Re: driver writing newbie

2001-08-14 Thread Alexander Langer

Thus spake Kenneth Wayne Culver ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

 SYS_RES_MEMORY instead of SYS_RES_IOPORT (all these combinations are for
 use in bus_alloc_resource). The thing is everything I've tried fails to
 work, so I can't attach my driver because it won't map the resources.
 Can anyone suggest other things I could try to make this work right?

Source?

Alex

-- 
WELCOME DATACOMP!

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: driver writing newbie

2001-07-25 Thread Kenneth Wayne Culver



On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:

 Sorry to post to this forum, but I'm not getting any replies from -hackers
 or -questions, and I've looked at the webpages on writing device drivers,
 as well as several other drivers. Here's my problem/question/whatever...
 
 I am writing a driver right now for the Hardware monitoring features of
 the via686a and via686b south bridge chips. I have documentation and have
 looked at the linux driver to see how things are done. My problem is that
 I've got the chip probing, and I have the pci_read_config telling me that
 my device needs a memory port (what's wierd is that I had to use the base
 register value of the chip instead of PCIR_COMMAND in pci_read_config to
 get it to tell me that it wanted me to set up a port instead of mem which
 is 0x70) So I set up the regid as 0x10 (PCIR_MAPS) as outlined in the

I meant above that the base register is 0x70 for my chip...

 webpage, and SYS_RES_IOPORT as I found in the pci driver for the es137x
 sound chip. I've also tried several combinations. So far the only thing I
 havn't tried is setting the regid to 0x10 (PCIR_MAPS) and using
 SYS_RES_MEMORY instead of SYS_RES_IOPORT (all these combinations are for
 use in bus_alloc_resource). The thing is everything I've tried fails to
 work, so I can't attach my driver because it won't map the resources.
 
 Can anyone suggest other things I could try to make this work right?
 
 Ken
 
 
 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: driver writing newbie

2001-07-25 Thread Kenneth Wayne Culver

Well, I could do that, but I'd rather write a complete driver with all the
regular interfaces... (open, close, ioctl, and a specific major/minor in
the kernel, I'm going to add other chips to this driver eventually) The
way you are suggesting just opens /dev/io and uses inb and outb to do some
hacking around I believe.

Ken
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 
 Hello Kenneth,
 
 shouldn't you use 0x70 for the mapping register of HWMon function ?
 
 With ABit KT7A (686B)
 
 # pciconf -l
 hostb1@pci0:7:4:
 class=0x06 card=0x chip=0x30571106 rev=0x40 hdr=0x00
 
 # pciconf -r pci0:7:4 0x70
 0x6001 
 
 and 0x6000 can be used as an i/o-base by a dirty hack to directly inb()
 the monitor data. I stripped it from the NetBSD driver (I think).
 
 
 Juha
 
 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: driver writing newbie

2001-07-25 Thread Juha . Nurmela



On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:

 Well, I could do that, but I'd rather write a complete driver with all the
 regular interfaces... (open, close, ioctl, and a specific major/minor in
 the kernel, I'm going to add other chips to this driver eventually) The
 way you are suggesting just opens /dev/io and uses inb and outb to do some
 hacking around I believe.

You are absolutely correct. I was not suggesting this as the proper
approach, but as a throw-away checkpoint only (the mapping registers
seemed inconsistent between OS/motherboard combinations). I suppose
0x70 is for HWMon and 0x90 is for the SMBus function, in Via 686B.

Have you checked NetBSD, the seem to have a framework for temperature
alarms etc.


Juha


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: driver writing newbie

2001-07-25 Thread Kenneth Wayne Culver

I havn't checked, but I'll probably do that soon.

Ken

On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 
 On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
 
  Well, I could do that, but I'd rather write a complete driver with all the
  regular interfaces... (open, close, ioctl, and a specific major/minor in
  the kernel, I'm going to add other chips to this driver eventually) The
  way you are suggesting just opens /dev/io and uses inb and outb to do some
  hacking around I believe.
 
 You are absolutely correct. I was not suggesting this as the proper
 approach, but as a throw-away checkpoint only (the mapping registers
 seemed inconsistent between OS/motherboard combinations). I suppose
 0x70 is for HWMon and 0x90 is for the SMBus function, in Via 686B.
 
 Have you checked NetBSD, the seem to have a framework for temperature
 alarms etc.
 
 
 Juha
 
 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message