[Flightgear-devel] What about 3 arcsec Eurasia Terrain data before the release of FGFS 0.9.4?

2004-03-24 Thread Oliver C.
Since Oct 2003 there is a 3 arcsec SRTM Terrain data for Europe and Asia on 
the usgs.gov ftp server available.

ftp://edcsgs9.cr.usgs.gov/pub/data/srtm/Eurasia/

I think we should create new scenery files for the Europe and Asia area based 
on this better 3 arcsec SRTM Terrain data before we release FGFS version 
0.9.4.
The current available scenery for Flightgear for Europe and Asia is still 
based on the low detail 30 arcsec SRTM Terrain data.


Best Regards, 
 Oliver C.


 

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] What about 3 arcsec Eurasia Terrain data before the release of FGFS 0.9.4?

2004-03-24 Thread Oliver C.
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 16:46, Jon Stockill wrote:
 On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Oliver C. wrote:
  Since Oct 2003 there is a 3 arcsec SRTM Terrain data for Europe and Asia
  on the usgs.gov ftp server available.
 
  ftp://edcsgs9.cr.usgs.gov/pub/data/srtm/Eurasia/
 
  I think we should create new scenery files for the Europe and Asia area
  based on this better 3 arcsec SRTM Terrain data before we release FGFS
  version 0.9.4.
  The current available scenery for Flightgear for Europe and Asia is still
  based on the low detail 30 arcsec SRTM Terrain data.

 You'll be disappointed - it's not as accurate as you'd hope, and while it
 has a lot more shape I'm not convinved by its absolute accuracy - there
 are still airfields on embankments and in trenches (and checking the
 airfield elevations shows them to be correct).

Ok, but at the location where i live i do allready have the airfield (EDGM) in 
trechnes when using the old scenery data, but the hills around my city would 
be a lot more accurate.
I allready tested that with a STRM Terrain viewer. 
The hills do look much more realistic with the new 3 arcsec data:
http://www.dgadv.com/dgtv/


So we allready have the problem with airfiels on embankments or in trenches.

Best Regards,
 Oliver C.




___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] What about 3 arcsec Eurasia Terrain data before the release of FGFS 0.9.4?

2004-03-24 Thread Jon Stockill
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Oliver C. wrote:

 So we allready have the problem with airfiels on embankments or in trenches.

OK, then I guess a scenery rebuild is the next job after getting 0.9.4
released, and packaged. As it's not in the base package it doesn't need to
hold up the release though.

I've got all the data downloaded and at least part processed ready to
build the scenery.

-- 
Jon Stockill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] What about 3 arcsec Eurasia Terrain data before the release of FGFS 0.9.4?

2004-03-24 Thread Arnt Karlsen

..has anyone played with the lower detail 30 arcsec SRTM Terrain 
data, _and_ the new higher detail 3 arcsec data,  _mixing_ the data, 
to try produce even higher detail than the 3 arcsec data?  
I mean, both data sets_are_ correct.

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.



___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] What about 3 arcsec Eurasia Terrain data before the release of FGFS 0.9.4?

2004-03-24 Thread David Megginson
Arnt Karlsen wrote:

..has anyone played with the lower detail 30 arcsec SRTM Terrain 
data, _and_ the new higher detail 3 arcsec data,  _mixing_ the data, 
to try produce even higher detail than the 3 arcsec data?  
I mean, both data sets_are_ correct.
I'm not sure how you'd end up with higher-level detail.  For every 100 
points in the 3 arcsec DEM, there will be one point in the 30 arcsec DEM, 
presumably equal to the highest of the 100 points (but I'm not sure -- Norm 
can probably fill us in).

All the best,

David

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel