Re: [fossil-users] toc.tcl

2017-08-30 Thread David Mason 
On 29 August 2017 at 23:55, Andy Goth  wrote:

> I'm curious how the Markdown formatter would know what language rules to
> use for syntax highlighting, so surely there's more to the syntax than
> bracketing ("fencing") the code with lines consisting entirely of "```".
> I searched online and found the answer to be: put the name of the syntax
> highlight mode (i.e. the language) right after the first "```" on the
> same line, for instance "```ruby".
>

Discord and github handle a keyword after the "```" on the first line. So:
```smalltalk
foo: anObject
^ anObject + 5
```
would format the 2 lines in Smalltalk.

../Dave
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned file replacement is broken?

2017-08-30 Thread David Mason 
I've seen it too, but it's sporadic.  My crontab pull script now checks if
the size is 0 and ignores the file if so.

../Dave
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] toc.tcl

2017-08-30 Thread Ron W 
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 7:05 AM, 
wrote:
>
> Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 22:55:56 -0500
> From: Andy Goth 
> To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] toc.tcl
> Message-ID: <56c8452e-5530-7c0d-c077-fa2b35375...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> dewey.hylton says "```" imbues syntax highlighting whereas indented
> lines are left plain.  Fossil doesn't do any kind of syntax highlighting
> at this point.  Is there any interest in having this feature?  I feel
> syntax highlighting is both expected and bloat.  We would have to decide
> which we prefer: being simple or having me-too features.
>
> I'm curious how the Markdown formatter would know what language rules to
> use for syntax highlighting, so surely there's more to the syntax than
> bracketing ("fencing") the code with lines consisting entirely of "```".
> I searched online and found the answer to be: put the name of the syntax
> highlight mode (i.e. the language) right after the first "```" on the
> same line, for instance "```ruby".
>

There are JavaScript scripts to do syntax highlighting in the browser, so
anyone who wanted to do that could. Hopefully, there is one that looks for
something like a  element. then
libdiscount could be enhanced to enclose code-fenced code in that element.

I am neutral on whether to do it, but this seems like it could be done with
a few small changes.
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Documentation on how to clone and how to download a tarball

2017-08-30 Thread Richard Hipp 
On 8/30/17, Thomas Levine <_...@thomaslevine.com> wrote:
> People often don't know how to clone or download a tarball from my
> fossil server, so I wind up documenting it in the homepage of each
> particular project. Is there a more convenient way of providing this
> documentation, such as generic documentation page on this topic and a
> skin that links to this documentation?

There is not, at the moment.  Perhaps you can suggest a good place to
put that information?

-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

[fossil-users] Documentation on how to clone and how to download a tarball

2017-08-30 Thread Thomas Levine 
People often don't know how to clone or download a tarball from my
fossil server, so I wind up documenting it in the homepage of each
particular project. Is there a more convenient way of providing this
documentation, such as generic documentation page on this topic and a
skin that links to this documentation?
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] New release?

2017-08-30 Thread Richard Hipp 
On 8/30/17, Andy Goth  wrote:
>
> Is there a compilation guide that says how exactly the official Windows
> binaries are produced?  I'd like to get that part right if I can.
>

I use this TCL script:

cd c:/users/drh/fossil/m1
exec make -f win/makefile.mingw FOSSIL_ENABLE_SSL=1
OPENSSLDIR=../../openssl-1.0.1t >@stdout 2>@stdout
exec ls -l c:/users/drh/fossil/m1/fossil.exe >@stdout

So the procedure is to do "fossil up $VERSION" in
/users/drh/fossil/m1, then run the script above.  Then I package the
resulting fossil.exe and push it as unversioned content.

-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] New release?

2017-08-30 Thread Andy Goth 

On 08/30/17 06:05, Richard Hipp wrote:

On 8/29/17, Andy Goth  wrote:

At work I'm having some difficulty due to the most recent released
version of Fossil not including my correction for /doc on read-only
repository files.  Would it be possible to make another release to
include this and other recent changes?


Can you not just download and compile the latest trunk?


I tried that once, had trouble with my self-compiled Windows binary
having the right icon and other such frou-frou.  But yeah, that's
probably the best solution regardless because I can do it immediately
without having to wait for someone else's release schedule.

Is there a compilation guide that says how exactly the official Windows
binaries are produced?  I'd like to get that part right if I can.

On Linux I build Fossil myself all the time.  It's just Windows that's a
headache for me.

--
Andy Goth | 
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned file replacement is broken?

2017-08-30 Thread Richard Hipp 
On 8/30/17, BohwaZ  wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm trying to update an unversioned file in my repo, so I do:
>
> # first add
> fossil uv add file.zip
> fossil uv sync
>
> # updating the file
> fossil uv add file.zip
> fossil uv sync
>
> And now the file is 0 bytes?

I'm having trouble reproducing the problem.  When I followed the steps
above it worked fine for me.  Here is a copy/paste of my shell:

drh@bella:~/fossil/m1/www$ echo one >test.txt
drh@bella:~/fossil/m1/www$ fossil uv add test.txt
drh@bella:~/fossil/m1/www$ fossil uv sync -v
Bytes  Cards  Artifacts Deltas
Sent: 127  1  0  0
Received:4842 72  0  0
Unversioned-file sent: test.txt
Sent: 147  1  0  0
Received:  32  1  0  0
 done, sent: 720  received: 1804  ip: 45.33.6.223
drh@bella:~/fossil/m1/www$ echo two >test.txt
drh@bella:~/fossil/m1/www$ fossil uv add test.txt
drh@bella:~/fossil/m1/www$ fossil uv sync -v
Bytes  Cards  Artifacts Deltas
Sent: 127  1  0  0
UV-PUSH: test.txt
Received:4912 73  0  0
Unversioned-file sent: test.txt
Sent: 147  1  0  0
Received:  32  1  0  0
 done, sent: 719  received: 1842  ip: 45.33.6.223

And if you look at https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/uv/test.txt you
can clearly see that it is the revised "test.txt" that got synced.

Do you have any additional information on how to cause this problem?
-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] New release?

2017-08-30 Thread Richard Hipp 
On 8/29/17, Andy Goth  wrote:
> At work I'm having some difficulty due to the most recent released
> version of Fossil not including my correction for /doc on read-only
> repository files.  Would it be possible to make another release to
> include this and other recent changes?

Can you not just download and compile the latest trunk?

-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users