alt keys
Hi; How can I enable ALT-b or ALT-f keys in cons25 terminal? Or do I have to use another terminal . REGARDS. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Problem with more than one connection Win VPN of client through FreeBSD 4.6 + IPNAT + IPF to W2k VPN server
Hi All! Can you help in the below problem: We have 4.6 FreeBSD box with IPF and IPNAT. FreeBSD has two Ethernet cards (with real IP and with IP from internal private network). We have some amount of Win98/W2K workstations in our office with IP from internal private network. We need VPN connection from above workstations to external W2K VPN server with real IP through IPNAT of FreeBSD box. But we can make only one VPN connection. The Win workstation shows message that VPN server doesn't answer if we try creating second VPN (I think that the IPNAT can't pass more than one PPTP, maybe I am wrong). However maybe W2K server doesn't answer on two or more MASQ VPN requests from the same server. Can you explain above problem? Pls send copy of answer directly to me : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you in advance With best regards Gennady To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: IPFW Rules for samba PDC? [WAS: samba PDC for WIN2K clients?]
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 10:47:48PM +0100, Stacey Roberts wrote: Subject: Re: IPFW Rules for samba PDC? [WAS: samba PDC for WIN2K clients?] From: Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: D. Penev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: FreeBSD Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 26 Oct 2002 22:47:48 +0100 Hi, Thanks for the reply. I should mention that I've made some progress with my efforts to set up a samba PDC for my Win2K clients. First of all I am now able to successfully complete all tests in the recommended DIAGNOSTICS.TXT at http://hr.uoregon.edu/davidrl/DIAGNOSIS.txt, except:- test 8: On the PC type the command net view \\BIGSERVER Specifically, I am only able to complete this test by using the IP Addr of the samba server in place of its name. Likewise for test 9 that follows. Recapping, I *am* able to serve share dirs to *NIX clients as well as the Win2K boxes, with the caveat that for the Windows boxes, I have to use the IP Addr of the samba server. This is not an issue for other (*NIX) client hosts. Needless to say, I am not as yet able to have the Win2K boxes join the domain as described in Chapter 9. (How to Configure Samba 2.2 as a Primary Domain Controller - 9.4.3. Joining the Client to the Domain.4.3. Joining the Client to the Domain). I still get the MS error when I click OK after entering the domain as defined in smb.conf. Hope this presents somewhat a clearer description of the current status here. Do get back to if you would require more information in assisting me in resolving this. From you description of the problem it's looks like that win2k box can't make resolving of names to ip address. That's why I accent to firewall because according to you logs ipfw block port 137, which is used to resolve NetBIOS names to IP address. I make a little test and block port 137 on my PDC (Samba 2.2.4 on NetBSD) and results are the same as yours. If that is true (blocking of netbios-ns port) you PDC can't register as domain controler, and workstations when is joined to domain can't find who is PDC for this domain. What are you firewall rules? What's show nbtstat -A YOU_SAMBA_SERVER and nbtstat -c on win2k box? Thanks On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 22:26, D. Penev wrote: On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 07:33:58PM +0100, Stacey Roberts wrote: Subject: IPFW Rules for samba PDC? [WAS: samba PDC for WIN2K clients?] From: Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Andrew Boothman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], FreeBSD Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 21 Oct 2002 19:33:58 +0100 Hello, I'd appreciate some help from anyone who's got samba 2.2.6 running on FreeBSD as a PDC for Win2K client wkstations, please. I'm trying to following the SAMBA How-To at: http://samba.epfl.ch/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html#AEN60 but fail at the smbclient -L PDC host stage: # smbclient -L -N Demon added interface ip=192.168.1.8 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Packet send failed to 192.168.1.255(137) ERRNO=Permission denied Connection to -N failed # I get these entries in /var/log/security: Oct 21 19:31:08 Demon /kernel: ipfw: 910 Deny UDP My IP:2308 net.255:137 out via sis0 You firewall blocks packets to port 137 (netbios-ns). That's why you can access samba server with ip address and not by name. Please help me out here. Stacey On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 02:32, Andrew Boothman wrote: Stacey Roberts wrote: Hello, I've got 2 WIN2K Pro workstations on my home lan that I'd like to enable network logon for. I've been banging my head against a wall for the last four hours trying to get this sorted, but to no avail. I keep getting the same error when trying to enter the Domain name into the WORKGROUP field in Win2K network properties: The following error occured validating the name my_domainname, This condition may be caused by a DNS lookup problem. For more information about troubleshooting common DNS lookup problems see the following Microsoft blah., blah.., blah.., The specified domain either does not exist or could not be contacted. Have you added machine accounts to the FreeBSD box for the client boxes? You need machine accounts that look like clientname$ (dollar sign at end) added both as local accounts and then again with smbpasswd passing whatever the appropriate switch is to create a machine account. I have a FreeBSD box here acting as a PDC so we should be able to find the problem. Andrew. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com -- Regards, D. Penev To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com -- Regards, D. Penev To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
COmpiling error
System: Pentium I, 120 MHz, 64 MB EDO ram, 4 GB harddisk ALS 120 Sound card. (tulip Vectra 5/120) Installed: bin, docs and kernel sources The bootloader only see 16 MB of memory while the kernel see the 64 MB. When I compile the kernel (make clean, make depend, make and make install) it sometimes goes OK. Most of the times I'll get an error 1, when make compiles the modules (sometime mlx, sometimes cisco etc). I've checked and rechecked the hardware. Can anyone give me a clue? Met vriendelijke groeten Jack Raats Met vriendelijke groeten Jack Raats To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Windowmaker segfault?
I dug through the lists, and recompiled/installed the whole port. But everytime I run X with Windowmaker 0.80.1 I get a segfault. I usually run Fluxbox or Blackbox, but some time ago I ran Windowmaker with no problems. Any ideas? NOTE: Please CC me, as I am not currently subscribed. Thanks. jm -- My other computer is your windows box. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: port installs failing
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 04:53:06AM +0100, Neo wrote: since upgrading to 4.7-STABLE, i have some strange behaviour when i try to install or upgrade some ports, for example xchat. The config fails with the message: configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables. Did you happen to mount your /tmp partition 'noexec'? Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Windowmaker segfault?
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 08:18:45AM +, Jonathon McKitrick wrote: I dug through the lists, and recompiled/installed the whole port. But everytime I run X with Windowmaker 0.80.1 I get a segfault. I usually run Fluxbox or Blackbox, but some time ago I ran Windowmaker with no problems. Are all the dependencies up to date? happy-idiot-talk:~:% pkg_info -r window\* Information for windowmaker-0.80.1: Depends on: Dependency: imake-4.2.0_1 Dependency: jpeg-6b_1 Dependency: png-1.2.5 Dependency: freetype2-2.1.2 Dependency: libiconv-1.8_1 Dependency: tiff-3.5.7 Dependency: XFree86-libraries-4.2.1_2 Dependency: expat-1.95.5 Dependency: wmicons-1.0 Dependency: gettext-0.11.5_1 Dependency: libungif-4.1.0b1 Dependency: Hermes-1.3.2 If that is the problem, portupgrade should sort you out in short order. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Freecom Traveller II DVD-Drive (USB 1.0) under FreeBSD 4.7-release
Hello all! :-) Is there any way how i can use this driver under FreeBSD? It is currently being detected as devive ugen0, but i am unable to mount it. Also, ugen0 is not the drive itself, but is called Freecom USB-IDE Controller. Any suggestions on what to do? TIA :-) Bye Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Getting some daemons out of the base system
-- Original Message -- Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:45:53 -0400 From: Michael Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Well as long as I can chose NOT to install sendmail, I'll be happy. But I don't see the difference between having sendmail removed and having to select it. We select all the ports we want, why not just make sendmail another port (like qmail)? Because people like me DEPEND on certain options as part of the base system. Sendmail is just one of those many options. Besides which, asking to have sendmail removed is asking to much. (IMHO) Whereas having an option to not have installed as part of the base system seems more digestable. :) Well if sendmail is in the base system it will be installed by ALL. Some don't even need a smtpd and other like me use another smtpd. But again, if it just could be an option when installing I'll be happy! br socketd To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Getting some daemons out of the base system
-- Original Message -- Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 13:14:17 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] This has been discussed more than once on -stable; and the general decision was to leave things as they are (which I happen to agree with). You can dig thru' the archives for the heated discussions. Ok. br socketd To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Upgrading a system with multiple jails
Hi all, I have a system running multiple jails.Anyone know of a good (ie fast, non-risky) proceedure to upgrade the host system and all the jails it runs Thanks. - Would you like to receive faxes to your personal email address? You can with mBox. Visit http://www.mbox.com.au/fax To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Upgrading a system with multiple jails
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 08:19:35PM +1100, BSD Freak wrote: Hi all, I have a system running multiple jails.Anyone know of a good (ie fast, non-risky) proceedure to upgrade the host system and all the jails it runs Thanks. - Would you like to receive faxes to your personal email address? You can with mBox. Visit http://www.mbox.com.au/fax To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message Hi, First off - make a backup. There are some good articles over at ONLamp.com about that (tar, pax, dump, restore, etc.). After that all I do is make buildworld in singleuser. Then I switch to single-user installworld and compile my kernel - this then gets installed and I just run make installworld DESTDIR=/kernel. This has caused no problems so far. You could try disabling the jails at startup (if you have them running by default) and just upgrade the host as per usual. Then you could tar the jails as a backup and make installworld after that - then just start them back up again. Neither of these has caused any problems for me. -lewiz. -- ... My pants just went on a wild rampage through a Long Island Bowling Alley!! --|| url: http://lewiz.info/ | http://www.westwood.karoo.net/pgpkey ||-- msg06717/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: alt keys
Hi I just added an extra CPU to my Dell server. I made a new kernel, the server recognizes the CPU' but FreeBSD does not. Steps I took: Copy GENERIC to GENERIC-SMP I added the 2 lines to the GENERIC-SMP file: options SMP options APIC_IO Then I did: make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC-SMP make installkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC-SMP And rebooted. In dmesg I see: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 cpu1 (AP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 io0 (APIC): apic id: 2, version: 0x000f0011, at 0xfec0 io1 (APIC): apic id: 3, version: 0x000f0011, at 0xfec01000 mptable: MP Config Base Table Entries: -- Processors: APIC ID Version State Family Model Step Flags 1 0x11BSP, usable 6 11 1 0x383fbff 0 0x11AP, usable 6 11 1 0x383fbff uname -a: FreeBSD xxx 4.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE #0: Sat Oct 26 12:04:37 CEST 2002 :/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC-SMP i386 But when I do a top, I only see one CPU. last pid: 725; load averages: 0.09, 0.04, 0.01 up 0+00:15:39 12:40:41 59 processes: 1 running, 58 sleeping CPU states: 21.4% user, 0.0% nice, 9.8% system, 0.5% interrupt, 68.3% idle Anybody can please help? -- Roelf Chaos reigns within. Reflect, repent, and reboot. Order shall return. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
SMP problems
Hi I just added an extra CPU to my Dell server. I made a new kernel, the server recognizes the CPU' but FreeBSD does not. Steps I took: Copy GENERIC to GENERIC-SMP I added the 2 lines to the GENERIC-SMP file: options SMP options APIC_IO Then I did: make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC-SMP make installkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC-SMP And rebooted. In dmesg I see: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 cpu1 (AP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 io0 (APIC): apic id: 2, version: 0x000f0011, at 0xfec0 io1 (APIC): apic id: 3, version: 0x000f0011, at 0xfec01000 mptable: MP Config Base Table Entries: -- Processors: APIC ID Version State Family Model Step Flags 1 0x11BSP, usable 6 11 1 0x383fbff 0 0x11AP, usable 6 11 1 0x383fbff uname -a: FreeBSD xxx 4.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE #0: Sat Oct 26 12:04:37 CEST 2002 :/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC-SMP i386 But when I do a top, I only see one CPU. last pid: 725; load averages: 0.09, 0.04, 0.01 up 0+00:15:39 12:40:41 59 processes: 1 running, 58 sleeping CPU states: 21.4% user, 0.0% nice, 9.8% system, 0.5% interrupt, 68.3% idle Anybody can please help? Roelf Schreurs IMC Amsterdam +31 20 527 5092 Chaos reigns within. Reflect, repent, and reboot. Order shall return. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: SMP problems
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 11:05:57AM +0100, Roelf Schreurs wrote: Hi I just added an extra CPU to my Dell server. I made a new kernel, the server recognizes the CPU' but FreeBSD does not. Steps I took: Copy GENERIC to GENERIC-SMP I added the 2 lines to the GENERIC-SMP file: options SMP options APIC_IO Then I did: make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC-SMP make installkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC-SMP And rebooted. In dmesg I see: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 cpu1 (AP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 io0 (APIC): apic id: 2, version: 0x000f0011, at 0xfec0 io1 (APIC): apic id: 3, version: 0x000f0011, at 0xfec01000 mptable: MP Config Base Table Entries: -- Processors: APIC ID Version State Family Model Step Flags 1 0x11BSP, usable 6 11 1 0x383fbff 0 0x11AP, usable 6 11 1 0x383fbff uname -a: FreeBSD xxx 4.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE #0: Sat Oct 26 12:04:37 CEST 2002 :/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC-SMP i386 But when I do a top, I only see one CPU. last pid: 725; load averages: 0.09, 0.04, 0.01 up 0+00:15:39 12:40:41 59 processes: 1 running, 58 sleeping CPU states: 21.4% user, 0.0% nice, 9.8% system, 0.5% interrupt, 68.3% idle Anybody can please help? Looks as though it's working fine to me -- Simon Dick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: ftpd.conf
I thought the mailinglist was for questions when you can figure it out yourself. But i see that this mailinglist is just for wannabees who think they can. Thanks for the help anyway. i do not have one, why waste your time to answer me if you dont even can help me, this is not just a waste of your time it is waste of mine too. Seems like a reasonable question to me. Asking for more information before spouting off is part of solving problems. so is here anybody serious here, i need a working example of ftpd.conf to the ftp daemon /usr/libexec/ftpd So, why don't you write one and not waste everyone else's time doing it for you... ;-} jerry thanx Hello is here anyone who can send me a ftpd.conf that works in real life??? thanx. Tina Uhhmmm... whats wrong with yours? _ Hitta billigaste resan på MSN Resor http://www.msn.se/resor/default.asp To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message _ Bli förälskad på MSN Dejting http://www.msn.se/dejting/default.asp To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: IPFW Rules for samba PDC? [WAS: samba PDC for WIN2K clients?]
