Re: [foreman-dev] Ansible based foreman-installer

[Greg Sutcliffe]

On Tuesday, 14 March 2017 18:16:59 GMT Michael Hofer wrote:
> Hi Ohad
> 
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 08:45:19 +0200
> Ohad Levy  wrote:
> [...]
> 
> > Would you be interested in doing a deep dive about the installer? what it
> > currently does, how to use it etc?
> > 
> > I think it would be interesting to our increasing ansible users community.
> 
> [...]
> 
> Sure, why not! :)
> 
> Would that be a topic for a community demo?

We can do it either way (or both!). Community demo items tend to be short 
(5-10 mins tops) and stay at a high level. Deep dives obviously have more time 
to get into the details.

I'd suggest a dedicated deep dive to start with, and then you'll always be 
welcome to join the regular demos to show off latest developments in the 
Ansible installer.

If that works for you, I'll ping you offlist to sort out a date & time for the 
deep dive.

Greg
-- 
IRC / Twitter: gwmngilfen
Diaspora: gwmngil...@joindiaspora.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [foreman-dev] Ansible based foreman-installer

[Michael Hofer]

Hi Ohad

On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 08:45:19 +0200
Ohad Levy  wrote:
[...]
> Would you be interested in doing a deep dive about the installer? what it
> currently does, how to use it etc?
> 
> I think it would be interesting to our increasing ansible users community.
[...]

Sure, why not! :)

Would that be a topic for a community demo?

Michael

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


pgpWsVbBQpxpQ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [foreman-dev] Ansible based foreman-installer

[Ohad Levy]

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Michael Hofer <
michael.ho...@adfinis-sygroup.ch> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> Some time ago there was a discussion about having an (alternative) Ansible
> based
> foreman-installer. Is someone still interested in such an implementation? I
> don't want to advertise our playbook [1] but it already provides a good
> baseline
> and we would be more than happy to contribute and improve it.
>
> [1] https://github.com/adfinis-sygroup/foreman-ansible
>
> I'm aware that maintaining 2 installers requires additional work but from
> my
> point of view it would be a great enhancement to give users the freedom and
> possibility to choose between them, especially as bigger projects (e.g.
> Openshift, also supported by Red Hat) are now using Ansible as a deployment
> tool.
>
> We would be more than happy to contribute and help improve it (e.g. more
> functionality, Ansible guidelines, documentation, change the license if
> required
> etc.).
>
> What do you think?
>

Would you be interested in doing a deep dive about the installer? what it
currently does, how to use it etc?

I think it would be interesting to our increasing ansible users community.

thanks!
Ohad

>
> Cheers
>
> Michael
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "foreman-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [foreman-dev] Ansible based foreman-installer

[Josh Baird]

Thanks for sharing this!  I'll dig through it.

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Michael Hofer <
michael.ho...@adfinis-sygroup.ch> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> Some time ago there was a discussion about having an (alternative) Ansible
> based
> foreman-installer. Is someone still interested in such an implementation? I
> don't want to advertise our playbook [1] but it already provides a good
> baseline
> and we would be more than happy to contribute and improve it.
>
> [1] https://github.com/adfinis-sygroup/foreman-ansible
>
> I'm aware that maintaining 2 installers requires additional work but from
> my
> point of view it would be a great enhancement to give users the freedom and
> possibility to choose between them, especially as bigger projects (e.g.
> Openshift, also supported by Red Hat) are now using Ansible as a deployment
> tool.
>
> We would be more than happy to contribute and help improve it (e.g. more
> functionality, Ansible guidelines, documentation, change the license if
> required
> etc.).
>
> What do you think?
>
> Cheers
>
> Michael
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "foreman-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[foreman-dev] Ansible based foreman-installer

[Michael Hofer]

Hi all

Some time ago there was a discussion about having an (alternative) Ansible based
foreman-installer. Is someone still interested in such an implementation? I
don't want to advertise our playbook [1] but it already provides a good baseline
and we would be more than happy to contribute and improve it.

[1] https://github.com/adfinis-sygroup/foreman-ansible

I'm aware that maintaining 2 installers requires additional work but from my
point of view it would be a great enhancement to give users the freedom and
possibility to choose between them, especially as bigger projects (e.g.
Openshift, also supported by Red Hat) are now using Ansible as a deployment
tool.

We would be more than happy to contribute and help improve it (e.g. more
functionality, Ansible guidelines, documentation, change the license if required
etc.).

What do you think?

Cheers

Michael

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


pgpOuLJyDEXtP.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature