Re: multimedia/mplayer2 (was Re: devel/check)
On 12/02/2017 20:06, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: Andy Farkas skrev: But now 'portmaster -a' fails in multimedia/mplayer2 :( :( Why do you use mplayer2 (instead of mplayer or mpv)? Good question. I guess I was thinking that mplayer2 was one better than mplayer. And why is this port still in the tree? Another good question... -andyf ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
multimedia/mplayer2 (was Re: devel/check)
Andy Farkas skrev: > > But now 'portmaster -a' fails in multimedia/mplayer2 :( :( Why do you use mplayer2 (instead of mplayer or mpv)? And why is this port still in the tree? * snapshot is from 2013-04-28 * github.com/mplayer2/mplayer2 is no longer updated * http://git.mplayer2.org does not exist * mplayer2.org redirects to http://www3.mplayer2.org (no content!) -- Herbert ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: devel/check
On 12/02/2017 19:01, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: pkg has plenty of manpages all of which are specified in the "SEE ALSO" section of pkg(8) which is a standardize section exactly made of that. The man page for pkg(8) does not explicitly state that the sub-commands to pkg have their own man page. SEE ALSO is not an indication that you should read those bits to find out about flags for pkg(8) commands. Just sayin. I was gonna delete this bit, but might keep it: For example: % man 1 ls "SEE ALSO ... xo_parse_args(3)..." ??? why? -andyf ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: devel/check
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 10:43:57PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Andy Farkaswrote: > > > On 12/02/2017 09:24, RW via freebsd-ports wrote: > > > > It doesn't, pkg-delete is just the documentation for "pkg delete". > >> > >> > > My proposal is that the man page for pkg(8) should state this. > > > > -andyf > > > First, the pkg(8) page should explicitly state that there are man pages for > each pkg command. Since this is NOT a typical FreeBSD practice, it is a > POLA violation to not make it clear. pkg has plenty of manpages all of which are specified in the "SEE ALSO" section of pkg(8) which is a standardize section exactly made of that. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: devel/check
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Andy Farkaswrote: > On 12/02/2017 16:43, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > First, the pkg(8) page should explicitly state that there are man pages for >> each pkg command. >> > > Yes. Were this the case, this thread wouldn't have existed. > > Since this is NOT a typical FreeBSD practice, it is a >> POLA violation to not make it clear. >> > > I've been POLA'd a few times with FreeBSD over the last couple decades... > I'm used to it now :) > > Second, the '-f' option does delete libcheck. Does installing devel/check >> cleanly fix up unresolved dependencies? If not, use of -o is the right >> answer. I'll admit that I m not sure. >> > > I'm not sure either. I did 'pkg delete -f libcheck' and then 'portmaster > -a' > again - devel/check installed, whereas before it would not. I was happy. > > But now 'portmaster -a' fails in multimedia/mplayer2 :( :( > > ...something about "/usr/local/lib/libcdio_cdda.so: undefined reference to > 'mmc_get_hwinfo@CDIO_16'"... > > -andyf > Has sysutils/libcdio been re-installed? I should expect that the symbol is from that port. (Educated guess.. not a promise.) Might be a dependency issue. I don't use maplayer2, so I can't try checking my dependency tree. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: devel/check
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Kevin Obermanwrote: > First, the pkg(8) page should explicitly state that there are man pages for > each pkg command. Since this is NOT a typical FreeBSD practice, it is a > POLA violation to not make it clear. It does so on my system in the same manner other modular software does eg openssl. -- Adam ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: devel/check
On 12/02/2017 16:43, Kevin Oberman wrote: First, the pkg(8) page should explicitly state that there are man pages for each pkg command. Yes. Were this the case, this thread wouldn't have existed. Since this is NOT a typical FreeBSD practice, it is a POLA violation to not make it clear. I've been POLA'd a few times with FreeBSD over the last couple decades... I'm used to it now :) Second, the '-f' option does delete libcheck. Does installing devel/check cleanly fix up unresolved dependencies? If not, use of -o is the right answer. I'll admit that I m not sure. I'm not sure either. I did 'pkg delete -f libcheck' and then 'portmaster -a' again - devel/check installed, whereas before it would not. I was happy. But now 'portmaster -a' fails in multimedia/mplayer2 :( :( ...something about "/usr/local/lib/libcdio_cdda.so: undefined reference to 'mmc_get_hwinfo@CDIO_16'"... -andyf ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: devel/check
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Andy Farkaswrote: > On 12/02/2017 09:24, RW via freebsd-ports wrote: > > It doesn't, pkg-delete is just the documentation for "pkg delete". >> >> > My proposal is that the man page for pkg(8) should state this. > > -andyf First, the pkg(8) page should explicitly state that there are man pages for each pkg command. Since this is NOT a typical FreeBSD practice, it is a POLA violation to not make it clear. Second, the '-f' option does delete libcheck. Does installing devel/check cleanly fix up unresolved dependencies? If not, use of -o is the right answer. I'll admit that I m not sure. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: devel/check
On 12/02/2017 09:24, RW via freebsd-ports wrote: It doesn't, pkg-delete is just the documentation for "pkg delete". My proposal is that the man page for pkg(8) should state this. -andyf ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: devel/check
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 09:08:29 +1000 Andy Farkas wrote: > On 12/02/2017 08:59, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 11/02/2017 22:57, Andy Farkas wrote: > >> The -f flag is not mentioned in the man page for pkg(8). > >> > > Try reading the pkg-delete(8) man page. > > > > To be fair, the pkg(8) man page does not mention that pkg(8) calls > sub-programmes like pkg-delete(8). It doesn't, pkg-delete is just the documentation for "pkg delete". ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: devel/check
On 12/02/2017 08:59, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 11/02/2017 22:57, Andy Farkas wrote: The -f flag is not mentioned in the man page for pkg(8). Try reading the pkg-delete(8) man page. To be fair, the pkg(8) man page does not mention that pkg(8) calls sub-programmes like pkg-delete(8). The only reference is in the SEE ALSO section. -andyf ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: devel/check
On 11/02/2017 22:57, Andy Farkas wrote: > The -f flag is not mentioned in the man page for pkg(8). > Try reading the pkg-delete(8) man page. Cheers, Matthew signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: devel/check
On 12/02/2017 08:37, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: Andy Farkas skrev: I did a 'portmaster -a' and it seems devel/libcheck has changed to devel/check. (nothing in /usr/ports/UPDATING about this) But devel/check won't install because: pkg-static: check-0.11.0 conflicts with libcheck-0.10.0 (installs files into the same place). Problematic file: /usr/local/bin/checkmk I then tried 'pkg delete libcheck' but it wants to delete 48 packages including my mate-base (which I rely on!) and also lumina which would leave me without a window-manager! - pkg delete -f libcheck or - portmaster -o devel/check libcheck Thanks Herb! The -f flag is not mentioned in the man page for pkg(8). How did you know about it? -andyf ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: devel/check
Andy Farkas skrev: > > I did a 'portmaster -a' and it seems devel/libcheck has changed to > devel/check. > (nothing in /usr/ports/UPDATING about this) > > But devel/check won't install because: > > pkg-static: check-0.11.0 conflicts with libcheck-0.10.0 (installs files > into the same place). Problematic file: /usr/local/bin/checkmk > > I then tried 'pkg delete libcheck' but it wants to delete 48 packages > including my mate-base (which I rely on!) and also lumina which would > leave me without a window-manager! - pkg delete -f libcheck or - portmaster -o devel/check libcheck -- Herbert ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"