Hi, Here's the relevant lines in my firewall: 00620 allow udp from any to any 137 keep-state out xmit sis0 00621 allow tcp from any to any 137 keep-state out xmit sis0 00623 allow log logamount 10 tcp from Win2KBox to me 137,138 keep-state in recv sis0 setup 00624 allow udp from any to any 138 keep-state out xmit sis0 00625 allow tcp from any to any 138 keep-state out xmit sis0 The output from nbtstat -A SAMBA_SERVER_IP: Host not found The output from nbtstat -c: No names in cache After running both commands, no new entries in /var/log/security appear for packets issued from Win2K box. Hope this helps. Stacey On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 07:15, D. Penev wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 10:47:48PM +0100, Stacey Roberts wrote: Subject: Re: IPFW Rules for samba PDC? [WAS: samba PDC for WIN2K clients?] From: Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: D. Penev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: FreeBSD Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 26 Oct 2002 22:47:48 +0100 Hi, Thanks for the reply. I should mention that I've made some progress with my efforts to set up a samba PDC for my Win2K clients. First of all I am now able to successfully complete all tests in the recommended DIAGNOSTICS.TXT at http://hr.uoregon.edu/davidrl/DIAGNOSIS.txt, except:- test 8: On the PC type the command net view \\BIGSERVER Specifically, I am only able to complete this test by using the IP Addr of the samba server in place of its name. Likewise for test 9 that follows. Recapping, I *am* able to serve share dirs to *NIX clients as well as the Win2K boxes, with the caveat that for the Windows boxes, I have to use the IP Addr of the samba server. This is not an issue for other (*NIX) client hosts. Needless to say, I am not as yet able to have the Win2K boxes join the domain as described in Chapter 9. (How to Configure Samba 2.2 as a Primary Domain Controller - 9.4.3. Joining the Client to the Domain.4.3. Joining the Client to the Domain). I still get the MS error when I click OK after entering the domain as defined in smb.conf. Hope this presents somewhat a clearer description of the current status here. Do get back to if you would require more information in assisting me in resolving this. From you description of the problem it's looks like that win2k box can't make resolving of names to ip address. That's why I accent to firewall because according to you logs ipfw block port 137, which is used to resolve NetBIOS names to IP address. I make a little test and block port 137 on my PDC (Samba 2.2.4 on NetBSD) and results are the same as yours. If that is true (blocking of netbios-ns port) you PDC can't register as domain controler, and workstations when is joined to domain can't find who is PDC for this domain. What are you firewall rules? What's show nbtstat -A YOU_SAMBA_SERVER and nbtstat -c on win2k box? Thanks On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 22:26, D. Penev wrote: On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 07:33:58PM +0100, Stacey Roberts wrote: Subject: IPFW Rules for samba PDC? [WAS: samba PDC for WIN2K clients?] From: Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Andrew Boothman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], FreeBSD Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 21 Oct 2002 19:33:58 +0100 Hello, I'd appreciate some help from anyone who's got samba 2.2.6 running on FreeBSD as a PDC for Win2K client wkstations, please. I'm trying to following the SAMBA How-To at: http://samba.epfl.ch/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html#AEN60 but fail at the smbclient -L PDC host stage: # smbclient -L -N Demon added interface ip=192.168.1.8 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Packet send failed to 192.168.1.255(137) ERRNO=Permission denied Connection to -N failed # I get these entries in /var/log/security: Oct 21 19:31:08 Demon /kernel: ipfw: 910 Deny UDP My IP:2308 net.255:137 out via sis0 You firewall blocks packets to port 137 (netbios-ns). That's why you can access samba server with ip address and not by name. Please help me out here. Stacey On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 02:32, Andrew Boothman wrote: Stacey Roberts wrote: Hello, I've got 2 WIN2K Pro workstations on my home lan that I'd like to enable network logon for. I've been banging my head against a wall for the last four hours trying to get this sorted, but to no avail. I keep getting the same error when trying to enter the Domain name into the WORKGROUP field in Win2K network properties: The following error occured validating the name my_domainname, This condition may be caused by a DNS lookup problem. For more information about troubleshooting common DNS lookup problems see the following Microsoft blah., blah.., blah.., The specified domain either does not exist or could not be contacted. Have you added machine accounts to the FreeBSD box for the client boxes? You need machine accounts that look like clientname$
Re: SMP problems
Top only shows 1 CPU and not 2. Simon Dick wrote: On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 11:05:57AM +0100, Roelf Schreurs wrote: Hi I just added an extra CPU to my Dell server. I made a new kernel, the server recognizes the CPU' but FreeBSD does not. Steps I took: Copy GENERIC to GENERIC-SMP I added the 2 lines to the GENERIC-SMP file: options SMP options APIC_IO Then I did: make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC-SMP make installkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC-SMP And rebooted. In dmesg I see: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 cpu1 (AP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 io0 (APIC): apic id: 2, version: 0x000f0011, at 0xfec0 io1 (APIC): apic id: 3, version: 0x000f0011, at 0xfec01000 mptable: MP Config Base Table Entries: -- Processors: APIC ID Version State Family Model Step Flags 1 0x11BSP, usable 6 11 1 0x383fbff 0 0x11AP, usable 6 11 1 0x383fbff uname -a: FreeBSD xxx 4.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE #0: Sat Oct 26 12:04:37 CEST 2002 :/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC-SMP i386 But when I do a top, I only see one CPU. last pid: 725; load averages: 0.09, 0.04, 0.01 up 0+00:15:39 12:40:41 59 processes: 1 running, 58 sleeping CPU states: 21.4% user, 0.0% nice, 9.8% system, 0.5% interrupt, 68.3% idle Anybody can please help? Looks as though it's working fine to me -- Roelf Schreurs IMC Amsterdam +31 20 527 5092 Chaos reigns within. Reflect, repent, and reboot. Order shall return. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: transparent proxy support
