Re: mail/thunderbird builds with enigmail even though not selected in options

2013-02-21 Thread Michael Gmelin
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:50:07 +0100
Bernt Hansson  wrote:

> 2013-02-22 03:36, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr skrev:
> > On 02/21/13 19:45, Bernt Hansson wrote:
> >> 2013-02-22 02:18, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr skrev:
> >>> Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building
> >>> with mail/thunderbird even though it's not selected? I"ve had it
> >>> not selected for two updates now and it's still listed in
> >>> add-ons. I'm wanting to try the one from addons.mozilla.org but I
> >>> can't enable it with 1.4.6 installed concurrently.
> >>
> >> Have you tried:
> >>
> >> cd mail/thunderbird && make rmconfig && make
> >
> > No, but after multiple svn updates and one or two complete ports
> > tree removals between builds, I was hoping it wasn't necessary.
> >
> Have you asked god or jesus? They should know.

http://dontbeadickday.com/howtonotbeadick.jpg

-- 
Michael Gmelin
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: [HEADS UP] Mark Linimon steps down from portmgr@

2013-02-21 Thread Michael Gmelin
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 04:12:11 +
Thomas Abthorpe  wrote:

> Mark Linimon, aka linimon@,  recently stepped down from his duties on
> the FreeBSD Ports Management Team.
> 
> Mark joined the team back in 2004, providing nine years of continuity
> to the Ports Infrastructure.  Among the many things Mark did, was
> maintaining and documenting the current portbuild system that the
> team uses for -exp runs and package building.  With his other
> bugbuster@ hat on, he played middle man contacting maintainers of
> BROKEN and DEPRECATED ports.
> 
> On behalf of the Ports Management team, we would like to thank Mark
> for his many years of service and dedication, his contributions will
> be greatly missed.

Thank you Mark for your efforts and contributions in almost a decade,
your work has been truly invaluable to us and (I assume) the whole
FreeBSD community.

Thanks again and all the best for your future.

-- 
Michael Gmelin
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: mail/thunderbird builds with enigmail even though not selected in options

2013-02-21 Thread Bernt Hansson

2013-02-22 03:36, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr skrev:

On 02/21/13 19:45, Bernt Hansson wrote:

2013-02-22 02:18, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr skrev:

Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building with
mail/thunderbird even though it's not selected? I"ve had it not selected
for two updates now and it's still listed in add-ons. I'm wanting to try
the one from addons.mozilla.org but I can't enable it with 1.4.6
installed concurrently.


Have you tried:

cd mail/thunderbird && make rmconfig && make


No, but after multiple svn updates and one or two complete ports tree
removals between builds, I was hoping it wasn't necessary.


Have you asked god or jesus? They should know.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: mail/thunderbird builds with enigmail even though not selected in options

2013-02-21 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr

On 02/21/13 21:28, Michael Gmelin wrote:

On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:15:30 -0600
"Joseph A. Nagy, Jr"  wrote:


On 02/21/13 21:07, Michael Gmelin wrote:

On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:36:45 -0600
"Joseph A. Nagy, Jr"  wrote:


On 02/21/13 19:45, Bernt Hansson wrote:

2013-02-22 02:18, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr skrev:

Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building
with mail/thunderbird even though it's not selected? I"ve had it
not selected for two updates now and it's still listed in
add-ons. I'm wanting to try the one from addons.mozilla.org but
I can't enable it with 1.4.6 installed concurrently.


Have you tried:

cd mail/thunderbird && make rmconfig && make

No, but after multiple svn updates and one or two complete ports
tree removals between builds, I was hoping it wasn't necessary.


If you say "ports tree removal", does that include /var/db/ports/*?


No, just an 'rm -rf /usr/ports/*'


Ah ok. In case you want to completely clean up and start from scratch
(like you assumed you would after removing the ports tree)
removing /var/db/ports/* might be a good idea, since all OPTIONS are
stored in there (make rmconfig should do the trick as well). Don't
think this is the root of your current problem, but might be helpful
for future endeavours.



Thanks, I appreciate the tip. (:

--
Yours in Christ,

Joseph A Nagy Jr
"Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction
is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL 
http://copyfree.org/licenses/owl/license.txt

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: mail/thunderbird builds with enigmail even though not selected in options

2013-02-21 Thread Michael Gmelin
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:15:30 -0600
"Joseph A. Nagy, Jr"  wrote:

> On 02/21/13 21:07, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:36:45 -0600
> > "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr"  wrote:
> >
> >> On 02/21/13 19:45, Bernt Hansson wrote:
> >>> 2013-02-22 02:18, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr skrev:
>  Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building
>  with mail/thunderbird even though it's not selected? I"ve had it
>  not selected for two updates now and it's still listed in
>  add-ons. I'm wanting to try the one from addons.mozilla.org but
>  I can't enable it with 1.4.6 installed concurrently.
> >>>
> >>> Have you tried:
> >>>
> >>> cd mail/thunderbird && make rmconfig && make
> >> No, but after multiple svn updates and one or two complete ports
> >> tree removals between builds, I was hoping it wasn't necessary.
> >
> > If you say "ports tree removal", does that include /var/db/ports/*?
> >
> No, just an 'rm -rf /usr/ports/*'

Ah ok. In case you want to completely clean up and start from scratch
(like you assumed you would after removing the ports tree)
removing /var/db/ports/* might be a good idea, since all OPTIONS are
stored in there (make rmconfig should do the trick as well). Don't
think this is the root of your current problem, but might be helpful
for future endeavours.

-- 
Michael Gmelin
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: mail/thunderbird builds with enigmail even though not selected in options

2013-02-21 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr

On 02/21/13 21:07, Michael Gmelin wrote:

On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:36:45 -0600
"Joseph A. Nagy, Jr"  wrote:


On 02/21/13 19:45, Bernt Hansson wrote:

2013-02-22 02:18, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr skrev:

Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building
with mail/thunderbird even though it's not selected? I"ve had it
not selected for two updates now and it's still listed in add-ons.
I'm wanting to try the one from addons.mozilla.org but I can't
enable it with 1.4.6 installed concurrently.


Have you tried:

cd mail/thunderbird && make rmconfig && make

No, but after multiple svn updates and one or two complete ports tree
removals between builds, I was hoping it wasn't necessary.


If you say "ports tree removal", does that include /var/db/ports/*?



No, just an 'rm -rf /usr/ports/*'

--
Yours in Christ,

Joseph A Nagy Jr
"Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction
is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL 
http://copyfree.org/licenses/owl/license.txt

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: mail/thunderbird builds with enigmail even though not selected in options

2013-02-21 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr

On 02/21/13 21:17, John Marshall wrote:

On 22/02/2013 14:09, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:

Ports enigmail has been updated? My complaint with the former ports
enigmail was it kept crashing Thunderbird.


There is no Enigmail port. It disappeared back in October 2012.


It's still pulled in by the ports system. Potatoe potatoe (that really 
doesn't come off the same in text, heh).



If you have removed all traces of Enigmail packages on your system, and
you cannot delete the Enigmail Add-on from Thunderbird (I haven't tried
since the integration), I suggest building Thunderbird WITH the Enigmail
option and see if that brings your Enigmail up to date (1.5.1).



Worth a try. I miss using enigmail.

--
Yours in Christ,

Joseph A Nagy Jr
"Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction
is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL 
http://copyfree.org/licenses/owl/license.txt

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: mail/thunderbird builds with enigmail even though not selected in options

2013-02-21 Thread John Marshall
On 22/02/2013 14:09, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
> Ports enigmail has been updated? My complaint with the former ports
> enigmail was it kept crashing Thunderbird.

There is no Enigmail port. It disappeared back in October 2012.

If you have removed all traces of Enigmail packages on your system, and
you cannot delete the Enigmail Add-on from Thunderbird (I haven't tried
since the integration), I suggest building Thunderbird WITH the Enigmail
option and see if that brings your Enigmail up to date (1.5.1).

-- 
John Marshall



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Issues Compiling editors/openoffice-3

2013-02-21 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr
I've been having issues compiling editors/openoffice-3 for several weeks 
and I'm not sure where the problem is cropping up.


# less /etc/make.conf
WITH_PKGNG=yes
# added by use.perl 2012-12-11 17:43:33
PERL_VERSION=5.16.2
#Add in clang after rebuilding world
WITH_CLANG=YES
CXX=clang++
CPP=clang-cpp
CC=clang
#kernel building
KERNCONF=ALEX-LAPTOP
#ruby support
RUBY_VER=1.9
RUBY_VERSION=1.9
RUBY_DEFAULT_VERSION=1.9
#python support
PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION=python2.7
#random stuff
WITH_CUPS=YES
CUPS_OVERWRITE_BASE=YES
WITHOUT_LPR=YES
WITH_BERKELEYDB=db48
WITH_BDB_VER=48

The error message and some of the scrollback:

touch ../../unxfbsdx.pro/misc/build/so_installed_commons-lang
cp -f 
../../unxfbsdx.pro/misc/build/commons-lang-2.3-src/dist/commons-lang-2.3.jar 
../../unxfbsdx.pro/class

touch ../../unxfbsdx.pro/misc/build/so_predeliver_commons-lang
apache-commons deliver
deliver -- version: 275594
COPY: build.lst -> 
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3/work/aoo-3.4.1/main/solver/341/unxfbsdx.pro/inc/apache-commons/build.lst
COPY: ../unxfbsdx.pro/class/commons-logging-1.1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar -> 
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3/work/aoo-3.4.1/main/solver/341/unxfbsdx.pro/bin/commons-logging-1.1.1.jar
COPY: ../unxfbsdx.pro/class/commons-codec-1.3.jar -> 
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3/work/aoo-3.4.1/main/solver/341/unxfbsdx.pro/bin/commons-codec-1.3.jar
COPY: ../unxfbsdx.pro/class/commons-httpclient.jar -> 
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3/work/aoo-3.4.1/main/solver/341/unxfbsdx.pro/bin/commons-httpclient-3.1.jar
COPY: ../unxfbsdx.pro/class/commons-lang-2.3.jar -> 
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3/work/aoo-3.4.1/main/solver/341/unxfbsdx.pro/bin/commons-lang-2.3.jar
LOG: writing 
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3/work/aoo-3.4.1/main/solver/341/unxfbsdx.pro/inc/apache-commons/deliver.log
Module 'apache-commons' delivered successfully. 5 files copied, 0 files 
unchanged


2 module(s):
stlport
soltools
need(s) to be rebuilt

Reason(s):

ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making 
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3/work/aoo-3.4.1/main/stlport
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making 
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3/work/aoo-3.4.1/main/soltools/giparser


When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build 
by running:


build --from stlport soltools

*** [do-build] Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3.
*** [build] Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3.

