[Flexradio] CEGet

2005-12-05 Thread Richard Stouffer








Im trying to figure out what I need to do to
configure CWGet/SDR1000/Delta 44 card. The Delta 44/ SDR 1000 set up I
have seems to be working fine for transmit and receive and others can read my
transmission fine. The audio Im receiving is great.



When I run CWGet while in a Commercial AM station, I get a
strong signal indication on CWGet in both the upper and lower windows.
When I switch to HF and monitor or transmit CW I get only the faintest
indication of a signal or no indication at all. When I do get recognition
of CW, there is seldom any indication of any signal in either window. Im
running Windows XP Pro. Any ideas as to what I can do to get CWGet to
work properly?





Richard KE5DLQ










Re: [Flexradio] ATU not tuning

2005-12-05 Thread Wallace Watson

Greetings Christoph,
I also experienced the problem you have described when I obtained my 
SDR-ATU and installed it in the SDR-1000 in May 2005.  My version of the 
ATU did not contain the red and green LED's which indicate the status of 
the ATU.   After several exchanges with Gerald Youngblood, he advised that 
several of the early ATU Z-100's obtained from LDG were assembled without 
the addition of these LED's.  This I corrected by obtaining the LED's from 
Gerald at Flex-Radio and installing them on my ATU unit.


In order for the ATU to function correctly, you must be using PowerSDR 
verion 1.4.5 Beta 6 or later due to a software bug discovered in the 
earlier versions of software.  What indication on the  RED and GREEN LED's 
are you observing when you tune the SDR?


The problem that I eventually discovered was a solder bridge short on the 
bottom of the 100W Amp board at the point of the ATU jumper pads.  I read a 
.2 ohm short with the jumper cut and should have read infinity on my 
digital ohmmeter.  I discussed this discovery with Gerald from Flex-Radio 
and we concluded that a short must exist, Gerald advised the procedure for 
removing the 100W amp from the SDR case and removal of the printed circuit 
board from the Amps heat-sink.  Upon performing this disassembly I found a 
blob of solder bridging the jumper pads on the bottom of the 100W Amp 
circuit board.  I removed the solder bridge and reassembled the AMP circuit 
board with the heat-sink and remounted the Amp in the SDR radio 
cabinet.  The ATU then performed flawlessly when tested subsequent to this 
troubleshooting and correction.


I am presently on Holiday at my future retirement home in Florida until 
after Christmas, after which my spouse and I return to the U.K. and resume 
work.


Advise if I can be of additional assistance in troubleshooting your ATU unit?

73's, Wally - M0ZAZ.





At 09:12 PM 12/4/2005 +0100, you wrote:
My ATU is not working properly: I hear the relays but when finished, there 
was
no tuning. Is there a way to test the ATU manually or is there a 
toubleshooting

procedure? I am using the sdr-100O with 100W and ATU installed, purchased in
September 05, Delta44, v1.4.5 Beta7. Actually it never worked until now, 
was not

sure from the readings if I still should wait for updates(?).
Chris, HB9AJP

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz


_
   Wallace A. Watson  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_ 





Re: [Flexradio] Interesting behavior when connected to a dummy load

2005-12-05 Thread Eric Wachsmann - FlexRadio
Title: Interesting behavior when connected to a dummy load









Jeff
nailed this one on the head. The
jumping around is because when spur reduction is turned on, the radio hardware is
only tuned every ~3.051kHz. We do
the fine tuning using a software oscillator. Also worthy of note is that we use an 11kHz IF. So
what you are seeing is the junk around DC on the left side of the spectrum.





Eric Wachsmann

FlexRadio Systems







-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Ellison
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005
11:23 PM
To: flexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] Interesting
behavior when connected to a dummy load



I
was testing tonight into a dummy load and noticed some very peculiar behavior.


When
connected to the dummy load on 14.179 MHz (USB) I see the noise floor
(signal) in the panadapter as a flat line from -10K to +10K Hz at about
-145 dBm. That looks good to me

Now
I change frequency to 14.178 MHz and I see the signal rise to -130 dBm between
-10K and -9.5K Hz. It is flat at -145dBm across the rest of the
spectrum. Looks like more noise on the low end. Not so good.

