Re: [Frameworks] projector-less film loops

2013-12-18 Thread Sasha Janerus
A good place to look would be the recent book Exhibiting Cinema in
Contemporary Art by Erika Balsom.


On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Mary Stark maryst...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:

 Hi Rebecca,

 I have been working with 16mm film as installation using loops, fresnel
 lenses and film as a sculptural material. If you are interested please look
 at my website and blog
 http://www.marystark.co.uk/
 http://interwovenpractices.co.uk/

 Best wishes,

 Mary Stark

 Tel: 07828450979


 On 17 Dec 2013, at 20:27, Jonathan Walley wall...@denison.edu wrote:

  Rebecca, et. al.,
 
  After re-reading your post, and reading Scott's response, it strikes me
 that you may have been looking for information about early (e.g. silent,
 primitive?) film systems that involved viewing 16mm film without lens or
 projector. Your use of the term installation made me assume expanded
 cinema, film installation, etc., but then there's your reference to the
 zoetrope, which suggests that you're looking for something further back in
 history. Of course, the zoetrope did not use film of any kind. What's more,
 16mm film wasn't invented until 1923, by which time projection - with
 lenses - was, of course, standard practice in film exhibition. I'm not
 aware of any viewing systems for 16mm that don't employ at least lenses:
 flatbed editors don't quite project the images, at least not in the same
 way a projector does, and devices like Moviolas and Moviscopes don't
 involve projection - the film image is simply magnified into a viewer, not
 unlike the Kinetsoscope. But these systems are used to edit film reels, not
 to show loops. And they all use lenses.
 
  Specifying your research project would be helpful - can we have a little
 more detail?
  Jonathan
 
  Dr. Jonathan Walley
  Associate Professor
  Department of Cinema
  Denison University
  wall...@denison.edu
 
 
  On Dec 17, 2013, at 12:44 PM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
 
  Well, the first loop system was the Edison Kinetoscope but that was
 35mm..
  --scott
  ___
  FrameWorks mailing list
  FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
  https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
 
  ___
  FrameWorks mailing list
  FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
  https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

 ___
 FrameWorks mailing list
 FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
 https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


[Frameworks] projector-less film loops

2013-12-17 Thread Rebekka Erin Moran
Hi,

I am researching 16mm in the use of film loop installations.  Does anyone have 
any references for that topic?
Other than zoetrope- Im looking for usage of 16mm film itself in a looping 
format viewed in any way possible without a projector or lense.

Thanks for any help!
Rebecca

___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


Re: [Frameworks] projector-less film loops

2013-12-17 Thread Jonathan Walley
Rebecca,

Writings by and about Paul Sharits would be a good place to start. Sharits' 
installations included the presentation of 16mm filmstrips without projection, 
but also used a lot of looping on multiple 16mm projectors. There is an entire 
issue of Film Culture dedicated to his work; many of his own writings are 
available online - a little Googling should turn them up. I also highly 
recommend Federico Windhausen's writing on Sharits.

Ron Green wrote a piece on the loop for a recent issue of Millennium Film 
Journal. The Re-Emergence of the Film/video Loop, it's called, in issue 55, I 
think. Darkened Rooms: A Genealogy of Avant-Garde Filmstrips from Man Ray to 
the London Film-Makers’ Co-op and Back Again by Noam Elcott is also good 
reading. It's in Grey Room #30.

Sandra Gibson and Luis Recoder's work makes use of the loop, and in some cases 
makes film loops visible without projection, as objects in and of themselves. 
Again, a web search should turn up abundant info on their work.

Hope this helps - lots more out there but this is off the top of my head and 
now I've got to get back to grading.
Best,
Jonathan

Dr. Jonathan Walley
Associate Professor
Department of Cinema
Denison University
wall...@denison.edu


On Dec 17, 2013, at 11:47 AM, Rebekka Erin Moran wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I am researching 16mm in the use of film loop installations.  Does anyone 
 have any references for that topic?
 Other than zoetrope- Im looking for usage of 16mm film itself in a looping 
 format viewed in any way possible without a projector or lense.
 
 Thanks for any help!
 Rebecca
 
 ___
 FrameWorks mailing list
 FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
 https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


Re: [Frameworks] projector-less film loops

2013-12-17 Thread Scott Dorsey
Well, the first loop system was the Edison Kinetoscope but that was 35mm..
--scott
___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


Re: [Frameworks] projector-less film loops

2013-12-17 Thread Jonathan Walley
Rebecca, et. al.,

After re-reading your post, and reading Scott's response, it strikes me that 
you may have been looking for information about early (e.g. silent, 
primitive?) film systems that involved viewing 16mm film without lens or 
projector. Your use of the term installation made me assume expanded cinema, 
film installation, etc., but then there's your reference to the zoetrope, which 
suggests that you're looking for something further back in history. Of course, 
the zoetrope did not use film of any kind. What's more, 16mm film wasn't 
invented until 1923, by which time projection - with lenses - was, of course, 
standard practice in film exhibition. I'm not aware of any viewing systems for 
16mm that don't employ at least lenses: flatbed editors don't quite project 
the images, at least not in the same way a projector does, and devices like 
Moviolas and Moviscopes don't involve projection - the film image is simply 
magnified into a viewer, not unlike the Kinetsoscope. But these systems are 
used to edit film reels, not to show loops. And they all use lenses. 

Specifying your research project would be helpful - can we have a little more 
detail?
Jonathan

Dr. Jonathan Walley
Associate Professor
Department of Cinema
Denison University
wall...@denison.edu


On Dec 17, 2013, at 12:44 PM, Scott Dorsey wrote:

 Well, the first loop system was the Edison Kinetoscope but that was 35mm..
 --scott
 ___
 FrameWorks mailing list
 FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
 https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


Re: [Frameworks] projector-less film loops

2013-12-17 Thread Mary Stark
Hi Rebecca,

I have been working with 16mm film as installation using loops, fresnel lenses 
and film as a sculptural material. If you are interested please look at my 
website and blog 
http://www.marystark.co.uk/
http://interwovenpractices.co.uk/

Best wishes,

Mary Stark

Tel: 07828450979


On 17 Dec 2013, at 20:27, Jonathan Walley wall...@denison.edu wrote:

 Rebecca, et. al.,
 
 After re-reading your post, and reading Scott's response, it strikes me that 
 you may have been looking for information about early (e.g. silent, 
 primitive?) film systems that involved viewing 16mm film without lens or 
 projector. Your use of the term installation made me assume expanded 
 cinema, film installation, etc., but then there's your reference to the 
 zoetrope, which suggests that you're looking for something further back in 
 history. Of course, the zoetrope did not use film of any kind. What's more, 
 16mm film wasn't invented until 1923, by which time projection - with lenses 
 - was, of course, standard practice in film exhibition. I'm not aware of any 
 viewing systems for 16mm that don't employ at least lenses: flatbed editors 
 don't quite project the images, at least not in the same way a projector 
 does, and devices like Moviolas and Moviscopes don't involve projection - the 
 film image is simply magnified into a viewer, not unlike the Kinetsoscope. 
 But these systems are used to edit film reels, not to show loops. And they 
 all use lenses. 
 
 Specifying your research project would be helpful - can we have a little more 
 detail?
 Jonathan
 
 Dr. Jonathan Walley
 Associate Professor
 Department of Cinema
 Denison University
 wall...@denison.edu
 
 
 On Dec 17, 2013, at 12:44 PM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
 
 Well, the first loop system was the Edison Kinetoscope but that was 35mm..
 --scott
 ___
 FrameWorks mailing list
 FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
 https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
 
 ___
 FrameWorks mailing list
 FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
 https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks