Re: Proposal: further OptionsNG improvements
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:47:47PM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote: On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:56:07AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote: So we just got done porting most of the tree to a new options syntax and now we want to change it again? :-) Yeah, why not? ;-) I've discussed that idea before with bapt@ on IRC; there is absolutely no reasons why we should not use now-free nice, short OPTIONS knob again. Perhaps your proposal would carry more weight, feedback and/or testing results if it included a patch and an example port with the modified values for your new idea. Surely, patch would be the next step. This has been quiet successful in the recent past with bapt's proposals for options, uses, etc. Except that sometimes I think they are not being discussed enough prior to commit. ;-) ./danfe ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: net/remmina-plugin-rdp is broken by net/freerdp
2013-06-19 15:32 Dmitry V. Kroupenier wrote: Oh, many thanks! I did SVN copy of Your repositiry but something comes bad with the tarball: # make install clean === License GPLv2 accepted by the user = remmina-plugins-1.0.0.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. = Attempting to fetch (snip) = Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this = port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop in /home/grimnir/devel/net/remmina-plugin-rdp. It seems like your network issue. Please try to fetch a tarball manually from here. https://github.com/FreeRDP/Remmina/downloads An then put the tarball into /usr/ports/distfiles with its filename remmina-plugins-1.0.0.tar.gz -- `whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w` meta m...@vmeta.jp ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
devel/rubygem-notify: maintainership request
Can I take maintainership of devel/rubygem-notify? I will update the port. Please pass maitainership to meta+po...@vmeta.jp. -- `whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w` meta m...@vmeta.jp ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: devel/rubygem-notify: maintainership request
Koichiro IWAO m...@vmeta.jp wrote: Can I take maintainership of devel/rubygem-notify? I will update the port. Please pass maitainership to meta+po...@vmeta.jp. Done. It's all yours. Emanuel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: devel/rubygem-notify: maintainership request
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:01:37PM +0200, Emanuel Haupt wrote: Koichiro IWAO m...@vmeta.jp wrote: Can I take maintainership of devel/rubygem-notify? I will update the port. Please pass maitainership to meta+po...@vmeta.jp. Done. It's all yours. Emanuel Thanks! -- `whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w` meta m...@vmeta.jp ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
I would like to maintain devel/robodoc
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portlint: FATAL: Makefile: [1]: old style headers found.
On 06/19/13 12:50, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: devel/robodoc/Makefile: # New ports collection makefile for:robodoc # Date created: 15 Dec 1999 # Whom: Will Andrews andr...@technologist.com # # $FreeBSD: branches/RELENG_9_1_0/devel/robodoc/Makefile 300896 2012-07-14 13:54:48Z beat $ # portlint version 2.14.3 gives: FATAL: Makefile: [1]: old style headers found. The header seems to be consistent with: http://docs.freebsd.org/doc/9.0-RELEASE/usr/share/doc/freebsd/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.html#PORTING-SAMPLEM What's the problem? That's a quite old version of the porter's handbook, please use the latest one: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/ At one point the header format has been changed, you can read about the change here: http://blogs.freebsdish.org/portmgr/2012/09/17/change-to-the-header-in-ports-makefiles-take-two/ Hope this helps. -- Guido Falsi m...@madpilot.net ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [HEADS UP] switch default xorg version in 9.1 and later
Hi! It is time to switch the default version of xorg on FreeBSD 9.1 and later, including CURRENT. In general this means better support for modern hardware, especially intel hardware, at the cost of support for some legacy hardware. The old version will still be around, and be the default for FreeBSD releases prior to 9.1, it is also possible to get the old version by setting WITHOUT_NEW_XORG= in /etc/make.conf. The attached patch will make the switch, and I intend to commit it ASAP unless something major shows up. The patch is also available at http://people.freebsd.org/~zeising/xorg-switch.diff Regards! -- Niclas Zeising FreeBSD x11 team PS. Please respect reply-to, to avoid too much cross posting. Now I am a bit confused, should it be x...@freebsd.org or freebsd-...@freebsd.org, or is one an alias for the other? Anyway, my concern was some complications in running the newer Xorg with Intel graphics. There was the danger that it might not be possible to go to text console after going into X, so I have questions on how to stay with the graphical interface and not go back to text console. If this belongs on another thread, feel free to change the subject to Xorg acrobatics. My question is how to go into X in such a way that there can be multiple users simultaneously logged in, root and nonroot, and all users have access to graphic applications (Mozilla Seamonkey for instance). I also want to be able to switch to or restart with a different window manager without going to a text console in between; this might require closing all applications and logging out. I don't really want to use gdm, kdm or xdm if I can help it. I don't think xdm would work anyway. My previous attempt with the new Xorg and KMS produced a completely nonrunnable X, immediately crashed, requiring Reset button, and I had a dilly of a time going back to the older Xorg. I might this time have an alternate xorg.conf with Driver=vesa for fallback so as to retain access to Xorg if the new Xorg bombs out with Intel driver: haven't tested this but hope it would work. Tom ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portlint: FATAL: Makefile: [1]: old style headers found.
From m...@madpilot.net Wed Jun 19 12:08:06 2013 On 06/19/13 12:50, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: devel/robodoc/Makefile: # New ports collection makefile for:robodoc # Date created: 15 Dec 1999 # Whom: Will Andrews andr...@technologist.com # # $FreeBSD: branches/RELENG_9_1_0/devel/robodoc/Makefile 300896 2012-07-14 13:54:48Z beat $ # portlint version 2.14.3 gives: FATAL: Makefile: [1]: old style headers found. The header seems to be consistent with: http://docs.freebsd.org/doc/9.0-RELEASE/usr/share/doc/freebsd/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.html#PORTING-SAMPLEM What's the problem? That's a quite old version of the porter's handbook, please use the latest one: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/ Thanks, stupid me... BTW, that page proudly says at the very top: Last modified on April 2000 by . Thanks Anton ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: I would like to maintain devel/robodoc
done -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portlint: FATAL: Makefile: [1]: old style headers found.
On 06/19/13 13:12, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: From m...@madpilot.net Wed Jun 19 12:08:06 2013 On 06/19/13 12:50, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: devel/robodoc/Makefile: # New ports collection makefile for:robodoc # Date created: 15 Dec 1999 # Whom: Will Andrews andr...@technologist.com # # $FreeBSD: branches/RELENG_9_1_0/devel/robodoc/Makefile 300896 2012-07-14 13:54:48Z beat $ # portlint version 2.14.3 gives: FATAL: Makefile: [1]: old style headers found. The header seems to be consistent with: http://docs.freebsd.org/doc/9.0-RELEASE/usr/share/doc/freebsd/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.html#PORTING-SAMPLEM What's the problem? That's a quite old version of the porter's handbook, please use the latest one: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/ Thanks, stupid me... BTW, that page proudly says at the very top: Last modified on April 2000 by . Never noticed, there is the subversion revision number above that though, which is the definitive reference. this detail should be pointed out to some of the docs guys I think. -- Guido Falsi m...@madpilot.net ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [HEADS UP] switch default xorg version in 9.1 and later
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 04:03:36AM -0700, Thomas Mueller wrote: Now I am a bit confused, should it be x...@freebsd.org or freebsd-...@freebsd.org, or is one an alias for the other? They are aliases. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ audio/freeswitch-sounds | 1.0.24 | 1.0.25 +-+ www/xpi-pentadactyl | 20130407| 20130619 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt If wish to stop receiving portscout reminders, please contact portsc...@portscout.freebsd.org Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
ports/179716
Hi. Please submit port update ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ports 10-CURRENT
There are quite a few ports which have issues using the new toolchain in 10. Dragging in imake in ports and the rest of X would be overkill too. I'll put this on my todo list for 10. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert cy.schub...@komquats.com FreeBSD UNIX: c...@freebsd.org Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org In message 20130618045504.GA1790@La-Habana, Matthias Apitz writes: El día Monday, June 17, 2013 a las 04:57:38PM -0700, Cy Schubert escribió: Which version of FreeBSD are you using? Can you send uname -a to me please. Thanks. FreeBSD La-Habana 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r250588: Mon May 13 22 :01:51 UTC 2013 guru@Perlach:/home/guru/head/obj/usr/home/guru/head/src/s ys/GENERIC i386 -- Matthias Apitz | /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.or g E-mail: g...@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ports 10-CURRENT
You don't understand. devel/imake is a fine piece of software but people do not want to install more software than they have to. net/vnc comes with it's own integrated Xserver. Using this logic we should integrate x11-servers/xorg into it too. Neither makes sense. The only reason to use devel/imake is if net/vnc _installs_ its own imake, which it does not. There's no reason to install more software just to build other software if we don't need it. It's extra baggage. I'll put net/vnc on my list of 10-exp builds that need fixing. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert cy.schub...@komquats.com FreeBSD UNIX: c...@freebsd.org Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org In message 20130619132325.gb30...@sh4-5.1blu.de, Matthias Apitz writes: El día Wednesday, June 19, 2013 a las 06:18:58AM -0700, Cy Schubert escribió: There are quite a few ports which have issues using the new toolchain in 10. Dragging in imake in ports and the rest of X would be overkill too. I'll put this on my todo list for 10. Hi Cy. The port devel/imake is already fine, i.e. the installed imake works fine; the problem here is that the vnc port tries to make its own version of 'imake' in its own source tree. matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.or g E-mail: g...@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ports 10-CURRENT
