Re: [fossil-users] Scalability

2012-03-17 Thread Gour
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 00:44:24 +0100
Jan Danielsson
jan.m.daniels...@gmail.com wrote:

At first I thought it was a problem with the server being
 overloaded, but when I finally got all of it downloaded to one of my
 servers, I tried to pull it to other systems from there, but I'm
 running into the 504 Gateway Time-out problem here as well (and
 this particular server has lots of time to spare).

Although not helpful to resolve the issue, I'm just curious which server
is concerned?

Recently I gave up on Cherokee (and embraced lighty) due to 504 errors
(serving PHP), but probably it's not connected with your problem.


Sincerely,
Gour

-- 
In this endeavor there is no loss or diminution, 
and a little advancement on this path can protect 
one from the most dangerous type of fear.

http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Scalability

2012-03-17 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 12:44:24AM +0100, Jan Danielsson wrote:
Joerg's NetBSD repository suddenly grew from ~2.5G to over 6GB. As it
 has grown, I've been having increasing problems pulling the latest
 changes. I started getting the database is locked errors and (more
 often) fossil: server says: 504 Gateway Time-out. These problems
 occurred in a very non-deterministic manner. Sometimes immediately,
 other times after a few hours. It got to the point where I had to while
 [ 1 ]; do fossil pull ; sleep 240 ; done to get it to the most recent
 check-in.

Guessing, I imagine some servers may have some default configuration regarding
timeouts in cgi operations.
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Names in imported git repositories

2012-03-17 Thread org.fossil-scm.fossil-users
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 03:11:56 +0100
Dmitry Chestnykh dmi...@codingrobots.com wrote:

 On 03/15/2012 02:38 PM, org.fossil-scm.fossil-us...@io7m.com wrote:
  Is it possible to tell fossil that commits should be assigned to
  specific user names in the resulting fossil repository?
 
 When I converted my repos, I just did a global search/replace in the 
 file exported from git.
 

That's fine. Just wanted to be sure that this wasn't a bug.
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Build non-debug version

2012-03-17 Thread Steve Bennett
On 18/03/2012, at 9:02 AM, Christopher Berardi wrote:

 Since I run 64-bit Linux, I have to build fossil myself from source.
 That's not a problem in the least. However, I always have to manually
 change the makefile to remove the '-g' flag that gets added to the
 compiler command (I don't want a 4 megabyte debug binary). Is there a
 simple configure switch that I've overlooked that will automatically
 omit that flag for me? 

./configure CFLAGS=-O2

Of course you can just strip the executable after building.

--
µWeb: Embedded Web Framework - http://uweb.workware.net.au/
WorkWare Systems Pty Ltd
W: www.workware.net.au  P: +61 434 921 300
E: ste...@workware.net.au   F: +61 7 3391 6002





___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users