===>>> make failed for editors/openoffice-3
===>>> Aborting update

Terminated
===>>> Installation of graphics/vigra (vigra-1.9.0_1) complete


===>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this command line:
   portmaster  editors/openoffice-3

I can run script(1) and retry the compile and upload that to a pastebin 
if need be.

--
Yours in Christ,

Joseph A Nagy Jr
"Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction
is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL 
http://copyfree.org/licenses/owl/license.txt

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: mail/thunderbird builds with enigmail even though not selected in options

2013-02-21 Thread Michael Gmelin
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:36:45 -0600
"Joseph A. Nagy, Jr"  wrote:

> On 02/21/13 19:45, Bernt Hansson wrote:
> > 2013-02-22 02:18, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr skrev:
> >> Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building
> >> with mail/thunderbird even though it's not selected? I"ve had it
> >> not selected for two updates now and it's still listed in add-ons.
> >> I'm wanting to try the one from addons.mozilla.org but I can't
> >> enable it with 1.4.6 installed concurrently.
> >
> > Have you tried:
> >
> > cd mail/thunderbird && make rmconfig && make
> No, but after multiple svn updates and one or two complete ports tree
> removals between builds, I was hoping it wasn't necessary.

If you say "ports tree removal", does that include /var/db/ports/*?

-- 
Michael Gmelin
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: mail/thunderbird builds with enigmail even though not selected in options

2013-02-21 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr

On 02/21/13 21:07, John Marshall wrote:

On 22/02/2013 13:33, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:

On 02/21/13 19:47, John Marshall wrote:

On 22/02/2013 12:18, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:

Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building with
mail/thunderbird even though it's not selected? I"ve had it not selected
for two updates now and it's still listed in add-ons. I'm wanting to try
the one from addons.mozilla.org but I can't enable it with 1.4.6
installed concurrently.


See /usr/ports/UPDATING for 20121010.

Enigmail is now (optionally) integrated with Thunderbird. You need to
delete the old Enigmail port before building Thunderbird.


I am aware of this, but the enigmail in ports causes current Thunderbird
to crash when you try to do anything useful with it (unless enigmail in
ports has been updated to 1.5.0). I don't want the enigmail in ports.
Period.


So you haven't disabled and deleted your old Add-on(s)?


You cannot delete the compiled-in-from-ports enigmail in that manner, 
I've tried, frequently.



- Disable and delete your ancient Enigmail Add-on from Tools-->Add-ons
- pkg_delete any existing Enigmail package you have installed
- Install the current Thunderbird port
   - without the Enigmail option if you don't want Enigmail; or
   - with the Enigmail option if you want the integrated Enigmail 1.5.1



Ports enigmail has been updated? My complaint with the former ports 
enigmail was it kept crashing Thunderbird.


--
Yours in Christ,

Joseph A Nagy Jr
"Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction
is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL 
http://copyfree.org/licenses/owl/license.txt

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: mail/thunderbird builds with enigmail even though not selected in options

2013-02-21 Thread John Marshall
On 22/02/2013 13:33, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
> On 02/21/13 19:47, John Marshall wrote:
>> On 22/02/2013 12:18, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
>>> Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building with
>>> mail/thunderbird even though it's not selected? I"ve had it not selected
>>> for two updates now and it's still listed in add-ons. I'm wanting to try
>>> the one from addons.mozilla.org but I can't enable it with 1.4.6
>>> installed concurrently.
>>
>> See /usr/ports/UPDATING for 20121010.
>>
>> Enigmail is now (optionally) integrated with Thunderbird. You need to
>> delete the old Enigmail port before building Thunderbird.
>>
> I am aware of this, but the enigmail in ports causes current Thunderbird
> to crash when you try to do anything useful with it (unless enigmail in
> ports has been updated to 1.5.0). I don't want the enigmail in ports.
> Period.

So you haven't disabled and deleted your old Add-on(s)?

- Disable and delete your ancient Enigmail Add-on from Tools-->Add-ons
- pkg_delete any existing Enigmail package you have installed
- Install the current Thunderbird port
  - without the Enigmail option if you don't want Enigmail; or
  - with the Enigmail option if you want the integrated Enigmail 1.5.1

-- 
John Marshall



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: mail/thunderbird builds with enigmail even though not selected in options

2013-02-21 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr

On 02/21/13 19:45, Bernt Hansson wrote:

2013-02-22 02:18, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr skrev:

Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building with
mail/thunderbird even though it's not selected? I"ve had it not selected
for two updates now and it's still listed in add-ons. I'm wanting to try
the one from addons.mozilla.org but I can't enable it with 1.4.6
installed concurrently.


Have you tried:

cd mail/thunderbird && make rmconfig && make


No, but after multiple svn updates and one or two complete ports tree 
removals between builds, I was hoping it wasn't necessary.


--
Yours in Christ,

Joseph A Nagy Jr
"Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction
is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL 
http://copyfree.org/licenses/owl/license.txt

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: mail/thunderbird builds with enigmail even though not selected in options

2013-02-21 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr

On 02/21/13 19:47, John Marshall wrote:

On 22/02/2013 12:18, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:

Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building with
mail/thunderbird even though it's not selected? I"ve had it not selected
for two updates now and it's still listed in add-ons. I'm wanting to try
the one from addons.mozilla.org but I can't enable it with 1.4.6
installed concurrently.


See /usr/ports/UPDATING for 20121010.

Enigmail is now (optionally) integrated with Thunderbird. You need to


I am aware of this, but the enigmail in ports causes current Thunderbird 
to crash when you try to do anything useful with it (unless enigmail in 
ports has been updated to 1.5.0). I don't want the enigmail in ports. 
Period.



delete the old Enigmail port before building Thunderbird.




--
Yours in Christ,

Joseph A Nagy Jr
"Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction
is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL 
http://copyfree.org/licenses/owl/license.txt

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Failure to build gettext

2013-02-21 Thread David J. Weller-Fahy
I'm currently unable to build gettext from ports (tried both `portmaster
devel/gettext` and `cd /usr/ports/devel/gettext ; make install`).  I've
searched around the forums, mailing list archives, and google to
determine what I'm doing wrong, but have had no luck so far in finding a
solution.

I use portsnap to update the ports, so they are updated.

I use freebsd-update to update the installation, the version is 9.1p1:

#v+
dave@nastie:~$ egrep '^(T|B|REV)' /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh
TYPE="FreeBSD"
REVISION="9.1"
BRANCH="RELEASE-p1"
#v-

The failure I get is as follows (from `portmaster devel/gettext`):

#v+
libtool: compile:  cc -c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local/share/locale\" 
-DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/usr/local/share/locale\" -DLIBDIR=\"/usr/local/lib\" 
-DBUILDING_LIBINTL -DBUILDING_DLL -DIN_LIBINTL -DENABLE_RELOCATABLE=1 
-DIN_LIBRARY -DINSTALLDIR=\"/usr/local/lib\" -DNO_XMALLOC 
-Dset_relocation_prefix=libintl_set_relocation_prefix 
-Drelocate=libintl_relocate -DDEPENDS_ON_LIBICONV=1 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.  -I. 
-I.. -I/usr/local/include -O2 -pipe -mssse3 -march=nocona -fno-strict-aliasing 
-fvisibility=hidden ./localename.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/localename.o
./localename.c: In function '_nl_locale_name_thread_unsafe':
./localename.c:2607: error: 'locale_t' undeclared (first use in this
function)
./localename.c:2607: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only
once
./localename.c:2607: error: for each function it appears in.)
./localename.c:2607: error: expected ';' before 'thread_locale'
./localename.c:2608: error: 'thread_locale' undeclared (first use in
this function)
./localename.c:2608: error: 'LC_GLOBAL_LOCALE' undeclared (first use in
this function)
*** Error code 1

Stop in
/usr/ports/devel/gettext/work/gettext-0.18.1.1/gettext-runtime/intl.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/devel/gettext/work/gettext-0.18.1.1/gettext-runtime.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/devel/gettext/work/gettext-0.18.1.1/gettext-runtime.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/devel/gettext/work/gettext-0.18.1.1.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/devel/gettext.

===>>> make failed for devel/gettext
===>>> Aborting update

Terminated

===>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this command line:
   portmaster  devel/gettext
#v-

I'm lost at this point, so can anyone point me in the proper direction?

Oh, and please let me know if you need more information, and I'll
gleefully provide anything needed to solve this problem.

Regards,
-- 
dave [ please don't CC me ]


pgpnzm9B6Gghc.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: mail/thunderbird builds with enigmail even though not selected in options

2013-02-21 Thread John Marshall
On 22/02/2013 12:18, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
> Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building with
> mail/thunderbird even though it's not selected? I"ve had it not selected
> for two updates now and it's still listed in add-ons. I'm wanting to try
> the one from addons.mozilla.org but I can't enable it with 1.4.6
> installed concurrently.

See /usr/ports/UPDATING for 20121010.

Enigmail is now (optionally) integrated with Thunderbird. You need to
delete the old Enigmail port before building Thunderbird.

-- 
John Marshall



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: mail/thunderbird builds with enigmail even though not selected in options

2013-02-21 Thread Bernt Hansson

2013-02-22 02:18, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr skrev:

Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building with
mail/thunderbird even though it's not selected? I"ve had it not selected
for two updates now and it's still listed in add-ons. I'm wanting to try
the one from addons.mozilla.org but I can't enable it with 1.4.6
installed concurrently.


Have you tried:

cd mail/thunderbird && make rmconfig && make
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


mail/thunderbird builds with enigmail even though not selected in options

2013-02-21 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr
Is anyone else having an issue with enigmail-1.4.6 (re)building with 
mail/thunderbird even though it's not selected? I"ve had it not selected 
for two updates now and it's still listed in add-ons. I'm wanting to try 
the one from addons.mozilla.org but I can't enable it with 1.4.6 
installed concurrently.

