Re: [fossil-users] fossil ui does not launch
On Thu, 26 May 2011 06:48:58 +0200, Gour-Gadadhara Dasa wrote: On Wed, 25 May 2011 23:42:58 +0200 Rene renew...@xs4all.nl wrote: make ./fossil rebuild ./fossil ui and voila a previous release Tried, but still does not work... :-/ I had to convert some repos to bzr (via git) ind order to continue commiting to them. :-/ Sincerely, Gour I'm lost! 1) you were a happy camper with PC-BSD latest and fossil version xx. 2) You updated to the latest version of fossil and the fossil webinterface stopped working. 3) You downgraded to fossil version xx and still no dice. take the latest fossil do fossil new gour.fossil fossil ui gour.fossil if that fails take the previous fossil and do the same thing one or both should work. Otherwise item 1 above never happened -- Rene ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Going back to previous revision: update?
Hello I read the wiki, but didn't find clear explanation about how to go back to a previous revision of a file in case something I tried didn't work as planned. The closest command that looks like it does this is update: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/help/update If I wanted to go back to the n-1 version of a file, should I... 1. Close the repository, so I can delete the current work file (otherwise, Fossil will merge n and n-1?) 2. Launch the UI 3. Check the version ID, ie. in Modified myfil.exet from [123] to [456], it'll be 123 4. and type: fossil.exe update 123 myfile.txt ? Thank you. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Going back to previous revision: update?
On Thu, 26 May 2011 10:22:09 +0200 Gilles gilles.gana...@free.fr wrote: I read the wiki, but didn't find clear explanation about how to go back to a previous revision of a file in case something I tried didn't work as planned. The closest command that looks like it does this is update: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/help/update If I wanted to go back to the n-1 version of a file, should I... 1. Close the repository, so I can delete the current work file (otherwise, Fossil will merge n and n-1?) 2. Launch the UI 3. Check the version ID, ie. in Modified myfil.exet from [123] to [456], it'll be 123 4. and type: fossil.exe update 123 myfile.txt The latter. Read carefully what fossil help update prints. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil ui does not launch
On Thu, 26 May 2011 10:18:46 +0200 Rene renew...@xs4all.nl wrote: 1) you were a happy camper with PC-BSD latest and fossil version xx. Yes. 2) You updated to the latest version of fossil and the fossil webinterface stopped working. Yes. 3) You downgraded to fossil version xx and still no dice. Yes. one or both should work. Otherwise item 1 above never happened There is a little flaw in your reasoning - you forgot that it works with Midori browser (I didn't want to install Chromium to test.) So, e.g. Fossil version [a2e1c48373] works with Midori here, but not with Firefox. The only problem is that my regular browser is FF and not Midori and it's painful investigating what's wrong with Fossil FF combo. Sincerely, Gour -- “In the material world, conceptions of good and bad are all mental speculations…” (Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu) http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810 signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil usage in root directory (was Re: [newbie] Can't get started)
Hi, Thanks for the discussion, it looks that there's some interest in it. For the record, I'm currently using mercurial + mtree, but I'd like to avoid the dependency on Python FreeBSD. * Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com [20110525 17:25]: System-level config files often need to belong to a specific user and/or group. So fossil would also have to track user names, and there is no guaranty that user 'stephan' on host1 is actually the same user as 'stephan' on host2 (though they tend to be the same person on my systems ;). Philosophically, i don't think that problem can be solved generically. It is certainly not easy (think LDAP/AD deployments), but fossil is missing another crucial feature: pre/post-commit hooks. Even if fossil did support storing/restoring the whole permissions (with user/group names/IDs), it literally couldn't work for anyone but the root user: Unix systems won't let a user's process chown a file to a different user. Obviously the OS user running fossil needs apropriate permissions. Given that though, and assuming fossil grows the ability to track them, there's no reason why it should not be able to restore them. And what to do on files imported into fossil from Windows and checked out on Unix systems? Regarding ownership, I believe the best that can be done is store a id/name pair on chekin and warn if the mapping does not resolve the same on checkout. * Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com [20110525 19:28]: On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Bill Burdick bill.burd...@gmail.comwrote: Etckeeper is a specialized tool that uses DVCSes for versioning. It's OK that Fossil can't support everything needed for this, but I don't think it's unreasonable for Joan to ask whether Fossil can be used for it -- every major DVCS can, except for Fossil. My apologies - it wasn't my intention to imply that it's not a reasonable usage/feature, i was just pointing out reasons it won't work well out of the box, and why supporting such usage probably requires more effort than it would seem to on the surface. The problem is that fossil does not support neither good-enough ownership/permission tracking nor the flexibility to work around it before/after commit. I hope that fossil grows either (or both :) of these features some time, even though they are likely not one-liners. qvb -- pica ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Going back to previous revision: update?
On Thu, 26 May 2011 13:03:34 +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Read carefully what fossil help update prints. Thanks, but it's just the same information from the wiki. Anyway, after going the list of commands, I seem to have found how to have Fossil check out a given revision of a file: = 1. First, find the list of revision numbers for the file: C:\fossil.exe finfo myfile.txt History of myfile.txt 2011-05-26 [6ae687415f] some comment (user: Me, artifact: [a16a331cb0]) 2011-05-26 [7091e0aaf4] some comment (user: Me, artifact: [750ae972b4]) The revision number is the alphanumeric data after the date, and revisions are in descending order (most recent on top). 2. To check out the first revision of the file: C:\fossil.exe revert -r 7091e0aaf4 myfile.txt REVERTED: myfile.txt = In case I edited the work version to try something, and simply want to discard the changes and go back to the latest committed version: = C:\fossil.exe revert -r 7091e0aaf4 myfile.txt REVERTED: myfile.txt fossil undo is available to undo changes to the working checkout. = Am I right in understanding that the sentence above about undo means that... 1. The work version was replaced by the committed version 2. But in case I'd like to go back to the work version that was just replaced, I can do this with undo? Thank you. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Going back to previous revision: update?
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Gilles gilles.gana...@free.fr wrote: Hello I read the wiki, but didn't find clear explanation about how to go back to a previous revision of a file in case something I tried didn't work as planned. The closest command that looks like it does this is update: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/help/update If I wanted to go back to the n-1 version of a file, should I... 1. Close the repository, so I can delete the current work file (otherwise, Fossil will merge n and n-1?) 2. Launch the UI 3. Check the version ID, ie. in Modified myfil.exet from [123] to [456], it'll be 123 4. and type: fossil.exe update 123 myfile.txt Way too much work. Just type: fossil update previous ? Thank you. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil ui does not launch
On Thu, 26 May 2011 06:50:39 -0400 Martin Gagnon eme...@gmail.com wrote: Do you explicitly set the web-browser setting Yes...that's how I change setting in order to be able to try/test with Midori browser. If you try to start firefox from cli with any url as argument, does it work ? Yes. If this give you same behavior, so fossil have nothing to do with the problem. Well, I admit it's strange problem, but, at the same time it's very real for me. :-/ Sincerely, Gour -- “In the material world, conceptions of good and bad are all mental speculations…” (Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu) http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810 signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil ui does not launch
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Gour-Gadadhara Dasa g...@atmarama.netwrote: On Thu, 26 May 2011 06:50:39 -0400 Martin Gagnon eme...@gmail.com wrote: Do you explicitly set the web-browser setting Yes...that's how I change setting in order to be able to try/test with Midori browser. If you try to start firefox from cli with any url as argument, does it work ? Yes. If this give you same behavior, so fossil have nothing to do with the problem. Well, I admit it's strange problem, but, at the same time it's very real for me. :-/ Please also understand that it is very hard for me to fix if I cannot reproduce it. Sincerely, Gour -- “In the material world, conceptions of good and bad are all mental speculations…” (Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu) http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil ui does not launch
On Thu, 26 May 2011 13:17:58 +0200, Gour-Gadadhara Dasa wrote: On Thu, 26 May 2011 06:50:39 -0400 Martin Gagnon eme...@gmail.com wrote: Do you explicitly set the web-browser setting Yes...that's how I change setting in order to be able to try/test with Midori browser. If you try to start firefox from cli with any url as argument, does it work ? Yes. If this give you same behavior, so fossil have nothing to do with the problem. Well, I admit it's strange problem, but, at the same time it's very real for me. :-/ Sincerely, Gour does the fossil new gour.fossil fossil ui gour.fossil still doesn't show the webinterface? If you do the same with the previous fossil version allow you to show the webinterface? has firefox been updated? if so can you downgrade with ports? which version off firefox are you using? 4.0,0, 4.0.1 or 5.0.0 -- Rene ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Going back to previous revision: update?
On Thu, 26 May 2011 07:08:55 -0400, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Way too much work. Just type: fossil update previous Thanks for the tip, but update merges the repo version with the work version, while I wanted to simply discard the work version altogether and go back to the repo version. This is indeed easier than what I did before: C:\fossil.exe revert previous myfile.txt Thank you. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Going back to previous revision: update?
