Re: [OpenRD Ultimate] e1000phy(88E1149/88E1121) has a initialize issue

2010-07-01 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 09:15:00PM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> Hi yongari.
> 
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:09:23 -0700
> Pyun YongHyeon  wrote:
> > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> > > - - - - - - - -
> > > Jun 13 05:02:14 sidearms kernel: mge1: watchdog timeout
> > > Jun 13 05:02:14 sidearms kernel: mge1: Timeout on link-up
> >   ^
> > This part looks like a bug in mge(4). Driver does not know how long
> > it would take to get a valid link. Waiting for valid link in driver
> > initialization does not work(e.g Starting controller without UTP
> > cable may always fail on mge(4)). I think mge(4) should implement
> > correct link state change handling.
> 
>   Thanks for your pointed out.  I didn't notice.
>   I'll fix this issue like following on mge_start_locked().
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> - - - - - -
> -   if ((ifp->if_drv_flags & (IFF_DRV_RUNNING | IFF_DRV_OACTIVE)) !=
> -   IFF_DRV_RUNNING)
> +   if (IFM_SUBTYPE(sc->mii->mii_media_active) == IFM_NONE ||
> +   (ifp->if_drv_flags & (IFF_DRV_RUNNING | IFF_DRV_OACTIVE)) != 
> IFF_DRV_RUNNING)

No, that change may not enough to fix a missing link state handling.
mge(4) needs a miibus_statchg KOBJ handler and it requires a lot of
code changes in mge(4).

> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> - - - - - -
> 
> > >   I found a initialize issue in e1000phy.c.
> > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> > > - - - - - - - -
> > > --- sys/dev/mii/e1000phy.c.orig   2010-05-01 10:17:15.282196000 +0900
> > > +++ sys/dev/mii/e1000phy.c2010-06-13 16:19:46.616650536 +0900
> > > @@ -278,6 +278,7 @@
> > >   case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1118:
> > >   break;
> > >   case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1116:
> > > + case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1149:
> > >   page = PHY_READ(sc, E1000_EADR);
> > >   /* Select page 3, LED control register. */
> > >   PHY_WRITE(sc, E1000_EADR, 3);
> > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> > > - - - - - - - -
> > >   I confirmed OK on my environment, OpenRD Ultimate has a 88E1121(I
> > >   saw it, physically):
> > Once it was there but I removed it due to some other issues seen on
> > Yukon Ultra. That part will program LED access so I guess it
> > wouldn't affect normal network activity.
> 
>   Hum..., like following?  At least, by current way, second NIC
>   doesn't link-up if link connected.
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> - - - - - -
>   case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1118:
> + case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1149:
>   break;

This change was also backed out due to 88E8072 issue on
establishing 100Mbps link. e1000phy(4)'s 88E1149 PHY handling seems
to require more work as some Yukon Ultra/Ultra II still have
problems. ATM I have no idea whether this issue comes from MAC
controller or not.

>   case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1116:
>   page = PHY_READ(sc, E1000_EADR);
>   /* Select page 3, LED control register. */
>   PHY_WRITE(sc, E1000_EADR, 3);
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> - - - - - -
> 
> 
> > 88E1116R might be RGMII variant of 88E1116. Because I don't have
> > controller that has 88E1116R I didn't treat it as 88E1116. With
> > that change could you use straight cable without help of MDI/MDI-X
> > converter?
> 
>   Sorry, I don't have 88E1116R machine, so I don't know.

Ok.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: [OpenRD Ultimate] e1000phy(88E1149/88E1121) has a initialize issue

2010-06-20 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
Hi Kristof.

On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 15:01:00 +0200
Kristof Provost  wrote:
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> > - - - - - - -
> > /* Tell the MAC where to find the PHY so autoneg works */
> > -   miisc = LIST_FIRST(&sc->mii->mii_phys);
> > -   MGE_WRITE(sc, MGE_REG_PHYDEV, miisc->mii_phy);
> > +   MGE_WRITE(sc, MGE_REG_PHYDEV, sc->phyaddr);
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> > - - - - - - -
> I think that's correct, but I haven't been able to test it on my board
> yet. Does this work for you on a board with two GbE ports? If so I'll
> try to get someone to commit it.

Yes, good works well.  I reported following:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2010-June/002402.html

Thank you.

-- 
Norikatsu Shigemura 
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: [OpenRD Ultimate] e1000phy(88E1149/88E1121) has a initialize issue

2010-06-20 Thread Kristof Provost
On 2010-06-20 21:03:51 (+0900), Norikatsu Shigemura  wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:13:31 +0200
> Kristof Provost  wrote:
> > >   I have a OpenRD Ultimate, which has two GbE ports - if_mge(4).  But
> > >   I couldn't use mge1 like following.  So I tried to investigate.
> > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> > > - - - - - - - -
> > > Jun 13 05:02:14 sidearms kernel: mge1: watchdog timeout
> > > Jun 13 05:02:14 sidearms kernel: mge1: Timeout on link-up
> > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> > > - - - - - - - -
> > I believe the mge(4) driver incorrectly configures the PHY address for
> > the second interface. Can you give the attached patch a try?
> 
>   Thank you. I think so, too.  And, by FDT, I suggest following
>   patch.
> 
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> - - - - - -
> /* Tell the MAC where to find the PHY so autoneg works */
> -   miisc = LIST_FIRST(&sc->mii->mii_phys);
> -   MGE_WRITE(sc, MGE_REG_PHYDEV, miisc->mii_phy);
> +   MGE_WRITE(sc, MGE_REG_PHYDEV, sc->phyaddr);
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> - - - - - -
> 
I think that's correct, but I haven't been able to test it on my board
yet. Does this work for you on a board with two GbE ports? If so I'll
try to get someone to commit it.

Regards,
Kristof

___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: [OpenRD Ultimate] e1000phy(88E1149/88E1121) has a initialize issue

2010-06-20 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
Hi yongari.

On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:09:23 -0700
Pyun YongHyeon  wrote:
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> > - - - - - - -
> > Jun 13 05:02:14 sidearms kernel: mge1: watchdog timeout
> > Jun 13 05:02:14 sidearms kernel: mge1: Timeout on link-up
>   ^
> This part looks like a bug in mge(4). Driver does not know how long
> it would take to get a valid link. Waiting for valid link in driver
> initialization does not work(e.g Starting controller without UTP
> cable may always fail on mge(4)). I think mge(4) should implement
> correct link state change handling.

Thanks for your pointed out.  I didn't notice.
I'll fix this issue like following on mge_start_locked().
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - -
-   if ((ifp->if_drv_flags & (IFF_DRV_RUNNING | IFF_DRV_OACTIVE)) !=
-   IFF_DRV_RUNNING)
+   if (IFM_SUBTYPE(sc->mii->mii_media_active) == IFM_NONE ||
+   (ifp->if_drv_flags & (IFF_DRV_RUNNING | IFF_DRV_OACTIVE)) != 
IFF_DRV_RUNNING)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - -

> > I found a initialize issue in e1000phy.c.
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> > - - - - - - -
> > --- sys/dev/mii/e1000phy.c.orig 2010-05-01 10:17:15.282196000 +0900
> > +++ sys/dev/mii/e1000phy.c  2010-06-13 16:19:46.616650536 +0900
> > @@ -278,6 +278,7 @@
> > case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1118:
> > break;
> > case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1116:
> > +   case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1149:
> > page = PHY_READ(sc, E1000_EADR);
> > /* Select page 3, LED control register. */
> > PHY_WRITE(sc, E1000_EADR, 3);
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> > - - - - - - -
> > I confirmed OK on my environment, OpenRD Ultimate has a 88E1121(I
> > saw it, physically):
> Once it was there but I removed it due to some other issues seen on
> Yukon Ultra. That part will program LED access so I guess it
> wouldn't affect normal network activity.

Hum..., like following?  At least, by current way, second NIC
doesn't link-up if link connected.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - -
case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1118:
+   case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1149:
break;
case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1116:
page = PHY_READ(sc, E1000_EADR);
/* Select page 3, LED control register. */
PHY_WRITE(sc, E1000_EADR, 3);
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - -


> 88E1116R might be RGMII variant of 88E1116. Because I don't have
> controller that has 88E1116R I didn't treat it as 88E1116. With
> that change could you use straight cable without help of MDI/MDI-X
> converter?

Sorry, I don't have 88E1116R machine, so I don't know.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: [OpenRD Ultimate] e1000phy(88E1149/88E1121) has a initialize issue

2010-06-20 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
Hi Kristof.

On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:13:31 +0200
Kristof Provost  wrote:
> > I have a OpenRD Ultimate, which has two GbE ports - if_mge(4).  But
> > I couldn't use mge1 like following.  So I tried to investigate.
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> > - - - - - - -
> > Jun 13 05:02:14 sidearms kernel: mge1: watchdog timeout
> > Jun 13 05:02:14 sidearms kernel: mge1: Timeout on link-up
> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> > - - - - - - -
> I believe the mge(4) driver incorrectly configures the PHY address for
> the second interface. Can you give the attached patch a try?

Thank you. I think so, too.  And, by FDT, I suggest following
patch.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - -
/* Tell the MAC where to find the PHY so autoneg works */
-   miisc = LIST_FIRST(&sc->mii->mii_phys);
-   MGE_WRITE(sc, MGE_REG_PHYDEV, miisc->mii_phy);
+   MGE_WRITE(sc, MGE_REG_PHYDEV, sc->phyaddr);
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - -

-- 
Norikatsu Shigemura 
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: [OpenRD Ultimate] e1000phy(88E1149/88E1121) has a initialize issue

2010-06-15 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 11:37:23PM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> Hi yongari!
> 
>   I have a OpenRD Ultimate, which has two GbE ports - if_mge(4).  But
>   I couldn't use mge1 like following.  So I tried to investigate.
> 
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> - - - - - -
> Jun 13 05:02:14 sidearms kernel: mge1: watchdog timeout
> Jun 13 05:02:14 sidearms kernel: mge1: Timeout on link-up
  ^

This part looks like a bug in mge(4). Driver does not know how long
it would take to get a valid link. Waiting for valid link in driver
initialization does not work(e.g Starting controller without UTP
cable may always fail on mge(4)). I think mge(4) should implement
correct link state change handling.

> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> - - - - - -
> 
>   I found a initialize issue in e1000phy.c.
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> - - - - - -
> --- sys/dev/mii/e1000phy.c.orig   2010-05-01 10:17:15.282196000 +0900
> +++ sys/dev/mii/e1000phy.c2010-06-13 16:19:46.616650536 +0900
> @@ -278,6 +278,7 @@
>   case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1118:
>   break;
>   case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1116:
> + case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1149:
>   page = PHY_READ(sc, E1000_EADR);
>   /* Select page 3, LED control register. */
>   PHY_WRITE(sc, E1000_EADR, 3);
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> - - - - - -
> 
>   I confirmed OK on my environment, OpenRD Ultimate has a 88E1121(I
>   saw it, physically):

Once it was there but I removed it due to some other issues seen on
Yukon Ultra. That part will program LED access so I guess it
wouldn't affect normal network activity.

> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> - - - - - -
> Jun 13 15:20:01 sidearms kernel: miibus0: miibus_probe: ma.mii_id1 = 0x141, 
> ma.mii_id2 = 0xcb3
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> - - - - - -
>   And I confirmed that MII chipset ID is same as 88E1249.
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> - - - - - -
> mge0
> Marvell OBIO Memory:
> 4043776000-4043784191
> Marvell OBIO IRQ:
> 11
> 12
> 13
> 14
> 46
>   miibus0
> e1000phy0 pnpinfo oui=0x5043 model=0xb rev=0x3 at phyno=0
> mge1
> Marvell OBIO Memory:
> 4043792384-4043800575
> Marvell OBIO IRQ:
> 15
> 16
> 17
> 18
> 47
>   miibus1
> e1000phy1 pnpinfo oui=0x5043 model=0xb rev=0x3 at phyno=1
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> - - - - - -
> 
> 
>   BTW, I knew same issue on OpenRD Client, it has a 88E1116R, maybe.
>   Sorry, I don't already have it.  I couldn't confirm.
>   So accordingly my memo:
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> - - - - - -
> miibus0: ma.mii_id1 = 0x141, ma.mii_id2 = 0xe40
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> - - - - - -
>   I found many initialize issues on 88E1116R by not existing on
>   e1000phy.c.  Maybe 88E1116 = 88E1116R like following:
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> - - - - - -
>   switch (esc->mii_model) {
>   case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E:
>   case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1112:
>   case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1116:
> + case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1116R:
>   case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1118:
>   case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1149:
>   case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_PHYG65G:
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> - - - - - -
>   But there are many points, I don't know that this modify is right.
> 

88E1116R might be RGMII variant of 88E1116. Because I don't have
controller that has 88E1116R I didn't treat it as 88E1116. With
that change could you use straight cable without help of MDI/MDI-X
converter?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: [OpenRD Ultimate] e1000phy(88E1149/88E1121) has a initialize issue

2010-06-13 Thread Kristof Provost
On 2010-06-13 23:37:23 (+0900), Norikatsu Shigemura  wrote:
> Hi yongari!
> 
>   I have a OpenRD Ultimate, which has two GbE ports - if_mge(4).  But
>   I couldn't use mge1 like following.  So I tried to investigate.
> 
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> - - - - - -
> Jun 13 05:02:14 sidearms kernel: mge1: watchdog timeout
> Jun 13 05:02:14 sidearms kernel: mge1: Timeout on link-up
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
> - - - - - -
> 
I believe the mge(4) driver incorrectly configures the PHY address for
the second interface. Can you give the attached patch a try?