my point was simple. Sorry you mistook it. I am using a STOCK squid install from the ports tree. I am *not* using ipf headers. Quoting Derrick Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm sorry man but I dont need your explanation regarding the configuration of the squid box, ipfw, router, etc. As I have told you, I was able to run a transparent proxy server from FreeBSD 4.6.2 without any problem. I customized the kernel, configured squid and my router and it worked fine for me and my subscribers. My primary concern here is that I did the same thing into this FreeBSD 4.7 and when I tried compiling the squid with the following options (a) --enable-ipf-transparent -- it tells me that ipfilter header files not found I've also tried, (b) --enable-pf-transparent -- it tells me that pf header files not found Now, why the heck is this new release tell me that the header files are not found. And this is my primary concern here ... Deejay On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 13:59:24 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if you are serving web pages off of your natd/ipfw/squid box, the following helps to... (to prevent people trying to view your site from getting squid denied errors) modify my previous rule 62 to read 00062 4792 259184 fwd 127.0.0.1,3128 tcp from any to any 80 via ed0 where (in my case) ed0 is your INTERNAL nic, not your public nic 00060 20198 1074897 allow tcp from me to any 80 00061 1133915005323 allow tcp from any 80 to me 00062 4792 259184 fwd 127.0.0.1,3128 tcp from any to any 80 via ed0 Quoting Derrick Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Oh yes, I was also able to do it before as stated in my previous email. The problem right now in the current release is that the ipfilter header files are missing. On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 00:01:57 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what I was saying, is that I didn't do any special build of squid at the time. unfortunately, this was before 4.7. Quoting Derrick Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]: So you're using 4.7 ??? On Fri, 25 Oct 2002 23:44:57 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I was running a transparent proxy for a college I used to work for, I just installed the standard squid from the ports collection and just adjusted my kernel to do the tranparent forwarding via ipfw and it seem to work just fine. Quoting Derrick Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello People !!! I just upgraded my system from FreeBSD 4.6.2 to FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE and now I'm having problem configuring a transparent proxy server support. With my FreeBSD 4.6.2 before, I haven't encountered a single problem when I compiled squid to support transparent proxy with --enable-ipf-transparent option. Thus, after installing the box and enabling the IPFIREWALL option in the kernel, I started installing squid with the same options I did with my FreeBSD 4.6.2 box. At the installation process it stops it tells me that IPFILTER header files not found so I went through squid's configure script and found out that it should be --enable-pf-transparent if I want to use IPFW as my platform. This time it tells me PF header files not found ... what seems to be the problem in here ? Please help I'm using this box for production purposes. Thanks. Deejay ** Get your free E-Mail account at WWW.DIGITELONE.COM ** To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message - This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ ** Get your free E-Mail account at WWW.DIGITELONE.COM ** - This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ ** Get your free E-Mail account at WWW.DIGITELONE.COM ** - This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ ** Get your free E-Mail account at WWW.DIGITELONE.COM ** -- FreeBSD System Administrator http://manhattan.hq.dyns.cx/ - This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body
Keyboard maps
Hello, I have inherited a rather nice laptop. However I believe it has what is called an international keyboard. For example,. on a us keyboard the keys at the top when shifted are: !@#$%^*()_+ On the other keyboard they are: !#$%_().? And the same differences between all the other special keys. So setting it up as an American keyboard gives me @ for , for example I have searched and experimented but to no avail. Now I can, since I have been years at it, get the right key for most things, but I would prefer it if the symbol I got represented the key symbol ! Anyone know a solution to this ? -- Regards Cliff Sarginson The Netherlands Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel : +31 (0)10 4764595 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: SMP problems
On Sun Oct 27, 2002; 11:51AM +0100 Roelf Schreurs propagated the following: Top only shows 1 CPU and not 2. Yes. The 'CPU' line is a combination of the activity measured on both CPUs. You should pay more attention to the stuff in your dmesg (namely this stuff quoted here:) FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 cpu1 (AP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 On my SMP machine I have exactly the same behavior. Don't get too worried about it. :) -wd -- chip norkus; unix geek and programmer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] question = (to) ? be : !be; --Shakespeare http://telekinesis.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
port installations failing
Hi, since upgrading to 4.7-STABLE, i have some strange behaviour when i try to install or upgrade some ports, for example xchat and gdkxft. The config fails with the message: configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables. Other ports are upgrading without this problem. I've rebuild the entire gcc3.0, but i get the same error. Any ideas? Thomas 'Neo' Weber --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
port installations failing
Hi, since upgrading to 4.7-STABLE, i have some strange behaviour when i try to install or upgrade some ports, for example xchat. The config fails with the message: configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables. Other ports are upgrading without this problem. I've rebuild the entire gcc3.0, but i get the same error. Any ideas? Thomas 'Neo' Weber --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
System-wide virus and spam scanning with qmail-scanner
A How-To describing the setup of system-wide virus and spam scanning of incoming email using qmail-scanner is now available here: http://logicsquad.net/freebsd/qmail-scanner-how-to.html The setup described uses qmail-scanner to filter incoming mail through Clam AntiVirus's clamscan and SpamAssassin's spamd. Email flagged by clamscan is quarantined in a separate Maildir, while procmail can be used to divert email flagged by spamd. Comments and corrections are sought. :-) -- Paul. mailto:paulh;logicsquad.net mailto:paul.hoadley;student.adelaide.edu.au To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
FBSD 4.7 reset itself - lots of DENY UDP messages in/var/log/security
Hello, Within the last few minutes, my FreeBSD g'way reset itself. On coming up, I checked all available logs, and found the following in /var/log/security: Oct 27 12:59:22 Demon /kernel: ipfw: 910 Deny UDP 192.168.1.8:53 192.33.4.12:53 out via sis0 Oct 27 12:59:30 Demon last message repeated 8 times Oct 27 12:59:34 Demon /kernel: ipfw: 910 Deny UDP 192.168.1.8:53 192.112.36.4:53 out via sis0 Oct 27 12:59:36 Demon /kernel: ipfw: 910 Deny UDP 192.168.1.8:53 192.112.36.4:53 out via sis0 Oct 27 12:59:36 Demon /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:1077 from 127.0.0.1:53 Oct 27 12:59:36 Demon /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:1076 from 127.0.0.1:53 Oct 27 12:59:36 Demon /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:1075 from 127.0.0.1:53 Oct 27 12:59:36 Demon /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:1074 from 127.0.0.1:53 Oct 27 12:59:36 Demon /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:1073 from 127.0.0.1:53 Oct 27 12:59:36 Demon /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:1071 from 127.0.0.1:53 Oct 27 12:59:36 Demon /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:1072 from 127.0.0.1:53 Oct 27 12:59:38 Demon /kernel: ipfw: 910 Deny UDP 192.168.1.8:53 128.63.2.53:53 out via sis0 Oct 27 12:59:42 Demon /kernel: ipfw: 910 Deny UDP 192.168.1.8:53 128.9.0.107:53 out via sis0 Oct 27 12:59:44 Demon /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 127.0.0.1:1078 from 127.0.0.1:53 Oct 27 12:59:46 Demon /kernel: ipfw: 910 Deny UDP 192.168.1.8:53 193.0.14.129:53 out via sis0 Messages repeated here - snip Oct 27 13:00:06 Demon /kernel: ipfw: 910 Deny UDP 192.168.1.8:53 192.5.5.241:53 out via sis0 # I recognised the remote addresses to be those of DNS root servers, to verify: # nslookup 192.203.230.10 Server: localhost.vickiandstacey.com Address: 127.0.0.1 Name:E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET Address: 192.203.230.10 # Here's what I've got from running last: Demon# last stacey ttyp0:0 Sun Oct 27 12:57 still logged in stacey ttyv0 Sun Oct 27 12:56 still logged in reboot ~ Sun Oct 27 12:56 stacey ttyp2:0 Sun Oct 27 00:52 - 01:18 (00:25) stacey ttyp0:0 Sun Oct 27 00:18 - crash (13:37) stacey ttyp2:0 Sat Oct 26 21:15 - 00:15 (03:00) stacey ttyp2:0 Fri Oct 25 20:59 - 23:02 (02:02) stacey ttyp2:0 Fri Oct 25 19:45 - 20:25 (00:40) stacey ttyp1:0 Wed Oct 23 22:50 - 23:19 (00:29) stacey ttyp0:0 Wed Oct 23 22:41 - 00:15 (3+01:34) Is anyone able to point me to what went wrong here? I suspect its got something to do with the tons of ipfw DENY messages, but I wouldn't know where to start with this. Here's the uname: # uname -a FreeBSD Desnip 4.7-STABLE FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE #0: Sat Oct 12 10:04:03 BST 2002 rootsnip.vickiandstacey.