[Flightgear-devel] Weekly CVS Changelog Summary: FlightGear data
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 2008-03-09_14:57:07 (abory) /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/A-10/Models/Attic/apibullet-tracer.ac - David Bastien: Stores repertory cleaning. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 2008-03-09_14:57:08 (abory) /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/A-10/Models/Attic/apibullet-tracer.xml - David Bastien: Stores repertory cleaning. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 2008-03-09_14:58:10 (abory) /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/A-10/Models/Stores/GAU-8A/apibullet-tracer.ac /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/A-10/Models/Stores/GAU-8A/apibullet-tracer.xml - David Bastien: Stores directory cleaning. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 2008-03-10_08:47:29 (martin) /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Models/Aircraft/737-01.rgb /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Models/Aircraft/737-static.ac /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Models/Aircraft/747-01.rgb /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Models/Aircraft/747-static.ac Group immovable aircraft, those who are meant to be placed by an OBJECT_SHARED entry in Scenery .stg files, in a directory separate from other geometries. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 2008-03-10_09:11:22 (martin) /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Models/Aircraft/ARFF-trainer.ac /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Models/Aircraft/ARFF-trainer.xml Herewith I declare this skeleton as being an aircraft as well :-) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 2008-03-15_05:57:18 (vmmeazza) /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/seahawk/seahawk-3d-2t-yasim.xml Remove tanks from the non-tank version =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 2008-03-15_15:06:13 (helijah) /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/Zlin-50lx/Nasal/Attic/pilot-g.nas *** empty log message *** 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Weekly CVS Changelog Summary: FlightGear source
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] autopilot u_min and u_max...
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 20:51:08 -0700 SydSandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all , I've been trying to change the xmlautopilot to use prop and value for the u_min and u_max properties , and currently have quite a mess on my hands right now :) The idea is to have a min and max property to control bank-limit / pitch with a panel knob ... setting the u_min and u_max from a property seems to be working , but I get some strange things happening . The pi-simple controller isnt clamped anymore (so i removed the clamp check )... and the output goes immediately to the u_min value...although u_min and u_max are checked every update... Has anyone else attempted this , with good results ? Or , hopefully , already implemented this ? Anyway , I'll keep plugging away at it, the answer is probably staring me in the face and I can't see it. Is this something that should be implemented anyway ? Cheers -- SydSandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK it seems the errors were caused by my autopilot config file, u_min and u_max work with prop and value as expected , but I need to test further , just in case ... Cheers -- SydSandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Rogue objects at KSQL
On Sunday 16 March 2008 15:47:15 George Patterson wrote: Hi All, There are a few objects that have been misplaced at KSQL. 1. Light tower to the right of Runway 30. 2. A large building (black and grey at the end of the same runway) G'day George, I flew around KSQL in the ufo and, after comparing with GE, that large building to the left of the threshhold on runway 30 is most definitely dodgy. All the AI light aircraft were clipping their wings on final! You can go to wherever_your_scenery_is/Objects/w130n30/w123n37/942051.stg and delete the line: OBJECT_SHARED Models/fgfsdb/generic_skyscraper_03.ac -122.2469440 37.5088890- 490.86 180 That should get rid of the blue building. I couldn't pin down the light tower in the middle of the taxiway but if you do, make it a windsock and place it about 50 metres north-east - it would just about match the image in GE. :) Regards, Drew It seems that the green and white light from the tower is solid. I have take a screen shot or two which I haven;'t attached to this email. Assuming that this is not a known bug, any comments on how to fix these two artifacts. (I though the problem of light being solid was fixed.) I am using Flightgear CVS version with glut. Regards George - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] FG build fails with plib 1.8.5 and SLD
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 14:49 -0600, dave perry wrote: Alasdair Campbell wrote: So all is OK now except for the hotspots on my c172 radio stack which have gone haywire. Clicking on the COM2 swap button switches COM1 radio, Clicking the ADF buttons change the COM2 radio, the Autopilot buttons are ineffective, etc.etc. Can anyone confirm this behaviour? Try resizing the window. I pointed this out more that a month ago, but Tim Moore (who is maintaining osgviewer) was unable to reproduce the problem on his system. The resize can be dragging a side of the window or minimize/maximize the window. The mouse coordinates are not properly initialized (I speculate) until this is done. - Dave Perry Thank You, Dave, you are correct. Min/max the window and the hotspots behave as expected. Sorry I missed your original post. Kind regards, Alasdair - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Till's MP patches /feedback -- WAS:MP forest fire model!
