[Flightgear-devel] Autopilot, Way point, GPS definitively broken ?
Hello, For the record With FG Git : I cannot get working the autopilot with the route manager, we had an automatic update of the autopilot box , by getting a GPS button , when a way point was activated within the route manager. That feature is not longer working. We had within the GPS box ( menu equipment gps ) , within closest or search by name , the required airport id. That feature is not longer working Thank Ahmad -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autopilot, Way point, GPS definitively broken ?
The autopilot and route manager are working for me in Boeing 777-200, but the airport/waypoint lookup box in the GPS window is missing. Saikrishna Arcot On Sun 16 Jun 2013 07:09:22 AM CDT, grtuxhangar team wrote: Hello, For the record With FG Git : I cannot get working the autopilot with the route manager, we had an automatic update of the autopilot box , by getting a GPS button , when a way point was activated within the route manager. That feature is not longer working. We had within the GPS box ( menu equipment gps ) , within closest or search by name , the required airport id. That feature is not longer working Thank Ahmad -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autopilot, Way point, GPS definitively broken ?
On 16 Jun 2013, at 13:09, grtuxhangar team hohora...@gmail.com wrote: For the record With FG Git : I cannot get working the autopilot with the route manager, we had an automatic update of the autopilot box , by getting a GPS button , when a way point was activated within the route manager. That feature is not longer working. We had within the GPS box ( menu equipment gps ) , within closest or search by name , the required airport id. That feature is not longer working They're temporarily broken, not definitively broken :) I was travelling most of last week and then had to rebuild my laptop due to a failed hard-drive, later today / next week I'll be looking at a collection of related route-manager / flight-plan / GPS issues. It will help to have very precise test cases in the bug-tracker, since when I did some limited testing two weeks ago, I found searching by nearest or name did work. So really I would like to see very exact steps to reproduce, not simple 'is not working'. Regards, James -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Rembrandt performance
Hello, You may want some screenshots which expose the performances with rembrandt at WAAJ and the PAF team DR-400 and the computer with Nvidia GPU 560 TI i refer to . It could help you to understand why you are getting that poor performances with your pretty fast beast GTX 670M. Let's consider right now the 560 TI is an old outdated GPU. https://3291185c-a-62cb3a1a-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/grtuxhangarctd/other-download/fgfs-screen-506.jpg https://3291185c-a-62cb3a1a-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/grtuxhangarctd/other-download/fgfs-screen-508.jpg https://3291185c-a-62cb3a1a-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/grtuxhangarctd/other-download/fgfs-screen-510.jpg and the screenshot which expose the cpu / gpu system usage https://3291185c-a-62cb3a1a-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/grtuxhangarctd/other-download/Flightgear-cpu-gpu_resource.jpg Thank Ahmad On 15 June 2013 13:42, grtuxhangar team hohora...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Just tested with an other computer 2x GPU 560 TI /SLI screen 1900x1200. better than mine. At WAAJ and the PAF team DR-400 Getting an average of 50 fps: rembrandt-enabled , real weather fetch, shaders water 5, urban 3, model 3, and multithreading ( the whole cpu loading is only at 25 % ). Nvidia FXAA , anisotropic filtering x16, texture sharpening. Since SLI does not improve the display with FG we may consider these performances to be compared with yours. Ahmad On 13 June 2013 12:09, Renk Thorsten thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote: Which screen size ? With my old GPU Geforce 9600 GT at 1024x800 i never got less than 24 fps (usually 30 fps). It is when using FG 2.10. Decreasing on the fly the screen size increase the fps. Yeah, well, fragment shader load (and hence deferred rendering) scales with the number of pixels. My fullscreen is 1920x1080, which means I have about 2.5 times the pixel number of your screen, which means that if I scale your 24 fps to my screen, I would get about 9-10 fps. If I decrease that by the 30% you mention (since I run recent GIT), then I'd end up with 6 fps compared with my 15, which doesn't seem grossly out of place. But to render 2 megapixels isn't an unusual demand - that's about what the human eye can resolve from a normal view distance. * Thorsten -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autopilot, Way point, GPS definitively broken ?
Hello, It will help to have very precise test cases in the bug-tracker, since when I did some limited testing two weeks ago, I found searching by nearest or name did work. So really I would like to see very exact steps to reproduce, not simple 'is not working'. Which become an other topic :) The last time i notified a bug within bug-tracker ( was bug to me since was working with previous version ) i got an answer your request is a new feature Since to me, by using the devel list it can open a talk about the issue if it is an issue. Thank BTW: i did notice the problem with a simple aircraft without any embedded NAV AP ( Cub ) Ahmad On 16 June 2013 15:05, James Turner zakal...@mac.com wrote: On 16 Jun 2013, at 13:09, grtuxhangar team hohora...@gmail.com wrote: For the record With FG Git : I cannot get working the autopilot with the route manager, we had an automatic update of the autopilot box , by getting a GPS button , when a way point was activated within the route manager. That feature is not longer working. We had within the GPS box ( menu equipment gps ) , within closest or search by name , the required airport id. That feature is not longer working They're temporarily broken, not definitively broken :) I was travelling most of last week and then had to rebuild my laptop due to a failed hard-drive, later today / next week I'll be looking at a collection of related route-manager / flight-plan / GPS issues. It will help to have very precise test cases in the bug-tracker, since when I did some limited testing two weeks ago, I found searching by nearest or name did work. So really I would like to see very exact steps to reproduce, not simple 'is not working'. Regards, James -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autopilot, Way point, GPS definitively broken ?
