Re: Can the following license be used for ported programs?
On Sunday 23 September 2007 15:43:12 Erik Trulsson wrote: On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 05:10:53PM +, Aryeh Friedman wrote: My company develops software under a commercial open source (see links for details) and I want to know if my license is close enough to open source (see links for why it is not 100% OSD compliant [it is 95% compliant]). Specifically does the business model as outlined in my blog (the third installment should be out later today), my business model page, the third party certifier and license allow for inclusion in the ports collection. Keep in mind that the source is available to anyone but execution is conditioned on attachment A of the license and after the trial period (30 days) is paid for software. License: http://www.flosoft-systems.com/license.php Official statement of my business model: http://www.flosoft-systems.com/bmodel.php Blog entries: http://www.flosoft-systems.com/blogs/aryeh/FOSS.php http://www.flosoft-systems.com/blogs/aryeh/SIW_Background.php Third party group (due to DNS issues is currently hosted on my domain but is not officially associated with my company): http://www.flosoft-systems.com/miai/ For inclusion in the ports tree it really does not matter much what license you use for your software - it could even be a commercial closed-source program. The reason for this is that the ports tree is just a framework for installing and managing software packages, and none of your code will actually live in the ports tree. If you have various restrictions in the license then it may not be possible for the FreeBSD project to distribute binary packages or source files. If that is the case the port creator should set RESTRICTED or other appropriate variable in the port Makefile to enforce this (see http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-r estrictions.html for what variations are possible.) Frankly I do not see the point. New software would have to be highly original not to have its objects fulfilled by a pure open source prokject rather than some contrived license. First look at the competitive merits of the software against works available -- not at the liocensing!! David David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can the following license be used for ported programs?
On Sunday 23 September 2007 18:41:43 Aryeh Friedman wrote: On 9/24/07, Michael Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: many people feel much differently, why not just a pure proprietary license then, rather than proliferating Yet Another Silly License which is not tempered by sound legal analysis. Not to be insulting but I don't think you read my 1st blog entry as I suggested (at least the first paragraph... specifically where I say both open and closed source are equally the wrong model). Now onto your actual points: The license has received legal review by an IP attorney. Again not to be insulting but I think most FOSS people slept through econ 101, especially the section on there is no such thing as a limitless resource. Even though you might consider this to be a conflict of interest; I have a family member who is a prof. of econ at UC Santa Cruz and has reviewed the economic aspects of both my specific work and the general concept of SIW (see second blog entry for definition). His general conclusion is while the model is untried on a large scale and there are some more minor things we can improve on (subject of debate within the SIW community) that we fix many of the economic flaws with both open and closed source models. He is currently in the process of writing a book on the matter and said he would have a full review after rewriting ch8 (which is on the economic issues raised by both models) in a few weeks. ___ I have read both the blog and looked at the product references. Frankly the intellectual and grammatical quality of the blog and the comparatively trivial nature of the products referred to makes me feel that the original contribution does not deserve the level of attention that its author seems to crave. Might it not be better to spend more time on creating truly original softaware than drawing attention to oneself by purporting to reinvent the wheel of software licensing? David David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
INDEX build failed for 5.x
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..Makefile, line 39: Unassociated shell
command @${ECHO}
Makefile, line 40: Unassociated shell command @${ECHO} Define
WITH_TEXMF_PREFIX=somewhere
Makefile, line 41: Unassociated shell command @${ECHO} if your tetex
type1 fonts are somewhere non-standard
Makefile, line 42: Unassociated shell command @${ECHO}
Makefile, line 46: Unassociated shell command @${ECHO}
Makefile, line 47: Unassociated shell command @${ECHO} Define
WITH_BROWSER=myBrowser to use
Makefile, line 48: Unassociated shell command @${ECHO} myBrowser to
browse ipe help instead of mozilla
Makefile, line 49: Unassociated shell command @${ECHO}
make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
=== graphics/ipe failed
*** Error code 1
*** Error code 1
Stop in /a/erwin/tindex/ports.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /a/erwin/tindex/ports.