till busch schrieb: hi georg, i am currently working on a patch that adds model-paging. models (ai, multiplayer and, to some degree, scenery) will be loaded in a different thread. this is more or less what you describe. some successful testing has been done already. so i hope to get it integrated into cvs soon. if you'd like to (beta-)test, feel free to get the latest versions of my patch at: http://flight.bux.at currently these are: http://flight.bux.at/0001-model-paging-v0.4.0-beta-simgear.patch http://flight.bux.at/0001-model-paging-v0.4.2-beta-flightgear.patch note that i'm not pushing for integration yet. the changes still need some clean-up and minimal documentation ;-) i'll be glad for any comments (success or regression reports, for the matter) cheers, -till Hi Till, I applied your patches after updating my FG OSG CVS version and compiled it. All went fine without problems. Then I tried two multiplayer sessions at KSFO this (European) sunday afternoon. There was a lot of traffic and several logging in and out due to crashes. I flew outbound KSFO to the south and made a HOGE for round about 20 Minutes. Trying to hold my position and altitude and observe the traffic. Congratulations! There were still short framerate depressions which caused a little instability but always to manage, some pedal-work to get the nose into the wished direction and some collective-corrections - this is really great! And a big, big ,big difference to the old problematic behaviour when I found myself in some uncontrollable flight after a 3 second pause. Not to mention, further flying and a smooth landing at KSFO hangar - ALL WITH REALLY A LOT OF PEOPLE JOINED! And as I was also active with local flights without the mp server connected I can say that until now I made no negative observation with this patch. This is a big step forward, I'm going to log into mp again as the fun-factor is back again. A further report will follow after some more testing-time, I hope that I can validate what I reported today. Thank you very much! Regards Georg EDDW - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] KLSV add-on is available
Hi all, http://croo.murgl.org/fgfs/scenery/KLSV/ Not all the shared models are already in fgfsdb, and the new terrain won't be available until next scenery build, *but* you can already download 2 tarballs from my website and anjoy the full Nellis AFB. Be sure that we do our best so this airport will be fully included in the standard scenery with standard process. I also hope it wont eat too much fps on the weakest PC's... Enjoy, Alexis - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Walking around
--- Detlef Faber [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi everybody, I've just committed a Walk View to the jeep, so a virtual passenger can get out of the car and walk around in the scenery. The View follows the terrain height and the movements gets blocked by steep slopes and scenery models (sadly not by random scenery models as they are insensitve to collisions). It is planned to be integrated with the interiour movement like in the Albatross, so one can seamlessly walk inside and outside of the Aircraft. Suggestions and comments are welcome! Greetings Detlef I can only say: wow! not yet tested, but this sounds awsome! Thanks for your work! Regards HHS still in work: http://www.hoerbird.net/galerie.html But already done: http://www.hoerbird.net/reisen.html E-Mails jetzt auf Ihrem Handy. www.yahoo.de/go - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Walking around
Detlef Faber schrieb: Hi everybody, I've just committed a Walk View to the jeep, so a virtual passenger can get out of the car and walk around in the scenery. The View follows the terrain height and the movements gets blocked by steep slopes and scenery models (sadly not by random scenery models as they are insensitve to collisions). It is planned to be integrated with the interiour movement like in the Albatross, so one can seamlessly walk inside and outside of the Aircraft. Suggestions and comments are welcome! Greetings Detlef Hi Detlef, downloaded and tried this nice feature. Getting out/in the Jeep works as described - only the walking w (used also W) does not work here. I was on a runway, so no terrain blocking or scenery object could disturb walking free forward. Any idea? Regards Georg - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] autopilot u_min and u_max...
On Sunday 16 March 2008 03:51, SydSandy wrote: Hi all , I've been trying to change the xmlautopilot to use prop and value for the u_min and u_max properties , and currently have quite a mess on my hands right now :) The idea is to have a min and max property to control bank-limit / pitch with a panel knob ... setting the u_min and u_max from a property seems to be working , but I get some strange things happening . The pi-simple controller isnt clamped anymore (so i removed the clamp check )... and the output goes immediately to the u_min value...although u_min and u_max are checked every update... Has anyone else attempted this , with good results ? Or , hopefully , already implemented this ? Anyway , I'll keep plugging away at it, the answer is probably staring me in the face and I can't see it. Is this something that should be implemented anyway ? Cheers Hi Syd, one way you could do this with the current autopilot controllers is to feed the output from your controller through a gain filter to get the range you want. For example, if you've set u_min/u_max to +/- 40 in your controller but want to reduce it to +/- 20, you'd set the gain value on the gain filter to 0.5. If you don't mind re-tuning your controller, it would probably make more sense to set u_min u_max to +/- 1.0, then the gain factor would be the required bank or pitch angle limit i.e. for +/- 30 limits you'd use a gain of 30. Changing the output clamps does change the overall behaviour of the controller, however. I found that I got more desirable behaviour from a pitch controller (output is a hstab deflection) when I set the u_min u_max limits to +/- 0.25 and then passed it through a gain filter with a factor of 4 to restore the required +/- 1.0 range, as opposed to setting the clamps directly to +/- 1.0. Heh - I'm still not entirely sure why this is, actually having fiddled with the code myself, but it came about through an experiment where I was trying to increase the effective bandwidth through parallelism. I started off with four identical controllers running in parallel, the outputs of which were summed but then I realised that I could get the same effect with a single controller using the gain filter technique. LeeE - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Walking around
Am Sonntag, den 16.03.2008, 21:55 +0100 schrieb Georg Vollnhals: Detlef Faber schrieb: Hi everybody, I've just committed a Walk View to the jeep, so a virtual passenger can get out of the car and walk around in the scenery. The View follows the terrain height and the movements gets blocked by steep slopes and scenery models (sadly not by random scenery models as they are insensitve to collisions). It is planned to be integrated with the interiour movement like in the Albatross, so one can seamlessly walk inside and outside of the Aircraft. Suggestions and comments are welcome! Greetings Detlef Hi Detlef, downloaded and tried this nice feature. Getting out/in the Jeep works as described - only the walking w (used also W) does not work here. I was on a runway, so no terrain blocking or scenery object could disturb walking free forward. Any idea? I forgot to mention you need to be in mouse view mode to walk around. The walk direction is steered by the direction you look to. If it still doesn't work for you, please tell me where you tested it. Regards Georg - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Walking around
Detlef Faber schrieb: I forgot to mention you need to be in mouse view mode to walk around. The walk direction is steered by the direction you look to. If it still doesn't work for you, please tell me where you tested it. Hi Detlef, thank you for the fast reply! Works like a charm now. You know already (Albatross walk around) that I like this feature very much. From now I can explore nice sceneries walking around - gives sometimes a surprising impressing perspective http://home.arcor.de/vollnhals-bremen/Walkaround/Walkaround01.jpg By the way, as my mouse modes have been reduced ever since to two (click-mode and lookaround-mode) I changed the nasal script to if (getprop (devices/status/mice/mouse/mode) == 1) This just as a reminder to some lurkers who also changed their mouse modes and might be surprised that the walk-around does not work. Regards Georg - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Walking around
Melchior FRANZ schrieb: * Georg Vollnhals -- Monday 17 March 2008: By the way, as my mouse modes have been reduced ever since to two (click-mode and lookaround-mode) I changed the nasal script to Better do not remove mouse mode 1, but just advise mode 0 to switch straight to mode 2. Then the indices remain the same and you don't have to modify scripts like walk.nas. Putting the following in your ~/.fgfsrc does the trick, while mice.xml remains unchanged: --prop:input/mice/mouse/mode/button[2]/binding/value=2 m. Thank you Melchior, good point as other (future) scripts might be affected, too. I'll change it tomorrow as you suggested :-) Georg - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Walking around
Heiko Schulz schrieb: But it seems to me, that I can't get under objects- even than they are not massiv. I can drive under Static-aircrafts, but not walk. But that's peanuts Detlef- a lot of thanks HHS But what is even better - you can walk ON an object if it has a RAMP to the earth. I walked the whole bridge, first driving on the ramp with the jeep, but then I walked from the ramp onto the earth and back on the ramp and over the bridge: http://home.arcor.de/vollnhals-bremen/Walkaround/Walkaround02.jpg I should be sleeping already but I had so much fun testing the walkaraound ... Regards Georg - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Walking around