El día Wednesday, June 19, 2013 a las 06:18:58AM -0700, Cy Schubert escribió: There are quite a few ports which have issues using the new toolchain in 10. Dragging in imake in ports and the rest of X would be overkill too. I'll put this on my todo list for 10. Hi Cy. The port devel/imake is already fine, i.e. the installed imake works fine; the problem here is that the vnc port tries to make its own version of 'imake' in its own source tree. matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org E-mail: g...@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ports 10-CURRENT
El día Wednesday, June 19, 2013 a las 06:32:40AM -0700, Cy Schubert escribió: You don't understand. devel/imake is a fine piece of software but people do not want to install more software than they have to. net/vnc comes with it's own integrated Xserver. Using this logic we should integrate x11-servers/xorg into it too. Neither makes sense. The only reason to use devel/imake is if net/vnc _installs_ its own imake, which it does not. There's no reason to install more software just to build other software if we don't need it. It's extra baggage. I keep thinking, that _if_ there is already installed an imake, net/vnc should make use of it and not try to build its own one; and most of the users of net/vnc will have installed an X server before; matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org E-mail: g...@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Ori Distributed File System Port
Hey Folks, Could someone take a look at my port that's been pending? Its bit more complicated than previous ports I've submitted, but I followed the testing in Section 3.4 of the porters handbook. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=176429cat Thanks, -- Ali Mashtizadeh ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
STABLE vs CURRENT packages
I just know that this is somewhere in the FreeBSD Handbook. And I probably deserve the scorn and snickers these questions will get. I just checked the .ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/ site and saw: packages-8-stable ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-8-stable/ 10/11/1200:00:00 packages-8.3-release ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-8.3-release/ 03/28/1200:00:00 packages-8.4-release ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-8.4-release/ 05/09/1305:06:00 packages-9-current ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9-current 12/09/1100:00:00 packages-9-stable ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9-stable/ 04/16/1315:20:00 packages-9.1-release ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/ 04/11/1303:29:00 packages-stable ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-stable 11/07/1100:00:00 I noted that the dates on the some of the packages in packages-8-stable were 2012, while most of those in packages-8.4.-release were much newer - 2013. And I noticed that there was no 'packages-8-current' directory. Questions: what is the relationship between the 'stable', 'release', and 'current' versions? And where is this documented in the FreeBSD Handbook? Is there supposed to be a 'packages-8-current' directory? OK, start the snickers and humiliation :-) ... -- Patrick Powell Astart Technologies papow...@astart.com1530 Jamacha Road, Suite X, Network and System El Cajon, CA 92019 Consulting 858-874-6543 Web Site: www.astart.com FAX 858-357-9931 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portlint: FATAL: Makefile: [1]: old style headers found.
Am 19.06.2013 12:53, schrieb Guido Falsi: On 06/19/13 12:50, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: devel/robodoc/Makefile: # New ports collection makefile for:robodoc # Date created: 15 Dec 1999 # Whom: Will Andrews andr...@technologist.com # # $FreeBSD: branches/RELENG_9_1_0/devel/robodoc/Makefile 300896 2012-07-14 13:54:48Z beat $ # portlint version 2.14.3 gives: FATAL: Makefile: [1]: old style headers found. The header seems to be consistent with: http://docs.freebsd.org/doc/9.0-RELEASE/usr/share/doc/freebsd/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.html#PORTING-SAMPLEM What's the problem? That's a quite old version of the porter's handbook, please use the latest one: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/ At one point the header format has been changed, you can read about the change here: http://blogs.freebsdish.org/portmgr/2012/09/17/change-to-the-header-in-ports-makefiles-take-two/ Hope this helps. There is also a Perl script to convert the header automatically, see /usr/ports/Tools/scripts/convert-makefile-header.pl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ports 10-CURRENT
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Cy Schubert cy.schub...@komquats.com wrote: You don't understand. devel/imake is a fine piece of software but people do not want to install more software than they have to. net/vnc comes with it's own integrated Xserver. Using this logic we should integrate x11-servers/xorg into it too. Neither makes sense. The only reason to use devel/imake is if net/vnc _installs_ its own imake, which it does not. There's no reason to install more software just to build other software if we don't need it. It's extra baggage. If follow this logic, net/vnc should to bundle it's own C compiler then... -- Andrew W. Nosenko andrew.w.nose...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
devel/subversion: Module mod_dav_svn gets not build, breaks Apache 24 DAV/SVN installations!