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Gilles gilles.gana...@free.fr wrote: On Thu, 26 May 2011 07:08:55 -0400, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Way too much work. Just type: fossil update previous Thanks for the tip, but update merges the repo version with the work version, while I wanted to simply discard the work version altogether and go back to the repo version. fossil revert This is indeed easier than what I did before: C:\fossil.exe revert previous myfile.txt Thank you. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Going back to previous revision: update?
On Thu, 26 May 2011 07:54:41 -0400, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: fossil revert Even easier. Thank you. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil ui does not launch
On Thu, 26 May 2011 07:20:46 -0400 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Please also understand that it is very hard for me to fix if I cannot reproduce it. Sure. I understand, np. Now, I tried with lynx - it works. I managed to launch firefox by killing old seesion and started a new one. However, I notice some strange things which I can swear I did not do: setting for main branch is 'trunk', althouth there is not 'trunk' branch listed, but 'master' instead? Then I found some other repos with the same setting and another one which was also not launching with the same setting. However, after I changed setting to 'trunk' it did launch, so I feel some smell here.. Was there some Fossil code which fiddled with such things? Sincerely, Gour -- “In the material world, conceptions of good and bad are all mental speculations…” (Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu) http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810 signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Zipping a packaged release -- option to ignore specific folder?
Hi folks, Is there a way with fossil zip to export all folders except a specific one? For example, I have a 'www' folder, which contains some js / css files for the web portion. However, when exporting a completed release, I'd like to export without that folder. This would be something similar to git's export-ignore. Have I just missed something in the documentation about this? Or perhaps I missed something in the archive of the list? Thanks, Tomek ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Zipping a packaged release -- option to ignore specific folder?
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Tomek Kott tkott.s...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks, Is there a way with fossil zip to export all folders except a specific one? For example, I have a 'www' folder, which contains some js / css files for the web portion. However, when exporting a completed release, I'd like to export without that folder. This would be something similar to git's export-ignore. Have I just missed something in the documentation about this? Or perhaps I missed something in the archive of the list? There is nothing like that now. But I will accept patches :-) Thanks, Tomek ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil usage in root directory (was Re: [newbie] Can't get started)
On Thu, 26 May 2011 12:03:19 +0200, Joan Picanyol i Puig wrote: The problem is that fossil does not support neither good-enough ownership/permission tracking nor the flexibility to work around it before/after commit. I hope that fossil grows either (or both :) of these features some time, even though they are likely not one-liners. What about creating your own wrappers on top of fossil ? If fossil doesn't store ownership, permissions, or the temperature of the room at the time you checked in, you're still free to handle these yourself using versioned files and helper scripts ;) For example : 1. a backup script, which generates a file at the root of your tree, containing all the information you need (ownership and permissions for each file in the tree, symlinks ignored by fossil, whatever... a kind of user-level manifest) and then calls fossil commit (and WOW, you get metadata history as a bonus !) 2. a restore script, which pulls/updates/checkouts/whatever, reads your manifest then applies the ownership and permissions on your files, creates symlinks, etc... Proof of concept (handles ownership and permissions) : - backup : http://dpaste.com/hold/546796/ - restore : http://dpaste.com/hold/546797/ These scripts should be called from the root of your checkout, or with the path to the checkout root as first argument. IMO, this is definitely NOT the goal of fossil to provide backup features out of the box... Regards, Simon ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil ui does not launch
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Gour-Gadadhara Dasa g...@atmarama.netwrote: On Thu, 26 May 2011 07:20:46 -0400 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Please also understand that it is very hard for me to fix if I cannot reproduce it. Sure. I understand, np. Now, I tried with lynx - it works. I managed to launch firefox by killing old seesion and started a new one. However, I notice some strange things which I can swear I did not do: setting for main branch is 'trunk', althouth there is not 'trunk' branch listed, but 'master' instead? Then I found some other repos with the same setting and another one which was also not launching with the same setting. However, after I changed setting to 'trunk' it did launch, so I feel some smell here.. Was there some Fossil code which fiddled with such things? Sincerely, Gour Git uses 'master' for its trunk. Were these repositories converted from GitHub? I had problems with some Git repositories I converted to Fossil because they had orphan branches -- GitHub uses orphan branches for the web content of a project (GitHub has instructions to create an orphan branch for the web content for a project, so it's kind of standard for GitHub repositories). Fossil got confused by these until I tagged the START of the orphan branches. Then, Fossil could deal with them. Bill ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Zipping a packaged release -- option to ignore specific folder?
