Re: [CFT] UNIQUENAME patches
On 17/06/2012 21:11, Mel Flynn wrote:
I really don't see what the problem is with setting uniquename to:
${PORTORIGIN:S,/,__,}+${CHILDPORTNAME}
or:
databases/mysql55+server
databases/mysql55+client
etc.
And so you want to forbid + as a character for PORTNAME? So you would need
to
fix all the ports having a + in the name.
No. Ports all have a version starting with a minus sign, yet we have
ports with a minus sign in it. This is the same principle. The plus or
whatever char you pick, should be the first one from the right side
after the version part. What's in between the plus and the start of
version is subpackage/childport name.
Deciding what character or characters to use to distinguish the sub-port
part of the package name from the rest is a particularly bikeshedable
point. Virtually any of the punctuation on the keyboard could be used,
and it really won't make much difference in the end what gets chosen.
Personally I feel it should be the sole choice of the people that do the
work to implement sub-ports.
On the point of how UNIQUENAME should be defined, your arguments have
some merit, but I'm not convinced. On balance, after considering such
points I preferred what I came up with (but then I would say that,
wouldn't I?)
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
custom license on new port?
got a new port. submitted by the copyright owner and author.
for reference, pr ports/168832
there is no LICENSE= in the Makefile, no LICENSE.txt in the
distribution, but it does have the attached in the main.c file.
Q: should I ask him to select one of the standard FreeBSD/GPL licenses
(and edit his source )?
Q: or do I do a 'post-patch' and head -27 bsdinfo.c
$[FILESDIR}/LICENSE.txt and add LICENSE= ${FILESDIR}/LICENSE.txt ?
(LICENSE TYPE EULA?)
what is the policy on custom licenses? it wants this in binary form
(pkgs, cd, etc), so something has to be done.
/*
* Copyright (c) 2011 Jakub Szafrański s...@pirc.pl
*
* All rights reserved.
*
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
* are met:
* 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
* 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
* documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
*
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
* ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
* IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
* ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
* FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
* DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
* OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
* HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
* LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
* OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
* SUCH DAMAGE.
*/
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation
d: +1.561.948.2259
w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Current unassigned ports problem reports
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description o ports/169181New port: databases/spatialite_gui spatialite-gui is a o ports/169180New port: graphics/libgaiagraphics libgaiagraphics is f ports/169178[PATCH] irc/gseen.mod: Fix build failure after eggdrop f ports/169174[patch] sysutils/htop: fix swap size calculation on i3 f ports/169165sysutils/fusefs-kmod: calling fchown(2) on sshfs files o ports/169153[REPOCOPY] net-mgmt/zabbix - zabbiz2 (server/agent/f o ports/169152portaudit fails to recognize changes in port revision o ports/169095New port: audio/mous A simpe yet powerful audio playe o ports/169090New Port: comms/ge-x2212-2 An EEPROM programmer for GE f ports/169078Fix for ports-mgmt/psearch to compile with lang/gcc46 o ports/169074[NEW PORT] net/jicmp6: ICMPv6 JNI f ports/169043Add CONFLICTS_INSTALL=fusefs-ntfs to sysutils/ntfsprog o ports/169041New port: devel/libgta: Libgta is a portable library t f ports/169032Update net-im/qutim port to 0.3.0 o ports/169014devel/libtecla: enhance command cannot find pseudo-ter f ports/168975databases/couchdb stops on start and did not return to o ports/168972[PATCH] for net/rdist6 to handle files 2GB f ports/168955mail/dovecot Makefile patches to include gssapi.h wh f ports/168935www/firefox-remote shares PORTNAME with www/firefox o ports/168926Second '59.xxx' out of range 0..59 at security/snort-r o ports/168905[NEW PORT] devel/rebar: A build-tool for Erlang that f f ports/168892[PATCH] benchmarks/polygraph: Update to 4.3.2 - Unmark o ports/168861devel/tkcvs: tkdiff no longer runs correctly f ports/168841x11/slim fails to authorize (through kereros) if built f ports/168824[PATCH] astro/gpstk: fix conflict lib links f ports/168661devel/boost-libs fails on make package because of miss o ports/168627[NEW