Re: [Framers] Numbered List Issue (Trying fixes on Monday)

2023-03-31 Thread Craig, Alison GLI/CA
Thanks.

I'll try the fixes I've been given on Monday

Alison 


-Original Message-
From: Framers 
 On 
Behalf Of david davidartman.com
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2023 5:06 PM
To: An email list for people using Adobe FrameMaker software. 

Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Framers] Numbered List Issue

!---|
  This message is from an external sender
  This email originated from outside of the organization.
  Do not click links or open attachments unless you
  recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If you
  are not sure, you can use the ReportPhish Button to
  submit the message for analysis.
|---!

You have to use a fundamentally different approach.

Explicitly declare the whole numbering scheme for your nested lists (2, in this 
example):
Level 1 = N+, A0
Level 2 = N, A+

Use your procedure-introduction heading to reset those numbering lists. Yes, a 
heading can have a numbering scheme, vidilicit:
N=0
A=0

So you never need a 'first number' style. Dumbest idea that the intern at Adobe 
ever came up with. (That intern might be a VP of development, now, so... Ooops!)

Bonus: conversation to DITA will be easier without an artificial/superfluous 
reset style.

HTH. I'm not at a keyboard, and I've been out of FM for yonks.
But that approach is right.

David

DCA:d.a.d.



 Original message 
From: acr...@shaw.ca
Date: 3/30/23 19:29 (GMT-05:00)
To: Framers 
Subject: [Framers] Numbered List Issue

Win 10 with FrameMaker 20 (not the latest Frame version as my company doesn't 
allow updates as they are released).

I'm sure the answer to this is easy, but I can't figure it out.

I have a list of numbered instructions. Within that list is an alpha sub-list 
under one of the instructions.

When I finish the last alpha sub-list entry and revert to the numbered 
instruction list, the number continues counting from the last alpha bullet, not 
the previous numbered instruction.

For example:

1.
2.
3.
 a)
 b)
 c)
 d)
5.

Where "5" should actually be "4".

The first numbered and alpha list steps have the following auto-numbering 
setups:
.\t
.\t

Second and subsequent numbered and alpha list steps have the following 
auto-numbering setups:
.\t
.\t

What am I doing wrong?

Alison

___

This message is from the Framers mailing list

Send messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com Visit the list's homepage at  
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.frameusers.com__;!!Oq50-tQ!p_23yrHzBBmQq1sGV3rmOm1TytT0qS07HtmJ1ylF2mvvglM69ZUP7kl1KGYmddaOSMsjidKLNkMymviPcTkTr3ubOQ$
Archives located at 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.mail-archive.com/framers*40lists.frameusers.com/__;JQ!!Oq50-tQ!p_23yrHzBBmQq1sGV3rmOm1TytT0qS07HtmJ1ylF2mvvglM69ZUP7kl1KGYmddaOSMsjidKLNkMymviPcTnfc_RgeA$
Subscribe and unsubscribe at 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.frameusers.com/listinfo.cgi/framers-frameusers.com__;!!Oq50-tQ!p_23yrHzBBmQq1sGV3rmOm1TytT0qS07HtmJ1ylF2mvvglM69ZUP7kl1KGYmddaOSMsjidKLNkMymviPcTl0UAWCDw$
Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com 
___

This message is from the Framers mailing list

Send messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com Visit the list's homepage at  
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.frameusers.com__;!!Oq50-tQ!p_23yrHzBBmQq1sGV3rmOm1TytT0qS07HtmJ1ylF2mvvglM69ZUP7kl1KGYmddaOSMsjidKLNkMymviPcTkTr3ubOQ$
Archives located at 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.mail-archive.com/framers*40lists.frameusers.com/__;JQ!!Oq50-tQ!p_23yrHzBBmQq1sGV3rmOm1TytT0qS07HtmJ1ylF2mvvglM69ZUP7kl1KGYmddaOSMsjidKLNkMymviPcTnfc_RgeA$
Subscribe and unsubscribe at 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.frameusers.com/listinfo.cgi/framers-frameusers.com__;!!Oq50-tQ!p_23yrHzBBmQq1sGV3rmOm1TytT0qS07HtmJ1ylF2mvvglM69ZUP7kl1KGYmddaOSMsjidKLNkMymviPcTl0UAWCDw$
Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com
___

This message is from the Framers mailing list

Send messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com
Visit the list's homepage at  http://www.frameusers.com
Archives located at http://www.mail-archive.com/framers%40lists.frameusers.com/
Subscribe and unsubscribe at 
http://lists.frameusers.com/listinfo.cgi/framers-frameusers.com
Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com


Re: [Framers] Numbered List Issue

2023-03-30 Thread acraig
I knew there was a  way  to do it!

