Re: eclipse 3.3.0
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 08:58 +0800, Xin LI wrote: Tom McLaughlin wrote: On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 03:07 -0700, David Southwell wrote: Hi Is a port of eclipse 3.3.0 likely soon? Thanks david [EMAIL PROTECTED], now CC'ed, may be a better place to ask though I don't see anything in their archives about it. On a side note, are any committers associated with [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've had a 3.2.2 update assigned to eclipse@ for a little bit. I use eclipse only minimally and don't feel comfortable committing it myself without comments on it since some of the last updates I've submitted have needed a correction or two for minor things I've missed. I will ask nemoliu@ to see if he has interest. He used to develop some Eclipse bits and use it for his daily work. Cheers, Thanks. I'm happy to occasionally work on Eclipse when I need something but all I use is a small subset of it. Really just PyDev. Since I'm not much of a coder I don't like working on / committing things which I don't have a full understanding of. If I can get at least a decent critique of what I do from a regular user or developer then I feel a bit better. We've had two submitters who have done some good work on Eclipse but both appear to understandably be busy with other things currently. tom -- | tmclaugh at sdf.lonestar.org tmclaugh at FreeBSD.org | | FreeBSD http://www.FreeBSD.org | ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What to do when the person who takes responsibility for a PR goes non-responsive?
Bill Moran wrote: Zane C.B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Summited http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=113611 over a month ago, Araujo took responsibility, and has been no sign from him that this is ever going to get committed. Posting to this list would be a good step. However, the subject title could be better. Something like, Would a committer please look at 113611 then mention in the email what port it relates to and comment that the person responsible seems to be timing out. And if you're going to ask us to look at a PR, please put the URL in your mail as well. It will greatly increase your chances of having someone look at it. hth, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ports depending on FORBIDDEN ports
I'm actually doing a slight superset by looking at dependent ports of (ignore/broken/forbidden/failed) ports, now that I have updated the graph and can see it better. It sounds like people are already working on the misc/compat3x dependents. Most of these ports are antiques. IMHO sysutils/eject should be fixed; there is a PR for it already: 112754. We definitely need to find someone who will keep zope up to date. I have privately emailed both the maintainer and the submitter of the last N PRs. There are a few other Python ports marked NO_PACKAGE, and I have also emailed the maintainers. This affects about 80 packages. Fixing all of these would add over 100 packages to the pointyhat builds. Thanks for taking a look at all of these. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unusual sudo / w behaviour - 0 users?
Hi Tom (and ports list by CC), After an upgrade to sudo v1.6.9 on my 6-STABLE workstation, I've noticed some interesting behaviour with regards to interaction between sudo and w. Check the output below for an example. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo -V Sudo version 1.6.9 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ w 7:42PM up 8 days, 7:46, 1 user, load averages: 0.11, 0.10, 0.15 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT pfraser p0 core-server01 7:38PM - w [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo -s Last login: Sun Jul 22 19:36:22 on ttyp1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# w 7:42PM up 8 days, 7:46, 0 users, load averages: 0.10, 0.09, 0.15 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# Note there is now no active session listed? If I then drop out of the sudo session, the problem persists. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# exit exit [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ w 7:44PM up 8 days, 7:47, 0 users, load averages: 0.27, 0.15, 0.17 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ I'm afraid I'm not familiar enough with the inner workings of all the related systems and can't be of much more assistance (at least initially), but I'm quite welcome to perform any testing you require. You may just need to hold my hand a little bit! -- Regards, Paul Fraser // Independent Technical Consultant // Ph: +61 405 341 905 // furyc0de.net This correspondence and any related attachments are confidential. Distribution, reproduction, or release (public domain or otherwise) without the author's prior written consent is STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. Failure to distribute any of the aforementioned without this footer (intact and unmodified) is also STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. Failure to abide by these terms and conditions can result in legal action. If you have received this correspondance in error, or believe any of these terms have been breached, you are requested to contact the author immediately and take steps to destroy all copies in your possession. PGP KeyID: 0x64E635B1 Keyserver: pgp.mit.edu:11371 Key fingerprint: CDA3 0797 68B9 0EC1 D4D3 A7B9 D7D7 4924 64E6 35B1 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unusual sudo / w behaviour - 0 users?