If
I change the frequency the to 14.177 MHz I see the signal rise to -113 dBm
between -10K and -9.5K Hz. It is flat at -145dBm across the rest of the
spectrum This shows a *lot* more noise.

Here
come the strange part. 

I
change the frequency to 14.176 MHz and the signal looks just like the signal on
14.179. Flat across the entire spectrum at -145 dBm.

By
changing the frequency down one kHz to 14.175, I see the signal that
looks like 14.178 MHz. A small rise to -130 dBm at the low end again.

If
I decrement the frequency down an additional kHz to 14.174, I see the signal
that looks like 14.177 MHz. A large rise to -113 dBm at the low end
again.

This
pattern repeats itself through out the entire 20 meter band. The rise in
the noise floor is a little less in magnitude at the very bottom of 20 meters
(14.050), but by the time I get to 14.150 the rise in the noise floor is back
to approximately -110 dBm.

I
checked other bands and it exhibits this behavior on ALL bands. Always a
three kHz stepping to repeat the pattern. 

Anyone
have a clue what might cause this behavior? I'm using the Delta 44 with
the breakout box eliminator. 

-Tim

---

Tim Ellison 
Integrated Technical Services 
Apex,
NC USA 
919.674.0044
Ext. 25 / 919.674.0045 (FAX) 
919.215.6375
- cell 
Skype:
kg4rzy 










Re: [Flexradio] Schematic

2005-12-05 Thread Eric Wachsmann - FlexRadio
The schematics are available on the private download page.  I will send
the info for how to get to it privately.


Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 radio.biz] On Behalf Of W2AGN
 Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 7:41 AM
 To: Flex Radio
 Subject: [Flexradio] Schematic
 
 I note there is not a schematic in the SDR-1000 Manual. Where can one
be
 obtained?
 
 
 John W2AGN
 
 ___
 FlexRadio mailing list
 FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
 http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz




[Flexradio] Team Speak

2005-12-05 Thread Lyman H. Wolfla II








Can someone give me the instructions on how to sign into TeamSpeak?
The link on the Flex Radio site is down, and I need to rebuild my computer
connection.



Thanks



K9LZJ



Hank Wolfla

Lyman H. Wolfla II, Inc.

1308 S. Peace St.

Greenfield, IN 46140

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

317-861-0186

Cell: 317-448-3457










[Flexradio] Schematic

2005-12-05 Thread Lee A Crocker
Eric 

I purchased a SDR-1000 used from N1JM and I need
access to schematics and what ever info is associated
with the radio.  

Looking forward to my SDR experience.

Lee W9OY



Re: [Flexradio] Interesting behavior when connected to a dummy load

2005-12-05 Thread Eric Wachsmann - FlexRadio
The radio will work with the spur reduction on or off.  Basically, you
can lighten the load on your parallel port and reduce the number of
spurs seen by leaving Spur Reduction at it's default ON position.

However, if you have an offending spur in the passband, you may want to
try to turn it off to move the spur around.


Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 radio.biz] On Behalf Of Jiri Sanda
 Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 1:42 PM
 To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
 Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Interesting behavior when connected to a
dummy
 load
 
 OK - so if I understand it well one should run it without the
reduction
 unless there is a problem - a spur audible - and than switching on
might
 help ?
 
 73 !
 
 Jiri
 OK1RI
 
 On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Ahti Aintila wrote:
 
  Jiri,
 
  My understanding is that the spur. reduction moves the spurious
signal
  generated by the DDS away from your listening passband. There is a
good
  probability that another spurious signal does not hit the same
 frequency.
 
  73, Ahti OH2RZ
 
  - Original Message - From: Jiri Sanda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: flexRadio@flex-radio.biz
  Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 7:04 PM
  Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Interesting behavior when connected to a
dummy
 load
 
 
 
  I do not understand ?
  If the transmitted noise get so much worse when spur. reduction
is on
  why is it there at all ? What positive it does ?
 
  73 !
 