--- Georg Vollnhals [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Heiko Schulz schrieb: But it seems to me, that I can't get under objects- even than they are not massiv. I can drive under Static-aircrafts, but not walk. But that's peanuts Detlef- a lot of thanks HHS But what is even better - you can walk ON an object if it has a RAMP to the earth. I walked the whole bridge, first driving on the ramp with the jeep, but then I walked from the ramp onto the earth and back on the ramp and over the bridge: http://home.arcor.de/vollnhals-bremen/Walkaround/Walkaround02.jpg I should be sleeping already but I had so much fun testing the walkaraound ... Regards Georg Me too :-) Yes- Nice feature, very nice- I'm waiting for the first FlightGear Ego-Shooter! When can we guess with your scenery on svn? Cheers HHS still in work: http://www.hoerbird.net/galerie.html But already done: http://www.hoerbird.net/reisen.html Lesen Sie Ihre E-Mails jetzt einfach von unterwegs. www.yahoo.de/go - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Walking around
Heiko Schulz schrieb: Me too :-) Yes- Nice feature, very nice- I'm waiting for the first FlightGear Ego-Shooter! Ok, there might be a lot of people thinking that FlightGear is a FLIGHTSimulator and not a WALKING or DRIVING Sim. But this nice add-on gives a lot of FUN - and if you could leave your aircraft in the future and do a preflight check, what's wrong with that? :-)) And to be honest - I personally like using a scenery in some other way. This walking feature reminds me at Sim Copter I used a long, long time ago. I always liked to have this other view groundnear between the objects, especially if there was/are a lot of them. When can we guess with your scenery on svn? Just working a lot to re-place the objects for EDDW and EDDV as so much has changed with the new v 1.0 scenery. Hopefully ready after Easter time as I get some more sparetime then to finish the task. Cheers HHS Georg - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Building fails cannot find plib library from CVS
Hi, i have some problems to compile Flightgear from CVS. I have plib (1.8.5 from CVS) successful installed and headers under /usr/include/plib but the compilation fails and say that getting undefined reference for puaList and puaComboBox. Compilation log in attached file. Any help ?? Regards, Cleber Santz. Abra sua conta no Yahoo! Mail, o único sem limite de espaço para armazenamento! http://br.mail.yahoo.com/../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(dialog.o): In function `fgList': /home/cleber/FGFS/src/Flightgear/source/src/GUI/dialog.hxx:210: undefined reference to `puaList::puaList(int, int, int, int, char**, int)' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(dialog.o): In function `fgList::update()': /home/cleber/FGFS/src/Flightgear/source/src/GUI/dialog.cxx:1006: undefined reference to `puaList::setTopItem(int)' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(dialog.o): In function `puaList::RTTI_vinfo() const': /usr/local/include/plib/puAux.h:889: undefined reference to `puaList::RTTI_obj' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(dialog.o): In function `~fgList': /home/cleber/FGFS/src/Flightgear/source/src/GUI/dialog.hxx:207: undefined reference to `puaList::~puaList()' /home/cleber/FGFS/src/Flightgear/source/src/GUI/dialog.hxx:207: undefined reference to `puaList::~puaList()' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(dialog.o):(.rodata._ZTV6fgList[vtable for fgList]+0x40): undefined reference to `puaList::RTTI_cast(ulRTTItypeid)' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(dialog.o):(.rodata._ZTV6fgList[vtable for fgList]+0x80): undefined reference to `puaList::getIntegerValue()' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(dialog.o):(.rodata._ZTV6fgList[vtable for fgList]+0x98): undefined reference to `puaList::getStringValue()' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(dialog.o):(.rodata._ZTV6fgList[vtable for fgList]+0xd0): undefined reference to `puaList::setSize(int, int)' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(dialog.o):(.rodata._ZTV6fgList[vtable for fgList]+0x100): undefined reference to `puaList::setColourScheme(float, float, float, float)' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(dialog.o):(.rodata._ZTV6fgList[vtable for fgList]+0x108): undefined reference to `puaList::setColour(int, float, float, float, float)' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(dialog.o):(.rodata._ZTV6fgList[vtable for fgList]+0x130): undefined reference to `puaList::init(int, int, short)' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(dialog.o):(.rodata._ZTV6fgList[vtable for fgList]+0x138): undefined reference to `puaList::newList(char**)' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(dialog.o):(.rodata._ZTV6fgList[vtable for fgList]+0x140): undefined reference to `puaList::getValue(char**)' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(dialog.o):(.rodata._ZTV6fgList[vtable for fgList]+0x148): undefined reference to `puaList::getValue(int*)' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(dialog.o):(.rodata._ZTI6fgList[typeinfo for fgList]+0x28): undefined reference to `typeinfo for puaList' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(dialog.o):(.rodata._ZTV10fgComboBox[vtable