Re: [fop] FOP for XML - FO?
Robert P. J. Day wrote: ah, i hadn't noticed that, thanks. and i realize that this may be painfully obvious, but it's important for me that invoking this xalan.bat to generate the intermediate FO would produce exactly the same intermediate FO that would be generated by going directly from XML+XSL - PDF. (since FOP would simply call xalan underneath to do the XSLT transformation, it seems that this would be obvious.) Serialization of the intermediate result may fubar the whole thing, if you use disable-outpur-escaping, output indentation and perhaps a few other unpleasant tricks. J.Pietschmann - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [fop] FOP for XML - FO?
because that is an XSLT transformation bye From: Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] it's not mentioned in the online help, so i just wanted to verify that there's no XML - FO transform supported by FOP, which would allow me to examine the intermediate FO before going on to generate the final PDF. is this the case? rday - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [fop] FOP for XML - FO?
On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Fabrizio Tringali wrote: because that is an XSLT transformation bye From: Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] it's not mentioned in the online help, so i just wanted to verify that there's no XML - FO transform supported by FOP, which would allow me to examine the intermediate FO before going on to generate the final PDF. is this the case? oh, i understand that. it's just that, since FOP already supports XML+XSL - FO, it must already be invoking what i assume is xalan/xerces underneath to generate the FO, yes? i assume that i could always invoke xalan directly to do the XSLT transformation, but it would just have been convenient if FOP supported that directly from the command line. no big deal. rday - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [fop] FOP for XML - FO?
FOP supports FO-PDF. My impression is it does not support XML+XSL-FO. quote: oh, i understand that. it's just that, since FOP already supportsXML+XSL - FO, it must already be invoking what i assume isxalan/xerces underneath to generate the FO, yes? Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
Re: [fop] FOP for XML - FO?
Starting with FOP 0.20.5rc2 FOP contains a xalan.bat to do just that. On 11.04.2003 15:25:25 Steve Guo wrote: FOP supports FO-PDF. My impression is it does not support XML+XSL-FO. quote: oh, i understand that. it's just that, since FOP already supports XML+XSL - FO, it must already be invoking what i assume is xalan/xerces underneath to generate the FO, yes? Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [fop] FOP for XML - FO?
On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Jeremias Maerki wrote: Starting with FOP 0.20.5rc2 FOP contains a xalan.bat to do just that. ah, i hadn't noticed that, thanks. and i realize that this may be painfully obvious, but it's important for me that invoking this xalan.bat to generate the intermediate FO would produce exactly the same intermediate FO that would be generated by going directly from XML+XSL - PDF. (since FOP would simply call xalan underneath to do the XSLT transformation, it seems that this would be obvious.) thanks for the pointer to xalan.bat. rday p.s. and on another note, i'm just getting back to seeing how well FOP supports docbook, as i'm about to start converting a bunch of courseware manuals into docbook. if anyone out there has been heavily involved with FOP and docbook, drop me a line. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [fop] FOP for XML - FO?
Robert P. J. Day wrote: Starting with FOP 0.20.5rc2 FOP contains a xalan.bat to do just that. ah, i hadn't noticed that, thanks. and i realize that this may be painfully obvious, but it's important for me that invoking this xalan.bat to generate the intermediate FO would produce exactly the same intermediate FO that would be generated by going directly from XML+XSL - PDF. (since FOP would simply call xalan underneath to do the XSLT transformation, it seems that this would be obvious.) Your assumption is almost certainly true, but the easiest way to make sure is to use the xalan.bat to produce the fo file, then use fop.bat to convert that fo file (not the original xml file) to your output format. Victor Mote - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