1 error
Committers on the hook:
edwin linimon lth miwi nemoliu rafan sem
Most recent CVS update was:
U LEGAL
U MOVED
U Mk/bsd.port.mk
U audio/csound/scripts/check-fltk-threads.sh
U audio/p5-Audio-Wav/Makefile
U audio/p5-libvorbis/Makefile
U cad/xcircuit/Makefile
U chinese/enscript/Makefile
U chinese/moefonts-cid/Makefile
U comms/gkermit/Makefile
U devel/p5-SVN-Notify/Makefile
U devel/p5-Time-Object/Makefile
U editors/slime/Makefile
U emulators/dynagen-devel/Makefile
U games/p5-Games-Bingo/Makefile
U games/p5-Games-Bingo/distinfo
U games/toppler/Makefile
U graphics/cthumb/Makefile
U graphics/epstool/Makefile
U graphics/ipe/Makefile
U graphics/ocaml-images/Makefile
U graphics/piddle/Makefile
U graphics/pstoedit/Makefile
U graphics/pstoepsi/Makefile
U graphics/py-chart/Makefile
U irc/epic4/Makefile
U irc/epic4/distinfo
U irc/epic4/pkg-descr
U irc/epic4/pkg-plist
U irc/epic4/files/pkg-message.in
U lang/logo/Makefile
U lang/p5-JavaScript/Makefile
U lang/scheme48/Makefile
U mbone/wb/Makefile
U net/quagga/Makefile
U net/quagga/distinfo
U net/quagga/files/patch-cvs-0-bgp-ipv6
U net/quagga/files/patch-cvs-1-prefix_buf
U net/quagga/files/patch-cvs-2-rtm_type_str
U net/quagga/files/patch-cvs-3-rib_sweep_route
U net/quagga/files/patch-cvs-4-old_pid
U net/quagga/files/patch-cvs-5-sndbuf
U net/quagga/files/quagga.sh.in
U net/ytalk/Makefile
U net-mgmt/icmpquery/Makefile
U palm/sitescooper/Makefile
U ports-mgmt/portupgrade/pkg-message
U print/Makefile
U print/apsfilter/Makefile
U print/font2svg/Makefile
U print/ggv/Makefile
U print/ghostscript-gnu/Makefile
U print/ghostscript-gnu-commfont/Makefile
U print/ghostscript-gpl/Makefile
U print/gnome-print/Makefile
U print/html2ps-letter/Makefile
U print/lpr-wrapper/Makefile
U print/magicfilter/Makefile
U print/pnm2ppa/Makefile
U print/psdim/Makefile
U print/pstotext/Makefile
U print/transfig/Makefile
U security/l0pht-watch/Makefile
U sysutils/daemontools53/Makefile
U sysutils/npadmin/Makefile
U sysutils/ucspi-tcp/Makefile
U textproc/latex2html/Makefile
U textproc/p5-XML-LibXSLT/Makefile
U textproc/p5-XML-SAX-Expat-Incremental/Makefile
U textproc/p5-XML-SAX-Expat-Incremental/distinfo
U textproc/pdftohtml/Makefile
U textproc/prosper/Makefile
U textproc/tth/Makefile
U www/mod_security2/Makefile
U www/p5-Apache-MP3/Makefile
U www/p5-ApacheBench/Makefile
U x11/dgs/Makefile
U x11-fonts/mozilla-fonts/Makefile
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current unassigned ports problem reports
Current FreeBSD problem reports The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Bugs can be in one of several states: o - open A problem report has been submitted, no sanity checking performed. a - analyzed The problem is understood and a solution is being sought. f - feedback Further work requires additional information from the originator or the community - possibly confirmation of the effectiveness of a proposed solution. p - patched A patch has been committed, but some issues (MFC and / or confirmation from originator) are still open. r - repocopy The resolution of the problem report is dependent on a repocopy operation within the CVS repository which is awaiting completion. s - suspended The problem is not being worked on, due to lack of information or resources. This is a prime candidate for somebody who is looking for a project to do. If the problem cannot be solved at all, it will be closed, rather than suspended. c - closed A problem report is closed when any changes have been integrated, documented, and tested -- or when fixing the problem is abandoned. Critical problems Serious problems S Tracker Resp. Description o ports/106369vpnd caused kernel panic with ppp mode o ports/106372vpnd can't run with slip mode f ports/108077www/linux-flashplugin9 crashes linux-firefox f ports/108413net/vnc does not works. f ports/108606Courier MTA terminates abnormaly after installation f ports/112083mail/qsheff overwrites configuration upon upgrade o ports/112385sysutils/lookupd on Kernel 64 f ports/112698www/opera's spell-check doesn't work f ports/112921x11-wm/Beryl not loading focus and keybinding settings o ports/113139sysutils/ucspi-tcp runtime crash on amd64 w/ fix f ports/113144print/ghostscript-gnu dumps core with several output d f ports/115818Executable clash between databases/grass and ruby gems f ports/115939mail/nmh: needs CFLAGS=-O f ports/115967enable chrooted net/isc-dhcp3-server on the FreeBSD 7. o ports/116251building biology/platon fails f ports/116292sysutils/cramfs patches for mkcramfs/cramfsck f ports/116378xorg 7.3 on -stable breaks math/scilab f ports/116385net/vnc using vnc.so crashes Xorg 7.3 when remote comp f ports/116475portupgrade of www/rt36 fails o ports/116493mail/websieve -- unbreak with appache22, etc. f ports/116586net/isc-dhcp3-server does not work when compiled with o ports/116587[maintainer update] security/amavisd-milter to 1.3.1 o ports/116589games/hex-a-hop port doesn't compile on 64bit systems 23 problems total. Non-critical problems S Tracker Resp. Description o ports/94921 isakmpd fails on amd64 o ports/100896[new ports] emulators/vmware-server-guestd1 emulators/ f ports/101166bittorrent-curses only works under English locales. o ports/103395security/gnome-ssh-askpass interferes with gnome-scree o ports/107354net/icmpinfo: icmpinfo -vvv does not recocnize any ICM f ports/107621net/proxychains doens't compile on 4 and 5 f ports/107937jailed net/isc-dhcp3-server wouldn't run with an immut f ports/108723kxgenerator never worked for me f ports/109041security/tinyca doesn't allow for user installed OpenS o ports/110326 ports Use TCL/TK 8.4: games/tvp f ports/111399print/ghostscript-gpl: ghostscript-gpl WITH_FT_BRIDGE f ports/111456[UPDATE] finance/pfpro updated distinfo o ports/112499Add a necessary runtime library for audio/mbrola to ru f ports/112876audio/xmcd - compile problems after xorg 7.2 upgrade ( f ports/112887net/nxserver 1.4.0_1 fails to compile after upgrading f ports/113423Update for ports net/freenx to version 0.6.0 o ports/113538databases/unixODBC fails to copy required INI files fo f ports/113750update science/kst to 1.4.0 o ports/113827when trying to play midis using audio/playmidi /dev/s o ports/114031[PATCH] editors/xemacs-devel - stop XEmacs from corrup o ports/114122New port: russian/stardict2-dict-eng_RU, Russian dicti f ports/114127net/vnc - vnc.so installed to bad location f ports/114825pam module security/pam_abl not working o ports/115216ADA devel/florist exit_process program doesn't compile o ports/115217
INDEX now builds successfully on 5.x
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD Port: google-earth-4.1.7076.4458
