Re: page-number-citation change btw .20.5 and .92beta?

[J.Pietschmann]

Mark_Fletcher wrote:

I'm trying to upgrade a conversion to use .92beta instead of .20.5. One
thing that's breaking is that my page numbers in the TOC don't show up in
the PDF file anymore. Has something changed in this implementation?


The new layout engine is an almost complete new implementation,
so yes, there has something changed.

The new release still has some problems with forward referencing page
number citations, although problems causing the whole number to
disappear should have been fixed meanwhile. The only way around seems
to be to avoid forward references, i.e. putting the TOC at the end
of the document.

Another hint:

Introduction


FOP 0.92ff is more compliant than 0.20.5, which means that processing
fo:inline is much more expensive now. You should use fo:wrapper for
changing font styles.

J.Pietschmann

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

page-number-citation change btw .20.5 and .92beta?

[Mark_Fletcher]

Hi,

I'm trying to upgrade a conversion to use .92beta instead of .20.5. One
thing that's breaking is that my page numbers in the TOC don't show up in
the PDF file anymore. Has something changed in this implementation? Here's a
snippiet of my generated .fo code:


Introduction




(This id does exist in the file, BTW.) In the output, I see Introduction and
the dot leader, but no page number.

FWIW, I'm using Acrobat Reader 6.0.

Thanks for any help!
--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/page-number-citation-change-btw-.20.5-and-.92beta--t1782147.html#a4852988
Sent from the FOP - Users forum at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]