--
Yours in Christ,

Joseph A Nagy Jr
"Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction
is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL 
http://copyfree.org/licenses/owl/license.txt

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Re: libreoffice

2013-02-21 Thread Max Brazhnikov
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:54:59 +0100 Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >
> > You know that time a quickstarter saves you starting a program is
> > just the same time it made your system start take longer.
> 
> true. but if user close a document and then open another - you get twice 
> the waiting time.
> 
> > Quick starters are a huge part of the reason windows installations
> > start to feel sluggish after some time. They are a plague, binding
> > resources before it's even clear that they're needed.
> 
> i can accept 100MB of VM "locked" per user for speed.

libreoffice --quickstart --nologo

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: libreoffice

2013-02-21 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 21/02/2013 20:54, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>>
>> You know that time a quickstarter saves you starting a program is
>> just the same time it made your system start take longer.
> 
> true. but if user close a document and then open another - you get twice the 
> waiting time.

That's strange. As long as you've got enough RAM all the data should
remain cached. A successive start of libreoffice takes < 1s on my system.

Only the first start gives me a couple of seconds of hard disk activity.

-- 
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? 
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Firefox 19.0,1 crashes at startup

2013-02-21 Thread Edwin L. Culp W.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Florian Smeets  wrote:

> On 21.02.13 20:34, Frank Seltzer wrote:
> > I am getting this on 2 machines, both at 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0
> > r247001.  Both have GENERIC kernel, no edits.  Both have the linux module
> > loaded if that matters.
> >
>
> Can you apply this patch
>
> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=246858
>
> to your stable/9 checkout, rebuild/install world and try to rebuild
> firefox?
>
> Thanks,
> Florian
>
>
I am running yesterdays kernel and just upgraded firefox this morning and
am writing this email on it with no problems.  The only difference is the
kernel is not Generic but that is probably a disadvantage for me.

I bet Florian's suggestion will fix it.

ed

-- 
Bienes RaĆ­ces in Coatepec, Veracruz, Mexico

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Inmobiliaria-Bienes-Raices-httpEcoManiainfo/102249989850215?sk=photos_albums
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: libreoffice

2013-02-21 Thread Wojciech Puchar


You know that time a quickstarter saves you starting a program is
just the same time it made your system start take longer.


true. but if user close a document and then open another - you get twice 
the waiting time.



Quick starters are a huge part of the reason windows installations
start to feel sluggish after some time. They are a plague, binding
resources before it's even clear that they're needed.


i can accept 100MB of VM "locked" per user for speed.

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Firefox 19.0,1 crashes at startup

2013-02-21 Thread Florian Smeets
On 21.02.13 20:34, Frank Seltzer wrote:
> I am getting this on 2 machines, both at 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0 
> r247001.  Both have GENERIC kernel, no edits.  Both have the linux module 
> loaded if that matters.
> 

Can you apply this patch

http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=246858

to your stable/9 checkout, rebuild/install world and try to rebuild firefox?

Thanks,
Florian



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Firefox 19.0,1 crashes at startup

2013-02-21 Thread Frank Seltzer
I am getting this on 2 machines, both at 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0 
r247001.  Both have GENERIC kernel, no edits.  Both have the linux module 
loaded if that matters.


First machine dmesg:

Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0 r247001: Tue Feb 19 23:09:04 EST 2013
frank_s@x.x.x:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz (2992.76-MHz 686-class CPU)
  Origin = "GenuineIntel"  Id = 0xf41  Family = 0xf  Model = 0x4  Stepping 
= 1


Features=0xbfebfbff
  Features2=0x641d
  AMD Features=0x2010
  TSC: P-state invariant
real memory  = 3221225472 (3072 MB)
avail memory = 3135553536 (2990 MB)
Event timer "LAPIC" quality 400
ACPI APIC Table: 
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs
FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 1 core(s) x 2 HTT threads
 cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID:  0
 cpu1 (AP/HT): APIC ID:  1

Second machine:

Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0 r247001: Tue Feb 19 23:01:16 EST 2013
frank_s@x.x.x:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
CPU: AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1035T Processor (2593.55-MHz 686-class CPU)
  Origin = "AuthenticAMD"  Id = 0x100fa0  Family = 0x10  Model = 0xa 
Stepping = 0


Features=0x178bfbff
  Features2=0x802009
  AMD 
Features=0xee500800
  AMD 
Features2=0x37ff

  TSC: P-state invariant, performance statistics
real memory  = 4294967296 (4096 MB)
avail memory = 3400425472 (3242 MB)
Event timer "LAPIC" quality 400
ACPI APIC Table: 
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 6 CPUs
FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 6 core(s)
 cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID:  0
 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID:  1
 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID:  2
 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID:  3
 cpu4 (AP): APIC ID:  4
 cpu5 (AP): APIC ID:  5

I have moved the .mozilla directory out of the way so both start clean.

Output from ktrace:

31893 firefox  PSIG  SIGSEGV caught handler=0x281b7be0 mask=0x0 code=0x2
 31893 firefox  CALL  sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0xbfbf981c,0)
 31893 firefox  RET   sigprocmask 0
 31893 firefox  CALL  unlink(0x285db2c0)
 31893 firefox  NAMI 
"/home/frank_s/.mozilla/firefox/atflhbg0.default/lock"

 31893 firefox  RET   unlink 0
 31893 firefox  CALL  sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x281bf824,0xbfbf946c)
 31893 firefox  RET   sigprocmask 0
 31893 firefox  CALL  sigaction(SIGSEGV,0xbfbf9454,0xbfbf943c)
 31893 firefox  RET   sigaction 0
 31893 firefox  CALL  sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0xbfbf946c,0)
 31893 firefox  RET   sigprocmask 0
 31893 firefox  CALL  sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK,0xbfbf94a0,0)
 31893 firefox  RET   sigprocmask 0
 31893 firefox  CALL  thr_kill(0x1894e,SIGSEGV)
 31893 firefox  RET   thr_kill 0
 31893 firefox  PSIG  SIGSEGV SIG_DFL code=0x10007
 31893 TimerRET   _umtx_op -1 errno 4 Interrupted system call
 31893 Gecko_IOThread GIO   fd 8 wrote 20 bytes
   0x 0900   0100     0303 0300 
||


 31893 Cache I/O RET   _umtx_op -1 errno 4 Interrupted system call
 31893 Gecko_IOThread RET   kevent -1 errno 4 Interrupted system call
 31893 JS GC Helper RET   _umtx_op -1 errno 4 Interrupted system call
 31893 XPCOM CC RET   _umtx_op -1 errno 4 Interrupted system call
 31893 firefox  RET   _umtx_op -1 errno 4 Interrupted system call
 31893 mozStorage #2 RET   _umtx_op -1 errno 4 Interrupted system call
 31893 Hang Monitor RET   _umtx_op -1 errno 4 Interrupted system call
 31893 HTML5 Parser RET   _umtx_op -1 errno 4 Interrupted system call
 31893 mozStorage #3 RET   _umtx_op -1 errno 4 Interrupted system call
 31893 mozStorage #1 RET   _umtx_op -1 errno 4 Interrupted system call
 31893 JS Watchdog RET   _umtx_op -1 errno 4 Interrupted system call
 31893 Socket Thread RET   poll -1 errno 4 Interrupted system call
 31893 StreamTrans #4 RET   _umtx_op -1 errno 4 Interrupted system call
 31893 firefox  NAMI  "firefox.core"

gdb output:

GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you 
are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain 
conditions.

Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for 
details.
This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"...(no debugging symbols 
found)...

(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/local/bin/firefox
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no 
debugging symbols found)...[New LWP 100460]
(no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...(no 
debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)...[New Thread 
28501080 (LWP 100460/firefox)]
(no debugging symbols fou

Re: State of pkgng?

2013-02-21 Thread Darren Pilgrim

On 2013-02-20 19:08, andrew clarke wrote:

On Wed 2013-02-20 17:45:52 UTC-0800, Darren Pilgrim 
(list_free...@bluerosetech.com) wrote:


Reading the pkgng page on the wiki:

"As a consequence of the security incident on 11th November 2012, for
the time being pre-compiled packages for pkgng are not available from
any official FreeBSD repository. [...] Target dates for when service may
be resumed have not been released."

Is that still the case?  Is pkgng presently a non-starter?


Just to be clear, pkgng is not broken. You can still use it with the
Ports tree or use it to install locally-built packages.


I wasn't clear on that point. Thanks.

No, pkgng integrates perfectly with Ports.  I have WITH_PKGNG=yes on 
almost all of my systems.  I was following up about the package repo, 
which is still empty.  I do like the speed increase of pkg-version over 
pkg_version.


What can the lowly sysadmin do to speed up getting the pkgng package repo?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


looking for testers/maintainer for sysutils/grub2

2013-02-21 Thread Sergey Matveychuk

Hi.

I'm looking for users of grub2, who could test (and may be maintain) 
sysutils/grub2 port. Please, write me.

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: libreoffice

2013-02-21 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 18/02/2013 12:46, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> package works great (and far faster than openoffice) but still i would find 
> quickstarter functionality that is available in windows openoffice useful.

You know that time a quickstarter saves you starting a program is
just the same time it made your system start take longer.

Quick starters are a huge part of the reason windows installations
start to feel sluggish after some time. They are a plague, binding
resources before it's even clear that they're needed.

Why MS accepted this practice from software vendors is beyond me.
They accept that their system looks bad on behalf of making the software
it runs look good, without any real benefit to the user. It's just
about shifting blame.

-- 
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? 
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: how to use -f[no-]color-diagnostics clang option with ports

2013-02-21 Thread Max Brazhnikov
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:49:30 + Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> clang colours corrupt script() output, e.g.:
> 
> #warning This file includes at least one deprecated or antiquated header. \
> ^[[0;1;32m ^
> ^[[0m1 warning generated.
> ^[[31m^[[1mLinking CXX executable ../../../bin/pvbatch
> ^[[0m[ 91%] Built target pvbatch-real
> 
> Can I use something like this
> 
>  CFLAGS+= -fno-color-diagnostics
>  CXXFLAGS+= -fno-color-diagnostics
> 
> to suppress colour?

CMAKE_ARGS+=-DCMAKE_COLOR_MAKEFILE=off

Max
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


how to use -f[no-]color-diagnostics clang option with ports

2013-02-21 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
clang colours corrupt script() output, e.g.:

#warning This file includes at least one deprecated or antiquated header. \
^[[0;1;32m ^
^[[0m1 warning generated.
^[[31m^[[1mLinking CXX executable ../../../bin/pvbatch
^[[0m[ 91%] Built target pvbatch-real

Can I use something like this

 CFLAGS+= -fno-color-diagnostics
 CXXFLAGS+= -fno-color-diagnostics

to suppress colour?

Thanks

Anton

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken

2013-02-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles.  In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
build environments.  The most common problem is that recent versions
of -CURRENT include gcc4.2, which is much stricter than older versions.
The next most common problem is that compiles succeed on the i386
architecture (e.g. the common Intel PC), but fail on one or more
of the other architectures due to assumptions about things such as
size of various types, byte-alignment issues, and so forth.

In occasional cases we see that the same port may have different
errors in different build environments.  The script that runs on the
build cluster uses heuristics to try to 'guess' the error type to
help you isolate problems, but it is only a rough guide.

One more note: on occasion, there are transient build errors seen
on the build farm.  Unfortunately, there is not yet any way for this
algorithm to tell the difference (humans are much, much better at
this kind of thing.)

The errors are listed below.  In the case where the same problem
exists on more than one build environment, the URL points to the
latest errorlog for that type.  (By 'build environment' here we
mean 'combination of 7.x/8.x/9.x/-current with target architecture'.)

(Note: the dates are included to help you to gauge whether or not
the error still applies to the latest version.  The program
that generates this report is not yet able to determine this
automatically.)

portname:   accessibility/yasr
broken because: fails to build with new utmpx
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=accessibility&portname=yasr


portname:   audio/gdam
broken because: does not build
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audio&portname=gdam


portname:   audio/hydrogen
broken because: does not install
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audio&portname=hydrogen


portname:   audio/py-tagpy
broken because: does not build
build errors:
http://pointyhat.FreeBSD.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9.20121104103132/py27-tagpy-0.94.8.log
 (_Nov__4_17:22:02_UTC_2012)
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audio&portname=py-tagpy


portname:   benchmarks/polygraph31
broken because: does not build
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=benchmarks&portname=polygraph31


portname:   cad/meshlab
broken because: does not build
build errors:
http://pointyhat.FreeBSD.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.10.20120628171716/meshlab-1.2.3_2.log
 (_Jul_16_09:33:26_UTC_2012)
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=cad&portname=meshlab


portname:   chinese/big5con
broken because: fails to build with new utmpx
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=chinese&portname=big5con


portname:   chinese/cxterm
broken because: fails to build with new utmpx
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=chinese&portname=cxterm


portname:   chinese/hztty
broken because: fails to build with new utmpx
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=chinese&portname=hztty


portname:   comms/hso-kmod
broken because: does not build with USB2, please try comms/uhso-kmod
instead
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=comms&portname=hso-kmod


portname:   comms/ib-kmod
broken because: does not build
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=comms&portname=ib-kmod


portname:   comms/uticom
broken because: does not compile
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=comms&portname=uticom


portname:   databases/adstudio
broken because: incomplete plist
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=databases&portname=adstudio


portname:   databases/glom
broken because: bad-plist
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=databases&portname=glom


portname:   databases/gomysql
broken because: Does not compile with go1
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=databases&portname=gomysql


portname:   databases/msql
broken because: Broken on FreeBS

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken

2013-02-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles.  In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
build environments.  The most common problem is that recent versions
of -CURRENT include gcc4.2, which is much stricter than older versions.
The next most common problem is that compiles succeed on the i386
architecture (e.g. the common Intel PC), but fail on one or more
of the other architectures due to assumptions about things such as
size of various types, byte-alignment issues, and so forth.

In occasional cases we see that the same port may have different
errors in different build environments.  The script that runs on the
build cluster uses heuristics to try to 'guess' the error type to
help you isolate problems, but it is only a rough guide.

One more note: on occasion, there are transient build errors seen
on the build farm.  Unfortunately, there is not yet any way for this
algorithm to tell the difference (humans are much, much better at
this kind of thing.)

The errors are listed below.  In the case where the same problem
exists on more than one build environment, the URL points to the
latest errorlog for that type.  (By 'build environment' here we
mean 'combination of 7.x/8.x/9.x/-current with target architecture'.)

(Note: the dates are included to help you to gauge whether or not
the error still applies to the latest version.  The program
that generates this report is not yet able to determine this
automatically.)

portname:   chinese/big5con
broken because: fails to build with new utmpx
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=chinese&portname=big5con


portname:   chinese/hztty
broken because: fails to build with new utmpx
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=chinese&portname=hztty


portname:   databases/adstudio
broken because: incomplete plist
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=databases&portname=adstudio


portname:   databases/msql
broken because: Broken on FreeBSD 9+
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=databases&portname=msql


portname:   databases/xapian-bindings10
broken because: does not compile
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=databases&portname=xapian-bindings10


portname:   deskutils/simpleagenda
broken because: does not build
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=deskutils&portname=simpleagenda


portname:   devel/dsss
broken because: does not build
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=dsss


portname:   devel/gauche-gaunit
broken because: does not package
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=gauche-gaunit


portname:   devel/libYGP
broken because: Does not build with recent boost
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=libYGP


portname:   devel/linux-js
broken because: does not build
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=linux-js


portname:   devel/linuxthreads
broken because: does not build
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=linuxthreads


portname:   devel/p5-Dialog
broken because: Does not build
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=p5-Dialog


portname:   devel/ros-common
broken because: does not compile
build errors:
http://pointyhat.FreeBSD.org/errorlogs/powerpc-errorlogs/e.8.20120528024705/ros-common-1.4.3_1.log
 (_Aug__9_01:19:13_UTC_2012)
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=ros-common


portname:   dns/opendd
broken because: segfaults upon use
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=dns&portname=opendd


portname:   editors/xemacs-devel-mule
broken because: does not build on FreeBSD 9.X
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=editors&portname=xemacs-devel-mule


portname:   emulators/vmsbackup
broken because: does not build
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=emul

Re: update failed for security/nss-3.14.3

2013-02-21 Thread Alex Dupre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Florian Smeets wrote:
> Jan committed a patch that should work, is that an acceptable
> workaround for your use case (it pulls in a newer gcc)? Can you
> test it and report back?

Yes, it works correctly, thanks.

- -- 
Alex Dupre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SeaMonkey - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlEl6woACgkQgRXp2M5fVU1p/wCfQ1SU4Amt32LsAaEUReUgGQHx
VgIAoPxH6sr9jO9o3Fam8Q1U16xQiQoz
=2fF4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


FreeBSD ports which are currently marked forbidden

2013-02-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the
FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about
ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles.  Often,
these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known
exploits.

An overview of each port, including errors seen on the build farm,
is included below.

portname:   graphics/linux-tiff
forbidden because:  Vulnerable since 2004-10-13,

http://portaudit.freebsd.org/8816bf3a-7929-11df-bcce-0018f3e2eb82.html
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=graphics&portname=linux-tiff


portname:   lang/eperl
forbidden because:  Vulnerable since 2001-06-21,

http://portaudit.freebsd.org/73efb1b7-07ec-11e2-a391-000c29033c32.html
build errors:
http://pointyhat.FreeBSD.org/errorlogs/sparc64-errorlogs/e.7.20101015091133/eperl-2.2.14_3.log.bz2
 (_Jul_31_06:17:35_UTC_2010)
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=lang&portname=eperl


portname:   security/sudosh3
forbidden because:  Secunia Advisory SA38292, ISS X-Force sudosh-replay-bo
(55903), replay() function buffer overflow.
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=security&portname=sudosh3


portname:   www/linux-flashplugin9
forbidden because:  CVE-2010-1297
build errors:
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-errorlogs/e.10.20120608131052/linux-flashplugin-9.0r289_1.log
 (_Jun_13_10:34:28_UTC_2012)
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=www&portname=linux-flashplugin9


portname:   x11-toolkits/linux-pango
forbidden because:  Vulnerable since 2009-05-13,

http://portaudit.freebsd.org/4b172278-3f46-11de-becb-001cc0377035.html
build errors:   none.
overview:   
http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=x11-toolkits&portname=linux-pango
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Firefox upgrade fails

2013-02-21 Thread Andrea Venturoli

Hello.


# uname -a
FreeBSD xx.x 9.0-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p5 #2: Sat Dec  1 
14:43:22 CET 2012 root@xx.x:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/XX  i386


> portupgrade -R firefox
> ...

/usr/local/local/storage/alamartmp/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-i386-portbld-fla-release/config/pythonpath.py
 -I../../config /usr/local/local/storage/alamartmp/usr/ports/www/mozalloc.so 
--uselist --  clang++ -Qunused-arguments -isystem/usr/local/include  
-Qunused-argumetor-dtor-privacy -Wno-overlength-strings -Wno-invalid-offsetof 
-Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-c++0x-ech=athlon-mp -fno-strict-aliasing 
-fno-exceptions -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-rtti 
-ffunction-sectfomit-frame-pointer -fPIC -shared -Wl,-z,defs 
-Wl,-h,libmozalloc.so -o libmozalloc.so  mozalloc.GIN -Wl,-z,noexecstack  
-fprofile-generate 
-Wl,-rpath-link,/usr/local/local/storage/alamartmp/usocal/local/storage/alamartmp/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/fake/lib
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/bin/../lib/libprofile_rt.a: No such file: No such file or 
directory
clang++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see 
invocation)
gmake[5]: *** [libmozalloc.so] Error 1

> ...

Any hint?

 bye & Thanks
av.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: State of pkgng?

2013-02-21 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr

On 02/20/13 21:08, andrew clarke wrote:

On Wed 2013-02-20 17:45:52 UTC-0800, Darren Pilgrim 
(list_free...@bluerosetech.com) wrote:


Reading the pkgng page on the wiki:

"As a consequence of the security incident on 11th November 2012, for
the time being pre-compiled packages for pkgng are not available from
any official FreeBSD repository. [...] Target dates for when service may
be resumed have not been released."

Is that still the case?  Is pkgng presently a non-starter?


Just to be clear, pkgng is not broken. You can still use it with the
Ports tree or use it to install locally-built packages.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"



I use portmaster and pgkng together. Works out brilliantly.

--
Yours in Christ,

Joseph A Nagy Jr
"Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction
is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL 
http://copyfree.org/licenses/owl/license.txt

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"