Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgfs configure error
It looks like there is a stray 2.0.0 version.h somewhere or your cpp-flags are pointing to the wrong place. In your fg/source directory there is a config.log file. Search for the string 'checking for SimGear 2.2.0 or newer' and you'll see some more details. Specifically the compile command used to test the simgear version. Are the -I options pointing to the proper location? And are the locations really free from the old version.h? Remember to also check the default header file locations like /usr/include. As a final step I'd do a search like find / -name version.h | grep simgear to locate all simgear version.h files. Is FG_ROOT pointing to /usr/local? Cheers, Jari On 2011-01-06 06.29, dave perry wrote: With today's simgear and flightgear source from git, after compiling and installing simgear, fgfs ./configure CFLAGS=-march=native CXXFLAGS=-march=native --prefix=$FG_ROOT fails with checking simgear/version.h usability... yes checking simgear/version.h presence... yes checking for simgear/version.h... yes checking for SimGear 2.2.0 or newer... [found 2.0.0] ... wrong version configure: error: Install latest SimGear first... make: *** [config.status] Error 1 I assume that it is checking the file /usr/local/include/simgear/version.h that was written by the simgear sudo make install. That file contains #ifndef _SIMGEAR_VERSION_H #define _SIMGEAR_VERSION_H #define SIMGEAR_VERSION 2.2.0 #endif // _SIMGEAR_VERSION_H which should have passed the test. I do have a source folder for SimGear 2.0.0 that contains simgear/version.h that would not pass. But I did a make uninstall in that folder before compiling and installing the git simgear. Suggestions? -- Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgfs configure error
On 01/06/2011 03:01 AM, Jari Häkkinen wrote: find / -name version.h | grep simgear I had already looked at config.log. The check was against simgear/version.h. But since --prefix=$FG_ROOT, the config checks for $FG_ROOT/include/simgear/version.h before it checks for /usr/local/include/simgear/version.h. Using the above find showed the accidentally created version.h in $FG_ROOT. Apparently I had used the config string from a fgfs compile script while compiling simgear 2.0.0 for an atlas build on Dec. 16. All makes sense now. Thanks, Dave -- Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgfs configure error
Hi Dave, - dave perry a écrit : On 01/06/2011 03:01 AM, Jari Häkkinen wrote: find / -name version.h | grep simgear I had already looked at config.log. The check was against simgear/version.h. But since --prefix=$FG_ROOT, the config checks Why are you using $FG_ROOT to install your binaries ? $FG_ROOT is the location of data. You shouldn't have problem if your --prefix is the same for SimGear and FlightGear -Fred -- Frédéric Bouvier http://my.fotolia.com/frfoto/ Photo gallery - album photo http://www.youtube.com/user/fgfred64 Videos -- Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Submitting changes to fgdata
Hi Alexey, Alexey Varjat wrote: PS: I know that some simmers from russian FG forum have made some changes (including city buildings) for Russian(Murmansk, Pulkovo), Lithuanian (Vilnius) and Estonian (Tallinn, Piarnu) airports and I hope that they want to share his work with community. I remember at least one model which has just recently been submitted: http://scenemodels.flightgear.org/modeledit.php?id=2011 and I'll be happily add more of them. Cheers, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! -- -- Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Latest git results in massive NAN errors with Tu154B
Updated my copy yesterday and now I cannot load flightgear with the Tu154B anymore. Trying just results in massive amounts of NAN errors and crash. Looks like the entire property tree and everything else got NaNifiedsee log. Anyone have any clues what may have changed to cause this? Aircraft hasn't changed in months and has always worked perfectly with git until this fresh build yesterday. log is here http://pastebin.com/utrUVmeu (would attach but got rejected by list mod) cheers -- Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] World Scenery Reissue?
Just tonight I have finished modeling the first skyscraper in FlightGear for Vancouver, BC, Canada. I am running FlightGear and the modeling software on an old laptop (which I am using FlightGear on solely for scenery development purposes). I downloaded the proper world scenery tile from: http://flightgear.org/Downloads/scenery-1.0.1.html I then used the ufo to fly around a bit. I did not use TerraSync. I have added a few buildings to Friday Harbor (KFHR?) and wanted to see if they showed up in the scenery. They did not. I then flew on to Seattle and I noted the scenery lacked any custom models, and the original generic skyscrapers were still in place. Finally I flew to Portland and the original generic skyscrapers were also in place. I am wondering, therefore, given the current difficulty in mass-generating new terrain from the mapserver, how difficult it would be to push what is in the current TerraSync directory out as World Scenery 1.1.0? There would be a number of new models, and I think Hawai'i would have better scenery, but it would mean there is a new scenery release which would basically coincide with the release of the new version. While those who have been using TerraSync would not notice any improvement, those who don't would notice at least 400 unique models in their scenery contributed over the course of over two years. Of course when we are ready to generate terrain from the mapserver, this would be World Scenery 2.0.0 - and the most important FlightGear scenery release for almost a decade, Cheers John -- Gaining the trust of online customers is vital for the success of any company that requires sensitive data to be transmitted over the Web. Learn how to best implement a security strategy that keeps consumers' information secure and instills the confidence they need to proceed with transactions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
