Re: [Flightgear-devel] HUP Retriever , an other Piasecki helicopter

2007-11-13 Thread gerard robin
On mar 13 novembre 2007, Georg Vollnhals wrote:



 Hi Gérard,

 although your H 21 flies very nice (and has an exellent  3D-model,
 eye-candy!)  I have the same  yaw-problem - reaction is very slow and
 damped.  This  makes  procedures nearly impossible like  going down to
 your selected  landing-area against  the wind,  then  turning
 (yaw-axis)  the helo  at  very  low  height  (very low speed or
 hovering) to fit your landing-place.
 Once again, I do know not so much about real-life tandem-rotor
 helicopter flight behaviour, it is just common sense that this
 low-yaw-reaction/low-yaw-power is somehow noticeable.

 Georg

Hello Georg,

Thanks for your feedback.
I conclude that i have to do more and more tuning.

May be with that existing  great  helicopter yasim code source   from Maik we 
have reach the limit. 

My previous mail was mainly to say that i could notice some actions  (good or 
bad) from the ballast definition to the fly quality.   
My first tests were crazy (helicopter sliding on the side, and a huge yaw 
problem), the helicopter was unable to fly straight ahead.
May be the yaw problem is only due to that ballast definition, may be there is 
some more complex   interactions. 
Could be an open Question :)

Cheers




-- 
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] HUP Retriever , an other Piasecki helicopter

2007-11-13 Thread Maik Justus
Hi Gérard,

gerard robin schrieb am 13.11.2007 12:59:
 On mar 13 novembre 2007, Georg Vollnhals wrote:
   

   
 Hi Gérard,

 although your H 21 flies very nice (and has an exellent  3D-model,
 eye-candy!)  I have the same  yaw-problem - reaction is very slow and
 damped.  This  makes  procedures nearly impossible like  going down to
 your selected  landing-area against  the wind,  then  turning
 (yaw-axis)  the helo  at  very  low  height  (very low speed or
 hovering) to fit your landing-place.
 Once again, I do know not so much about real-life tandem-rotor
 helicopter flight behaviour, it is just common sense that this
 low-yaw-reaction/low-yaw-power is somehow noticeable.

 Georg

 
 Hello Georg,

 Thanks for your feedback.
 I conclude that i have to do more and more tuning.

 May be with that existing  great  helicopter yasim code source   from Maik we 
 have reach the limit. 

   
no, I am sure that don't reached any limit here.
 My previous mail was mainly to say that i could notice some actions  (good or 
 bad) from the ballast definition to the fly quality.   
 My first tests were crazy (helicopter sliding on the side, and a huge yaw 
 problem), the helicopter was unable to fly straight ahead.
 May be the yaw problem is only due to that ballast definition, may be there 
 is 
 some more complex   interactions. 
   
The yaw problem is rather complex. It is the result of tilting one rotor 
to one side and the other to the opposite direction. This results in a 
yaw-moment on the fuselage. The resulting yaw rotation depends on many 
parameters:
- the tilt angle of the rotors (which depends on the CYCLICAIL control 
input and min-, maxcyclicail, on delta3, rellenflaphinge, 
relbladecenter, weightperblade, the airfoil parameters, delta, 
cyclic-factor, and the blade geometry; most of these parameters we do 
not know.)
- the interaction of the downwash (and remaining air) with the 
(rotating) fuselage, gears and stabs (downwashfactor, yasimdragfactor, 
yasimliftfactor, geometry of fuselage, gears and stabs)
- the weight distribution (the gravity tensor) of the whole helicopter.

Unfortunately these parameters are not independent of each other and 
some of them are not linear (and for some the derivation changes the 
sign)

And we even do not know, which is the maximum yaw-rate of the real 
helicopter.

Conclusion: The yaw rate is one of the complexest values simulating a 
tandem helicopter.

 Could be an open Question :)

 Cheers


   
Regards,
Maik


   


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] HUP Retriever , an other Piasecki helicopter

2007-11-12 Thread Maik Justus
Hi gérard,

Great helicopter. Nice addon to flightgear.
By the way: Watching the HUP I got aware, that there is a problem with 
the animation of the flapping angle of the blades. The problem is the 
missing documentation of the output of the the rotor simulation in the 
property tree. If position-deg is 0, then the blade is pointing 
backwards (and to be honest, I thought it means it points forward :-(   )
The animation assumes, that position-deg == 0 means the blade is 
pointing forward. Therefore the tilting of the rotor seem to be 
inversed. The rotation needs a 180deg offset. (by adding another 180deg 
offset to the yasim-xml file (phi0 = 0) the starting position of the 
rotor would remain the same).
The same is necessary at the H-21.

I think I need to improve the documentation in that point...

Maik

gerard robin schrieb am 12.11.2007 02:48:
 Hello

 An other model of an ancestor helicopter, the HUP Retriever ,which was 
 developed by Piasecki, is available on CVS.
 It was a rescue helicopter, with To provide rescue without crew assistance, a 
 door (under the copilot seat) , available after folding the copilot’s seat 
 forward, opened through which a rescue sling could be lowered from an 
 overhead winch. 
 That helicopter was used by the U.S. Navy and Army (from 1949 to 1964), it 
 was 
 also delivered to the Canadian and French Navies (in service from  1953 to 
 1965)


 The model is under construction.
 The FDM is a guess.
 Mainly to do:
  -the instruments, 
  -the landing gear animations
  -liveries variant

 Here  snapshots
 http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/HUP-img1.jpg
 http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/HUP-img2.jpg


 Cheers

   


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] HUP Retriever , an other Piasecki helicopter

2007-11-12 Thread gerard robin
On lun 12 novembre 2007, Maik Justus wrote:
 Hi gérard,

 Great helicopter. Nice addon to flightgear.
 By the way: Watching the HUP I got aware, that there is a problem with
 the animation of the flapping angle of the blades. The problem is the
 missing documentation of the output of the the rotor simulation in the
 property tree. If position-deg is 0, then the blade is pointing
 backwards (and to be honest, I thought it means it points forward :-(   )
 The animation assumes, that position-deg == 0 means the blade is
 pointing forward. Therefore the tilting of the rotor seem to be
 inversed. The rotation needs a 180deg offset. (by adding another 180deg
 offset to the yasim-xml file (phi0 = 0) the starting position of the
 rotor would remain the same).
 The same is necessary at the H-21.

 I think I need to improve the documentation in that point...

 Maik


Hello Maik,

Does that position-deg == 0   inverted,  specific to HUP and H-21 or a generic 
problem to any helicopter which blade Zero is drawn pointing forward ?
The S-51 could have the same error, and looking at the nice new CH47 it   
seems to want the 180 offset.
I did not checked the others choppers.

Cheers
-- 
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] HUP Retriever , an other Piasecki helicopter

2007-11-12 Thread Maik Justus
Hello Gerard,

it's generic. I need to check, which helicopters are doing it correct 
and which helicopters are doing it as one would expect (0 deg  = 
forward) and which helicopters do not depend on this flapping angle (you 
can use cone-deg, roll-deg and cone-deg instead). Maybe it is easier to 
modify the source than to modify many helicopters.

Maik

gerard robin schrieb am 13.11.2007 01:39:
 On lun 12 novembre 2007, Maik Justus wrote:
   
 Hi gérard,

 Great helicopter. Nice addon to flightgear.
 By the way: Watching the HUP I got aware, that there is a problem with
 the animation of the flapping angle of the blades. The problem is the
 missing documentation of the output of the the rotor simulation in the
 property tree. If position-deg is 0, then the blade is pointing
 backwards (and to be honest, I thought it means it points forward :-(   )
 The animation assumes, that position-deg == 0 means the blade is
 pointing forward. Therefore the tilting of the rotor seem to be
 inversed. The rotation needs a 180deg offset. (by adding another 180deg
 offset to the yasim-xml file (phi0 = 0) the starting position of the
 rotor would remain the same).
 The same is necessary at the H-21.

 I think I need to improve the documentation in that point...

 Maik

 

 Hello Maik,

 Does that position-deg == 0   inverted,  specific to HUP and H-21 or a 
 generic 
 problem to any helicopter which blade Zero is drawn pointing forward ?
 The S-51 could have the same error, and looking at the nice new CH47 it   
 seems to want the 180 offset.
 I did not checked the others choppers.

 Cheers
   


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] HUP Retriever , an other Piasecki helicopter

2007-11-12 Thread gerard robin
On mar 13 novembre 2007, Maik Justus wrote:
 Hello Gerard,

 it's generic. I need to check, which helicopters are doing it correct
 and which helicopters are doing it as one would expect (0 deg  =
 forward) and which helicopters do not depend on this flapping angle (you
 can use cone-deg, roll-deg and cone-deg instead). Maybe it is easier to
 modify the source than to modify many helicopters.