Several systems running FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT with Apache 24 serving development subversion repositories via WebDAV were broken by a faulty devel/subversion port, just updated to 1.8.0 today. Strange thing is that those fancy dialog boxes for the configuration ALWAYS popo up no matter whether I have selected my options before or not (same stupid behaviour in SWIG). This is a pain in the ass when updating lots of ports, choosing at the beginning all the proper options and hoping having an unattended update procedure. Although selected, devel/subversion (1.8.0) doesn't build the module mod_dav_svn which is crucial for the subversion subsystem. Can someone help? Oliver ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ports 10-CURRENT
In message CALa-7vxh_fEJ1yzw+RSB23fo8JgyMydwvBPcnDQ9P9+zTOERMA@mail.gmail.c om , Andrew W. Nosenko writes: On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Cy Schubert cy.schub...@komquats.com wrote : You don't understand. devel/imake is a fine piece of software but people do not want to install more software than they have to. net/vnc comes with it's own integrated Xserver. Using this logic we should integrate x11-servers/xorg into it too. Neither makes sense. The only reason to use devel/imake is if net/vnc _installs_ its own imake, which it does not. There's no reason to install more software just to build other software if we don't need it. It's extra baggage. If follow this logic, net/vnc should to bundle it's own C compiler then... The point is, why install software permanently when you don't need to? Or, go through the exercise of uninstalling build software post-install? -- Cheers, Cy Schubert cy.schub...@komquats.com FreeBSD UNIX: c...@freebsd.org Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ports 10-CURRENT
On 6/19/2013 20:52, Cy Schubert wrote: The point is, why install software permanently when you don't need to? Or, go through the exercise of uninstalling build software post-install? That's not pertinent for binary packages. The build depends aren't tied to the final products. It's just a build-for-source issue, and then you might as well leave them in place for the next port that needs that build dependency. I don't really see the problem here. John ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ports 10-CURRENT
In message 20130619141527.ga25...@sh4-5.1blu.de, Matthias Apitz writes: El día Wednesday, June 19, 2013 a las 06:32:40AM -0700, Cy Schubert escribió: You don't understand. devel/imake is a fine piece of software but people do not want to install more software than they have to. net/vnc comes with it's own integrated Xserver. Using this logic we should integrate x11-servers/xorg into it too. Neither makes sense. The only reason to use devel/imake is if net/vnc _installs_ its own imake, which it does not. There's no reason to install more software just to build other software if we don't need it. It's extra baggage. I keep thinking, that _if_ there is already installed an imake, net/vnc should make use of it and not try to build its own one; and most of the users of net/vnc will have installed an X server before; Agreed. I doubt devel/imake would be any more successful though. I haven't looked at it closely (less than a couple of minutes, so I may be wrong) but I believe that OSMajorVersion may not be defined properly under 10. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert cy.schub...@komquats.com FreeBSD UNIX: c...@freebsd.org Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: devel/subversion: Module mod_dav_svn gets not build, breaks Apache 24 DAV/SVN installations!
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:32:13 -0700 Charles Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote: Hi-- On Jun 19, 2013, at 11:30 AM, O. Hartmann ohart...@web.de wrote: [ ... ] Although selected, devel/subversion (1.8.0) doesn't build the module mod_dav_svn which is crucial for the subversion subsystem. Can someone help? For testing, I just built subversion-1.8.0 against Apache-2.2.24 directly via: ./configure --enable-mod-activation --with-apr=/usr/local/apache2 --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs ...which produced mod_dav_svn.so, and even activated it in Apache's httpd.conf. Regards, Do you use FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT? Use Apache 2.4. We use Apache 2.4 on our installation. The ports tree on all four boxes I test at the moment is at URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head Relative URL: ^/head Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 Revision: 321324 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: jkim Last Changed Rev: 321324 Last Changed Date: 2013-06-19 22:52:13 +0200 (Mi, 19 Jun 2013) The OS is at FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r251990: Wed Jun 19 14:12:57 CEST 2013 amd64 Within the ports framework, I can not build devel/subversion with the proper modules. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: devel/subversion: Module mod_dav_svn gets not build, breaks Apache 24 DAV/SVN installations!
