Re: [fossil-users] FOSSIL SEARCH improvement suggestion
Am 17.11.2015 um 17:12 schrieb Tony Papadimitriou : > I tried it, and no, it doesn't -- I'm talking about SEARCH from the > command-line in case there is some misunderstanding. > (Let alone that the "Porter Stemmer" option changed my repo from 40MB to > 102MB!!) fossil search -a "scroll*" works fine for me > -Original Message- From: Richard Hipp > Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 6:03 PM > To: Fossil SCM user's discussion > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] FOSSIL SEARCH improvement suggestion > > On 11/17/15, Tony Papadimitriou wrote: >> >> So, if you’re looking for the word ‘scroll’ it won’t match ‘scrolling’ and >> vice versa. > > "scroll" should match "scrolling" if you activate the "Porter Stemmer" option Michael http://www.mksolutions.info ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] FOSSIL SEARCH improvement suggestion
This worked (and I without the Porter Stemmer 'bloat'). Thanks. -Original Message- From: Michael Keuter Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 6:10 PM To: Fossil SCM user's discussion Subject: Re: [fossil-users] FOSSIL SEARCH improvement suggestion Am 17.11.2015 um 17:03 schrieb Richard Hipp : On 11/17/15, Tony Papadimitriou wrote: So, if you’re looking for the word ‘scroll’ it won’t match ‘scrolling’ and vice versa. "scroll" should match "scrolling" if you activate the "Porter Stemmer" option Or 'scroll*' :-). Michael http://www.mksolutions.info ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] FOSSIL SEARCH improvement suggestion
I tried it, and no, it doesn't -- I'm talking about SEARCH from the command-line in case there is some misunderstanding. (Let alone that the "Porter Stemmer" option changed my repo from 40MB to 102MB!!!) -Original Message- From: Richard Hipp Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 6:03 PM To: Fossil SCM user's discussion Subject: Re: [fossil-users] FOSSIL SEARCH improvement suggestion On 11/17/15, Tony Papadimitriou wrote: So, if you’re looking for the word ‘scroll’ it won’t match ‘scrolling’ and vice versa. "scroll" should match "scrolling" if you activate the "Porter Stemmer" option -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] FOSSIL SEARCH improvement suggestion
Am 17.11.2015 um 17:03 schrieb Richard Hipp : > On 11/17/15, Tony Papadimitriou wrote: >> >> So, if you’re looking for the word ‘scroll’ it won’t match ‘scrolling’ and >> vice versa. > > "scroll" should match "scrolling" if you activate the "Porter Stemmer" option Or 'scroll*' :-). Michael http://www.mksolutions.info ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] FOSSIL SEARCH improvement suggestion
On 11/17/15, Tony Papadimitriou wrote: > > So, if you’re looking for the word ‘scroll’ it won’t match ‘scrolling’ and > vice versa. > "scroll" should match "scrolling" if you activate the "Porter Stemmer" option -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] FOSSIL SEARCH improvement suggestion
When using SEARCH you need to type the word exactly as it appears in the timeline. I’m guessing it uses SQL’s LIKE to find the related matches. So, if you’re looking for the word ‘scroll’ it won’t match ‘scrolling’ and vice versa. One suggestion is to append ‘%’ to the search term to match any ending variant of the word. It’s usually the ending of a word that differs. It could also use % on either side to find the sought term inside any bigger word (perhaps with an option), perhaps ordering the exact matches before the rest. A 2nd related suggestion (this only with the use of an option) is to use the SOUNDEX function to also catch sometimes misspelled words. Thanks.___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
