Re: Is there any way to increase the KVM?

2008-06-01 Thread Ender

Jeremy Chadwick wrote:

On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 04:43:48PM +0800, Tz-Huan Huang wrote:
  

On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 4:03 AM, Maslan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Your are right PAE is for i386, i mean try running i386 freebsd with
PAE enabled rather than amd64. PAE will let you access 64GB which is
far than you got.
  

The whole 8G physical memory is available in our system, the point we
concerned is that the kernel cannot use more than 2G memory in kernel
space.



Your concern is justified; I don't think Maslan understands what it is
you're describing.  Yes, there is a 2GB limit for kmem_size.  Yes, that
limit applies to both i386 (with or without PAE) and amd64.  Yes, it's a
problem.  And yes, it's absolutely a problem (especially when it comes
to ZFS).

  
Exactly. If you have to use ZFS in production I would suggest the new 
2008.05 opensolaris.com live cd / installer

Since the server is on line now, we cannot re-install it to i386 to check this.
We'll try it if we have spare machines.



Don't bother -- it won't fix the problem you're reporting.

  


___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Patch RFC: Promise SATA300 TX4 hardware bug workaround.

2007-11-03 Thread Ender

Arno J. Klaassen wrote:

Hello,

Alexander Sabourenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  

Hello.

I have ported the workaround for the hardware bug that causes data
corruption on Promise SATA300 TX4 cards to RELENG_7.

Bug description:
SATA300 TX4 hardware chokes if last PRD entry (in a dma transfer) is
larger than 164 bytes. This was found while analysing vendor-supplied
linux driver.

Workaround:
Split trailing PRD entry if it's larger that 164 bytes.

Two supplied patches do fix problem on my machine.




definitely an improvement, but not sufficient (for my setup ) :

amd64-releng_6 on an ASUS A8V UP (box ran rock-stable
for years i386-releng_5 with same hardware apart TX4 and
drives)

from dmesg :

atapci0: Promise PDC40718 SATA300 controller port 0xe000-0xe07f,0xd800-0xd8ff 
mem 0xfbb0-0xfbb00fff,0xfba0-0xfba1 irq 18 at device 13.0 on pci0
ata2: ATA channel 0 on atapci0
ata3: ATA channel 1 on atapci0
ata4: ATA channel 2 on atapci0
ata5: ATA channel 3 on atapci0
atapci1: VIA 6420 SATA150 controller port 
0xd400-0xd407,0xd000-0xd003,0xc800-0xc807,0xc400-0xc403,0xc000-0xc00f,0xb800-0xb8ff 
irq 20 at device 15.0 on pci0
ata6: ATA channel 0 on atapci1
ata7: ATA channel 1 on atapci1
atapci2: VIA 8237 UDMA133 controller port 
0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xfc00-0xfc0f at device 15.1 on pci0
ata0: ATA channel 0 on atapci2
ata1: ATA channel 1 on atapci2

[ ... ]

ad0: 38166MB Seagate ST3402111A 3.AAJ at ata0-master UDMA100
ad6: 476940MB WDC WD5000AAKS-00TMA0 12.01C01 at ata3-master SATA300
ad12: 305245MB WDC WD3200JD-22KLB0 08.05J08 at ata6-master SATA150

booting from ad0 and simple gconcat over ad6 and ad12.

Improvement : I now can fsck /dev/concat/data without
ad6 being detached

Persistent problem : when I rsync an nfs-mounted disk to /dev/concat/data,
I get after about some Gigs of data have been transfered :

Nov  2 16:39:55 charlotte kernel: ad6: WARNING - WRITE_DMA UDMA ICRC error 
(retrying request) LBA=268435392
Nov  2 16:40:50 charlotte kernel: ad6: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE 
taskqueue timeout - completing request directly
Nov  2 16:40:50 charlotte kernel: ad6: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE 
taskqueue timeout - completing request directly
Nov  2 16:40:50 charlotte kernel: ad6: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE 
taskqueue timeout - completing request directly
Nov  2 16:40:50 charlotte kernel: ad6: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE 
taskqueue timeout - completing request directly
Nov  2 16:40:50 charlotte kernel: ad6: WARNING - SET_MULTI taskqueue timeout - 
completing request directly
Nov  2 16:40:50 charlotte kernel: ad6: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (0 retries 
left) LBA=268435392
Nov  2 16:40:50 charlotte kernel: ad6: FAILURE - WRITE_DMA 
status=ffBUSY,READY,DMA_READY,DSC,DRQ,CORRECTABLE,INDEX,ERROR 
error=ffICRC,UNCORRECTABLE,MEDIA_CHANGED,NID_NOT_FOUND,MEDIA_CHANGE_REQEST,ABORTED,NO_MEDIA,ILLEGAL_LENGTH
 LBA=268435392
Nov  2 16:40:50 charlotte kernel: 
g_vfs_done():concat/data[WRITE(offset=137438920704, length=131072)]error = 5
Nov  2 16:40:50 charlotte kernel: ad6: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA48 retrying (1 retry 
left) LBA=268435648
Nov  2 16:40:50 charlotte kernel: ad6: WARNING - WRITE_DMA48 UDMA ICRC error 
(retrying request) LBA=268435648
Nov  2 16:40:50 charlotte kernel: ad6: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE 
taskqueue timeout - completing request directly
Nov  2 16:40:50 charlotte kernel: ad6: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE 
taskqueue timeout - completing request directly
Nov  2 16:40:50 charlotte kernel: ad6: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE 
taskqueue timeout - completing request directly
Nov  2 16:40:50 charlotte kernel: ad6: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE 
taskqueue timeout - completing request directly
Nov  2 16:40:50 charlotte kernel: ad6: WARNING - SET_MULTI taskqueue timeout - 
completing request directly
Nov  2 16:40:50 charlotte kernel: ad6: FAILURE - WRITE_DMA48 timed out 
LBA=268435648
Nov  2 16:40:50 charlotte kernel: 
g_vfs_done():concat/data[WRITE(offset=137439051776, length=131072)]error = 5

...

I will test again with #define PDC_MAXLASTSGSIZE 32*4 (just to see
if that makes a difference)

Regards, Arno

  


Just a guess here, I bet that patch helped, but there are compound 
problems reguarding SATA on amd64 in 7.x Do a quick search for [sata] 
(especially g_vfs_done) in the PR database. Hopefully this removed a 
layer of bugs so the other ones are easyer to fix.





___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]