Re: [CFT+RFC] patch to buildworld with heimdal from ports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Benjamin Lee wrote: On 11/15/2010 02:08 PM, Joerg Pulz wrote: Hi, after the security/heimdal port was updated to the current heimdal release and i added one missing function from base it is now possible to completely buildworld src/ using the port for all Kerberos5/GSSAPI enabled parts. Hi Joerg, I don't think that having the base system depend on a port is the right solution to resolving the libgssapi compatibility problems in base. Did you ever come across the old PR kern/147454 that I submitted in June? In it I included a src patch that replaced the base system's libgssapi with upstream Heimdal's, which resolved all libgssapi compatibility problems. That patch is now stale, but either way I haven't been able to draw enough attention to the issue to have it fixed. Hi Benjamin, the patch is not being meant to change the default. So default world builds will still use what we have in base now. It's just an additional option. There are already other places in base where one can link against stuff from ports. E.g. you can build base heimdal with OpenLDAP hdb backend support (see src/kerberos5/Makefile.inc) or you can build base sendmail with SASL and OpenLDAP support (see /etc/make.conf for SASL instructions) or you can build base bind with IDN and XML support (see src/usr.sbin/named/Makefile or in src.conf(5) the WITH_BIND_IDN and WITH_BIND_XML option). So it's not really uncommon to build base and link/use stuff from ports. I think as long as base is self hosting and you're not required to have somthing from ports installed just to be able to actually build world successful, everything is fine. I'm aware of kern/147454 and it will probably of use for my ongoing work in this area. Kind regards Joerg - -- The beginning is the most important part of the work. -Plato -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFM4jpjSPOsGF+KA+MRAiffAKCRJazCvg/feEJgUhkc8ieDz+6mDACfTyYh kreX9tEcoBq57VWr0i3XxBU= =y7Vb -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT+RFC] patch to buildworld with heimdal from ports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Content-ID: alpine.bsf.2.00.1011160928330.1...@unqrf.nqzva.sez2 On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Brandon Gooch wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Garrett Cooper gcoo...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Brandon Gooch jamesbrandongo...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Benjamin Lee b...@b1c1l1.com wrote: On 11/15/2010 02:08 PM, Joerg Pulz wrote: Hi, after the security/heimdal port was updated to the current heimdal release and i added one missing function from base it is now possible to completely buildworld src/ using the port for all Kerberos5/GSSAPI enabled parts. Hi Joerg, I don't think that having the base system depend on a port is the right solution to resolving the libgssapi compatibility problems in base. Did you ever come across the old PR kern/147454 that I submitted in June? In it I included a src patch that replaced the base system's libgssapi with upstream Heimdal's, which resolved all libgssapi compatibility problems. That patch is now stale, but either way I haven't been able to draw enough attention to the issue to have it fixed. I guess we're waiting on someone to review the patch and commit it? Hopefully someone can get this in soon, before 8.2 is released. Is there something wrong with your patch? Not according to another person that commented on the patch (and it sounds like the experience is positive, not negative). Who's the maintainer of the component? Garrett, where would one look for such an important detail? Source file somewhere? Joerg, how about taking over what's in base? Seems to me like you know what's going on, and you're maintaining the port :) BTW, I'm only beginning to dive into Kerberos on FreeBSD, so I'm not bringing to this discussion much wisdom :/ But I would like all of the pieces to work! Hi Brandon, i already started to work on updating base heimdal to a recent version which is not the easiest task but i made some progreess. Be patient. Kind regards - -- The beginning is the most important part of the work. -Plato -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFM4kWSSPOsGF+KA+MRAn3xAJ4ttm/cy+1ue0+G/Ca0+82fXWpf6wCePS4D Fm+7ZkvEu34lWhByynZKOGM= =PWDZ -END PGP SIGNATURE-___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT+RFC] patch to buildworld with heimdal from ports
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:54:40 -0600 Brandon Gooch jamesbrandongo...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Garrett Cooper gcoo...@freebsd.org wrote: Not according to another person that commented on the patch (and it sounds like the experience is positive, not negative). Who's the maintainer of the component? Garrett, where would one look for such an important detail? Source file somewhere? libgssapi doesn't have an official maintainer. Usually the committers who touch it the most are deemed responsible. Seems that dfr@ and uqs@ fit the bill. -- Gary Jennejohn ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT+RFC] patch to buildworld with heimdal from ports
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Joerg Pulz joerg.p...@frm2.tum.de wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Content-ID: alpine.bsf.2.00.1011160928330.1...@unqrf.nqzva.sez2 On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Brandon Gooch wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Garrett Cooper gcoo...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Brandon Gooch jamesbrandongo...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Benjamin Lee b...