I'm not familiar with the PHY code so I won't comment on those changes.

Regards,
Kristof

Index: sys/dev/mge/if_mge.c
===
--- sys/dev/mge/if_mge.c	(revision 208113)
+++ sys/dev/mge/if_mge.c	(working copy)
@@ -606,7 +606,6 @@
 mge_attach(device_t dev)
 {
 	struct mge_softc *sc;
-	struct mii_softc *miisc;
 	struct ifnet *ifp;
 	uint8_t hwaddr[ETHER_ADDR_LEN];
 	int i, error ;
@@ -690,9 +689,9 @@
 	}
 	sc->mii = device_get_softc(sc->miibus);
 
-	/* Tell the MAC where to find the PHY so autoneg works */
-	miisc = LIST_FIRST(&sc->mii->mii_phys);
-	MGE_WRITE(sc, MGE_REG_PHYDEV, miisc->mii_phy);
+	/* Tell the MAC where to find the PHY so autoneg works 
+	 * We assume a static mapping (see mge_miibus_readreg) */
+	MGE_WRITE(sc, MGE_REG_PHYDEV, device_get_unit(dev) + MII_ADDR_BASE);
 
 	/* Attach interrupt handlers */
 	for (i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

[OpenRD Ultimate] e1000phy(88E1149/88E1121) has a initialize issue

2010-06-13 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
Hi yongari!

I have a OpenRD Ultimate, which has two GbE ports - if_mge(4).  But
I couldn't use mge1 like following.  So I tried to investigate.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - -
Jun 13 05:02:14 sidearms kernel: mge1: watchdog timeout
Jun 13 05:02:14 sidearms kernel: mge1: Timeout on link-up
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - -

I found a initialize issue in e1000phy.c.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - -
--- sys/dev/mii/e1000phy.c.orig 2010-05-01 10:17:15.282196000 +0900
+++ sys/dev/mii/e1000phy.c  2010-06-13 16:19:46.616650536 +0900
@@ -278,6 +278,7 @@
case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1118:
break;
case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1116:
+   case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1149:
page = PHY_READ(sc, E1000_EADR);
/* Select page 3, LED control register. */
PHY_WRITE(sc, E1000_EADR, 3);
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - -

I confirmed OK on my environment, OpenRD Ultimate has a 88E1121(I
saw it, physically):
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - -
Jun 13 15:20:01 sidearms kernel: miibus0: miibus_probe: ma.mii_id1 = 0x141, 
ma.mii_id2 = 0xcb3
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - -
And I confirmed that MII chipset ID is same as 88E1249.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - -
mge0
Marvell OBIO Memory:
4043776000-4043784191
Marvell OBIO IRQ:
11
12
13
14
46
  miibus0
e1000phy0 pnpinfo oui=0x5043 model=0xb rev=0x3 at phyno=0
mge1
Marvell OBIO Memory:
4043792384-4043800575
Marvell OBIO IRQ:
15
16
17
18
47
  miibus1
e1000phy1 pnpinfo oui=0x5043 model=0xb rev=0x3 at phyno=1
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - -


BTW, I knew same issue on OpenRD Client, it has a 88E1116R, maybe.
Sorry, I don't already have it.  I couldn't confirm.
So accordingly my memo:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - -
miibus0: ma.mii_id1 = 0x141, ma.mii_id2 = 0xe40
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - -
I found many initialize issues on 88E1116R by not existing on
e1000phy.c.  Maybe 88E1116 = 88E1116R like following:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - -
switch (esc->mii_model) {
case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E:
case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1112:
case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1116:
+   case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1116R:
case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1118:
case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_E1149:
case MII_MODEL_MARVELL_PHYG65G:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
- - - - -
But there are many points, I don't know that this modify is right.

-- 
Hayabusa, Okaerinasai!

Norikatsu Shigemura 
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"