PORT] net/bibtexconv port f ports/168611conflict: cad/brlcad: Port shares files with other por o ports/168523[PATCH] sysutils/smartmontools smartd can't see ada(4) o ports/168486[PATCH] www/sams, warnings strftime() [function.strft o ports/168483Maintainer Update: lang/squeak version up to 4.4.7-238 o ports/168466[PATCH] www/sams, web-interface, needs GetHostnameSam. o ports/168452New Port: comms/qtel EchoLink Client and SvrLink audio f ports/168444Segfault in devel/gdb version 7.4.1 f ports/168407[patch] lang/gauche: update to 0.9.3.2, unbreak o ports/168404[NEW PORT] databases/dev-sqlite3: This is a developmen o ports/168385every port has vulnerabilities in case of locale probl f ports/168319graphics/qiviewer: Not displaying image jpeg o ports/168177[NEW PORT] games/asteroids3d: First-person shooter blo f ports/168161[PATCH] sysutils/conky: update to 1.9.0 f ports/168160ports-mgmt/jailaudit doesn't return a non-0 exit code o ports/168141faild to install lang/ezm3 f ports/168139install net/quagga is failed s ports/167955[update] graphics/tinyows: Fix dependency to postgis f ports/167950databases/memcachedb does not work on 10-CURRENT f ports/167910[MAINTAINER] databases/mariadb-scripts: add missing de f ports/167824mail/dovecot: double checks for build options f ports/167691security/heimdal: problem compiling kerberos/heimdal o ports/167591security/openssh-portable looks for ecdsa key but none o ports/167554security/openssh-portable has some drawbacks f ports/167090sysutils/ezjail: Invalid command line option in ezjail o ports/167042New port: net-p2p/tahoe-lafs f ports/167031security/heimdal ignore environment after process call f ports/166987net/nss_ldap: ports/152982 causes nss_ldap to not func o ports/166826New port: misc/libphidget The driver for Phidgets devi o ports/166812New port: mail/bounceHammer o ports/166728New port: science/fvcom-mpi o ports/166726New port: science/fvcom o ports/15[new port] java/jboss-as: JBoss 7.1 new port o ports/166522lang/f77: Fortran 77 compiler always exits with error f ports/166388security/libgcrypt is broken s
Current problem reports assigned to po...@freebsd.org
Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description o ports/168328 ports [REPOCOPY] devel/codeblocks -- devel/codeblocks-devel 1 problem total. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: custom license on new port?
Michael Scheidell wrote: got a new port. submitted by the copyright owner and author. for reference, pr ports/168832 there is no LICENSE= in the Makefile, no LICENSE.txt in the distribution, but it does have the attached in the main.c file. [...] * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions * are met: * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the * documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. * * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND * ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE * IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE * ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE * FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL * DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS * OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) * HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT * LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY * OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF * SUCH DAMAGE. That is 2-clause BSD [1], aka the FreeBSD license [2], so LICENSE=BSD should be sufficient if you want to add that (my understanding is that the license framework is unused and should probably be removed). [1] http://www.opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause [2] https://gnu.org/licenses/license-list#FreeBSD ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: TeXLive merge into FreeBSD ports tree - FreeBSD project idea
Hi all, Summary of below. I have started an effort to get TeXLive into the FreeBSD ports. See github.com/DragonSA/texlive for details. Volunteers welcome. On Sunday, 17 June 2012 22:04:15 David Schultz wrote: On Sun, Jun 17, 2012, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: Even with a knob instead of checking if print/texlive-core is installed, it would put a lot of mess into the ports tree. Some maintainers will not agree to introduce these conditions, if there is no general agreement that we want to transition to TeXLive that way. teTeX hasn't been updated since 2006 and the maintainer of teTeX has discontinued development and recommends using TeXLive. Undoubtably updating the TeXLive will break some things but the same could be said about teTeX if an update existed. Are there any people who don't want to migrate to TeXLive? As far as I remember, both romain@ and hrs@ have stated that they do not want both teTeX and TeXLive