Yes, looks right.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Gary Palmer" writes:
Does this look right? Without this patch, my AXP was memory faulting
every time it booted, in the dev2udev routine.
Thanks
Index: alpha/alpha/cons.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/alpha/alpha/cons.c,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -r1.11 cons.c
--- cons.c 1999/06/22 14:13:16 1.11
+++ cons.c 1999/07/24 07:18:25
@@ -88,9 +88,8 @@
};
static dev_t cn_dev_t; /* seems to be never really used */
-static udev_t cn_udev_t;
SYSCTL_OPAQUE(_machdep, CPU_CONSDEV, consdev, CTLFLAG_RD,
- cn_udev_t, sizeof cn_udev_t, "T,dev_t", "");
+ cn_dev_t, sizeof cn_dev_t, "T,dev_t", "");
static int cn_mute;
@@ -185,7 +184,6 @@
cdp-d_open = cnopen;
cn_tp = (*cdp-d_devtotty)(cn_tab-cn_dev);
cn_dev_t = cn_tp-t_dev;
- cn_udev_t = dev2udev(cn_dev_t);
}
static void
@@ -206,7 +204,6 @@
cn_phys_open = NULL;
cn_tp = NULL;
cn_dev_t = 0;
- cn_udev_t = dev2udev(cn_dev_t);
}
/*
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
--
Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message