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FALCON i386 # I'm running named in a sandbox here, and would have thought that this set-up would have prevented a crash of this nature (if it is indeed that the crash is related to DNS) Anything that you need, please let me know. TIA Stacey -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Upgrading (was) Re: Linux vs. FreeBSD
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg wrote: An upgrade consists of the following commands: 'cvsup -g -L2 stable-supfile cd /usr/src/ make buildworld make buildkernel KERNCONF=whatever make installkernel KERNCONF=whatever make installworld reboot' Theoretically you could just paste those lines into a shellscript, make a crontab entry and be done Nope. If you're tracking -STABLE, an upgrade isn't guaranteed to be automatable like this - you should check /usr/src/UPDATING. You're also missing any calls to mergemaster to update your configuration files. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ Rereleasing dolphins into the wild since 1998. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: alt keys
Omer Faruk Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi; How can I enable ALT-b or ALT-f keys in cons25 terminal? Or do I have to use another terminal . REGARDS. Just set it up in kbdcontrol(1). To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Windowmaker segfault?
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 08:52:34AM +, Matthew Seaman wrote: | On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 08:18:45AM +, Jonathon McKitrick wrote: | | I dug through the lists, and recompiled/installed the whole port. But | everytime I run X with Windowmaker 0.80.1 I get a segfault. I usually run | Fluxbox or Blackbox, but some time ago I ran Windowmaker with no problems. | | Are all the dependencies up to date? | | happy-idiot-talk:~:% pkg_info -r window\* | Information for windowmaker-0.80.1: | | Depends on: | Dependency: imake-4.2.0_1 | Dependency: jpeg-6b_1 | Dependency: png-1.2.5 | Dependency: freetype2-2.1.2 | Dependency: libiconv-1.8_1 | Dependency: tiff-3.5.7 | Dependency: XFree86-libraries-4.2.1_2 | Dependency: expat-1.95.5 | Dependency: wmicons-1.0 | Dependency: gettext-0.11.5_1 | Dependency: libungif-4.1.0b1 | Dependency: Hermes-1.3.2 | | If that is the problem, portupgrade should sort you out in short order. I started a 'portupgrade -RPN windowmaker' and left it to do its magic and I still get the segfault. I tried truss but I don't know the system well enough to figure out what happened. The cause of the crash wasn't immediately obvious. I did get a core file however, and if there is any info I can extract from there I'd be happy to try. jm -- My other computer is your Windows box. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: machine disappearance after upgrade 4.7
Dan Kalowsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hopefully someone can give me a pointer or two here. A normally extremely stable machine running FreeBSD has become rather unstable after upgrading to the 4.7 release. By unstable I mean disappearing off the network suddenly, and having console non-responsive to anything but a nice ctl-alt-del reboot. The log files only show one thing that may be of issue: Oct 25 01:05:48 x-wing /kernel: arplookup 207.8.132.194 failed: host is not on local network Oct 25 01:36:27 x-wing /kernel: arplookup 207.8.132.194 failed: host is not on local network So is 207.8.132.194 on the local subnet or not? Right before the machine disappears, these messages start repeating rather rapidly to the tune of one about ever 5 seconds. This behavior was not seen in any of the earlier FreeBSD releases. The said IP address is the IP for the nameserver of the cluster group, which is responding just fine to requests. A quick search of the archives reveals nothing thats of any help to me so... Have I somehow misconfigured my upgrade, and if so any suggestions on what to fix or where to begin looking? Or have I stumbled upon a legit bug? Those messages generally indicate a networking configuration problem, but locking up a machine with such a problem would be hard (not impossible, though, because that part of the IP stack is inside the kernel). To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: how to add space
Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: At 05:14 PM 10/26/2002 +0100, you wrote: Perhaps I have to install a boot manager - but which how? I don't think it would be that much trouble to use Partition Magic, delete slice1 and then reo the fdisk and the rest of the mounting process - but I should then install the boot manager - but will it install it on slice 1 (ad0s1) ? I suppose from there, the boot manager should poinbt to slice 2 to boot... I don't think the boot manager goes in any slice. It goes before them in the boot sector. It gets read up and executed and it lets you select which bootable slice you want to boot up. That's correct, but it's only the full story for the standard FreeBSD boot manager (BootEasy). Other boot managers are too large to fit entirely in the Master Boot Record, and need to access a disk slice for partial functionality. It is also possible to put a boot manager in a slice, but this is only useful if the boot manager in the MBR is able to boot that slice. I *very* rarely use my boot manager to do anything but boot my FreeBSD root partition, so I like BootEasy, because if anything bad happens to it, I can fix it easily. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: SMP problems
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 11:51:39AM +0100, Roelf Schreurs wrote: Simon Dick wrote: On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 11:05:57AM +0100, Roelf Schreurs wrote: Hi I just added an extra CPU to my Dell server. I made a new kernel, the server recognizes the CPU' but FreeBSD does not. Steps I took: Copy GENERIC to GENERIC-SMP I added the 2 lines to the GENERIC-SMP file: options SMP options APIC_IO Then I did: make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC-SMP make installkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC-SMP And rebooted. In dmesg I see: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 cpu1 (AP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 io0 (APIC): apic id: 2, version: 0x000f0011, at 0xfec0 io1 (APIC): apic id: 3, version: 0x000f0011, at 0xfec01000 mptable: MP Config Base Table Entries: -- Processors: APIC ID Version State Family Model Step Flags 1 0x11BSP, usable 6 11 1 0x383fbff 0 0x11AP, usable 6 11 1 0x383fbff uname -a: FreeBSD xxx 4.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE #0: Sat Oct 26 12:04:37 CEST 2002 :/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC-SMP i386 But when I do a top, I only see one CPU. last pid: 725; load averages: 0.09, 0.04, 0.01 up 0+00:15:39 12:40:41 59 processes: 1 running, 58 sleeping CPU states: 21.4% user, 0.0% nice, 9.8% system, 0.5% interrupt, 68.3% idle Looks as though it's working fine to me Top only shows 1 CPU and not 2. Also look for the line in dmesg which states: SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! which is another good indication that smp is working. Also, in `top', sometimes under the STATE column it will display 'CPU0 or CPU1. Although, I'm not exactly sure what this means in the STATE context, but it is another indication that the system is aware of two processors. Nathan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