On 7/22/07, Paul Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Tom (and ports list by CC), After an upgrade to sudo v1.6.9 on my 6-STABLE workstation, I've noticed some interesting behaviour with regards to interaction between sudo and w. Sorry to respond so shortly afterwards (especially to myself!), but I've also confirmed this behaviour on a FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p6 box with sudo v1.6.9. Quite an interesting little bug with potentially dangerous implications, since a user could hide from the real administrator if (s)he were to compromise the box and at least temporarily escalate themselves. -- Regards, Paul Fraser // Independent Technical Consultant // Ph: +61 405 341 905 // furyc0de.net This correspondence and any related attachments are confidential. Distribution, reproduction, or release (public domain or otherwise) without the author's prior written consent is STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. Failure to distribute any of the aforementioned without this footer (intact and unmodified) is also STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. Failure to abide by these terms and conditions can result in legal action. If you have received this correspondance in error, or believe any of these terms have been breached, you are requested to contact the author immediately and take steps to destroy all copies in your possession. PGP KeyID: 0x64E635B1 Keyserver: pgp.mit.edu:11371 Key fingerprint: CDA3 0797 68B9 0EC1 D4D3 A7B9 D7D7 4924 64E6 35B1 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: TeXLive for Net/FreeBSD
Hi, On 21/07/07, Nikola Lecic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If the base (your texmf-minimal) remains unchanged (as it was at the time of TL2007 release) -- it will maybe need some patches for the files outside xetexdir/, but nothing too difficult. XeTeX also requires texmf-full. So this means that no massive complications must occur. What do you think? In theory. However this is the theory I had when I started out porting texlive. It took a whole lot longer than I thought. But then I didn't have any BSD documentation, so I had to work out the wrong ways to do things myself :P -- Best Regards Edd --- http://students.dec.bournemouth.ac.uk/ebarrett ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
INDEX build failed for 5.x
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. make_index: htdig-3.2.0.b6_2: no entry for /usr/ports Committers on the hook: clement sobomax vd Most recent CVS update was: U Mk/bsd.apache.mk U misc/libpri/Makefile U misc/libpri/distinfo U misc/libpri/files/patch-Makefile U misc/ossp-uuid/Makefile U misc/ossp-uuid/distinfo U misc/zaptel/Makefile U misc/zaptel/files/patch-ztcfg::Makefile U net/asterisk/Makefile U net/asterisk/distinfo U net/asterisk/pkg-plist U net/asterisk/files/asterisk.sh.in U net/asterisk/files/patch-Makefile U net/asterisk/files/patch-configure U www/apache22/Makefile U www/apache22/pkg-plist U www/apache22/files/htcacheclean.sh.in U www/apache22/files/patch-support:Makefile.in ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: emacs upgrade question
On 2007-Jul-21 10:34:36 -0700, Brian Gruber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now I'm ready to upgrade to emacs 22. What's the correct procedure for this? I'm guessing perhaps it's to set the var in make.conf to emacs22 and then do 'portupgrade -fr emacs'. You no longer have 'emacs' installed. I would suggest removing 'EMACS_PORT_NAME' (which defaults to emacs22 and causes problems with some ports if set) and using: # portupgrade -f -o editors/emacs emacs21 -- Peter Jeremy pgprQ6WpkbjoN.pgp Description: PGP signature
INDEX build failed for 5.x
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. make_index: htdig-3.2.0.b6_2: no entry for /usr/ports Committers on the hook: barner clement pav sobomax vd Most recent CVS update was: U dns/maradns/Makefile U mail/fetchmail/Makefile U mail/fetchmail/files/fetchmail.in U www/newsbeuter/Makefile U www/rsstail/Makefile ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: geography category adoption
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 00:57:07 +0200
Pav Lucistnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Virtual category geography was created some time ago. Is anybody
willing to scan the tree and add some ports to that category?
