RE: about boot0

2001-12-10 Thread John Baldwin


On 09-Dec-01 Hiten Pandya wrote:
 hi all,
 is there a reason behind.. why all Windows related
 boot
 options are marked as DOS?...
 
 src/sys/boot/i386/boot0.s
 
 is it because of the 512-byte limit...

Yes.  There used to be a 1024 byte boot0 which did use different names (as well
as auto-detecting the need for EDD) but it was backed out since it froze on a
few systems.

-- 

John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
Power Users Use the Power to Serve!  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: about boot0

2001-12-09 Thread Matthew Emmerton

I believe it's because the boot loader goes by partition type.  All
Microsoft operating systems can use FAT (either FAT16, FAT32 or both).  The
boot loader can't tell what operating system you've got installed on your
FAT partition, so it goes with the lowest common denominator - DOS.

--
Matt Emmerton

 hi all,
 is there a reason behind.. why all Windows related
 boot
 options are marked as DOS?...

 src/sys/boot/i386/boot0.s

 is it because of the 512-byte limit...

 =
 -Hiten,

 Thank You,
 Yours Sincerely,
 Hiten Pandya,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.geocities.com/hitmaster2k

 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
 http://greetings.yahoo.com

 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message