On 16 Jun 2013, at 13:09, grtuxhangar team hohora...@gmail.com wrote: I cannot get working the autopilot with the route manager, we had an automatic update of the autopilot box , by getting a GPS button , when a way point was activated within the route manager. That feature is not longer working. I need some help understanding this one, since you don't like to use the bug tracker please list the exact steps to reproduce the issue. We had within the GPS box ( menu equipment gps ) , within closest or search by name , the required airport id. That feature is not longer working I've just pushed a fix to the GPS box which should fix this issue, please test and let me know. (fix is in fgdata) Thanks, James-- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autopilot, Way point, GPS definitively broken ?
Yes, i can first, the screenshot done with my working FG version ( was an old GIT version ) with its own fgdata https://3291185c-a-62cb3a1a-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/grtuxhangarctd/other-download/fgfs-screen-511.jpg you can notice within the autopilot box Heading setting the GPS/FMS heading is exposed after i had Activated within the Route Manager the airport way point (KSFO) and the screenshot done with the last FG Git version with the last fgdata you can notice within the autopilot box Heading setting the GPS/FMS is missing, in spite of i had Activated within the Route Manager the airport way point (KSFO) https://3291185c-a-62cb3a1a-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/grtuxhangarctd/other-download/fgfs-screen-512.jpg Both same place , same computer.. Thank Ahmad On 16 June 2013 16:10, James Turner zakal...@mac.com wrote: On 16 Jun 2013, at 13:09, grtuxhangar team hohora...@gmail.com wrote: I cannot get working the autopilot with the route manager, we had an automatic update of the autopilot box , by getting a GPS button , when a way point was activated within the route manager. That feature is not longer working. I need some help understanding this one, since you don't like to use the bug tracker please list the exact steps to reproduce the issue. We had within the GPS box ( menu equipment gps ) , within closest or search by name , the required airport id. That feature is not longer working I've just pushed a fix to the GPS box which should fix this issue, please test and let me know. (fix is in fgdata) Thanks, James -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Turbulence should affect YaSim and JSBSim the same way
Hi, I have been looking over the FG code for sometime and would like to start contributing to the project. I just browsed through the open items and figured out Turbulence should affect YaSim and JSBSim the same way issue in 3.0 backlog. As the first step, I am trying grasp YaSim and JSBSim approaches. I just would like to ask if anybody else is working on this. And if not, can anyone help/guide me through drafting a solution. Regards, -- Umut DURAK, Ph.D. http://www.metu.edu.tr/~udurak/ -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autopilot, Way point, GPS definitively broken ?
On 16 Jun 2013, at 15:46, grtuxhangar team hohora...@gmail.com wrote: Both same place , same computer.. I've just pushed a fix to FlightGear, which fixes part of this for the Cub. Please test and let me know if things are improved! Regards, James-- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Turbulence should affect YaSim and JSBSim the same way
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 23:03:21 +0300, Umut wrote in message candytvdfry0hsmpts0+ul4yvhgagtb2ggzpenpbml8kci7k...@mail.gmail.com: Hi, I have been looking over the FG code for sometime and would like to start contributing to the project. I just browsed through the open items and figured out Turbulence should affect YaSim and JSBSim the same way issue in 3.0 backlog. As the first step, I am trying grasp YaSim and JSBSim approaches. ..my oversimplification: http://wiki.flightgear.org/YASim guesses how it flies from how it looks, while http://wiki.flightgear.org/JSBSim knows how it flies and tries to show us how that looks, e.g. stalls are assymetrical in YASim but (still?) symmetrical in JSBSim. ..if I guess FG progress correctly, we need to model downwash correctly, and if you want assymetrical stalls in JSBSim, you need 2 halved JSBSim models per plane so each wing etc surface calculation is run independently. I just would like to ask if anybody else is working on this. And if not, can anyone help/guide me through drafting a solution. Regards, -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Turbulence should affect YaSim and JSBSim the same way
..my oversimplification: http://wiki.flightgear.org/YASim guesses how it flies from how it looks, while http://wiki.flightgear.org/JSBSim knows how it flies and tries to show us how that looks, e.g. stalls are assymetrical in YASim but (still?) symmetrical in JSBSim. ..if I guess FG progress correctly, we need to model downwash correctly, and if you want assymetrical stalls in JSBSim, you need 2 halved JSBSim models per plane so each wing etc surface calculation is run independently. I have not tried modeling a piston aircraft in quite some time. [Hal Engel's P-51D does stall in either direction, does it not?] In any case, it should be possible to model aerodynamic effects from the propeller in the XML model file for any JSBSim aircraft (in the aerodynamics section) - effects that would affect stalling, I suspect. It's not that JSBSim doesn't support asymmetric stalls - JSBSim doesn't *not* support it. But, I'm not sure anyone has crafted the aerodynamic/propulsion interactions that would effect that. This isn't necessarily the fault of users, either. We (JSBSim development community) would ideally make available more examples and documentation. JB -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