Hi Pav,
where can I find some description of what is expected to be found in this
'geography' category?
if anything related to geo
net/GeoIP makes sense in net and also in geography (relates to matching IP to
country)
only related to GIS ?
thx :)
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
There are no stupid questions, but there are a LOT of inquisitive idiots.
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: geography category adoption
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:57:07AM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: Virtual category geography was created some time ago. Is anybody willing to scan the tree and add some ports to that category? ports/64304 is marked as suspended. Mark it as open, throw it back in the pool and let the sharks feast on it! Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eclipse Aptana (Was Re: eclipse 3.3.0)
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:44:22 -0700
David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running Version: 3.2.2 with aptana mainly for Ruby, Ruby on Rails and
Ajax on Rails programming and it is working fine
Hi David,
I took a look @ Aptana a few days ago and I am wondering whether it (the
Eclipse plugin Download ) provides anything other than the Ruby Development
tools (RTD) + Web Standard Tools (WST).
I have those tools already installed..and I can't seem to find any gross
differences just by checking the screenshots in their site.
thanks, and apologies for the change of topic in the middle of the thread.
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind
who gets the credit.
Robert Woodruff
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
INDEX now builds successfully on 5.x
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Eclipse Aptana (Was Re: eclipse 3.3.0)
On Sunday 22 July 2007 06:35:55 Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:44:22 -0700
David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running Version: 3.2.2 with aptana mainly for Ruby, Ruby on Rails
and Ajax on Rails programming and it is working fine
Hi David,
I took a look @ Aptana a few days ago and I am wondering whether it (the
Eclipse plugin Download ) provides anything other than the Ruby Development
tools (RTD) + Web Standard Tools (WST).
I have those tools already installed..and I can't seem to find any gross
differences just by checking the screenshots in their site.
thanks, and apologies for the change of topic in the middle of the thread.
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Yes Aptana provides full support for rails developments and integrates really
well with subversion. If you use Ruby on Rails and Ajax on Rails as part of
Ruby development tools I would recomend Aptana without hesitation. IMHO I do
not feel there is a stonger or more fully feature IDE for an IDE.
The Aptana/subversion installation takes a little bit of hassle but I feel it
is well worth while.
David
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Keeping ports and packages synchronized
Hi everyone, I'm trying to find a way to keep the ports tree synchronized with the latest packages in order to minimize version mismatches and to allow easy mixing between them. So far I've been using a hack that does a listing of the packages-6-stable directory on the freebsd ftp, and uses the mtime of the most recent file (excluding CHECKSUM.MD5) for doing a csup checkout. Unfortunately, this seems to work seldomly. Is anyone aware of a better way to accomplish this? Thank you Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games. http://sims.yahoo.com/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sockets port
I've started using net/Socket, which is at version (1.8.7) and found a serious bug wrt OpenSSL (even when not using it). I've now switched to net/Socket-devel, which is at 1.9.9, and this bug is solved. However, from the master site, I see this libray is now at 2.1.7. Any plan to import it? bye Thanks av. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: geography category adoption
Norberto Meijome píše v ne 22. 07. 2007 v 23:26 +1000: On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 00:57:07 +0200 Pav Lucistnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Virtual category geography was created some time ago. Is anybody willing to scan the tree and add some ports to that category? Hi Pav, where can I find some description of what is expected to be found in this 'geography' category? if anything related to geo net/GeoIP makes sense in net and also in geography (relates to matching IP to country) only related to GIS ? It's virtual category, so GeoIP stays in net, but can grow geography as a secondary category. I think GeoIP is a good candidate. I think GIS, GPS related, localization services like GeoIP, maps, etc.. -- Pav Lucistnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] God is real unless declared integer. signature.asc Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
Re: geography category adoption
Edwin Groothuis píše v ne 22. 07. 2007 v 23:32 +1000: On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:57:07AM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: Virtual category geography was created some time ago. Is anybody willing to scan the tree and add some ports to that category? ports/64304 is marked as suspended. Mark it as open, throw it back in the pool and let the sharks feast on it! I don't see how `suspended' status on that PR is preventing people from adding ports to the category. Sharks - go! -- Pav Lucistnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] How will you recognize experienced hacker from beginner? Beginner thinks that kilobyte have 1000 bytes. Experienced hacker thinks one kilometer have 1024 meters. signature.asc Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
Re: mulberry mail crashes when using PGP under AMD64 ... ?
+-Le 21/07/07 18:53 -0300, Marc G. Fournier a dit : | | Running latest -STABLE of FreeBSD on an 64bit Dual Core, mulberry mail | seems to run okay until such a point in time as I try to PGP Sign/Encrypt | an email and send it out, then it 'Seg Faults' ... | | gpg appears to run fine from the command line, using gpg --list-keys ... | | Anyone running Mulberry + 6-STABLE + AMD64 kernel successfully? Hum, I've had some kind of the same problem on i386, and, hum, I don't recall what solution I finally found, but I think it was a FreeBSD/linux locale conflict. -- Mathieu Arnold pgpRmh3HE7mBo.pgp Description: PGP signature
Unfetchable distfiles in recent openoffice ports
Hello, I can't get any source tarball for ooorg-2.x. The OOo_OOF680_m18_source.tar.bz2 seems to be very uncommon, I couldn't find that tarball on any mirror. Is there a known solution? Best regards, -Harry ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unusual sudo / w behaviour - 0 users?
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 19:45 +1000, Paul Fraser wrote: Hi Tom (and ports list by CC), After an upgrade to sudo v1.6.9 on my 6-STABLE workstation, I've noticed some interesting behaviour with regards to interaction between sudo and w. Check the output below for an example. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo -V Sudo version 1.6.9 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ w 7:42PM up 8 days, 7:46, 1 user, load averages: 0.11, 0.10, 0.15 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT pfraser p0 core-server01 7:38PM - w [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo -s Last login: Sun Jul 22 19:36:22 on ttyp1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# w 7:42PM up 8 days, 7:46, 0 users, load averages: 0.10, 0.09, 0.15 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# Note there is now no active session listed? If I then drop out of the sudo session, the problem persists. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# exit exit [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ w 7:44PM up 8 days, 7:47, 0 users, load averages: 0.27, 0.15, 0.17 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ I'm afraid I'm not familiar enough with the inner workings of all the related systems and can't be of much more assistance (at least initially), but I'm quite welcome to perform any testing you require. You may just need to hold my hand a little bit! I'm not sure if this is a sudo bug or a -STABLE bug. I can only reproduce this on -STABLE with sudo 1.6.9. -CURRENT with 1.6.9 and 1.6.8p12 works fine and -STABLE with sudo 1.6.8p12 works fine. I did a little more experimenting and saw this behavior below. -STABLE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ last tom ttyp2bofh Sun Jul 22 16:16 still logged in ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ sudo -s # last | head -n 5 root ttyp2 Sun Jul 22 16:16 - 16:16 (00:00) tom ttyp2bofh Sun Jul 22 16:16 - 16:16 (00:00) ... # ^D [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ last root ttyp2 Sun Jul 22 16:16 - 16:16 (00:00) tom ttyp2bofh Sun Jul 22 16:16 - 16:16 (00:00) -CURRENT: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ last tom ttyp1bofh Sun Jul 22 16:18 still logged in ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ sudo -s # last | head -n 6 tom ttyp1bofh Sun Jul 22 16:18 still logged in ... # ^D [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ last tom ttyp1bofh Sun Jul 22 16:18 still logged in I'm going to do a little more digging and figure out if this is caused by a behavior difference in sudo or FreeBSD. tom -- | tmclaugh at sdf.lonestar.org tmclaugh at FreeBSD.org | | FreeBSD http://www.FreeBSD.org | ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: geography category adoption
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 09:20:01PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: Edwin Groothuis p??e v ne 22. 07. 2007 v 23:32 +1000: On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:57:07AM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: Virtual category geography was created some time ago. Is anybody willing to scan the tree and add some ports to that category? ports/64304 is marked as suspended. Mark it as open, throw it back in the pool and let the sharks feast on it! I don't see how `suspended' status on that PR is preventing people from adding ports to the category. The status of the port (suspended, not analyzed or patched) plus the comments in the PR (This is probably still a good idea, if we can find someone willing to write the patch and help do the testing.) doesn't really make me go like This *is* already implemented, let's see if I can add it to the ports mentioned in it. But the sharks have feasted, nothing to worry about anymore. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Eclipse Aptana (Was Re: eclipse 3.3.0)