Does dmesg show anything suspicious while running application ? No. Also, just in case, try the patch below and report whether it helps. I've applied the patch. The result was: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/src]# patch i915_dma.diff Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -- |--- a/sys/dev/drm/i915_dma.c |+++ b/sys/dev/drm/i915_dma.c -- File to patch: /usr/src/sys/dev/drm/i915_dma.c Patching file /usr/src/sys/dev/drm/i915_dma.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 failed at 366. Hunk #2 failed at 394. Hunk #3 failed at 594. Hunk #4 failed at 610. Hunk #5 failed at 640. Hunk #6 failed at 651. 6 out of 6 hunks failed--saving rejects to /usr/src/sys/dev/drm/i915_dma.c.rej done Regards, Helko ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD Port: google-earth-4.1.7076.4458
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:37:09PM +0200, Helko Glathe wrote: Does dmesg show anything suspicious while running application ? No. Also, just in case, try the patch below and report whether it helps. I've applied the patch. The result was: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/src]# patch i915_dma.diff Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -- |--- a/sys/dev/drm/i915_dma.c |+++ b/sys/dev/drm/i915_dma.c -- File to patch: /usr/src/sys/dev/drm/i915_dma.c Patching file /usr/src/sys/dev/drm/i915_dma.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 failed at 366. Hunk #2 failed at 394. Hunk #3 failed at 594. Hunk #4 failed at 610. Hunk #5 failed at 640. Hunk #6 failed at 651. 6 out of 6 hunks failed--saving rejects to /usr/src/sys/dev/drm/i915_dma.c.rej done It seems that the patch was damaged by some MUA. Try http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/i915_dma.patch pgpznUNFPSUoH.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: sendmal + cyrus imap + ckuser
Matthew Seaman ha scritto: This isn't really a question for freebsd-ports, but... Sorry! I thought that, since ckuser is not part of sendmail or cyrusimap, but is in the sendmail port, this would possibly be a good place. Where should I post instead? The way to do this is to configure the cyrus smmapd to listen on a network port -- something like this in /usr/local/etc/cyrus.conf # Sendmail socket map daemon smmapdcmd=smmapdlisten=192.168.1.1:smmap prefork=1 smmapdunixcmd=smmapdlisten=/var/imap/socket/smmapd prefork=1 This I've already done. Then you can tell your 2ary sendmails to use that to check for mailbox existence and quota availability -- in /etc/mail/`hostname`.mc: FEATURE(`ckuser_cyrus', `inet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]')dnl Did this too; first time I restarted sendmail, I read: sm-mta: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): No local mailer defined sm-mta: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): QueueDirectory (Q) option must be set I checked everything again and restarted; now I get no errors, but the above line does nothing; everything still works as before with incoming mail accepted and forwarded to the primary MX, then bounced back. Oh, and I'd be wary of exposing the smmapd port on the internet: either arrange for your 1ary and 2ary mailers to have a private back-end network they can communicate on This is my case. Making your 2ary machines speak LMTP to cyrus on your mail box server involves very similar tweaks. You'll need something like this in your .mc file: define(`confLOCAL_MAILER', `cyrusv2')dnl define(`CYRUSV2_MAILER_ARGS', `TCP your.mail.server lmtp')dnl I'll try this, if I can't get the above to work. bye Thanks av. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can the following license be used for ported programs?
