Re: [Foundation-l] Fundraising Promotion and Job Opening

2009-09-17 Thread Gregory Kohs
Congratulations to Anya, and it sounds like Rand made a nice choice.

Anya, if you wish to continue receiving my assistance on the 2009
Fundraising Survey that I helped design, I hope that Rand will put you in
touch with me during the data analysis phase.  I think a key break-out for
analysis will be the $500+ donor segment.  They are a key constituency in
supporting the financial stream, as every single one of them is worth 16 or
more average donors.

Kindly,

   Greg

-- 
Gregory Kohs
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Fundraising Promotion and Job Opening

2009-09-17 Thread Michael Peel

On 17 Sep 2009, at 17:22, Gregory Kohs wrote:

 They are a key constituency in
 supporting the financial stream, as every single one of them is  
 worth 16 or
 more average donors.

This doesn't seem quite right to me. average donors may financially  
be worth less in each donation, but remember that there's a lot more  
of them, and they're more likely to give repeat donations. Also,  
there's more to worth than just financial, e.g. in good will /  
spreading the word.

Mike

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Fundraising Promotion and Job Opening

2009-09-17 Thread Thomas Dalton
2009/9/17 Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net:

 On 17 Sep 2009, at 17:22, Gregory Kohs wrote:

 They are a key constituency in
 supporting the financial stream, as every single one of them is
 worth 16 or
 more average donors.

 This doesn't seem quite right to me. average donors may financially
 be worth less in each donation, but remember that there's a lot more
 of them, and they're more likely to give repeat donations. Also,
 there's more to worth than just financial, e.g. in good will /
 spreading the word.

Obviously there are more of them, Gregory didn't say otherwise. That
smaller donors are more likely to give repeat donations is (assuming
it is true) precisely why we need to make an effort to cultivate the
medium sized donors. Obviously good will and spreading the word are
important, but they aren't really related to fundraising (at least,
not in that direction - work on good will should help fundraising, not
the other way around).

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Fundraising Promotion and Job Opening

2009-09-17 Thread David Gerard
2009/9/17 Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net:

 This doesn't seem quite right to me. average donors may financially
 be worth less in each donation, but remember that there's a lot more
 of them, and they're more likely to give repeat donations. Also,
 there's more to worth than just financial, e.g. in good will /
 spreading the word.


It's generally a sort of power-law graph, like so many things are.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_law

They're all worth chasing at all levels.


- d.

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l


Re: [Foundation-l] Fundraising Promotion and Job Opening

2009-09-17 Thread Robert Rohde
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:22 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
 2009/9/17 Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net:

 This doesn't seem quite right to me. average donors may financially
 be worth less in each donation, but remember that there's a lot more
 of them, and they're more likely to give repeat donations. Also,
 there's more to worth than just financial, e.g. in good will /
 spreading the word.


 It's generally a sort of power-law graph, like so many things are.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_law

 They're all worth chasing at all levels.

In Wikimedia's past public fund raising campaigns (i.e. the things
with banner messages shown to the public) one usually sees about 80%
of the total income come in amounts of $100 or less.   On the other
hand, most of WMF's really large grants and donors have come from
direct solicitations that are not part of the public campaigns.

I would assume that Rand et al. see the $500 to $10k bracket as a
target of opportunity precisely because it has been undercultivated in
the past.  It is a large enough number that such donations are rarely
made during the public campaigns (and make up only a small fraction of
the campaign totals), and yet at the same time it is too small to have
gotten the same level of attention that might go into soliciting a
major foundation for $100k+ grant.

-Robert Rohde

___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l