Last time I used vi, it showed ^M at end of each line... does the new version
classify files as DOS/Unix and handles edits correctly?
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Stephen De Gabrielle spdegabrie...@gmail.com
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Fri, Oct 23, 2009 1:44 pm
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Developing on Unix and Windows
vi
emacs
s.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 8:09 AM, altufa...@mail.com wrote:
I'm not much familiar with editors in unix. Are there good editors in
unix that handle \r\n correctly?
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Paine jos...@letterblock.com
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: __aolWsbDateToL10n__Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:42:47
-0400__aolWsbDateToL10n__
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Developing on Unix and Windows
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 17:09 +0200, Ramon Ribó wrote:
1- A TCL file is checked in on windows
2- It is checked out on unix and line ending is \r\n
When the file is created on Windows, it should be created using unix
line endings. This is very easy to do in most editors. You can just set
it as your default and no one gets hurt. Everything except Notepad can
view it fine.
1- I create a nice README or License file for my application in unix
3- README files are open by the user (not by my that I use a
wonderful
convert-all editor). In Windows, they typically open with
Notepad.
4- The file is viewed as with one very long line
Since your end users are not likely to checkout your code from fossil, I
don't think fossil's behavior is very relevant here. Either create your
README with windows line endings, or add some kind of conversion into
your build process when you produce packages for end users.
For source code, my experience is that unix endings work everywhere for
running or viewing--except windows notepad. If there is any language
available on both windows and linux where a file will run/compile on
windows if it has windows endings *but not* if it has unix endings and
likewise will run on linux only with unix endings, then I have some
sympathy for your plight. Frankly, though, probably not enough that I
would want to see such an ugly feature built into fossil.
--
Joshua Paine
LetterBlock: Web applications built with joy
http://letterblock.com/
301-576-1920
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
--
--
Stephen De Gabrielle
stephen.degabrie...@acm.org
Telephone +44 (0)20 85670911
Mobile+44 (0)79 85189045
http://www.degabrielle.name/stephen
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users