DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37236] [PATCH] Fix gradients and patterns
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37236 taffy-tyler6...@hotmail.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||taffy-tyler6...@hotmail.co. ||uk -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37236] [PATCH] Fix gradients and patterns
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37236 Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 --- Comment #15 from Glenn Adams gad...@apache.org 2012-04-11 03:21:04 UTC --- increase priority for bugs with a patch -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37236] [PATCH] Fix gradients and patterns
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37236 --- Comment #14 from Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com 2012-04-07 01:42:45 UTC --- resetting P2 open bugs to P3 pending further review -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37236] [PATCH] Fix gradients and patterns
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37236 Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37236] - [PATCH] Fix gradients and patterns
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37236. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37236 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-14 14:29 --- (In reply to comment #11) Patch #10 applied. Thanks. I'm looking forward to moving the Transcoders out after the FOP release. :-) It will likely make this stuff easier to track. Is there anything outstanding concerning this bug or can we close it? As I see it there are two outstanding issues: 1) 'Complex' patterns on Text - While it is probably a 5% case it's bad that things won't work. 2) The overflow for pattern case being commented out. I would lean towards saying this is still broken enough to leave the bug open, but it's not my bug DB (so to speak). Having it open makes it at least possible that someone will have an answer to their question. It starts to get confusing which patches are to be applied and so on. Yes, I strongly considered going to a single PDFTranscoder patch instead of trying to track everything seperately. I assume you'll also help track the currently commented part that we'll have to uncomment as soon as we can rely on a later Batik version. I'll try and make sure of it. What do you think of a Batik 1.6.1 release? There are a number of small but significant improvements in Batik since 1.6.1. The real hurdle would be straightening out the XML lib lincensing (which really needs to be fixed anyways). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37236] - [PATCH] Fix gradients and patterns
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37236. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37236 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-14 17:07 --- (In reply to comment #12) snip/ Is there anything outstanding concerning this bug or can we close it? As I see it there are two outstanding issues: 1) 'Complex' patterns on Text - While it is probably a 5% case it's bad that things won't work. 2) The overflow for pattern case being commented out. I would lean towards saying this is still broken enough to leave the bug open, but it's not my bug DB (so to speak). Having it open makes it at least possible that someone will have an answer to their question. Ok. snip/ I assume you'll also help track the currently commented part that we'll have to uncomment as soon as we can rely on a later Batik version. I'll try and make sure of it. What do you think of a Batik 1.6.1 release? There are a number of small but significant improvements in Batik since 1.6.1. The real hurdle would be straightening out the XML lib lincensing (which really needs to be fixed anyways). It's on my list to help you with the XML libs as soon as the FOP release is off my desk. Anyway, I think a Batik 1.6.1 is a good idea. A lot of things have been done since the last release. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37236] - [PATCH] Fix gradients and patterns
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37236. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37236 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #16837|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-02 12:56 --- Created an attachment (id=16853) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16853action=view) Update to gradient repeat, fixed createGraphics problem. This patch is an update to 16837. It indirects the access to jpegCount so all the PDFGraphics2D share a common count. This prevents inadvertant reuse of the wrong image. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37236] - [PATCH] Fix gradients and patterns
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37236. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37236 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-30 21:54 --- Created an attachment (id=16837) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16837action=view) Adds support for gradient repeat and transparency through rasterization This patch adds the ability to rasterize 'unknown' paints or paints that can't be mapped natively to PDF. This includes gradients with repeats, and or transparent stops. This patch covers fill and stroke, however it does not handle text. This is because currently it works by treating the paint as an image which it clips with the path to be filled (it strokes the path using the JDK and the just 'fills' it). For text this would require turning the text into outlines. A better way to do this would be to turn the image into a tile pattern (which would be expected to be used only once), but the transforms to pull this off are non-trivial, also I'm not sure I know quite enough PDF to get this right. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
