Re: [fossil-users] Mailing list shutting down...
* Codebykevin: > Does Mailman support old school subscription over email? It does. It's possible to run it without any web frontend at all, and it's still useful. Of course, there's no browsable web archive, but an external service can handle that. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Mailing list shutting down...
* Richard Hipp: > I have not. On the other hand, that patch has apparently been > available for 4 years and has not yet be folded into the official GNU > MailMan. Is Mailman still supported? It is, but it's a GNU project, so they are reluctant to download proprietary Javascript for execution by their users. > (2) We keep having problems with evil subscribers harvesting the email > addresses of innocent posters and send them porn-spam via private > email. Since the porn-spam contain the subject line of the original > posting, it often makes it through spam filters. MailMan has not > effective solution to this. What would be an effective solution against *that*? Isn't it caused by some subscribers having malware on their system? ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] New Tree-View feature requires newer sqlite.
* Richard Hipp: The silly requirement of some distributions that *everything* must be a shared library irks me beyond words. I hate having to support --disable-internal-sqlite, and I hate having to add silly work-arounds in the code to accommodate distributions trying to use an older SQLite with a newer Fossil. This impedes progress and introduces bugs. It's a lose-lose situation. And yet the distributions are dogmatic on this point. Uhm, does POSIX file locking work correctly if there are multiple copies of SQLite within the same process (assuming that there are no symbol collisions/interpositions)? ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Odd numbers reported as sent and received
This doesn't look right: fw@deneb:~/src/fossil$ ./fossil update Autosync: http://www.fossil-scm.org/ Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas Sent: 177 2 0 0 Received:3620 79 0 0 Total network traffic: 322 bytes sent, 2101 bytes received fw@deneb:~/src/sqlite3-doc$ ../fossil/fossil update Autosync: http://www.sqlite.org/docsrc/ Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas Sent: 130 1 0 0 Received: 538 12 0 0 Sent: 647 12 0 0 Received:8152 23 1 10 Sent:2762 57 0 0 Received: 59240 68 5 51 Total network traffic: 2515 bytes sent, 39285 bytes received Or is compression involved? Then perhaps the last line should read Total uncompressed network traffic. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
