[Flightgear-devel] Former AI Plans - revived?

2011-09-17 Thread Cedric Sodhi
Hello, I'm ManDay

(It has been critizised that I did not choose my nickname as a listname,
so I wanted to tell you who I am, in case you didn't know).

Just today, I received a PM from Hooray on the forums, mentioning my
draft proposal for a strategy to implement AI ATC in Flightgear. Sadly,
the thread received little feedback back then. Durk, to my knowledge,
was still somewhere on the move, too.

Meanwhile, so I've heard, he has made some efforts to implement basic
ATC with takeoff permission, so I've understood.

Nevertheless I'm still convinced of the proposal I've made and I was
hoping that you might revisit and reconsider it - possibly giving
feedback on how eligible you deem it.

http://flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?p=115173

regards,
ManDay

--
BlackBerryreg; DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy2
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Former AI Plans - revived?

2011-09-17 Thread Durk Talsma
Hi,
On 17 Sep 2011, at 21:04, Cedric Sodhi wrote:

 
 Just today, I received a PM from Hooray on the forums, mentioning my
 draft proposal for a strategy to implement AI ATC in Flightgear. Sadly,
 the thread received little feedback back then. Durk, to my knowledge,
 was still somewhere on the move, too.
 
 Meanwhile, so I've heard, he has made some efforts to implement basic
 ATC with takeoff permission, so I've understood.
 
Yeah that's right. Life\s been pretty busy in the beginning of the year. I do 
recall receiving an email from you almost a year ago. But, back then, I was at 
a conference, and with a very busy teaching program taking up most of my time 
after I came back, I had to put much of my flightgear activities on the 
back-burner. I just had a quick look at your pdf. While there are some parts 
that I immediately agree with, there are also a few other parts that I need to 
think a little more about. I hope to have a look at you pdf in more detail in 
the next few weeks and give you some more comments as I go through. 

My first impression after glancing through your pdf is that you'd probably be 
surprised how much of what you propose is either already implement (at least in 
terms of hooks and building blocks)  or on the drawing board. But, there is 
still plenty of stuff left to do. More comments will follow as I think about it 
a little more.

Cheers,
Durk
--
BlackBerryreg; DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy2
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel