DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41649] - fop0.93 - Does not generate svg line or svg rectable, used to work in fop0.91beta
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41649. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41649 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-05 00:21 --- Appears to be a known issue http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/faq.html#svg-attribute-required My work-arround was to put the svg in an external file. Sean -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41995] - [PATCH] Barcode Support for AFP Renderer
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41995. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41995 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-05 01:28 --- The BDD specifies the size of the bar code presentation space, the type of bar code to be generated, and the parameters used to generate the bar code symbols. The data portion of the BDD structured field is defined in Bar Code Symbol Descriptor (BSD), I didn't see much benefit in havng this in a seperate BSD object. See page 112 of the BCOCA Reference manual. I'm not sure that setters on the BCOCA model are a ideal solution. I think we'd still need BCOCA objects representing the different barcodes and for these to have the setters. This then starts to replicate the beans in barcode4j, hence the interface suggestion. For example the PDF417 barcode requires a special functions in the BarcodeData object to set the error correction level and number of columns. Let me know how you get on and if you want me to pick anything up. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41831] - [PATCH] Refactored configuration, font detection and caching, url resolution
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41831. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41831 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-05 11:21 --- (In reply to comment #21) Hi Keith / Adrian, ... I wonder whether it is worth changing this log from info to debug after the first run (FontInfoFinder line 151). If you have a lot of fonts, it can produce several pages of messages (mainly from /usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts on my system). Indeed, I tend to agree with Keith here. Adrian, what do you think? Of course, the issue is rendered moot once we're talking about servlet environments. Still, we do have CLI users to take into account... Cheers, Andreas -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41831] - [PATCH] Refactored configuration, font detection and caching, url resolution
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41831. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41831 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-05 11:33 --- (In reply to comment #20) Hi Adrian, Andreas, this patch is getting a little out of date with the trunk now - if you need me to create a fresh patch from the latest trunk code let me know. Just a little nit: the last attachment does not include an updated NativeFontDirFinder, while at least the addition of a 'fontPaths' member seems to have changed...? Is it possible this was changed, or did I miss something? Cheers, Andreas -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Re: startPageSequence() in Renderer interface
On Apr 4, 2007, at 16:42, Adrian Cumiskey wrote: Hi Adrian / Jeremias, snip / Speak now or forever hold your peace :-) This is not very helpful, despite the smiley. Besides, things change. Your post is the best example of that. Well, maybe I'm missing a joke not being native English speaking. I will try to be less playful with my language in future so as to not cause any unnecessary confusion. Please don't let one misunderstanding hold you back here. If it 'slips' out as it were, so be it. If someone misunderstands, then there is always the possibility for further explanation. There have been times when I myself caused much worse misunderstandings (mainly by /not/ including emoticons). Also, only recently, Jeremias himself added a note to a bug which apparently did not sit too well with Joe, the Reporter... :-) I got the drift of the above expression without further explanation (and English is not my mother tongue either...) Freedom of expression is higher up on my list than avoiding misunderstandings. (To make the latter work, /everyone/ should keep their thoughts to themselves ;-)) Cheers, Andreas
