Re: [fossil-users] multiple open leaf on closed branches?

2016-06-07 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:27 AM, Luca Ferrari  wrote:
>
> In the meantime I've tried the desperate trick:
>
> % fossil merge --integrate  --force aa9521ccd9
>
> but the leaf is still listed on the open ones.
>

As Richard said, it's not a real problem.

I would suggest you compare the files in the extra open leaf with it's
sibling commit(s) to be sure you don't miss any changes.
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


[fossil-users] When is 'tip' not 'trunk'

2016-06-07 Thread Clark Christensen
Hit an unexpected thing today cloning a just-committed repo to a new computer.
I cloned the repo from server, then did 'fossil open D:/path/to/repo.fossil'.  
It left me with a checkout whose directory structure was almost a year old.  A 
looking at the timeline, it all looked good.
Looking at the All Files, and Trunk views in the browser show the "old" 
structure I got with "fossil open"

The "Tip" view, fortunately, showed what I expect, and "fossil co tip" got me 
what I expected in the checkout.
But I don't understand why trunk and tip are not the same.  What am I missing?
Both clients (committer and cloner) have fossil version 1.32 [6c40678e91] 
2015-03-14 13:20:34 UTC on Windows 7x64
The server has fossil version [6c40678e91] 2015-03-14 13:20:34 on Linux.
Thanks in advance.
 -Clark
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] multiple open leaf on closed branches?

2016-06-07 Thread Richard Hipp
On 6/7/16, Luca Ferrari  wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Richard Hipp  wrote:
>> No.  Can you make the repo available for analysis?
>>
>
> Sorry, my employer does not grant me to do it. Is there anything I can
> export that can be useful? The repo is actually 800+MB.
>
> In the meantime I've tried the desperate trick:
>
> % fossil merge --integrate  --force aa9521ccd9
>
> but the leaf is still listed on the open ones.


There is nothing inherently wrong with having open leaves.  You could
simply ignore the issue.

-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users