I never claimed to be original... if you want to see the innovator/largest code base in the community look at jahia.com... the only claim I made was I wanted to have my stuff included in the ports collection and wanted to know if the legal aspects of my business model where sufficient... one of the first replies answered that... all other discussion was on the philosophical merits of SIW and I should of put a disclaimer on that I was no longer speaking (purely) as the owner of FloSoft Systems but as the VP of the Miai Foundation... specifically any defense arguments I made for the business model was as a member of the SIW community and not as a owner of a company that practices it. On 9/24/07, David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 23 September 2007 18:41:43 Aryeh Friedman wrote: On 9/24/07, Michael Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: many people feel much differently, why not just a pure proprietary license then, rather than proliferating Yet Another Silly License which is not tempered by sound legal analysis. Not to be insulting but I don't think you read my 1st blog entry as I suggested (at least the first paragraph... specifically where I say both open and closed source are equally the wrong model). Now onto your actual points: The license has received legal review by an IP attorney. Again not to be insulting but I think most FOSS people slept through econ 101, especially the section on there is no such thing as a limitless resource. Even though you might consider this to be a conflict of interest; I have a family member who is a prof. of econ at UC Santa Cruz and has reviewed the economic aspects of both my specific work and the general concept of SIW (see second blog entry for definition). His general conclusion is while the model is untried on a large scale and there are some more minor things we can improve on (subject of debate within the SIW community) that we fix many of the economic flaws with both open and closed source models. He is currently in the process of writing a book on the matter and said he would have a full review after rewriting ch8 (which is on the economic issues raised by both models) in a few weeks. ___ I have read both the blog and looked at the product references. Frankly the intellectual and grammatical quality of the blog and the comparatively trivial nature of the products referred to makes me feel that the original contribution does not deserve the level of attention that its author seems to crave. Might it not be better to spend more time on creating truly original softaware than drawing attention to oneself by purporting to reinvent the wheel of software licensing? David David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports/116050: [NEW PORT] devel/p5-Gearman-Server: Gearman server daemon
Hi... Sorry I've been out of the loop for a while. Thanks for submitting this new port, but I object to having a new port created and assigned to me as the MAINTAINER. It just seems wrong to do that. Furthermore, since this port replaces devel/p5-gearmand, it should have either been repo-copied, or moved, or some such, and appropriate entries in UPDATING created so that the various ports tools can follow the move. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can the following license be used for ported programs?
On Monday 24 September 2007 07:54:25 Aryeh Friedman wrote: I never claimed to be original... if you want to see the innovator/largest code base in the community look at jahia.com... the only claim I made was I wanted to have my stuff included in the ports collection and wanted to know if the legal aspects of my business model where sufficient... one of the first replies answered that... all other discussion was on the philosophical merits of SIW and I should of put a disclaimer on that I was no longer speaking (purely) as the owner of FloSoft Systems but as the VP of the Miai Foundation... specifically any defense arguments I made for the business model was as a member of the SIW community and not as a owner of a company that practices it. On 9/24/07, David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 23 September 2007 18:41:43 Aryeh Friedman wrote: On 9/24/07, Michael Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: many people feel much differently, why not just a pure proprietary license then, rather than proliferating Yet Another Silly License which is not tempered by sound legal analysis. Not to be insulting but I don't think you read my 1st blog entry as I suggested (at least the first paragraph... specifically where I say both open and closed source are equally the wrong model). Now onto your actual points: The license has received legal review by an IP attorney. Again not to be insulting but I think most FOSS people slept through econ 101, especially the section on there is no such thing as a limitless resource. Even though you might consider this to be a conflict of interest; I have a family member who is a prof. of econ at UC Santa Cruz and has reviewed the economic aspects of both my specific work and the general concept of SIW (see second blog entry for definition). His general conclusion is while the model is untried on a large scale and there are some more minor things we can improve on (subject of debate within the SIW community) that we fix many of the economic flaws with both open and closed source models. He is currently in the process of writing a book on the matter and said he would have a full review after rewriting ch8 (which is on the economic issues raised by both models) in a few weeks. ___ I have read both the blog and looked at the product references. Frankly the intellectual and grammatical quality of the blog and the comparatively trivial nature of the products referred to makes me feel that the original contribution does not deserve the level of attention that its author seems to crave. Might it not be better to spend more time on creating truly original softaware than drawing attention to oneself by purporting to reinvent the wheel of software licensing? David David ___ Well I must say I am not impressed.. the business model, the license concept and the arguments in it support appears half-baked nonsense. All models that have tried to keep a foot in both camps have finished up with both feet in the grave!! Also it would inspire more confidence if you began to follow the model set by generations of networkers on mail lists and elsewhere. Please do not mimic newbies by top posting___ it is an extremely irritating foible. best of luck david ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD-current cannot build java/jdk15
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 12:19:59AM -0300, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: I am running -CURRENT as of yesterday (23 of september of 2007) and I am unable to build java/jdk15. FreeBSD exxodus.fedaykin.here 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #7: Fri Sep 21 07:35:14 BRT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LIOUX i386 I am running all latest ports as of today. My system information is attached. Let me know if there is anything else I can do. My broken build can be found at: http://people.freebsd.org/~lioux/jdk15.tar.lzma MD5 (jdk15.tar.lzma) = 6a5f7e16795f89e20f415b8748ee2c0b The build log can be found at: http://people.freebsd.org/~lioux/jdk15.log Looks like the gcc 4.2 optimiser bug. Try setting -fno-tree-vrp in your CFLAGS. Either that or hack the HotSpot compile to use -O0 rather than -O3. -- Greg Lewis Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can the following license be used for ported programs?