 

I'll fix things on Monday - tomorrow I have to complete a different project.

 

From: Alan Houser  
Sent: March 30, 2023 6:09 PM
To: An email list for people using Adobe FrameMaker software.

Cc: acr...@shaw.ca
Subject: Re: [Framers] Numbered List Issue

 

Alison,

 

The fix is fairly simple. You basically need to specify two counters in your
numbered list formats; one for each list level.

 

The first numbered and alpha list steps have the following auto-numbering

setups:

 

.\t

This should be < =0>.\t (set the top-level list number to "1"; reset
but do not print the second-level list number.)

 

.\t

You actually don't need this format. Each top-level list will resent the
counter for the second-level list. If you did keep this format, it would be
< >.\t

 

 

 

Second and subsequent numbered and alpha list steps have the following

auto-numbering setups:

 

.\t

This should be < =0>.\t (increment the first-level list number; reset
but do not print the second-level list number)

 

.\t

This should be < >\t (maintain, but do not print, the first-level list
number. Increment the second-level list).

 

Once set up, FrameMaker's list numbering is rock-solid and reliable.

 

Hope this helps!

 

-Alan

-- 
Alan Houser
Group Wellesley, Inc.
Consultant and Trainer, Technical Publishing
arh on Twitter
412-450-0532

 

 





On Mar 30, 2023, at 7:28 PM, acr...@shaw.ca <mailto:acr...@shaw.ca>  wrote:

 

Win 10 with FrameMaker 20 (not the latest Frame version as my company
doesn't allow updates as they are released).





I'm sure the answer to this is easy, but I can't figure it out.



I have a list of numbered instructions. Within that list is an alpha
sub-list under one of the instructions.



When I finish the last alpha sub-list entry and revert to the numbered
instruction list, the number continues counting from the last alpha bullet,
not the previous numbered instruction.



For example:



1. 

2. 

3. 

a)

b)

c)

d)

5. 



Where "5" should actually be "4".



The first numbered and alpha list steps have the following auto-numbering
setups:

.\t

.\t



Second and subsequent numbered and alpha list steps have the following
auto-numbering setups:

.\t

.\t



What am I doing wrong?



Alison

 

___

This message is from the Framers mailing list

Send messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com
Visit the list's homepage at  http://www.frameusers.com
Archives located at http://www.mail-archive.com/framers%40lists.frameusers.com/
Subscribe and unsubscribe at 
http://lists.frameusers.com/listinfo.cgi/framers-frameusers.com
Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com


Re: [Framers] Numbered List Issue

2023-03-30 Thread Alan Houser
Alison,

The fix is fairly simple. You basically need to specify two counters in your 
numbered list formats; one for each list level.

The first numbered and alpha list steps have the following auto-numbering
setups:

.\t
This should be < =0>.\t (set the top-level list number to "1"; reset but 
do not print the second-level list number.)

.\t
You actually don't need this format. Each top-level list will resent the 
counter for the second-level list. If you did keep this format, it would be < 
>.\t



Second and subsequent numbered and alpha list steps have the following
auto-numbering setups:

.\t
This should be < =0>.\t (increment the first-level list number; reset but 
do not print the second-level list number)

.\t
This should be < >\t (maintain, but do not print, the first-level list 
number. Increment the second-level list).

Once set up, FrameMaker's list numbering is rock-solid and reliable.

Hope this helps!

-Alan
-- 
Alan Houser
Group Wellesley, Inc.
Consultant and Trainer, Technical Publishing
arh on Twitter
412-450-0532



> On Mar 30, 2023, at 7:28 PM, acr...@shaw.ca wrote:
> 
> Win 10 with FrameMaker 20 (not the latest Frame version as my company
> doesn't allow updates as they are released).
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I'm sure the answer to this is easy, but I can't figure it out.
> 
> 
> 
> I have a list of numbered instructions. Within that list is an alpha
> sub-list under one of the instructions.
> 
> 
> 
> When I finish the last alpha sub-list entry and revert to the numbered
> instruction list, the number continues counting from the last alpha bullet,
> not the previous numbered instruction.
> 
> 
> 
> For example:
> 
> 
> 
> 1. 
> 
> 2. 
> 
> 3. 
> 
> a)
> 
> b)
> 
> c)
> 
> d)
> 
> 5. 
> 
> 
> 
> Where "5" should actually be "4".
> 
> 
> 
> The first numbered and alpha list steps have the following auto-numbering
> setups:
> 
> .\t
> 
> .\t
> 
> 
> 
> Second and subsequent numbered and alpha list steps have the following
> auto-numbering setups:
> 
> .\t
> 
> .\t
> 
> 
> 
> What am I doing wrong?
> 
> 
> 
> Alison
> 