@b1c1l1.com wrote: On 11/15/2010 02:08 PM, Joerg Pulz wrote: Hi, after the security/heimdal port was updated to the current heimdal release and i added one missing function from base it is now possible to completely buildworld src/ using the port for all Kerberos5/GSSAPI enabled parts. Hi Joerg, I don't think that having the base system depend on a port is the right solution to resolving the libgssapi compatibility problems in base. Did you ever come across the old PR kern/147454 that I submitted in June? In it I included a src patch that replaced the base system's libgssapi with upstream Heimdal's, which resolved all libgssapi compatibility problems. That patch is now stale, but either way I haven't been able to draw enough attention to the issue to have it fixed. I guess we're waiting on someone to review the patch and commit it? Hopefully someone can get this in soon, before 8.2 is released. Is there something wrong with your patch? Not according to another person that commented on the patch (and it sounds like the experience is positive, not negative). Who's the maintainer of the component? Garrett, where would one look for such an important detail? Source file somewhere? Joerg, how about taking over what's in base? Seems to me like you know what's going on, and you're maintaining the port :) BTW, I'm only beginning to dive into Kerberos on FreeBSD, so I'm not bringing to this discussion much wisdom :/ But I would like all of the pieces to work! Hi Brandon, i already started to work on updating base heimdal to a recent version which is not the easiest task but i made some progreess. Be patient. Kind regards Thanks Joerg! Patience is indeed a virtue, though I suppose I'm not too virtuous! ;) I'm sure you're work is going to make a lot of people happy! -Brandon ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT+RFC] patch to buildworld with heimdal from ports
On 11/15/2010 02:08 PM, Joerg Pulz wrote: Hi, after the security/heimdal port was updated to the current heimdal release and i added one missing function from base it is now possible to completely buildworld src/ using the port for all Kerberos5/GSSAPI enabled parts. Hi Joerg, I don't think that having the base system depend on a port is the right solution to resolving the libgssapi compatibility problems in base. Did you ever come across the old PR kern/147454 that I submitted in June? In it I included a src patch that replaced the base system's libgssapi with upstream Heimdal's, which resolved all libgssapi compatibility problems. That patch is now stale, but either way I haven't been able to draw enough attention to the issue to have it fixed. -- Benjamin Lee http://www.b1c1l1.com/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [CFT+RFC] patch to buildworld with heimdal from ports
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Benjamin Lee b...@b1c1l1.com wrote: On 11/15/2010 02:08 PM, Joerg Pulz wrote: Hi, after the security/heimdal port was updated to the current heimdal release and i added one missing function from base it is now possible to completely buildworld src/ using the port for all Kerberos5/GSSAPI enabled parts. Hi Joerg, I don't think that having the base system depend on a port is the right solution to resolving the libgssapi compatibility problems in base. Did you ever come across the old PR kern/147454 that I submitted in June? In it I included a src patch that replaced the base system's libgssapi with upstream Heimdal's, which resolved all libgssapi compatibility problems. That patch is now stale, but either way I haven't been able to draw enough attention to the issue to have it fixed. I guess we're waiting on someone to review the patch and commit it? Hopefully someone can get this in soon, before 8.2 is released. Is there something wrong with your patch? -Brandon ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT+RFC] patch to buildworld with heimdal from ports
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Brandon Gooch jamesbrandongo...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Benjamin Lee b...@b1c1l1.com wrote: On 11/15/2010 02:08 PM, Joerg Pulz wrote: Hi, after the security/heimdal port was updated to the current heimdal release and i added one missing function from base it is now possible to completely buildworld src/ using the port for all Kerberos5/GSSAPI enabled parts. Hi Joerg, I don't think that having the base system depend on a port is the right solution to resolving the libgssapi compatibility problems in base. Did you ever come across the old PR kern/147454 that I submitted in June? In it I included a src patch that replaced the base system's libgssapi with upstream Heimdal's, which resolved all libgssapi compatibility problems. That patch is now stale, but either way I haven't been able to draw enough attention to the issue to have it fixed. I guess we're waiting on someone to review the patch and commit it? Hopefully someone can get this in soon, before 8.2 is released. Is there something wrong with your patch? Not according to another person that commented on the patch (and it sounds like the experience is positive, not negative). Who's the maintainer of the component? ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [CFT+RFC] patch to buildworld with heimdal from ports
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Garrett Cooper gcoo...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Brandon Gooch jamesbrandongo...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Benjamin Lee b...@b1c1l1.com wrote: On 11/15/2010 02:08 PM, Joerg Pulz wrote: Hi, after the security/heimdal port was updated to the current heimdal release and i added one missing function from base it is now possible to completely buildworld src/ using the port for all Kerberos5/GSSAPI enabled parts. Hi Joerg, I don't think that having the base system depend on a port is the right solution to resolving the libgssapi compatibility problems in base. Did you ever come across the old PR kern/147454 that I submitted in June? In it I included a src patch that replaced the base system's libgssapi with upstream Heimdal's, which resolved all libgssapi compatibility problems. That patch is now stale, but either way I haven't been able to draw enough attention to the issue to have it fixed. I guess we're waiting on someone to review the patch and commit it? Hopefully someone can get this in soon, before 8.2 is released. Is there something wrong with your patch? Not according to another person that commented on the patch (and it sounds like the experience is positive, not negative). Who's the maintainer of the component? Garrett, where would one look for such an important detail? Source file somewhere? Joerg, how about taking over what's in base? Seems to me like you know what's going on, and you're maintaining the port :) BTW, I'm only beginning to dive into Kerberos on FreeBSD, so I'm not bringing to this discussion much wisdom :/ But I would like all of the pieces to work! -Brandon ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