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 07:56:49 -0700
David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes Aptana provides full support for rails developments and integrates really
well with subversion. If you use Ruby on Rails and Ajax on Rails as part of
Ruby development tools I would recomend Aptana without hesitation. IMHO I do
not feel there is a stonger or more fully feature IDE for an IDE.
Thanks David,
great - but do you know if it provides anything other than the combination of
the RDT, subclipse and WST plugins?
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that
take our breath away.
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sudo 1.6.9 segfault
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 13:19:35 -0400
Tom McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 16:39 +0600, yarodin wrote:
Jul 21 15:12:01 home sudo:admin : TTY=unknown ; PWD=/home/admin ;
USER=root ; COMMAND=/sbin/ipfw
Jul 21 15:12:36 home kernel: pid 42226 (sudo), uid 0: exited on signal 11
I need a little more information.
sudoers:
tom LOCAL = NOPASSWD: /sbin/ipfw
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ sudo ipfw
Last login: Sat Jul 21 13:09:52 on ttyp0
usage: ipfw [options]
do ipfw -h or see ipfw manpage for details
What options are you using in the port? What does your sudoers look
like? Also, I'm curious why TTY would show up as unknown in the log.
tom
Hi,
I can reproduce the sigfault with .1.6.9., but not with 1.6.8.12.
1.6.9 does NOT sigfault when run from a shell, but it does if called from a
menu or launcher in XFCE. For example, i have sudo configured to allow me to
run sudo wireshark without password.
from an shell (in Terminal, actually), sudo wireshark works fine.
From the launcher or menu option which executes 'sudo wireshark' , i get a
sigfault.
I tried to trace the call with
ktrace -f /tmp/SUDOKTRACE -d sudo wireshark
but i only get up to the loading of ld-elf ...
If you have any tests to suggest, let me know.
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Always do right. This will gratify some and astonish the rest.
Mark Twain
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: sudo 1.6.9 segfault
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 10:12 +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote: On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 13:19:35 -0400 Tom McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 16:39 +0600, yarodin wrote: Jul 21 15:12:01 home sudo:admin : TTY=unknown ; PWD=/home/admin ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/sbin/ipfw Jul 21 15:12:36 home kernel: pid 42226 (sudo), uid 0: exited on signal 11 I need a little more information. sudoers: tom LOCAL = NOPASSWD: /sbin/ipfw [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ sudo ipfw Last login: Sat Jul 21 13:09:52 on ttyp0 usage: ipfw [options] do ipfw -h or see ipfw manpage for details What options are you using in the port? What does your sudoers look like? Also, I'm curious why TTY would show up as unknown in the log. tom Hi, I can reproduce the sigfault with .1.6.9., but not with 1.6.8.12. 1.6.9 does NOT sigfault when run from a shell, but it does if called from a menu or launcher in XFCE. For example, i have sudo configured to allow me to run sudo wireshark without password. from an shell (in Terminal, actually), sudo wireshark works fine. From the launcher or menu option which executes 'sudo wireshark' , i get a sigfault. I tried to trace the call with ktrace -f /tmp/SUDOKTRACE -d sudo wireshark but i only get up to the loading of ld-elf ... If you have any tests to suggest, let me know. B I've just committed the fix for this. You should be fine after you update. tom -- | tmclaugh at sdf.lonestar.org tmclaugh at FreeBSD.org | | FreeBSD http://www.FreeBSD.org | ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unusual sudo / w behaviour - 0 users?