for fgComboBox]+0x100): undefined reference to `puaComboBox::setColourScheme(float, float, float, float)' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(dialog.o):(.rodata._ZTV10fgComboBox[vtable for fgComboBox]+0x108): undefined reference to `puaComboBox::setColour(int, float, float, float, float)' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(dialog.o):(.rodata._ZTV11fgSelectBox[vtable for fgSelectBox]+0x100): undefined reference to `puaSelectBox::setColourScheme(float, float, float, float)' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(dialog.o):(.rodata._ZTV11fgSelectBox[vtable for fgSelectBox]+0x108): undefined reference to `puaSelectBox::setColour(int, float, float, float, float)' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(AirportList.o): In function `~AirportList': /home/cleber/FGFS/src/Flightgear/source/src/GUI/AirportList.cxx:20: undefined reference to `puaList::~puaList()' /home/cleber/FGFS/src/Flightgear/source/src/GUI/AirportList.cxx:20: undefined reference to `puaList::~puaList()' /home/cleber/FGFS/src/Flightgear/source/src/GUI/AirportList.cxx:20: undefined reference to `puaList::~puaList()' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(AirportList.o): In function `AirportList': /home/cleber/FGFS/src/Flightgear/source/src/GUI/AirportList.cxx:12: undefined reference to `puaList::puaList(int, int, int, int, int)' /home/cleber/FGFS/src/Flightgear/source/src/GUI/AirportList.cxx:15: undefined reference to `puaList::~puaList()' /home/cleber/FGFS/src/Flightgear/source/src/GUI/AirportList.cxx:12: undefined reference to `puaList::puaList(int, int, int, int, int)' /home/cleber/FGFS/src/Flightgear/source/src/GUI/AirportList.cxx:15: undefined reference to `puaList::~puaList()' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(AirportList.o):(.rodata._ZTV11AirportList[vtable for AirportList]+0x18): undefined reference to `puaList::RTTI_cast(ulRTTItypeid)' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(AirportList.o):(.rodata._ZTV11AirportList[vtable for AirportList]+0x58): undefined reference to `puaList::getIntegerValue()' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(AirportList.o):(.rodata._ZTV11AirportList[vtable for AirportList]+0x70): undefined reference to `puaList::getStringValue()' ../../src/GUI/libGUI.a(AirportList.o):(.rodata._ZTV11AirportList[vtable for AirportList]+0xa8):
Re: [Flightgear-devel] autopilot u_min and u_max...
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 21:59:18 + LeeE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 16 March 2008 21:52, LeeE wrote: On Sunday 16 March 2008 03:51, SydSandy wrote: Hi all , I've been trying to change the xmlautopilot to use prop and value for the u_min and u_max properties , and currently have quite a mess on my hands right now :) The idea is to have a min and max property to control bank-limit / pitch with a panel knob ... setting the u_min and u_max from a property seems to be working , but I get some strange things happening . The pi-simple controller isnt clamped anymore (so i removed the clamp check )... and the output goes immediately to the u_min value...although u_min and u_max are checked every update... Has anyone else attempted this , with good results ? Or , hopefully , already implemented this ? Anyway , I'll keep plugging away at it, the answer is probably staring me in the face and I can't see it. Is this something that should be implemented anyway ? Cheers Hi Syd, one way you could do this with the current autopilot controllers is to feed the output from your controller through a gain filter to get the range you want. For example, if you've set u_min/u_max to +/- 40 in your Oops - that should have said u_max/u_min to +/- 40 controller but want to reduce it to +/- 20, you'd set the gain value on the gain filter to 0.5. If you don't mind re-tuning your controller, it would probably make more sense to set u_min u_max to +/- 1.0, then the gain and again above - u_max u_min to +/- 1.0 factor would be the required bank or pitch angle limit i.e. for +/- 30 limits you'd use a gain of 30. Changing the output clamps does change the overall behaviour of the controller, however. I found that I got more desirable behaviour from a pitch controller (output is a hstab deflection) when I set the u_min u_max limits to +/- 0.25 and then passed Sigh... u_max u_min to +/- 0.25 it through a gain filter with a factor of 4 to restore the required +/- 1.0 range, as opposed to setting the clamps directly to +/- 1.0. Heh - I'm still not entirely sure why this is, actually having fiddled with the code myself, but it came about through an experiment where I was trying to increase the effective bandwidth through parallelism. I started off with four identical controllers running in parallel, the outputs of which were summed but then I realised that I could get the same effect with a single controller using the gain filter technique. LeeE Doh! LeeE Hi LeeE, Thanks for the tips. Still I think it would be a good idea to make these two settings modifiable with a property , don't know if any one else agrees . It turns out that the problems I was having was my autopilot config file , it's been working fine so far it simply checks for value or prop like the recent Kp update, and uses the u_min and u_max value if no prop or value tag is present ... now, the fun part, to try to create an lnav /vnav flight profile :) Cheers -- SydSandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
