Re: aspell conflicts with ispell?
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote: On 27 September 2012 22:52, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote: In any case, if you don't have the ispell wrapper selected, than there should be no conflict. It looks like that was intended since there are two CONFLICTS statements. the first is unconditional and I suspect should have been removed. The second is conditional on hte ispell wrapper being selected. I'd just comment out the first CONFLICTS line in the Makefile and request that the Makefile be corrected. On a quick look, this seems correct. Please file a PR so it doesn't get lost! Wow! Sounds exactly like one of my responses. PR ports/172131. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: aspell conflicts with ispell?
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote: On 27 September 2012 22:52, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote: In any case, if you don't have the ispell wrapper selected, than there should be no conflict. It looks like that was intended since there are two CONFLICTS statements. the first is unconditional and I suspect should have been removed. The second is conditional on hte ispell wrapper being selected. I'd just comment out the first CONFLICTS line in the Makefile and request that the Makefile be corrected. On a quick look, this seems correct. Please file a PR so it doesn't get lost! Wow! Sounds exactly like one of my responses. PR ports/172131. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Hi, I had the same problem yesterday and committed a fix (r304984) several hours ago. Thanks. Regards, sunpoet ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: aspell conflicts with ispell?
I think aspell does not conflict with ispell; they have no common files. Is it any problem with ispell when running or building aspell ? BTW, textproc/ispell does not have CONFLICTS entry... it is confusing. --- Tsurutani Naoki turut...@scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: aspell conflicts with ispell?
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Tsurutani Naoki turut...@scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp wrote: I think aspell does not conflict with ispell; they have no common files. Is it any problem with ispell when running or building aspell ? BTW, textproc/ispell does not have CONFLICTS entry... it is confusing. I suspect it is bogus unless the Install the ispell wrapper is selected. If so, it installs it's own /usr/local/bin/ispell, a definite conflict. I don't know how good the ispell emulation is, but it MIGHT replace the separate ispell port. In any case, if you don't have the ispell wrapper selected, than there should be no conflict. It looks like that was intended since there are two CONFLICTS statements. the first is unconditional and I suspect should have been removed. The second is conditional on hte ispell wrapper being selected. I'd just comment out the first CONFLICTS line in the Makefile and request that the Makefile be corrected. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: aspell conflicts with ispell?
On 27 September 2012 22:52, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote: In any case, if you don't have the ispell wrapper selected, than there should be no conflict. It looks like that was intended since there are two CONFLICTS statements. the first is unconditional and I suspect should have been removed. The second is conditional on hte ispell wrapper being selected. I'd just comment out the first CONFLICTS line in the Makefile and request that the Makefile be corrected. On a quick look, this seems correct. Please file a PR so it doesn't get lost! -- Eitan Adler ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
