Re: smbfs support

2001-12-28 Thread Jan Stocker

What is the state of smbfs for current at present?



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: smbfs support

2001-12-28 Thread Max Khon

hi, there!

On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 09:33:08PM +0100, Jan Stocker wrote:

 What is the state of smbfs for current at present?

Boris Popov has updated kernel-side smbfs for KSE.
Sheldon Hearn imported smbfs 1.4.3 userland (to both HEAD and RELENG_4).

smbfs should work out of box.

we still do not have libiconv in base system so if you want to do
filenames recoding you have to install it from ports.

/fjoe

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: smbfs support

2001-12-03 Thread Julian Elischer


 On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Sheldon Hearn wrote:

  | I have some untested patches in my tree and I will contact bp this
  | week about them (I wanted to import smbfs userland to the tree and
  | already got ok from bp but could not test it because kernel-side smbfs
  | is not compilable yet).
  
  Excellent news!

   Indeed.

  Presumably, if bp doesn't respond by the end of the year, you'll go
  ahead regardless? :-)

   Actually, bp responded much faster than you expected :)
 Patches submitted by Max were mostly correct except for two or three
 lines and now committed to the tree. Again, special thanks to him for very
 good work.

   However, I'm still don't have enough spare time and really hope
 Max will import userland part of smbfs soon.


do these patches include the proc-thread changes needed?



 -- 
 Boris Popov
 http://rbp.euro.ru


 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: smbfs support

2001-12-03 Thread Boris Popov

On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:

 do these patches include the proc-thread changes needed?


According to cvs logs - yes.

-- 
Boris Popov
http://rbp.euro.ru


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: smbfs support

2001-12-02 Thread Boris Popov

On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Sheldon Hearn wrote:

 | I have some untested patches in my tree and I will contact bp this
 | week about them (I wanted to import smbfs userland to the tree and
 | already got ok from bp but could not test it because kernel-side smbfs
 | is not compilable yet).
 
 Excellent news!

Indeed.

 Presumably, if bp doesn't respond by the end of the year, you'll go
 ahead regardless? :-)

Actually, bp responded much faster than you expected :)
Patches submitted by Max were mostly correct except for two or three
lines and now committed to the tree. Again, special thanks to him for very
good work.

However, I'm still don't have enough spare time and really hope
Max will import userland part of smbfs soon.

-- 
Boris Popov
http://rbp.euro.ru


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: smbfs support

2001-11-28 Thread Sheldon Hearn



On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:06:00 +0100, Przemyslaw Kowalczyk wrote:

| I'm trying to compile smbfs. I've added SMBFS and NETSMB options to my kernel 
| config, but I'm not sure is it enough. The output of make buildkernel is as 
| follows:

I don't think anyone's updated smbfs for the post-KSE world order.  The
smbfs maintainer seems snowed under, and Julian wants someone who
understands it better to take a look.

That was the case a couple of weeks ago, at any rate.

Ciao,
Sheldon.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: smbfs support

2001-11-28 Thread Max Khon

hi, there!

On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 02:30:54PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:

 | I'm trying to compile smbfs. I've added SMBFS and NETSMB options to my kernel 
 | config, but I'm not sure is it enough. The output of make buildkernel is as 
 | follows:
 
 I don't think anyone's updated smbfs for the post-KSE world order.  The
 smbfs maintainer seems snowed under, and Julian wants someone who
 understands it better to take a look.
 
 That was the case a couple of weeks ago, at any rate.

I have some untested patches in my tree and I will contact bp this week
about them (I wanted to import smbfs userland to the tree and already
got ok from bp but could not test it because kernel-side smbfs is not compilable
yet).

/fjoe

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: smbfs support

2001-11-28 Thread Max Khon

hi, there!

On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 02:55:24PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:

 | I have some untested patches in my tree and I will contact bp this
 | week about them (I wanted to import smbfs userland to the tree and
 | already got ok from bp but could not test it because kernel-side smbfs
 | is not compilable yet).
 
 Excellent news!
 
 Presumably, if bp doesn't respond by the end of the year, you'll go
 ahead regardless? :-)

:)
bp is quite responsive. I even had a talk with him on #bsdcode

/fjoe

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: smbfs support

2001-11-28 Thread Sheldon Hearn



On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:58:10 +0600, Max Khon wrote:

| :)
| bp is quite responsive. I even had a talk with him on #bsdcode

Even more good news.  I look forward to forgetting about the smbfs port!
:-)

Ciao,
Sheldon.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: smbfs support

2001-11-28 Thread Julian Elischer

SMBFS is broken, it will be fixed but I'm not sure when.
the other broken one in NWFS


On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Przemyslaw Kowalczyk wrote:

 Hi.
 
 I'm trying to compile smbfs. I've added SMBFS and NETSMB options to my kernel 
 config, but I'm not sure is it enough. The output of make buildkernel is as 
 follows:
 
  -I/usr/src/sys/../include  -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -elf  
 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2  /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c
 /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c: In function `smbfs_readvdir':
 /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:97: structure has no member named `uio_procp'
 /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c: In function `smbfs_readvnode':
 /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:201: structure has no member named 
 `uio_procp'
 /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:205: warning: passing arg 3 of `vn_lock' 
 from incompatible pointer type
 /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:208: warning: passing arg 3 of `vn_lock' 
 from incompatible pointer type
 /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:215: warning: passing arg 4 of `VOP_GETATTR' 
 from incompatible pointer type
 /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:220: warning: passing arg 4 of `VOP_GETATTR' 
 from incompatible pointer type
 /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:186: warning: `p' might be used 
 uninitialized in this function
 /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c: In function `smbfs_writevnode':
 /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:253: structure has no member named 
 `uio_procp'
 /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:241: warning: `p' might be used 
 uninitialized in this function
 /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c: In function `smbfs_doio':
 /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:310: structure has no member named 
 `uio_procp'
 /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c: In function `smbfs_getpages':
 /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:461: structure has no member named 
 `uio_procp'
 /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c: In function `smbfs_putpages':
 /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:599: structure has no member named 
 `uio_procp'
 /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c: In function `smbfs_vinvalbuf':
 /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:657: warning: passing arg 4 of `vinvalbuf' 
 from incompatible pointer type
 /usr/src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_io.c:667: warning: passing arg 4 of `vinvalbuf' 
 from incompatible pointer type
 
 Is there any workaround for this? 
 
 greets
 
 przem
 
 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message