Re: mplayer from SVN

2010-01-01 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Lars Engels lars.eng...@0x20.net wrote:

 Are there any killer features missing in our old version from ports?

mplayer 2009-07-08 (as currently in the OpenBSD ports tree)
* plays fine some H.264 MP4 files where the old mplayer shows massive
  image errors and crashes;
* more or less plays some of the H.264 FLV files YouTube occasionally
  still presents as best quality and where the old mplayer just
  crashes, e.g.
  youtube-dl -bt http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dadPWhEhVk

-- 
Christian naddy Weisgerber  na...@mips.inka.de

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-30 Thread Thomas Zander
Hi Doug, Wes, list,

On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 05:19, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:

 B) I don't think daily is a reasonable target, but neither is every
 3 years.

This is correct. While it's true that I was hoping for the mplayer
developers to change their minds and subscribe to a decent release
engineering process, it seems it is not going to happen anytime soon.
I was planning to switch the mplayer port to a svn snapshot some time
next week (new year's resolution!) and continue with updated snapshot
ports in the range of ~3 months or so. That is, if there is no
objection from committers's perspective.

@Wes: Would you mind sending me your modified port? TIA.

Best regards,
Riggs
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-30 Thread Wes Morgan
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Thomas Zander wrote:

 Hi Doug, Wes, list,

 On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 05:19, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:

  B) I don't think daily is a reasonable target, but neither is every
  3 years.

 This is correct. While it's true that I was hoping for the mplayer
 developers to change their minds and subscribe to a decent release
 engineering process, it seems it is not going to happen anytime soon.
 I was planning to switch the mplayer port to a svn snapshot some time
 next week (new year's resolution!) and continue with updated snapshot
 ports in the range of ~3 months or so. That is, if there is no
 objection from committers's perspective.

I'll send it separately to those who have asked. Upgrading the mplayer and
mencoder ports may not be as simple as a drop in. They require a newer
version of x264, which there is already a pr for updating. I'm not certain
about all of the dependencies, but there will be a shared library version
to chase, and I believe that some ports may fail to detect it or even not
compile. There is also the issue of the age of gcc in base. I use gcc44
from ports and enable the assembler in x264. It might just be my
imagination, but I'm fairly sure my encodes get quite a few more fps on
average.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-30 Thread Wes Morgan
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009, Lars Engels wrote:

 Quoting Frank Staals fr...@fstaals.net:

  On 12/28/09 15:47, eculp wrote:
 On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote:

  Hello,
 
  Does anybody have a port for building mplayer from SVN?
 
  Thanks!
  On a sidenote: I used to build mplayer from svn regularly on my
  previous system. Updating mplayer usually was quite painless. Simply
  'svn up  ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/mplayersvn  gmake  gmake
  install'. In 99% of the cases rebuilding went perfectly; no patches
  required or anything, and I rebuilded mplayer almost weekly. This was
  on a i386 system by the way, on my current amd64 install I run into
  problems trying to compile the current svn snapshots.
 
  I know it is not as nice as simply having a port. But if you realy need
  the svn-releases for some feature XYZ it may be a (temporary) solution.


 Are there any killer features missing in our old version from ports?

ffmpeg, x264 and mplayer/mencoder all have a number of improvements that
are not available in official releases. x264 has some significant
improvements with the mbtree option and I've seen quite a few bugfixes.
There is also a remarkable speed improvement due to assembler, but this
requires a recent version of gcc. Mplayer and mencoder have many bugfixes
and they also handle blu-ray streams and codecs much better. Ffmpeg is
also much improved in svn, especially with mpeg2 transport streams and the
HD audio found on blu-ray/hddvd discs.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-29 Thread Stefan Ehmann
On Monday 28 December 2009 19:06:51 Frank Staals wrote:
 On 12/28/09 15:47, eculp wrote:
  On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote:
  Hello,
 
  Does anybody have a port for building mplayer from SVN?
 
  Thanks!
 
 On a sidenote: I used to build mplayer from svn regularly on my previous
 system. Updating mplayer usually was quite painless. Simply 'svn up 
 ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/mplayersvn  gmake  gmake install'.
 In 99% of the cases rebuilding went perfectly; no patches required or
 anything, and I rebuilded mplayer almost weekly. This was on a i386
 system by the way, on my current amd64 install I run into problems
 trying to compile the current svn snapshots.
 
 I know it is not as nice as simply having a port. But if you realy need
 the svn-releases for some feature XYZ it may be a (temporary) solution.

It's not that easy. I tried to compile mplayer from SVN some weeks ago.

Basic compile worked fine, but x264 support was lacking. As it turned out, the 
x264 port was too old. Tried to compile x264 from SVN, it complained binutils 
are too old. At this point I gave up.

I'd like to see mplayer/mencoder/x264-svn ports. Actually, I'd prefer new 
proper releases, but that doesn't seem likely in the near future.

One of the hardest parts is probably to pick a good SVN revision. Just picking 
the most recent version is not necessarily a good solution.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-29 Thread Lars Engels

Quoting Frank Staals fr...@fstaals.net:


On 12/28/09 15:47, eculp wrote:

On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote:


Hello,

Does anybody have a port for building mplayer from SVN?

Thanks!

On a sidenote: I used to build mplayer from svn regularly on my
previous system. Updating mplayer usually was quite painless. Simply
'svn up  ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/mplayersvn  gmake  gmake
install'. In 99% of the cases rebuilding went perfectly; no patches
required or anything, and I rebuilded mplayer almost weekly. This was
on a i386 system by the way, on my current amd64 install I run into
problems trying to compile the current svn snapshots.

I know it is not as nice as simply having a port. But if you realy need
the svn-releases for some feature XYZ it may be a (temporary) solution.



Are there any killer features missing in our old version from ports?


pgpQZfC0V98HD.pgp
Description: PGP Digital Signature


Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-29 Thread Frank Staals

On 12/29/09 14:31, Lars Engels wrote:

Quoting Frank Staals fr...@fstaals.net:


I know it is not as nice as simply having a port. But if you realy need
the svn-releases for some feature XYZ it may be a (temporary) solution.



Are there any killer features missing in our old version from ports?
I don't really know. The reason that I used svn snapshots in the past 
was that my machine in combination with the mplayer port was unable to 
decode relatively high res h264 video while with the svn version there 
were some improvements which did make it possible. But that is a long 
time ago.


--

- Frank
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-29 Thread Michal Varga
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Frank Staals fr...@fstaals.net wrote:
 On 12/29/09 14:31, Lars Engels wrote:

 Quoting Frank Staals fr...@fstaals.net:

 I know it is not as nice as simply having a port. But if you realy need
 the svn-releases for some feature XYZ it may be a (temporary) solution.


 Are there any killer features missing in our old version from ports?

 I don't really know. The reason that I used svn snapshots in the past was
 that my machine in combination with the mplayer port was unable to decode
 relatively high res h264 video while with the svn version there were some
 improvements which did make it possible. But that is a long time ago.

Related to that, VDPAU ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VDPAU ) is
definitely the killer feature, though I'm not sure how well (and if)
it works on FreeBSD. For what I know, it works miracles on Linux
(well, at least Linux people say that). Quick google turned out this,
so I guess it's a start:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=4756

For anything else killer-grade, I'm not really sure, but since the
dawn of time, mplayer code base has always been a bit flaky (well, a
bit itself is a bit too generous here). I guess all of us keep at
least one other backup movie player (Gnome's Totem, XINE before
that, etc.) for files that make mplayer die horribly in a ball of fire
(recent youtube formats, I'm looking at you!) and vice versa - so one
can reasonably assume that sticking to a 3-year old code base is not
the very best we could do here and in the long term, unmanageable. It
will only get worse.. 4 years? 5 years? Eventually other apps that use
mplayer as their backend will start to fail, dtto various mencoder
frontends (I'd say 'video editing software', if we only had any), and
we will get stuck with gstreamer-powered crap (ok, not exactly bad,
but even now in 2009, it's light years far from anything that 3-year
old mplayer can do, and, you know, even a bad timed sneeze or an
unfavorable lunar phase can make Totem crash).

Anyway, my point was - if there is anyone planning on bringing mplayer
up to date - either the main port, or as a set of new -devel ports,
please, please, please, do it soon. Even from strictly political view
- having something as hight profile as THE movie player on *nix
built from a 3 year old code base just looks bad and only adds fuel to
various Linux vs. BSD piss contests. The whole situation needs to be
dealt with*.

m.

(* Sooner, or later.)
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-29 Thread Lars Engels
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 08:03:21PM +0100, Michal Varga wrote:
 On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Frank Staals fr...@fstaals.net wrote:
  On 12/29/09 14:31, Lars Engels wrote:
 
  Quoting Frank Staals fr...@fstaals.net:
 
  I know it is not as nice as simply having a port. But if you realy need
  the svn-releases for some feature XYZ it may be a (temporary) solution.
 
 
  Are there any killer features missing in our old version from ports?
 
  I don't really know. The reason that I used svn snapshots in the past was
  that my machine in combination with the mplayer port was unable to decode
  relatively high res h264 video while with the svn version there were some
  improvements which did make it possible. But that is a long time ago.
 
 Related to that, VDPAU ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VDPAU ) is
 definitely the killer feature, though I'm not sure how well (and if)
 it works on FreeBSD. For what I know, it works miracles on Linux
 (well, at least Linux people say that). Quick google turned out this,
 so I guess it's a start:
 http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=4756
 
 For anything else killer-grade, I'm not really sure, but since the
 dawn of time, mplayer code base has always been a bit flaky (well, a
 bit itself is a bit too generous here). I guess all of us keep at
 least one other backup movie player (Gnome's Totem, XINE before
 that, etc.) for files that make mplayer die horribly in a ball of fire
 (recent youtube formats, I'm looking at you!) and vice versa - so one
 can reasonably assume that sticking to a 3-year old code base is not
 the very best we could do here and in the long term, unmanageable. It
 will only get worse.. 4 years? 5 years? Eventually other apps that use
 mplayer as their backend will start to fail, dtto various mencoder
 frontends (I'd say 'video editing software', if we only had any), and
 we will get stuck with gstreamer-powered crap (ok, not exactly bad,
 but even now in 2009, it's light years far from anything that 3-year
 old mplayer can do, and, you know, even a bad timed sneeze or an
 unfavorable lunar phase can make Totem crash).

Thanks a lot for the information on the new features.
I hope we can find a solution to use the svn version.


pgp69vrm7l2EG.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-29 Thread Sean C. Farley

I am jumping randomly into the thread.

If we want to use some type of release for MPlayer based upon a 
snapshot from svn, how about using the same snapshot as used in Fedora 
(actually RPM Fusion)[1]?  It has the advantages of already being 
created, tested(?) and easier to track bugs that users of Fedora may 
have already faced.


Sean
  1. 
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/releases/12/Everything/source/SRPMS/repoview/mplayer.html
--
s...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-29 Thread Michal Varga
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Sean C. Farley s...@freebsd.org wrote:
 I am jumping randomly into the thread.

 If we want to use some type of release for MPlayer based upon a snapshot
 from svn, how about using the same snapshot as used in Fedora (actually RPM
 Fusion)[1]?  It has the advantages of already being created, tested(?) and
 easier to track bugs that users of Fedora may have already faced.

This is an interesting idea, though there may be one issue. Do we know
how Fedora people create those snapshots? Let's say, hypothetically,
there are two different output drivers in mplayer's SVN tree - let's
name them CoolOutput_Linux and CoolOutput_BSD. Can we be sure that
Fedora guys simply don't strip out the parts that they can't/will
never use, so we end up with a snapshot package that lacks
CoolOutput_BSD?

m.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-29 Thread Sean C. Farley

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009, Michal Varga wrote:


On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Sean C. Farley s...@freebsd.org wrote:

I am jumping randomly into the thread.

If we want to use some type of release for MPlayer based upon a 
snapshot from svn, how about using the same snapshot as used in 
Fedora (actually RPM Fusion)[1]?  It has the advantages of already 
being created, tested(?) and easier to track bugs that users of 
Fedora may have already faced.


This is an interesting idea, though there may be one issue. Do we know 
how Fedora people create those snapshots? Let's say, hypothetically, 
there are two different output drivers in mplayer's SVN tree - let's 
name them CoolOutput_Linux and CoolOutput_BSD. Can we be sure that 
Fedora guys simply don't strip out the parts that they can't/will 
never use, so we end up with a snapshot package that lacks 
CoolOutput_BSD?


In the source RPM, there is the script they use to generate the tar 
file.  There are also a few patches in the RPM separate from the tar 
file.  It looked like the tar file is missing a few pieces of libraries 
distributed separately.  We probably already have (some of) them in the 
ports tree.  I only glanced at the file; I did not inhale.  :)


Sean
--
s...@freebsd.org___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-28 Thread eculp

Quoting army.of.root army.of.r...@googlemail.com:


On 12/13/2009 15:44, Wes Morgan wrote:

On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote:


Hello,

Does anybody have a port for building mplayer from SVN?

Thanks!


I have a port for building the latest exported snapshot from SVN, but
it requires manual editing because the extract dir changes daily.



Hi,

does your port deinstall cleanly ? - I would love to use an mplayer  
version newer than the 3-year old RC.

If yes, I would very appreciate if you could send it to me :)



I'll go the old Me Too route.  I like the idea very much.

Look forward to using it.

Thanks,

ed



best regards
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org




___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-28 Thread Michal Varga
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 3:47 PM, eculp ec...@encontacto.net wrote:
 I have a port for building the latest exported snapshot from SVN, but
 it requires manual editing because the extract dir changes daily.


 Hi,

 does your port deinstall cleanly ? - I would love to use an mplayer
 version newer than the 3-year old RC.
 If yes, I would very appreciate if you could send it to me :)


 I'll go the old Me Too route.  I like the idea very much.

 Look forward to using it.

Does anybody know why are we still using 3-year old version? I mean,
mplayer (and its brother mencoder) are one of THE killer apps on
*nix, and I see obscure 20-year old games being updated more often in
the ports collection. Did something specific happen to mplayer that it
ended in this state? I could hardly believe the reason is only that
upstream decided to stop releasing tarballs, after all, this never
stopped anybody in creating -devel ports. Why was mplayer different?
Is there any background info?

s.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-28 Thread Frank Staals

On 12/28/09 15:47, eculp wrote:

On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote:


Hello,

Does anybody have a port for building mplayer from SVN?

Thanks!
On a sidenote: I used to build mplayer from svn regularly on my previous 
system. Updating mplayer usually was quite painless. Simply 'svn up  
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/mplayersvn  gmake  gmake install'. 
In 99% of the cases rebuilding went perfectly; no patches required or 
anything, and I rebuilded mplayer almost weekly. This was on a i386 
system by the way, on my current amd64 install I run into problems 
trying to compile the current svn snapshots.


I know it is not as nice as simply having a port. But if you realy need 
the svn-releases for some feature XYZ it may be a (temporary) solution.


--

- Frank
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-28 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2009-Dec-28 18:25:41 +0100, Michal Varga varga.mic...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anybody know why are we still using 3-year old version?

The MPlayer Project no longer do releases.  Instead they only offer
daily snapshots of their SVN repo.  It appears that the maintainer of
the MPlayer port has adopted a policy of waiting for an official
release before updating the port.

 I could hardly believe the reason is only that
upstream decided to stop releasing tarballs, after all, this never
stopped anybody in creating -devel ports.

In most cases, the -devel ports relate to specific pre-release versions
of a codebase and are available as a versioned distribution file.

The FreeBSD ports system is designed around distfiles with fixed, known
content.  This is not compatible with a mplayer-export-snapshot.tar.bz2
that changes daily.

If someone wanted to update MPlayer to an SVN version (either by updating
the existing mplayer port or by creating a new mplayer-svn port), they
would need to:
- grab a copy of MPlayer from http://www.mplayerhq.hu/design7/dload.html
- create/update suitable Makefile with supported options/dependencies
  (the existing Makefiles would make a good start)
- Create FreeBSD-specific patches if required.
- Build and test mplayer with a variety of options on a variety of platforms
- Create pkg-plist listing everything that is installed
- Arrange for the distfile to be hosted somewhere (eg freebsd.org)
- Submit normal ports PR.

This is basically the same as any other port except for the requirement
to host the distfile.

-- 
Peter Jeremy


pgpr8viu5yqcD.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-28 Thread Doug Barton
Peter Jeremy wrote:
 On 2009-Dec-28 18:25:41 +0100, Michal Varga varga.mic...@gmail.com wrote:
 Does anybody know why are we still using 3-year old version?
 
 The MPlayer Project no longer do releases.  Instead they only offer
 daily snapshots of their SVN repo.  It appears that the maintainer of
 the MPlayer port has adopted a policy of waiting for an official
 release before updating the port.

That's not a realistic perspective at this point. Perhaps the mplayer
maintainer would like to consider releasing the port to someone else
if they are not interested in moving forward with a new version.

 The FreeBSD ports system is designed around distfiles with fixed, known
 content.  This is not compatible with a mplayer-export-snapshot.tar.bz2
 that changes daily.

A) More and more projects are moving to the no official release
mode, so we need to move with the times.

B) I don't think daily is a reasonable target, but neither is every
3 years.

Doug

-- 

Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-27 Thread army.of.root

On 12/13/2009 15:44, Wes Morgan wrote:

On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote:


Hello,

Does anybody have a port for building mplayer from SVN?

Thanks!


I have a port for building the latest exported snapshot from SVN, but
it requires manual editing because the extract dir changes daily.



Hi,

does your port deinstall cleanly ? - I would love to use an mplayer version 
newer than the 3-year old RC.

If yes, I would very appreciate if you could send it to me :)


best regards
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-13 Thread army.of.root
Wesley Shields wrote:
 On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 08:08:56PM +0100, army.of.root wrote:
 On 2009/12/11 21:20, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote:
 Hello,

 Does anybody have a port for building mplayer from SVN?

 Thanks!

 Hi,

 just wantet to express my interest for a mplayer-devel port.
 It seems that it is the common way fetching a svn snapshot
 to supply mplayer to the users in other distributions.
 
 Having a port fetch directly from SVN, build and install, is not how
 things are done. A maintainer must periodically fetch, verify and build
 a tarball for the port to use.
 
 -- WXS

Hi,

sorry, i meant the distributor fetches a snapshot, makes sure it does what is
needed und builds a package. In our case that would look like use snapshot
from 2009-mm-dd. Sorry for my ambigous mail :)

best regards
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-13 Thread Wes Morgan

On Fri, 11 Dec 2009, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote:


Hello,

Does anybody have a port for building mplayer from SVN?

Thanks!


I have a port for building the latest exported snapshot from SVN, but it 
requires manual editing because the extract dir changes daily.

___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-12 Thread army.of.root

On 2009/12/11 21:20, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote:

Hello,

Does anybody have a port for building mplayer from SVN?

Thanks!



Hi,

just wantet to express my interest for a mplayer-devel port.
It seems that it is the common way fetching a svn snapshot
to supply mplayer to the users in other distributions.

Thanks btw. for the awesome 8.0 release you all !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: mplayer from SVN

2009-12-12 Thread Wesley Shields
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 08:08:56PM +0100, army.of.root wrote:
 On 2009/12/11 21:20, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote:
  Hello,
 
  Does anybody have a port for building mplayer from SVN?
 
  Thanks!
 
 
 Hi,
 
 just wantet to express my interest for a mplayer-devel port.
 It seems that it is the common way fetching a svn snapshot
 to supply mplayer to the users in other distributions.

Having a port fetch directly from SVN, build and install, is not how
things are done. A maintainer must periodically fetch, verify and build
a tarball for the port to use.

-- WXS
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org