Hi-- On Jun 19, 2013, at 11:30 AM, O. Hartmann ohart...@web.de wrote: [ ... ] Although selected, devel/subversion (1.8.0) doesn't build the module mod_dav_svn which is crucial for the subversion subsystem. Can someone help? For testing, I just built subversion-1.8.0 against Apache-2.2.24 directly via: ./configure --enable-mod-activation --with-apr=/usr/local/apache2 --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs ...which produced mod_dav_svn.so, and even activated it in Apache's httpd.conf. Regards, -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: devel/subversion: Module mod_dav_svn gets not build, breaks Apache 24 DAV/SVN installations!
Hello, Charles. You wrote 20 июня 2013 г., 0:32:13: Can someone help? CS For testing, I just built subversion-1.8.0 against Apache-2.2.24 directly via: CS ./configure --enable-mod-activation CS --with-apr=/usr/local/apache2 CS --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs CS ...which produced mod_dav_svn.so, and even activated it in Apache's httpd.conf. Here ARE problem in port, update/fix will be submitted in 10 minutes. -- // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ports 10-CURRENT
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:26:40PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote: In message 20130619141527.ga25...@sh4-5.1blu.de, Matthias Apitz writes: El día Wednesday, June 19, 2013 a las 06:32:40AM -0700, Cy Schubert escribió: You don't understand. devel/imake is a fine piece of software but people do not want to install more software than they have to. net/vnc comes with it's own integrated Xserver. Using this logic we should integrate x11-servers/xorg into it too. Neither makes sense. The only reason to use devel/imake is if net/vnc _installs_ its own imake, which it does not. There's no reason to install more software just to build other software if we don't need it. It's extra baggage. I keep thinking, that _if_ there is already installed an imake, net/vnc should make use of it and not try to build its own one; and most of the users of net/vnc will have installed an X server before; Agreed. I doubt devel/imake would be any more successful though. I haven't looked at it closely (less than a couple of minutes, so I may be wrong) but I believe that OSMajorVersion may not be defined properly under 10. Problem with imake is that it doesn't work with clang because it uses a traditional cpp while clang's cpp does not support traditional mode, the port right now has been fixed by making it use gcpp, which is not something we want in long term as gcpp will be removed from base one day. I'm working on devel/tradcpp and to make devel/imake use this version to fix the situation, if some ports do bundle imake they will not benefit those fixes so it will duplicate the work. There is a reason while we do prefer undbundling things the main one is that the bug fix and the compatibility patch, having to do them only once is less painful. regards, Bapt pgp5emTfWNmBV.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: devel/subversion: Module mod_dav_svn gets not build, breaks Apache 24 DAV/SVN installations!
Hi, Lev-- On Jun 19, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org wrote: Hello, Charles. You wrote 20 июня 2013 г., 0:32:13: Can someone help? CS For testing, I just built subversion-1.8.0 against Apache-2.2.24 directly via: CS CS ./configure --enable-mod-activation --with-apr=/usr/local/apache2 CS --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs CS CS ...which produced mod_dav_svn.so, and even activated it in Apache's httpd.conf. Here ARE problem in port, update/fix will be submitted in 10 minutes. Ah, many thanks for looking into this so quickly. Regards, -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: www/rubygem-passenger now requires bash?
I'm running FreeBSD/amd64 8-STABLE (r250276) and, yesterday, updated www/rubygem-passenger from 3.0.19 to 4.0.5 via portmaster. Although the port upgraded without error, the resultant Passenger no longer works: it complains it can't find bash and Rails apps won't spawn. I don't have shells/bash installed, and didn't need to with version 3.0.19 of the www/rubygem-passenger port. The shells/bash port isn't listed as a runtime dependency for www/rubygem-passenger in its Makefile, either. If I install shells/bash and also put a symlink from /usr/bin/bash to /usr/local/bin/bash then Passenger will run once again. I don't like this solution, though. Does anyone know of a way of running the Passenger 4.0.5 port without needing bash? I've included at the end a snippet from httpd-error.log showing the behaviour of the new Passenger 4.0.5 prior to the workaround I put in place mentioned in the preceding paragraph. I've submitted a patch for this, please see PR ports/179737 Any testing and feedback would be appreciated. Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: devel/subversion: Module mod_dav_svn gets not build, breaks Apache 24 DAV/SVN installations!
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:46:35 +0400 Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org wrote: Hello, Charles. You wrote 20 июня 2013 г., 0:32:13: Can someone help? CS For testing, I just built subversion-1.8.0 against Apache-2.2.24 CS directly via: CS ./configure --enable-mod-activation CS --with-apr=/usr/local/apache2 CS --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs CS ...which produced mod_dav_svn.so, and even activated it in CS Apache's httpd.conf. Here ARE problem in port, update/fix will be submitted in 10 minutes. Thank you for looking into this so quickly. Oliver signature.asc Description: PGP signature
