Re: [fossil-users] documentation clarification
Leo Razoumov wrote: Hopefully, this issue is of no practical importance, for one can always correct errors later on by pushing yet another tag. As with cryptography, keeping your clock up to date is essentiel... -- urban jc...@i2pmail.org http://chiselapp.com/user/jcage/repository/rdk/ ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] unexpected results when branching
Altu Faltu wrote: This is indeed a bug. Simpler recipe is here: fossil new test fossil open test touch file1 fossil add file1 fossil commit -m one fossil rm file1 fossil add file1 --- This command doesn't re-add deleted file fossil commit -m two fossil ls I have filed a new ticket for it. Thank you. 'Since add followed by a commit is a valid sequence, there are possibilities of user losing his work.' - thats exactly what happened to me. At least drop me a line, like so: refused to add previously deleted file: file1. Use 'fossil revert' instead. Urban ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] unexpected results when branching
urban wrote: Altu Faltu wrote: I have filed a new ticket for it. Wow. That was quick. Thanks for the fix. [feed6232af] ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] compile error
Hi, when compiling [feed6232af], gcc 4.2.2 gives this error: bld/http_ssl.o: In function `ssl_open': /mnt/sda6/Fossil-feed6232af207151/./src/http_ssl.c:215: undefined reference to `SSL_set_tlsext_host_name' Urban -- # gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: i486-t2-linux-gnu Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --libdir=/usr/lib --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --infodir=/usr/info --mandir=/usr/man --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var --disable-debug --without-libpam --without-pam --disable-libpam --disable-pam --host=i486-t2-linux-gnu --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-checking --disable-bootstrap --disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-multilib --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-libmudflap Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.2 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] unexpected results when branching
Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: You say nothing added?. Right. Nothing added. fossil revert file1 would have brought your file back at that time. Therefore, you commited removal of file1 at commit 'two'. Does this make more sene? No. Then please explain to me why the behaviour is different in this case: # fossil new test project-id: 4ba34bfb8540e1a5ec0547f7711af2984474473a server-id: 56cf69fe6db6c6377f4c3e77218197c4c3c538e5 admin-user: root (initial password is 528fb2) # fossil open test # touch file1 # fossil add file1 ADDED file1 # fossil rm file1 DELETED file1 # fossil add file1 ADDED file1 # I just want to fully understand the internal working of fossil before using it with my own projects. Thats all. Urban Regards, Lluís. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] unexpected results when branching
Hello list, I wanted to checkout how branching works but I got unexpected results. Here is the session. In en empty directory I did: sh-4.1# fossil new test project-id: 788376d693c5a597f327fb01901ab263e333870d server-id: 52a134e7d9d44f546d033b914322a2962da1d756 admin-user: root (initial password is 957271) sh-4.1# fossil open test sh-4.1# touch file1 sh-4.1# fossil add file1 ADDED file1 sh-4.1# fossil commit -m one New_Version: e5eb048857578372dace96a98579b7fd99849b72 sh-4.1# fossil branch new esp trunk gpg: no default secret key: secret key not available gpg: out-E128D037D5A8CDA68BE8: clearsign failed: secret key not available unable to sign manifest. continue (y/N)? y New branch: fa005bdc7d8f72a8d3aa6be4573ddfdad4d857f5 sh-4.1# fossil branch esp * trunk sh-4.1# fossil checkout esp file1 sh-4.1# fossil rm * DELETED file1 sh-4.1# fossil add file1 # nothing added ?! sh-4.1# fossil ls file1 sh-4.1# fossil branch * esp trunk sh-4.1# fossil commit -m two New_Version: 537f08cc487c572a781888c73b4e6d6811fef9a9 sh-4.1# fossil checkout trunk # file1 is there. sh-4.1# fossil checkout esp sh-4.1# fossil ls sh-4.1# # file1 is gone. If I do rm * , then commit, then add file1 again in the new branch, the result is different. I read the archives and the branching tutorial, did I miss something ? (fossil version 1.20) Regards, urban ps. my project is here: http://chiselapp.com/user/jcage/repository/rdk/ Thanks Richard for fossil and James for the web space! ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