in the tree concurrently. Looking through the list of bundled packages for TeXLive it will be quite difficult to have both TeXLive and teTeX in the tree concurrently. There are a group of support ports, such as xdvik and ptex that require special integration into either teTeX or TeXLive. To switch between either will require reinstalling many dependencies, not just the TeXLive or teTeX ports. With that said, it is not impossible nor, I think, will it impose a big maintenance burden. In that case, it sounds like using TeXLive in FreeBSD will be a bit tricky until someone steps in and does all the work required for integration. Unfortunately I'm a bit time-constrained for the next few months, but I do use TeXLive and would be happy to test any proposed patches. I have started working on just this, getting TeXLive into FreeBSD ports. It is still early days and I have only two monolithic ports, with texlive-base requiring lots of love. I believe my work is in a state ready for initial testing (verifying the ports) and some feedback. Some open questions are: - how to split texlive-texmf (OpenBSD has an approach) - how to handle bundled software that has existing (sometimes outdated) ports Also, I am looking for a sponsor: someone who will commit the ports when they are ready, and to provide feedback so that the ports may get to a ready state. For details about the project, and to get the ports, please see: github.com/DragonSA/texlive Regards P.S. I am not subscribed to freebsd-ports@ so please CC me. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
graphics/flphoto: Fails to build
Hello. Latest flphoto doesn't build (here). Build log: http://ketas.si.pri.ee/fbsd/ports-buildlogs/graphics::flphoto.1340021653.log uname -a: FreeBSD ketas-laptop.mydomain 8.2-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p4 #0: Sat Dec 10 22:25:43 EET 2011 root@ketas-laptop.mydomain:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KETASLAPTOP i386 Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: custom license on new port?
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 02:21:37PM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote: Michael Scheidell wrote: got a new port. submitted by the copyright owner and author. for reference, pr ports/168832 there is no LICENSE= in the Makefile, no LICENSE.txt in the distribution, but it does have the attached in the main.c file. [...] * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions * are met: * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the * documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. * * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND * ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE * IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE * ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE * FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL * DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS * OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) * HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT * LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY * OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF * SUCH DAMAGE. That is 2-clause BSD [1], aka the FreeBSD license [2], so LICENSE=BSD should be sufficient if you want to add that (my understanding is that the license framework is unused and should probably be removed). I don't know if it's considered unused by the ports system committers, but as a port maintainer and a user I actually get some use from the license framework. As such, I hope the plan is not to remove the license framework, but even if there is such a plan I think it would probably be a good idea to specify license in the port Makefile when at all reasonable to do so, considering how simple it is to do so and the fact it may be useful to some users. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: custom license on new port?
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 06:57:28AM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote: got a new port. submitted by the copyright owner and author. for reference, pr ports/168832 there is no LICENSE= in the Makefile, no LICENSE.txt in the distribution, but it does have the attached in the main.c file. Q: should I ask him to select one of the standard FreeBSD/GPL licenses (and edit his source )? Why would you try to pressure him into changing the license? As already pointed out, the license used is not a custom or nonstandard license, but even if it was I do not think the ports system needs to be in the business of deciding that some license that is not already well-represented in the ports system is not good enough on the basis of its relative lack of popularity alone. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ports/168328: [REPOCOPY] devel/codeblocks -- devel/codeblocks-devel
Synopsis: [REPOCOPY] devel/codeblocks -- devel/codeblocks-devel Responsible-Changed-From-To: ports-freebsd-ports-bugs Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jun 18 15:45:45 UTC 2012 Responsible-Changed-Why: Canonicalize assignment. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=168328 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Building gimp-2.8
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 20:23:30 +0400 Ruslan Mahmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru wrote: Matthieu Volat wrote on 07.05.2012 15:56: Hello everybody, As gimp 2.8 was released a few days ago, I naturaly tried to get it working on my 9.0-RELEASE desktop :) I forked a few ports directories to bump gimp and the dependancies to the needed versions. Everything seems to work quite nicely. I'm sure those modifications cannot be pushed right now in the ports tree, there are quite a few version bump that would impact other ports, but I'd like to share them anyway. I've attached a tarball of my files, here are the list of modified ports: glib20 - 2.30.2 gio-fam-backend - 2.30.2 atk - 2.2.0 gtk - 2.24.10 gdk-pixbuf2 - 2.24.1 pango - 1.29.4 babl - 0.1.10 gegl - 0.2.0 gimp - 2.8.0 I hope it can help people wanting to upgrade to the lastest version of gimp. Lol, dunno how I read this thread so this message was still missed :). I checked my system with pkg_libchk and there was no ports that needed rebuild for new libraries. I also rebooted, checked all my gtk2 applications - all of them runs fine. So I think it more need to concentrate on testing gimp-depended ports, like a plugins/extensions etc. -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives. I've been using a few plugins (focusblur, lqr, resynthetizer mainly) without any problems. The Gimp devs are realy conservative about plugin APIs, and it seems that even ABI wasn't broken as I did not have to rebuild any plugin. But I haven't done the new gimp-data-extras and gimp-help (doc was released a few days after the app). -- Matthieu Volat ma...@alkumuna.eu ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
INDEX build failed for 7.x
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-7 - please wait../nonexistentlocal/bin/bash: No such file or directory === net-mgmt/zenoss failed *** Error code 1 *** Error code 1 Stop in /a/erwin/tindex/ports. *** Error code 1 Stop in /a/erwin/tindex/ports. 1 error Committers on the hook: beat garga jgh jpaetzel osa sunpoet Most recent CVS update was: U devel/p5-AnyEvent-DBI/Makefile U devel/p5-AnyEvent-DBI/distinfo U devel/p5-Carp/Makefile U devel/p5-Carp/distinfo U irc/epic4/Makefile U irc/epic5/Makefile U net-mgmt/zenoss/Makefile U science/cdo/Makefile U www/firefox/Makefile U www/firefox/distinfo U www/firefox-i18n/Makefile U www/firefox-i18n/distinfo U www/nginx/Makefile U www/nginx/distinfo U www/nginx-devel/Makefile U www/nginx-devel/distinfo U www/py-imdbpy/Makefile U www/py-imdbpy/distinfo U www/py-imdbpy/pkg-plist U www/py-qp/Makefile U www/py-qpy/Makefile U x11-wm/awesome/Makefile U x11-wm/awesome/distinfo U x11-wm/awesome/pkg-plist ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: INDEX build failed for 7.x
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 07:16:55PM +, Erwin Lansing thus spake: INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-7 - please wait../nonexistentlocal/bin/bash: No such file or directory === net-mgmt/zenoss failed *** Error code 1 *** Error code 1 Stop in /a/erwin/tindex/ports. *** Error code 1 Stop in /a/erwin/tindex/ports. 1 error Committers on the hook: beat garga jgh jpaetzel osa sunpoet This should be fixed, now. -jgh -- Jason Helfman FreeBSD Committer | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh | The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
INDEX build failed for 7.x
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-7 - please wait../nonexistentlocal/bin/bash: No such file or directory === net-mgmt/zenoss failed *** Error code 1 *** Error code 1 Stop in /a/erwin/tindex/ports. *** Error code 1 Stop in /a/erwin/tindex/ports. 1 error Committers on the hook: ak beat beech cy garga jgh jpaetzel osa pav sunpoet Most recent CVS update was: U converters/Makefile U converters/bibtexconv/Makefile U converters/bibtexconv/distinfo U converters/bibtexconv/pkg-descr U devel/soapui/Makefile U devel/soapui/distinfo U devel/soapui/pkg-plist U devel/soapui/files/patch-aa U math/dynare/Makefile U net-mgmt/zenoss/Makefile U sysutils/cfengine3/Makefile U sysutils/cfengine3/distinfo U sysutils/cfengine3/pkg-plist ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
INDEX now builds successfully on 7.x
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