dig . ns @b.root-servers.net - Connection refused. WHY? [related toFBSD 4.7 reset itself - lots of DENY UDP mess]ages in /var/log/security
Hello, I don't know if this is related to post earlier today [FBSD 4.7 reset itself - lots of DENY UDP messages in /var/log/security], but I've been trying to trouble shoot the DENY messages in /var/log/security using dig: # dig . ns b.root-servers.net ; DiG 8.3 . ns b.root-servers.net ; (1 server found) ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; res_nsend to server b.root-servers.net 128.9.0.107: Connection refused # I get connection refused for this. Checking security: Oct 27 15:16:26 Demon /kernel: ipfw: 910 Deny UDP snip:1381 128.9.0.107:53 out via sis0 Oct 27 15:16:26 Demon /kernel: ipfw: 910 Deny UDP 1snip:1382 128.9.0.107:53 out via sis0 # Verifying relevant ipfw rules: # Allow out access to Internet Domain name server $fwcmd add 00618 allow tcp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup keep-state $fwcmd add 00619 allow udp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup keep-state Checking ipfw rule 910: $fwcmd add 00910 deny log logamount 500 ip from any to any Why am I not able to query root servers, given my rules 00618 00619? I'd appreciate someone helping me out here., (or hitting me over the head if I'm missing something simple and glaringly obvious) TIA Stacey -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Freebsd multiple gateways
*My apologies if this mail has already gone to this list, but I didn't realise you had to subscribe first, im a newbie to mail-lists* I have a problem with having 2 nics and the need for multiple gateways for IP's that are bound to them, heres my prognosis in detail :-# Background Scenario :- I have a server that is running FREEBSD 4.7-STABLE. This server has 2 network cards. Each network card has its own pool of IP's and are on different subnets which are transported by different carriers. Details :- The servers main hostname is admin.mghost.net the IP is 66.250.145.138, the default gateway for this is 66.250.145.137, these ips are on the cogent network, all traffic in/out of the server for the ip 66.250.145.138 should be routed through the gateway 66.250.145.137. These are all on the first network card which is an realtek card. The servers second hostname is test.mghost.net the IP is 69.1.78.8, the default gateway for this is 69.1.78.1, these IP's are on the internap network, all traffic in/out of the server for the ip 69.1.78.8 should be routed through the gateway 69.1.78.1. There are all on the second network card which is an intel thing. The problem :- It appears there is no easy way to add a second default gateway, something I did, which I thought was working, is not. all inbound traffic destined for the IP 69.1.78.8 is going through the correct channels and through teh correct nic, however, outgoing traffic is being routed to the default gateway, through the first NIC, so when people connect to the IP 69.1.78.8, the traffic is being sent through the first NIC and through the gateway 66.250.145.137. The needed solution :- I need something that will allow me to make traffic that is destined for the IP 69.1.78.8 to be routed through the correct NIC and the correct router, not the default gateway, so traffic from 69.1.78.8 back out again, should go via the gateway 69.1.78.1. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
NFS from win to fbsd
Anyone know of a decent, free NFS client for win32 that can access exports from my fbsd nfsd? -- GnuPG Key - http://probsd.org/michael.asc To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Amanda FreeBSD: gtar must be run as operator
Hi! error [must be invoked by operator] Well, your message missed an obvious bit of information - is amdump invoked as user operator? If not, who does it run as? To work correctly, most of the Amanda stuff wants to run as user AMANDA_USER, which in FreeBSD port is set to operator, IIRC. -- Toomas Aas | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.raad.tartu.ee/~toomas/ * What are you looking down here for? Read the message! To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: NFS from win to fbsd
At 10:50 AM 10.27.2002 -0500, Michael Sharp wrote: Anyone know of a decent, free NFS client for win32 that can access exports from my fbsd nfsd? -- GnuPG Key - http://probsd.org/michael.asc Don't know about NFS, but me know Samba in ports... Best regards, Jack L. Stone, Administrator SageOne Net http://www.sage-one.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: machine disappearance after upgrade 4.7
On Sunday, October 27, 2002, at 09:49 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: So is 207.8.132.194 on the local subnet or not? Physically, yes. Logically, no. Those messages generally indicate a networking configuration problem, but locking up a machine with such a problem would be hard (not impossible, though, because that part of the IP stack is inside the kernel). Typically I would agree with this statement. Seeing as this wasn't an issue while using the 4.6 systems though, I'll have to lean towards the probably not in this case side of the argument. It's been localized to happen within every 30-40 minutes now. Again the only message in /var/log/message is rapid repeating of the ARP failure. From console running a series of pings or anything resulted in: sendto: no buffer space available (typed from memory; grepping for that exact string may fail.) --- Dan KalowskyMomma take this badge offa me, http://www.deadmime.org/~dankI can't use it anymore. [EMAIL PROTECTED]- Knockin on Heavens Door, [EMAIL PROTECTED]Bob Dylan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: dig . ns @b.root-servers.net - Connection refused. WHY? [related to FBSD 4.7 reset itself - lots of DENY UDP mess]ages in /var/log/security
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 03:24:07PM +, Stacey Roberts typed: Hello, I don't know if this is related to post earlier today [FBSD 4.7 reset itself - lots of DENY UDP messages in /var/log/security], but I've been trying to trouble shoot the DENY messages in /var/log/security using dig: # dig . ns @b.root-servers.net ; DiG 8.3 . ns @b.root-servers.net ; (1 server found) ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; res_nsend to server b.root-servers.net 128.9.0.107: Connection refused # I get connection refused for this. Checking security: Oct 27 15:16:26 Demon /kernel: ipfw: 910 Deny UDP snip:1381 128.9.0.107:53 out via sis0 Oct 27 15:16:26 Demon /kernel: ipfw: 910 Deny UDP 1snip:1382 128.9.0.107:53 out via sis0 # Verifying relevant ipfw rules: # Allow out access to Internet Domain name server $fwcmd add 00618 allow tcp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup keep-state $fwcmd add 00619 allow udp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup keep-state This last rule is bogus. From ipfw(8): setup Matches TCP packets that have the SYN bit set but no ACK bit. This is the short form of ``tcpflags syn,!ack''. setup is not supposed to work for UDP packets. there is no handshake as in tcp connections. Checking ipfw rule 910: $fwcmd add 00910 deny log logamount 500 ip from any to any Why am I not able to query root servers, given my rules 00618 00619? I'd appreciate someone helping me out here., (or hitting me over the head if I'm missing something simple and glaringly obvious) TIA Stacey -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