  Jiri
  OK1RI
 
  On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Eric Wachsmann - FlexRadio wrote:
 
  Jeff nailed this one on the head.  The jumping around is because
when
  spur reduction is turned on, the radio hardware is only tuned
every
  ~3.051kHz.  We do the fine tuning using a software oscillator.
Also
  worthy of note is that we use an 11kHz IF.  So what you are seeing
is
  the junk around DC on the left side of the spectrum.
 
 
  Eric Wachsmann
  FlexRadio Systems
 
 
 
 ___
 FlexRadio mailing list
 FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
 http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz




[Flexradio] [Fwd: Re: no constant Output]

2005-12-05 Thread David Broger
David Broger wrote:

  David,
  I would be suspicious of the output voltage from the line-out from your 
  sound card.  I would recommend that you use the calibration routine for 
  determining  the line-out voltage, thus with the M-Audio Delta 44 sound 
  card and utilizing the recommended settings for the card you should observe 
  a line-out voltage of.98 volts.  The PowerSDR console when picking the 
  Delta 44 sound card will default to expect .98 volts.
 
  Wally - M0ZAZ.
 
 
  Hi
  I have the sdr1k with the 100W pa. I use the Delta SC and sw-version
  1.4.5p7. There is the following problem: when I go to tune (should be
  10W) I have only 1W. PA-calibration doesen't work all the time (50%
  abort).  If calibration works I'll get the required output-power. But
  the power is not constant - it goes form 5W to15W. Restart the computer
  or the sdr1k doesn't solve the problem. After successfull calibration
  and restart the system it could there is low power. With 1.4.4 there ist
  the same behavior.  What's the Problem?
 
  David, HB9RVS
 
 
  ___
  FlexRadio mailing list
  FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
  http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
 

   
Hi Wally
Thanks for the info. I checked the output volatage. It's 0.96V - a
little bit lower than the original value. With 0.96 it's not possible to
make the pa-calibration. All gain values are lower than 40dB. The
message invalid gain found appears. With 0.98 some time calibration is
possible. With both values the tune-power is not constant. I have my
sdr1k since about 2-3 months. I can't remember that the calibration at
the beginning was a problem. The factory calibration values are all
higher than 42 dB. Could it be that a hardware part is demaged (overheated)?

73 David, HB9RVS


---BeginMessage---
David Broger wrote:
 David,
 I would be suspicious of the output voltage from the line-out from your 
 sound card.  I would recommend that you use the calibration routine for 
 determining  the line-out voltage, thus with the M-Audio Delta 44 sound 
 card and utilizing the recommended settings for the card you should observe 
 a line-out voltage of.98 volts.  The PowerSDR console when picking the 
 Delta 44 sound card will default to expect .98 volts.

 Wally - M0ZAZ.


 Hi
 I have the sdr1k with the 100W pa. I use the Delta SC and sw-version
 1.4.5p7. There is the following problem: when I go to tune (should be
 10W) I have only 1W. PA-calibration doesen't work all the time (50%
 abort).  If calibration works I'll get the required output-power. But
 the power is not constant - it goes form 5W to15W. Restart the computer
 or the sdr1k doesn't solve the problem. After successfull calibration
 and restart the system it could there is low power. With 1.4.4 there ist
 the same behavior.  What's the Problem?

 David, HB9RVS


 ___
 FlexRadio mailing list
 FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
 http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz

   
Hi Wally
Thanks for the info. I checked the output volatage. It's 0.96V - a
little bit lower than the original value. With 0.96 it's not possible to
make the pa-calibration. All gain values are lower than 40dB. The
message invalid gain found appears. With 0.98 some time calibration is
possible. With both values the tune-power is not constant. I have my
sdr1k since about 2-3 months. I can't remember that the calibration at
the beginning was a problem. The factory calibration values are all
higher than 42 dB. Could it be that a hardware part is demaged (overheated)?