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 16:48 -0400, Tom McLaughlin wrote: On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 19:45 +1000, Paul Fraser wrote: Hi Tom (and ports list by CC), After an upgrade to sudo v1.6.9 on my 6-STABLE workstation, I've noticed some interesting behaviour with regards to interaction between sudo and w. Check the output below for an example. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo -V Sudo version 1.6.9 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ w 7:42PM up 8 days, 7:46, 1 user, load averages: 0.11, 0.10, 0.15 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT pfraser p0 core-server01 7:38PM - w [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo -s Last login: Sun Jul 22 19:36:22 on ttyp1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# w 7:42PM up 8 days, 7:46, 0 users, load averages: 0.10, 0.09, 0.15 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# Note there is now no active session listed? If I then drop out of the sudo session, the problem persists. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# exit exit [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ w 7:44PM up 8 days, 7:47, 0 users, load averages: 0.27, 0.15, 0.17 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ I'm afraid I'm not familiar enough with the inner workings of all the related systems and can't be of much more assistance (at least initially), but I'm quite welcome to perform any testing you require. You may just need to hold my hand a little bit! I'm not sure if this is a sudo bug or a -STABLE bug. I can only reproduce this on -STABLE with sudo 1.6.9. -CURRENT with 1.6.9 and 1.6.8p12 works fine and -STABLE with sudo 1.6.8p12 works fine. I did a little more experimenting and saw this behavior below. -STABLE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ last tom ttyp2bofh Sun Jul 22 16:16 still logged in ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ sudo -s # last | head -n 5 root ttyp2 Sun Jul 22 16:16 - 16:16 (00:00) tom ttyp2bofh Sun Jul 22 16:16 - 16:16 (00:00) ... # ^D [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ last root ttyp2 Sun Jul 22 16:16 - 16:16 (00:00) tom ttyp2bofh Sun Jul 22 16:16 - 16:16 (00:00) -CURRENT: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ last tom ttyp1bofh Sun Jul 22 16:18 still logged in ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ sudo -s # last | head -n 6 tom ttyp1bofh Sun Jul 22 16:18 still logged in ... # ^D [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ last tom ttyp1bofh Sun Jul 22 16:18 still logged in I'm going to do a little more digging and figure out if this is caused by a behavior difference in sudo or FreeBSD. tom Yeah, I was totally wrong above. The issue is caused by pam_lastlog. I forgot I had commented out the session line in the pam file on my -CURRENT box to shutup the login message everytime I ran a command via sudo. It's not an issue on my CentOS box so it appears to be an issue with our pam_lastlog. I'm going to ask on freebsd-security@ tom -- | tmclaugh at sdf.lonestar.org tmclaugh at FreeBSD.org | | FreeBSD http://www.FreeBSD.org | ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to include new dirs in @INC
I'm working on a port upgrade, and I'm copying some perl modules to %%SITE_PERL%%/mach/newdir. Unfortunately, the scripts won't run because the perl modules aren't included in @INC. How do I update @INC to include the new path? (I have USE_PERL= yes in the Makefile.) Is there a script I have to run? Is there an ldconfig for perl? Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