RE: Keyboard maps
Hello, I have inherited a rather nice laptop. However I believe it has what is called an international keyboard. Did you try the mappings that are in /usr/src/share/syscons/keymaps/ ? If one of them works for you, add a keymap entry in /etc/rc.conf (see /etc/defaults/rc.conf). Test it with something like: kbdcontrol /dev/ttyv0 -l finnish.iso.kbd Note this is for console mapping, not for X. If you're looking to change the mappings under X, then look for xmodmap files. This is not a FreeBSD-specific issue, so the best for you would be to look in geographically-local forums for Unix or X-windows. -- Dan Pelleg To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Getting some daemons out of the base system
At 2002-10-26T23:03:38Z, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ...and I don't understand why we need a smtp daemon in the base system, but not a pop3 daemon. One reason is that a standard install expects to have an install MTA so that it can, for example, email periodic reports to the system administrator. Since users can read their mailspools directly (i.e., using 'less'), POP3 isn't strictly necessary. -- Kirk Strauser In Googlis non est, ergo non est. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: dig . ns @b.root-servers.net - Connection refused. WHY?[related to FBSD 4.7 reset itself - lots of DENY UDP mess]ages in/var/log/security
Hi Ruben, Thanks much for the reply - comments inline..., Verifying relevant ipfw rules: # Allow out access to Internet Domain name server $fwcmd add 00618 allow tcp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup keep-state $fwcmd add 00619 allow udp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup keep-state This last rule is bogus. From ipfw(8): setup Matches TCP packets that have the SYN bit set but no ACK bit. This is the short form of ``tcpflags syn,!ack''. setup is not supposed to work for UDP packets. there is no handshake as in tcp connections. Okay, I see what you mean about rule 00619 (probably explains why this rule never appears in ipfw l), and as such, I have three questions based on rule 00619 being bogus: 1] Is this the reason why I am unable to query root-servers? 2] Do I remove it completely - would ipfw still be secure without it completely? 3] If not, should I just amend as: BEFORE $fwcmd add 00619 allow udp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup keep-state AFTER Based on ipfw (8): ### A similar approach can be used for UDP, where an UDP packet coming from the inside will install a dynamic rule to let the response through the firewall: ipfw add check-state ipfw add allow udp from my-subnet to any ipfw add deny udp from any to any $fwcmd add 00619 allow udp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup keep-state CHANGE TO: $fwcmd add allow udp from any to any 53 out via $oif $fwcmd add deny udp from any to any 53 in via $oif I'm basing the above amendments based on: I have a check-state at rule 00500 From the make up of my rule-set, I do not have a rule and explicitly denies udp to port 53 per-se. More clearly, I have these deny rules in place at the moment: $ grep -i deny fwrules $fwcmd add 00020 deny log ip from me to any in $fwcmd add 00030 deny log tcp from any to any in tcpflags syn,fin $fwcmd add 00100 deny udp from any to any 520 in via $oif $fwcmd add 00502 deny all from any to any frag $fwcmd add 00501 deny tcp from any to any established $fwcmd add 00850 deny log ip from me to me in via $oif $fwcmd add 00860 deny log icmp from any to me icmptype 0,8 in via $oif $fwcmd add 00900 deny log all from any to any in via $oif $fwcmd add 00910 deny log logamount 500 ip from any to any $ None of which explicitly applies to DNS. I make this point as there *are* udp packets I want to allow in via $oif - 137 - 139 Thanks again for the reply Ruben. If I'm not clear enough in my explanations, I'm quite happy to post my complete rule-set to you (off-list) if you need it to get a better picture. Cheers! Stacey On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 16:06, Ruben de Groot wrote: On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 03:24:07PM +, Stacey Roberts typed: Hello, I don't know if this is related to post earlier today [FBSD 4.7 reset itself - lots of DENY UDP messages in /var/log/security], but I've been trying to trouble shoot the DENY messages in /var/log/security using dig: # dig . ns @b.root-servers.net ; DiG 8.3 . ns @b.root-servers.net ; (1 server found) ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; res_nsend to server b.root-servers.net 128.9.0.107: Connection refused # I get connection refused for this. Checking security: Oct 27 15:16:26 Demon /kernel: ipfw: 910 Deny UDP snip:1381 128.9.0.107:53 out via sis0 Oct 27 15:16:26 Demon /kernel: ipfw: 910 Deny UDP 1snip:1382 128.9.0.107:53 out via sis0 # snip Checking ipfw rule 910: $fwcmd add 00910 deny log logamount 500 ip from any to any Why am I not able to query root servers, given my rules 00618 00619? I'd appreciate someone helping me out here., (or hitting me over the head if I'm missing something simple and glaringly obvious) TIA Stacey -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
netatalk port and remote printing
I'm trying to use my FreeBSD, 4.7 release, box as a remote print server for a Mac box on the network. Printing is fine with the FBSD box, using HP812C deskjet printer and apsfilter. I want to make sure I'm going down the correct path and not wasting time doing something that's *obviously* not right (though not obvious to me). I have installed the netatalk port, and am having problems identifying the printer to the add_netatalk_printer program. Does anyone know: 1) is this the correct way to configure a printer so the Mac can use it? 2) is there any good documentation anywhere on this? I've tried to follow Chuck's Tips at: http://lantech.geekvenue.net/chucktips/jason/chuck/986883054.html, but haven't had any luck Thanks for any help or pointers. Michael Heyes To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: dig . ns @b.root-servers.net - Connection refused. WHY?[related to FBSD 4.7 reset itself - lots of DENY UDP mess]ages in/var/log/security
Just checked against http://www.pgp.net/wwwkeys.html to verify: pub 2048R/DC92FBD7 2002-08-03 Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key fingerprint = 04 2E 82 F6 3E 78 25 14 42 84 90 E7 B7 B1 F7 26 Verbose: Public Key Server -- Verbose Index ``0xDC92FBD7 '' Type bits/keyIDDate User ID pub 2048R/DC92FBD7 2002-08-03 Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key fingerprint = 04 2E 82 F6 3E 78 25 14 42 84 90 E7 B7 B1 F7 26 New! attempt to lookup keyholder on biglumber.com. sig 0x10 DC92FBD7 2002-08-03 [selfsig] Unless I'm missing something., so do enlighten me, please. Stacey On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 17:06, Daniel Harris wrote: On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 04:48:34PM +, Stacey Roberts wrote: -snip- Just letting you know that the pgp sig on this message did not verify with my gnupg 1.2.1. -- Daniel Harris -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Help! WordPerfect can't find /compat/linux/lib/ld-linux.so.1 !