73 David, HB9RVS

---End Message---


[Flexradio] First OLIVIA digital mode QSO with SDR1K

2005-12-05 Thread Tim Ellison

After getting MixW working correctly, Hoping VAC wouldn't generate a BSD
and downloading the latest beta version that supports OLIVIA, I was able
to have a successful QSO with YV4GMH, Hector in Venezuela.  Olivia is a
new data mode which is excellent for poor conditions. It's a wideband
data mode using error correction and a modulation method similar to MFSK
For more info, you can check out this URL:

http://homepage.sunrise.ch/mysunrise/jalocha/mfsk.html

It is a very cool digital mode.  It sounds like a bunch of sparrows
fighting over a bread crust!!  Much more pleasant to listen to than PSK.

If anyone wants to sked a SDR1K to SDR1K OLIVIA QSO, just drop me an
e-mail

-Tim
---
Tim Ellison mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Integrated Technical Services http://www.itsco.com/  
Apex, NC USA
919.674.0044 Ext. 25 / 919.674.0045 (FAX)
919.215.6375 - cell
 PGP public key available at all public KeyServers 






[Flexradio] Master's Thesis Defense

2005-12-05 Thread Jon Beckwith
Hey folks, just wanted to let everyone know that my digital comm/SDR 
project is nearly complete!  Thanks for all the help along the way.


Master's Thesis Defense

A MATLAB AND SOFTWARE DEFINED RADIO APPROACH TO TEACHING DIGITAL 
COMMUNICATIONS


Jonathan A. Beckwith

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Friday, 9 December 2005, 1:00PM-3:00PM
301 Morse Hall



Increasing complexity of communication protocols, especially modulations, 
requires expensive signal generation and demodulation equipment for 
meaningful lab experiences in communication engineering courses.  Pure 
software simulation can simulate most real-world modulations and 
impairments, but it still lacks the .feel. of real hardware and channel 
impairments.


Software radio, which uses hardware for analog and software for baseband 
processing of the signal, is attracting lots of attention in commercial as 
well as military circles.  Using a software radio platform, one can 
achieve control of the simulation with real hardware, while maintaining 
flexibility for many environments.


To this end, a series of digital communication lab exercises is presented 
which is based on the principles in software radio and uses an open Matlab 
code suite and a commercial RF front end, the FlexRadio Systems SDR-1000 
transceiver.  The lab exercises include realistic implementations of 
synchronization sections as well as modulation and demodulation 
subsystems.  The flexibility of the SDR allows for not only labs for 
current EE 757 and EE 758 classes, but also future ones, which have 
different modulation requirements.


As the system has not yet been implemented, a complete evaluation of its 
effectiveness has yet to be completed.  Only the students using it can 
provide a complete assessment and evaluation of the SDR Teaching System. 
This will be done in the semester following its completion.




Dr. M. Carter, Thesis Advisor
Dr. Thomas Miller
Dr. Jianqiu Zhang



--
*
 Jon Beckwith -KB1KBB-   B.S.E.E.
 UNH InterOperability Lab  RD
 Fast  Gigabit Ethernet Consortiums
 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2
 Durham, NH  03824-3525   (603) 862-4534
*



Re: [Flexradio] Interesting behavior when connected to a dummy load

2005-12-05 Thread Jeff Anderson
Interestingly, tuning across the band with spur-reduction Off does introduce
audible artifacts that are not present when tuning with spur-reduction On.

For example, if I'm tuning in 10 Hz steps with spur-reduction OFF, I hear a
distintive tick each time the frequency changes, and the receiver's noise
floor seems to blip up a bit on the panadapter (a phenomena easily seen if
no antenna is attached).  A bit annoying, given that, if spur-reduction is
ON, no ticks are heard, nor does there seem to be any effect on the noise
floor.

Probably something isn't being allowed to properly settle when
spur-reduction is OFF, compared to when it's ON.

- Jeff, WA6AHL


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric Wachsmann -
FlexRadio
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 11:59 AM
To: 'Jiri Sanda'; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Interesting behavior when connected to a dummy
load


The radio will work with the spur reduction on or off.  Basically, you
can lighten the load on your parallel port and reduce the number of
spurs seen by leaving Spur Reduction at it's default ON position.

However, if you have an offending spur in the passband, you may want to
try to turn it off to move the spur around.


Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz




Re: [Flexradio] Master's Thesis Defense

2005-12-05 Thread Jeff Anderson
A friend of mine has an interesting Matlab-based SDR.  Check out the last
article at:  http://home.comcast.net/~w1qg/

- Jeff, WA6AHL

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of ecellison
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 3:53 PM
To: 'Jon Beckwith'; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Master's Thesis Defense


Jon

A hearty hip hip Congratulations! The 'everything radio!'

Eric2


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Beckwith
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 5:26 PM
To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] Master's Thesis Defense

Hey folks, just wanted to let everyone know that my digital comm/SDR
project is nearly complete!  Thanks for all the help along the way.

Master's Thesis Defense

A MATLAB AND SOFTWARE DEFINED RADIO APPROACH TO TEACHING DIGITAL
COMMUNICATIONS

Jonathan A. Beckwith

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Friday, 9 December 2005, 1:00PM-3:00PM
301 Morse Hall



Increasing complexity of communication protocols, especially modulations,
requires expensive signal generation and demodulation equipment for
meaningful lab experiences in communication engineering courses.  Pure
software simulation can simulate most real-world modulations and
impairments, but it still lacks the .feel. of real hardware and channel
impairments.

Software radio, which uses hardware for analog and software for baseband
processing of the signal, is attracting lots of attention in commercial as
well as military circles.  Using a software radio platform, one can
achieve control of the simulation with real hardware, while maintaining
flexibility for many environments.

To this end, a series of digital communication lab exercises is presented
which is based on the principles in software radio and uses an open Matlab
code suite and a commercial RF front end, the FlexRadio Systems SDR-1000
transceiver.  The lab exercises include realistic implementations of
synchronization sections as well as modulation and demodulation
subsystems.  The flexibility of the SDR allows for not only labs for
current EE 757 and EE 758 classes, but also future ones, which have
different modulation requirements.

As the system has not yet been implemented, a complete evaluation of its
effectiveness has yet to be completed.  Only the students using it can
provide a complete assessment and evaluation of the SDR Teaching System.
This will be done in the semester following its completion.



Dr. M. Carter, Thesis Advisor
Dr. Thomas Miller
Dr. Jianqiu Zhang



--
*
  Jon Beckwith -KB1KBB-   B.S.E.E.
  UNH InterOperability Lab  RD
  Fast  Gigabit Ethernet Consortiums
  121 Technology Drive, Suite 2
  Durham, NH  03824-3525   (603) 862-4534
*

___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz




[Flexradio] Fw: HELP

2005-12-05 Thread Michael Freedman




I am seeing something strange with my SDR. I 
notice nowwhen I hit the MOX button in USB or LSB modes I am seeing full 
output WITHOUT talking. I have done a number of alignments on two diferent 
computers both using the sameFirebox.

what I have now are:

160 62.3
80 49.0
60. 55.6
40 49.0
30 46.4
20 49.1
17 50.9
1549.4
12 45.9
10 44.6 

EVEN if I pull the lineoutput out of the back of 
the SDR I am still getting the same full output when I push the MOX button. 
Receive works perfectly. I can even see my transmit audio on the sdr's software 
screen. 

What is wrong Does this call for a service trip 
to Texas??

Mike VE3BGE





[Flexradio] SSB vs CW transmit paths

2005-12-05 Thread Bill Tracey
Warning: boring technical details of software internals follow - posted 
here as others playing in the code may find it of interest.


Been poking at PowerSDR and the DttSP code to see how to support transmit 
with  SoftRock style hardware.  SSB  is pretty straight forward, and I've 
gotten that working by setting the DttSP TXOsc appropriately when going 
into xmit mode.   Works like a charm.   The problem comes when trying to do 
CW (the perennial SDR problem child mode).


It appears that for modes other than CW the audio code in 
PowerSDR  (Callback1 in audio.cs) calls ExchangeSamples (dsp.cs) which in 
turn maps to audio_callback in DttSP/winmain.c to feed data to DttSP.  This 
copies and moves that data around and eventually results in process_samples 
in DttSP/sdr.c being called.  In here do_tx is called and DSP magic is 
performed and finally the DttSP transmit osc is applied in do_tx_post.


