Re: [fossil-users] Fossil support level
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote: You might want to scan through the open tickets looking for issues that would impact your intended usage and then either test the latest fossil against those issues or ask on the list specifically about it. +1 We don't often tend to tickets which aren't addressed on the list. That is probably a side effect of fossil not having hooks which send emails for new tickets. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Fossil support level
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote: You might want to scan through the open tickets looking for issues that would impact your intended usage and then either test the latest fossil against those issues or ask on the list specifically about it. +1 We don't often tend to tickets which aren't addressed on the list. That is probably a side effect of fossil not having hooks which send emails for new tickets. The newer (last Autumn) ticket moderation feature gives new tickets a bit more visibility than before, but the majority of the tickets were opened before that was added. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Ticket [967cedbf20]: fossil extra - Report for subtree
2013/7/4 Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com: Well, when I did this commit: http://core.tcl.tk/itcl/info/0805477fbf what I did was a fossil commit . while the current directory was generic. So, why was Makefile.in committed then? Found the bug: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/c1611f7dfa The capital M in the filename while missing a COLLATE nocase in the query (on a case-insensitive file system) was the problem. Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Fossil support level
OK, sounds good, but it would be great it someone who Has A Clue (unfortunately not me at this point) could go through those old tickets and clean them up - i.e. close them as fixed, duplicates, or will-not-implement. Call it project hygiene - make the project look a lot more professional. Should I have a login for the fossil-scm.org site to report bugs as other than anonymous, or is that just for code committers? Thanks again, ../Dave ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Fossil support level
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:57 PM, David Mason dma...@ryerson.ca wrote: OK, sounds good, but it would be great it someone who Has A Clue (unfortunately not me at this point) could go through those old tickets and clean them up - i.e. close them as fixed, duplicates, or will-not-implement. Call it project hygiene - make the project look a lot more professional. That's going to require a group effort because no single person here is intimate with all of fossil's features (==bug report areas). Should I have a login for the fossil-scm.org site to report bugs as other than anonymous, or is that just for code committers? Good question. fossil-scm.org does not allow self-registration, so it seems that only committers can currently post non-anonymous tickets (unless Richard would like me to set up a ticket-only user for you?). That said, please heed the warning at the top of the new-ticket page (pasted in here); *Discuss your issue on the fossil-users mailing listhttp://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users first. Tickets for issues that have not previously been discussed on the mailing list are very likely to be deleted without comment and without consideration.* (sorry that's so big, it just pasted in that way) -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Side-by-side diff improvement
Hi all, I've committed a pretty big changeto the diff code(http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/4081a91c84) , and I'd like some other people to take a look at it/test it out before it (maybe/hopefully) gets merged into the trunk. The purpose of this commit is, as the commit message says, to support arbitrary line lengths with synced horizontal scrolling in side-by-side diffs. Here's an example of it in action on a test copy of the Fossil repo: http://joelface.com/fossil/fdiff?v1=98aec3c55155011bv2=d74d0c320c455abdsbs=1(you can click anywhere inside a diff and use the left/right arrow keys to scroll) The diff --tk code also needed to be updated to support the new HTML output, and, well, I probably overdid it. I think it's really nice, though, so I hope you'll give it a try. (Tip: tab/shift-tab cycles through files.) Neither the diff logic itself nor the plaintext diff output have been modified (if they have, it's a bug). There are also a few other minor changes to the web output: fixing non-compliant HTML (like div's inside pre's), making chunk fragment IDs not repeat on pages with multiple diffs, and simplifying diff error messages. I've tested the web UI in Firefox/Chrome/IE (including IE8) and diff --tk on Windows 7 (Tcl 8.6) and Linux (8.4, 8.5). If there's anything I need to change to get this accepted into the trunk, let me know. Thanks! ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