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Tomek Kott tkott.s...@gmail.com wrote: Now, I believe that the easiest (not necessarily the best place to check to ignore would be in the zip_add_file(), since all commands flow through that (both folder / file names). The only question remaining, since I can't seem to follow the logic (I guess the caffeine hasn't kicked in yet) is: given a pIgnore and a zName (file or folder), how do I compare the two? The code for crnl-glob proably already has code to make such a comparison. In the add function, this seems to be accomplished by vfile_scan(), but I can't seem to find the definition to that! See vfile.c, search for 'void vfile_scan'. If I can answer that question, then I should be able to put together a patch which does the export-ignore controls. If I understand the setup correctly, I will also need to add the export-ignore-glob definition to db.c, and configure.c to make sure they are correctly synced. Anyone with more knowledge of fossil please chime in! One detail to consider: this setting, as described here, would apply to all branches over all of time, whereas the exclude list might be branch- or timeframe-specific. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil ui does not launch
On Thu, 26 May 2011 10:22:38 -0500 Bill Burdick bill.burd...@gmail.com wrote: Git uses 'master' for its trunk. Were these repositories converted from GitHub? Ohh...completely forgot about that (/me prefers not to think about about Git)...yes, that one was darcs --- fossil converted via Git, but, strange enough, I never had any problem with it until few days ago. Moreover, Midori browser could show same repo which failed with FF. Sincerely, Gour -- “In the material world, conceptions of good and bad are all mental speculations…” (Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu) http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810 signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Zipping a packaged release -- option to ignore specific folder?
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.comwrote: On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Tomek Kott tkott.s...@gmail.com wrote: Now, I believe that the easiest (not necessarily the best place to check to ignore would be in the zip_add_file(), since all commands flow through that (both folder / file names). The only question remaining, since I can't seem to follow the logic (I guess the caffeine hasn't kicked in yet) is: given a pIgnore and a zName (file or folder), how do I compare the two? The code for crnl-glob proably already has code to make such a comparison. In the add function, this seems to be accomplished by vfile_scan(), but I can't seem to find the definition to that! See vfile.c, search for 'void vfile_scan'. If I can answer that question, then I should be able to put together a patch which does the export-ignore controls. If I understand the setup correctly, I will also need to add the export-ignore-glob definition to db.c, and configure.c to make sure they are correctly synced. Anyone with more knowledge of fossil please chime in! One detail to consider: this setting, as described here, would apply to all branches over all of time, whereas the exclude list might be branch- or timeframe-specific. Exactly. I think it best that this not be a persistent setting, but just a command-line option or query parameter. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Zipping a packaged release -- option to ignore specific folder?
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Exactly. I think it best that this not be a persistent setting, but just a command-line option or query parameter. Or possibly a propagating tag? That would(?) solve the branching/timeframe issue, i think, by simply taking the latest value (for a given revision) of the tag's value. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil ui does not launch
On Thu, 26 May 2011 12:06:19 +0200, Gour-Gadadhara Dasa wrote: On Thu, 26 May 2011 10:18:46 +0200 Rene renew...@xs4all.nl wrote: 1) you were a happy camper with PC-BSD latest and fossil version xx. Yes. 2) You updated to the latest version of fossil and the fossil webinterface stopped working. Yes. 3) You downgraded to fossil version xx and still no dice. Yes. one or both should work. Otherwise item 1 above never happened There is a little flaw in your reasoning - you forgot that it works with Midori browser (I didn't want to install Chromium to test.) So, e.g. Fossil version [a2e1c48373] works with Midori here, but not with Firefox. The only problem is that my regular browser is FF and not Midori and it's painful investigating what's wrong with Fossil FF combo. Sincerely, Gour Just out of curiosity I installed PC-BSD latest in a virtual machine. (Long install nice user interface!) I installed firefox-4.0.1 I downloaded the latest fossil release compiled that cloned fossil fossil ui myclone.fossil and I got a web interface -- Rene ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] fossil ui does not launch
On Fri, 27 May 2011 00:38:37 +0200 Rene renew...@xs4all.nl wrote: Just out of curiosity I installed PC-BSD latest in a virtual machine. (Long install nice user interface!) Heh, nice that you tried PC-BSD. ;) I installed firefox-4.0.1 I downloaded the latest fossil release compiled that cloned fossil fossil ui myclone.fossil and I got a web interface As you may guess from my previous email, it might be that it is something with the repos which were darcs -- fossil converted via git and/or with FF 'stale' session. Sincerely, Gour -- “In the material world, conceptions of good and bad are all mental speculations…” (Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu) http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810 signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