For CW the path is a bit different.  Callback1 in audio.cs calls 
CWtoneExchange that maps to CWtoneExchange in DttSP/keyd.c.  All 
CWtoneExchange does is pull data from the ringbuffer being filled by 
send_thread_keyd in keyd.c.  The data never gets passed through the tx 
signal processing hain in sdr.c's do_tx, so the transmit oscillator is 
never applied,. so with a SoftRock style transmitter one ends transmitting 
at the fundamental frequency.   Ooops, that's not what was supposed to happen!


Any suggestions on how to go about fixing this?  I could add the TX Osc 
mixer into the send_tone code in keyd.c - although I think  the buffers 
being sent back via this path are also used for sidetone generation.  I 
wonder if two sets of buffers need to be sent back - one to be sent to the 
transmit hardware and one to be used for sidetone.   Or perhaps  a better 
performer would be to change the freq of the CWToneGen osc, or run two of 
them if two buffers need to be returned to handle sidetone.   Also, it 
would appear IQ correction does not happen in the transmit path for CW - 
probably want to figure out how to put that in the CW chain as well.


Regards,

Bill (kd5tfd)





Re: [Flexradio] Interesting behavior when connected to a dummy load

2005-12-05 Thread FlexRadio - Eric
This is actually related to the asynchronous manner in which the hardware is
controlled with respect to the audio.  When Spur Reduction is off, the
hardware is having to tune a lot more often and it can happen in the middle
of a sample causing blips or holes in the audio.  When the software tuning
is used, it only tunes inbetween callbacks, thus ensuring that samples are
not dropped/skewed during the change.


Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Anderson
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 5:46 PM
To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Interesting behavior when connected to a dummy load

Interestingly, tuning across the band with spur-reduction Off does introduce
audible artifacts that are not present when tuning with spur-reduction On.

For example, if I'm tuning in 10 Hz steps with spur-reduction OFF, I hear a
distintive tick each time the frequency changes, and the receiver's noise
floor seems to blip up a bit on the panadapter (a phenomena easily seen if
no antenna is attached).  A bit annoying, given that, if spur-reduction is
ON, no ticks are heard, nor does there seem to be any effect on the noise
floor.

Probably something isn't being allowed to properly settle when
spur-reduction is OFF, compared to when it's ON.

- Jeff, WA6AHL


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric Wachsmann -
FlexRadio
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 11:59 AM
To: 'Jiri Sanda'; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Interesting behavior when connected to a dummy
load


The radio will work with the spur reduction on or off.  Basically, you
can lighten the load on your parallel port and reduce the number of
spurs seen by leaving Spur Reduction at it's default ON position.

However, if you have an offending spur in the passband, you may want to
try to turn it off to move the spur around.


Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz


___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz




Re: [Flexradio] SSB vs CW transmit paths

2005-12-05 Thread Frank Brickle


I 
wonder if two sets of buffers need to be sent back - one to be sent to the 
transmit hardware and one to be used for sidetone.


This is approximately what happens under Linux. Generating sidetone 
within jsdr (as opposed to an outboard keyer) requires 4 audio output 
ports. (The keyer is also a separate process/jack client.) The generated 
CW tone is routed both to an audio input of jsdr, and also patched 
directly to two audio monitor outputs. There is then a constant 1-buffer 
lag between the sidetone you hear and the CW tone that is transmitted. 
There's little chance for confusion since you the operator never hear 
the signal that's actually transmitted.


Or perhaps  a better 
performer would be to change the freq of the CWToneGen osc, or run two of 
them if two buffers need to be returned to handle sidetone.


I don't know about Bob's mods to the keyer code to make it run under 
Windows, but this would be a straightforward procedure algorithmically 
with the generic keyer code. The computational overhead would probably 
be tolerable too. All that would be needed would be a pair of CWTone 
unit generators tuned to different frequencies, but otherwise run 
exactly in parallel (as well as buffers to put their output in).


73
Frank
AB2KT