

Leif
a.k.a., JesterXL's manager












Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.