 Maik

Hello Maik,

To me, i have done a modular .xml  and drawing .ac file system, so i can 
modify easily,  theses animations, or  to add another 180deg  offset to the 
yasim-xml file (phi0 = 0) , like you told me.
No problem :)

Cheers

-- 
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] HUP Retriever , an other Piasecki helicopter

2007-11-12 Thread Georg Vollnhals
Hi Maik,

now as we have several tandem-rotor helicopters I would like to ask
wheather the yaw-axis treatment of the helo flightmodel is satisfying or
has to be polished up a little. Or if this is just up to the creator of
such a helo how to implement better.

As for the nice HUP I can get some yaw movement but only if I apply
*full* pedal either left or right  (and the reaction is  pretty tame and
only  when hovering/at very low speed).
The CH47  reacts a little  better but has a  heavy  roll  tendency 
when  pedal is  used, strange for me as this helo is said to be very
stable when doing tasks like logging (civil version, Columbia helicopter).

Just a question what you are thinking about this :-)
Thank you for your reply.

Regards
Georg EDDW
 

 

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] HUP Retriever , an other Piasecki helicopter

2007-11-12 Thread gerard robin
On mar 13 novembre 2007, Georg Vollnhals wrote:
 Hi Maik,

 now as we have several tandem-rotor helicopters I would like to ask
 wheather the yaw-axis treatment of the helo flightmodel is satisfying or
 has to be polished up a little. Or if this is just up to the creator of
 such a helo how to implement better.

 As for the nice HUP I can get some yaw movement but only if I apply
 *full* pedal either left or right  (and the reaction is  pretty tame and
 only  when hovering/at very low speed).
 The CH47  reacts a little  better but has a  heavy  roll  tendency
 when  pedal is  used, strange for me as this helo is said to be very
 stable when doing tasks like logging (civil version, Columbia helicopter).

 Just a question what you are thinking about this :-)
 Thank you for your reply.

 Regards
 Georg EDDW


Hello Georg,

You are right and probably, Maik could give us some better tuning.
However when doing the H-21 FDM i could notice that we get some diff about the 
yaw reaction, according to the values and  position of the ballast (with 
respect in any case of the CG position), and the best we get with yaw gives 
the best on the ground position, i mean the helicopter does not slide on the 
side.
I do not pretend that the H-21 is right, it is only a remark  :) .

I am working on the HUP in order to get the same result.

Cheers

-- 
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


Re: [Flightgear-devel] HUP Retriever , an other Piasecki helicopter

2007-11-12 Thread Georg Vollnhals
gerard robin schrieb:

 Hello Georg,

 You are right and probably, Maik could give us some better tuning.
 However when doing the H-21 FDM i could notice that we get some diff about 
 the 
 yaw reaction, according to the values and  position of the ballast (with 
 respect in any case of the CG position), and the best we get with yaw gives 
 the best on the ground position, i mean the helicopter does not slide on the 
 side.
 I do not pretend that the H-21 is right, it is only a remark  :) .

 I am working on the HUP in order to get the same result.

 Cheers

   
Hi Gérard,

although your H 21 flies very nice (and has an exellent  3D-model,
eye-candy!)  I have the same  yaw-problem - reaction is very slow and 
damped.  This  makes  procedures nearly impossible like  going down to
your selected  landing-area against  the wind,  then  turning
(yaw-axis)  the helo  at  very  low  height  (very low speed or
hovering) to fit your landing-place.
Once again, I do know not so much about real-life tandem-rotor
helicopter flight behaviour, it is just common sense that this
low-yaw-reaction/low-yaw-power is somehow noticeable.

Georg

-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


[Flightgear-devel] HUP Retriever , an other Piasecki helicopter

2007-11-11 Thread gerard robin
Hello

An other model of an ancestor helicopter, the HUP Retriever ,which was 
developed by Piasecki, is available on CVS.
It was a rescue helicopter, with To provide rescue without crew assistance, a 
door (under the copilot seat) , available after folding the copilot’s seat 
forward, opened through which a rescue sling could be lowered from an 
overhead winch. 
That helicopter was used by the U.S. Navy and Army (from 1949 to 1964), it was 
also delivered to the Canadian and French Navies (in service from  1953 to 
1965)


The model is under construction.
The FDM is a guess.
Mainly to do:
 -the instruments, 
 -the landing gear animations
 -liveries variant

Here  snapshots
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/HUP-img1.jpg
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/HUP-img2.jpg


Cheers

-- 
Gérard
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/


-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now  http://get.splunk.com/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel