[fossil-users] SSL support?

2010-11-03 Thread Michal Suchanek
Helllo

I tried building fossil trunk (with a few patches) and when I try to
commit fossil says:

Autosync:  https://another repo URL

fossil: HTTPS: Fossil has been compiled without SSL support

I clearly see

gcc -g -Os -Wall -DFOSSIL_ENABLE_SSL  -I. -I./src -o ./obj/http.o -c http_.c

Is SSL no longer supported or is there some issue currently?

Thanks

Michal
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] SSL support?

2010-11-03 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz wrote:

 Helllo

 I tried building fossil trunk (with a few patches) and when I try to
 commit fossil says:

 Autosync:  https://another repo URL

 fossil: HTTPS: Fossil has been compiled without SSL support

 I clearly see

 gcc -g -Os -Wall -DFOSSIL_ENABLE_SSL  -I. -I./src -o ./obj/http.o -c
 http_.c

 Is SSL no longer supported or is there some issue currently?


Works fine for me here on Linux and Mac.  Are you sure you are running the
correct binary?



 Thanks

 Michal
 ___
 fossil-users mailing list
 fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
 http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users




-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


[fossil-users] Questions about Fossil.

2010-11-03 Thread Riza Dindir
Hello,

I have been using CVS and WinCVS for a while now, and stumbled upon fossil.
I find fossil very interesting, and usefull because it provides tickets,
events, and
a wiki with it, in a standalone single package. Outstanding in my opinion.

I have a question regarding fossil and its usage. I was using CVS with
modules in the repository. I have many different directories in CVS for
example code, projects, notes, etc. Whatever you can think of. And had many
different levels of subdirectories. My CVS repository has many projects in
it. The CVSROOT is about 250 Meg and counting.

Given this picture, how could I do that in fossil effectively. Is it better
to provide different repositories for each project, or have all the CVS
repository directory structure reside in one repository file in fossil. If
that repository file (.fossil file) is a couple hundred megabytes (and it
will grow) would that have an impact in the performance, or usage of
fossil?

Another question would be... Is it possible to selectively check out
one directory and its subdirectories (a module) from the repository?

Thanks in advance for any information.

Kind regards,
rd
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] fossil local server

2010-11-03 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Riza Dindir riza.din...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello,

 I want to run the

 fossil server path/to/repo

 command. The path/to/repo has 3 fossil files (with .fossil extensions).
 When I start the above command and
 point the browser to the http://localhost:8080/repo_name it does not open
 the repository wiki site/pages.

 In the server help it says (fossil help server)

 In the 'server' command, the REPOSITORY can be a directory (aka
 folder)
 that contains one or more respositories with names ending in '.fossil'.
 In that case, the first element of the URL is used to select among the
 various repositories.

 Isn't the URL http://localhost:8080/repo_name; correct?


Is your repository named path/to/repo/repo_name.fossil?


 Kind Regards,
 rd

 ___
 fossil-users mailing list
 fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
 http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users




-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Questions about Fossil.

2010-11-03 Thread Richard Hipp
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Riza Dindir riza.din...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello,

 I have been using CVS and WinCVS for a while now, and stumbled upon fossil.
 I find fossil very interesting, and usefull because it provides tickets,
 events, and
 a wiki with it, in a standalone single package. Outstanding in my opinion.

 I have a question regarding fossil and its usage. I was using CVS with
 modules in the repository. I have many different directories in CVS for
 example code, projects, notes, etc. Whatever you can think of. And had many
 different levels of subdirectories. My CVS repository has many projects in
 it. The CVSROOT is about 250 Meg and counting.


A year and half ago, when the 9-year history of SQLlite was imported from
CVS into Fossil, the 320MB CVS repository was rendered into a 35MB Fossil
repository.  Fossil, it seems, does a much better job of compressing.  (To
be fair, most of the 320MB of CVS were contained in the CVSROOT/history
file.)  See http://www.fossil-scm.org/doc/trunk/www/stats.wiki for
additional information.





 Given this picture, how could I do that in fossil effectively. Is it better
 to provide different repositories for each project, or have all the CVS
 repository directory structure reside in one repository file in fossil. If
 that repository file (.fossil file) is a couple hundred megabytes (and it
 will grow) would that have an impact in the performance, or usage of
 fossil?


I would put each independent project in a separate repository.



 Another question would be... Is it possible to selectively check out
 one directory and its subdirectories (a module) from the repository?


Fossil does not have the concept of a module or a partial tree check-out.
You have to check out the entire tree or none at all.  This is true of all
DVCSes, as far as I am aware.



 Thanks in advance for any information.

 Kind regards,
 rd


 ___
 fossil-users mailing list
 fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
 http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users




-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Multiple fossil projects: sharing configuration

2010-11-03 Thread Laurens Van Houtven
Richard,


Thank you very much for your reply. I'm interested in REMOTE_USER: what
Fossil docs should I be reading? How does this work with cloned
repositories? (I assume these users do exist when I clone a repository?)


thanks
lvh
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] fossil local server

2010-11-03 Thread Riza Dindir
On Wed, 03 Nov, 2010 06:54:20 -0700, Laurens Van Houtven wrote

Can you try it anyway in Firefox? I had a very similar redirect loop problem
with Chrome nightlies in a different app that magically went away with FF.

lvh

I have tried that, but has the same error, that refers to recursive
behavior that
is seen in chrome. Here is the error...

  The page isn't redirecting properly

  Firefox has detected that the server is redirecting the request for
  this address in a way that will never complete.
    *   This problem can sometimes be caused by disabling or refusing to
          accept cookies.

Kind Regards,
rd
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Question about global settings

2010-11-03 Thread James Turner
So looking through the source code, I can see why the autosync global
doesn't work in my case. It would seem on repository creation, fossil
checks to see if the global autosync setting is set, if it is, it sets
the local config to whatever the global was. When a db_get is ran it
checks the local config and only if it doesn't find a match does it
check the global.

Since I changed the global autosync setting after the fact, it doesn't
get honored. So my question is, should the global config get checked
before the local config? Or should local always win?

I would think if after the fact I decided I want to turn autosync off
globally I should be able to with out having to change autosync in each
individual repository.

Feel free to let me know if I've missed some obvious behavior. Thanks.
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Question about global settings

2010-11-03 Thread altufaltu
 if it is, it sets the local config to whatever the global was.

Can you check if this is true? I'm using latest version of fossil, 
which doesn't exhibit this.

- Altu

-Original Message-
From: James Turner ja...@calminferno.net
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Thu, Nov 4, 2010 8:05 am
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Question about global settings

So looking through the source code, I can see why the autosync global
doesn't work in my case. It would seem on repository creation, fossil
checks to see if the global autosync setting is set, if it is, it sets
the local config to whatever the global was. When a db_get is ran it
checks the local config and only if it doesn't find a match does it
check the global.

Since I changed the global autosync setting after the fact, it doesn't
get honored. So my question is, should the global config get checked
before the local config? Or should local always win?

I would think if after the fact I decided I want to turn autosync off
globally I should be able to with out having to change autosync in each
individual repository.

Feel free to let me know if I've missed some obvious behavior. Thanks.
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Question about global settings

2010-11-03 Thread chi
James Turner wrote:

 Quick question, if I have autosync set to off globally but the
 repository has it set to on...who wins?

If there is no locally defined setting, it takes the global one. If
there is a local setting defined, it will beats the global one.


 From what I see the repository wins, so what does setting it
 globally get you?

That you have not to set it for every new created repository explictly.
Only if it divert from your global policy.

For me for instance: autosync, localauth and editor are set globally
only. Only for a few reository, I did change one or another setting locally.

Ciao,
chi.

___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users