___

This message is from the Framers mailing list

Send messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com
Visit the list's homepage at  http://www.frameusers.com
Archives located at http://www.mail-archive.com/framers%40lists.frameusers.com/
Subscribe and unsubscribe at 
http://lists.frameusers.com/listinfo.cgi/framers-frameusers.com
Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com


Re: [Framers] Numbered List Issue

2023-03-30 Thread david davidartman . com
You have to use a fundamentally different approach.

Explicitly declare the whole numbering scheme for your nested lists (2, in this 
example):
Level 1 = N+, A0
Level 2 = N, A+

Use your procedure-introduction heading to reset those numbering lists. Yes, a 
heading can have a numbering scheme, vidilicit:
N=0
A=0

So you never need a 'first number' style. Dumbest idea that the intern at Adobe 
ever came up with. (That intern might be a VP of development, now, so... Ooops!)

Bonus: conversation to DITA will be easier without an artificial/superfluous 
reset style.

HTH. I'm not at a keyboard, and I've been out of FM for yonks.
But that approach is right.

David

DCA:d.a.d.



 Original message 
From: acr...@shaw.ca
Date: 3/30/23 19:29 (GMT-05:00)
To: Framers 
Subject: [Framers] Numbered List Issue

Win 10 with FrameMaker 20 (not the latest Frame version as my company
doesn't allow updates as they are released).





I'm sure the answer to this is easy, but I can't figure it out.



I have a list of numbered instructions. Within that list is an alpha
sub-list under one of the instructions.



When I finish the last alpha sub-list entry and revert to the numbered
instruction list, the number continues counting from the last alpha bullet,
not the previous numbered instruction.



For example:



1.

2.

3.

 a)

 b)

 c)

 d)

5.



Where "5" should actually be "4".



The first numbered and alpha list steps have the following auto-numbering
setups:

.\t

.\t



Second and subsequent numbered and alpha list steps have the following
auto-numbering setups:

.\t

.\t



What am I doing wrong?



Alison

___

This message is from the Framers mailing list

Send messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com
Visit the list's homepage at  http://www.frameusers.com
Archives located at http://www.mail-archive.com/framers%40lists.frameusers.com/
Subscribe and unsubscribe at 
http://lists.frameusers.com/listinfo.cgi/framers-frameusers.com
Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com
___

This message is from the Framers mailing list

Send messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com
Visit the list's homepage at  http://www.frameusers.com
Archives located at http://www.mail-archive.com/framers%40lists.frameusers.com/
Subscribe and unsubscribe at 
http://lists.frameusers.com/listinfo.cgi/framers-frameusers.com
Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com


[Framers] Numbered List Issue

2023-03-30 Thread acraig
Win 10 with FrameMaker 20 (not the latest Frame version as my company
doesn't allow updates as they are released).

 

 

I'm sure the answer to this is easy, but I can't figure it out.

 

I have a list of numbered instructions. Within that list is an alpha
sub-list under one of the instructions.

 

When I finish the last alpha sub-list entry and revert to the numbered
instruction list, the number continues counting from the last alpha bullet,
not the previous numbered instruction.

 

For example:

 

1. 

2. 

3. 

 a)

 b)

 c)

 d)

5. 

 

Where "5" should actually be "4".

 

The first numbered and alpha list steps have the following auto-numbering
setups:

.\t

.\t

 

Second and subsequent numbered and alpha list steps have the following
auto-numbering setups:

.\t

.\t

 

What am I doing wrong?

 

Alison

___

This message is from the Framers mailing list

Send messages to framers@lists.frameusers.com
Visit the list's homepage at  http://www.frameusers.com
Archives located at http://www.mail-archive.com/framers%40lists.frameusers.com/
Subscribe and unsubscribe at 
http://lists.frameusers.com/listinfo.cgi/framers-frameusers.com
Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com