Aryeh Friedman wrote: [...] the only claim I made was I wanted to have my stuff included in the ports collection and wanted to know if the legal aspects of my business model where sufficient... one of the first replies answered that... [...] There are other programs in the ports with much stricter licenses (Java for example). I don't see a problem here; you only have to find someone who ports and maintains your program ;-) Just my 2 cents. Philipp ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: nvidia-driver rebooting machine on X startup
On 9/24/07, Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 24 September 2007 21:14:03 falz wrote: I came across this thread on freebsd-questions after some searching on google. I have the exact same issue as others here- if xorg is started with 'nvidia' as the driver, instant reboot. However, my machine is a 100% fresh install with things compiled from source this weekend. However, I did have to install some binary vncserver packages, but they have since been removed. I did the 'xorg' meta port which got me the current xorg-7.3_1. The machine I did the install on was running Debian Unstable for about a year without issue with the same hardware (two cards for 3 monitors): Sep 24 13:41:24 falz kernel: nvidia0: GeForce 7100 GS mem 0xdd00-0xddff,0xb000-0xbfff,0xde00-0xdeff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 Sep 24 13:41:24 falz kernel: nvidia0: [GIANT-LOCKED] Sep 24 13:41:24 falz kernel: nvidia1: GeForce FX 5200 mem 0xdb00-0xdbff,0xc000-0xcfff irq 18 at device 2.0 on pci3 Sep 24 13:41:24 falz kernel: nvidia1: [GIANT-LOCKED] I forgot, but was there one person in the thread that has only 1 monitor attached to 1 card? Cause you're the 3rd I see with multiple monitor issues. Ironically, we have one system with CRT + TV-OUT through one card, with no issues whatsoever (500GB HDD, DVDRW, rock on!). However I turned off Xinerama support from the get go and use TwinView. With all the Xorg 7.3 issues, I have not gone that road nor plan to anytime soon. I also think we've had all the different cards by now, a quatro, GeForce 5k, 7k, 6k... Maybe someone can build a WITNESS/DDB kernel, since dumping seems to be failing? I was the single monitor issue, on the single monitor it does not reboot unless you set probe_all_gpu's *BUT* it does fail to reconize all nVidia cards (so does nv)... as far I can tell neither drive understands 64bit io space and PCI/AGP... the clue is the addr conflicts that everyone seems to get... btw I think it might of fried my 8k but at least gives me vesa with no werid video probs on the 5200 GT I have now (1024x768 ;-()). ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: porting software using glibc's getline()
Am 21.09.2007 um 18:22 schrieb Dmitry Marakasov: I have a problem porting a piece of software that use getline(char**, int*, FILE*). This function is only present in glibc so I wonder what do I do in this case? Ideally, you'd replace getline()'s usage with something similar, like fgets(3). If this isn't reasonable, get inspired by glibc's sources and write your own. Another inspiration might come from here: http://www.lst.inf.ethz.ch/teaching/lectures/ss07/2100/ filesystem_lab/html/getline_8h-source.html HTH, Markus - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dipl. Ing. Markus Hitter http://www.jump-ing.de/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ports/116050: [NEW PORT] devel/p5-Gearman-Server: Gearman server daemon
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:11:02AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: Thanks for submitting this new port, but I object to having a new port created and assigned to me as the MAINTAINER. It just seems wrong to do that. You can't just drop your kitten on our doorstep and expect us to take care of it. If you want us to help you with your kitten you should take responsibility for it. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