We upgraded our Toshiba Satellite Pro 4600 from 4.6-R to 4.7-R yesterday to try to take advantage of some work on USB devices (specifically, ucom uvisor for our Palm m130). That bit still isn't working, but another, more troubling problem has arisen. Our WordPerfect 8 for Linux installation (which worked perfectly under 4.6-R w/linux_base-6.1) now complains when asked to start: ELF interpreter /compat/linux/lib/ld-linux.so.1 not found Abort Of course, linux_base-7.1_1 doesn't reference ld-linux.so.1, so what's up with that ?! And the 4.7-R distribution come with linux_base-6, so going back isn't an immediate option. I find the same behavior with the Acrobat 3 reader. I won't mind terribly ditching Acrobat 3 for its successors, but we use WordPerfect often enough for this to be a problem. Suggestions, pointers will be appreciated ! -- Gary E. RAFE, PhD [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: What is vnlru really?
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-26 14:17:50 -0400: On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, DaleCo Help Desk wrote: PL PS - Is `arp -a` the most reliable way to get one's current IP address? What's wrong with ifconfig ??? Kevin Kinsey I was not familiar with ifconfig and am surprised at such a similar name to winipcfg for Win98. try ipconfig. IIRC it works even on w98 (no box in sight to test), and i'm positive that's the name on NT4, NT5, and XP. oh, and you're pointed at ifconfig(8) by the SEE ALSO section of arp(8). have you read it? It seems arp -a tells me one IP while ipconfig tells me another. Is that because I'm using DHCP, or is arp -a maybe reporting a DNS value, not my currently-assigned IP? arp -a doesn't display your ip at all. Read The Fine Manpage, and experiment with the other options. -- If you cc me or take the list(s) out completely I'll most likely ignore your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: dig . ns @b.root-servers.net - Connection refused. WHY? [related to FBSD 4.7 reset itself - lots of DENY UDP mess]ages in /var/log/security
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 05:18:10PM +, Stacey Roberts wrote: Just checked against http://www.pgp.net/wwwkeys.html to verify: pub 2048R/DC92FBD7 2002-08-03 Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key fingerprint = 04 2E 82 F6 3E 78 25 14 42 84 90 E7 B7 B1 F7 26 Verbose: Public Key Server -- Verbose Index ``0xDC92FBD7 '' Type bits/keyIDDate User ID pub 2048R/DC92FBD7 2002-08-03 Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Key fingerprint = 04 2E 82 F6 3E 78 25 14 42 84 90 E7 B7 B1 F7 26 New! attempt to lookup keyholder on biglumber.com. sig 0x10 DC92FBD7 2002-08-03 [selfsig] Unless I'm missing something., so do enlighten me, please. It doesn't verify here either. I think it's because you haven't added the email address you post from as an alias. Ceri -- you can't see when light's so strong you can't see when light is gone To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: burncd wierdness
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 10:17:33AM -0700, Joel Mc Graw wrote: Every time I burn a cd with the following line: burncd -f /dev/acd0c -e file.to.burn fixate it creates a perfect CD, but upon ejecting (the -e switch), the CD drive dies. The tray stays in the out position, even when pushing the external eject/load button, and the only way I can regain access to the drive is by rebooting. This is an IDE SONY CD-RW on FreeBSD 4.5-R (i386). Any thoughts on what might be wrong? Don't know what might be wrong, but you could try: `cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0c close' assuming, of course that your cdrom device is located at acd0c. When the problem occurs are there any stray processes that might still be using the device? Try taking a peek at `top' or `ps aux' when this happens. Nathan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
openoffice install
Does anybody know just what is required to install OpenOffice on FBSD 4.7. I think their message that 4Gb is required is a little naive just where should this 4gb be available. I have a 10gb disk: ad0s1= ad0s1e (/usr/local - 3.7gb); ad0s2=4gb K(but this includes /,/tmp/,/usr (2.7gb),/var; and ad0s3 = ad0s3e (/usr/ports - 2gb). This is on a test machine. On my work or production machine I can convert an NTFS slice to ufs, but I still don't know where the 4gb are needed. In my present attempt to install OO on the test machine, the file system became full... Som now what? Thanks for any help. PJ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Help! WordPerfect can't find /compat/linux/lib/ld-linux.so.1 !
Hello I was able to get older linux binaries to work by install the following rpms from the Red Hat 6.1 distribution: ld.so-1.9.5-13.i386.rpm libc-5.3.12-31.i386.rpm I did this by: # /usr/compat/linux/bin/bash # rpm -ivh ld.so-1.9.5-13.i386.rpm # rpm -ivh libc-5.3.12-31.i386.rpm Then you will need to add the library to the /usr/compat/linux/etc/ld.so.conf file here are the directories listed in my file: /usr/lib /usr/X11R6/lib /usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib I do not know if this is the best method of getting the old libraries to work. It works for me, both Matlab R11 and WordPerfect 8 are working on my computer. On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 10:26, G.E. Rafe wrote: We upgraded our Toshiba Satellite Pro 4600 from 4.6-R to 4.7-R yesterday to try to take advantage of some work on USB devices (specifically, ucom uvisor for our Palm m130). That bit still isn't working, but another, more troubling problem has arisen. Our WordPerfect 8 for Linux installation (which worked perfectly under 4.6-R w/linux_base-6.1) now complains when asked to start: ELF interpreter /compat/linux/lib/ld-linux.so.1 not found Abort Of course, linux_base-7.1_1 doesn't reference ld-linux.so.1, so what's up with that ?! And the 4.7-R distribution come with linux_base-6, so going back isn't an immediate option. I find the same behavior with the Acrobat 3 reader. I won't mind terribly ditching Acrobat 3 for its successors, but we use WordPerfect often enough for this to be a problem. Suggestions, pointers will be appreciated ! -- Gary E. RAFE, PhD [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
HP scanjet 2200c USB w/sane on current How to Configure
I have just installed sane 1.0.9, backends and frontends on my laptop running current, cvsuped, built and rebooted this morning. The hp-2200c seems to be recognized on boot up. The dmesg follows: usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uscanner0: Hewlett-Packard HP ScanJet 2200C, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2 I try sane-find-scanner and it says found USB scanner (UNKNOWN vendor and product) at device /dev/uscanner0 rather than the HP2200C that I was expecting. When I try: scanimage -d hp:/dev/uscanner0 /tmp/h.pnm I get: scanimage: open of device hp:/dev/uscanner0 failed: Error during device I/O I'm sure that I need to configure something else but after reading the README.freebsd, README and the man pages for sane, sane-hp, uscanner and others, I can't for the life of me find it. xscanimage gives a similar message: [xscanimage] No scanners were identified. Any help will be greatly appreciated. I did test it under windows, btw, so the hardware is working. Thanks, ed - To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: dig . ns @b.root-servers.net - Connection refused. WHY?[related to FBSD 4.7 reset itself - lots of DENY UDP mess]ages in/var/log/security
Okay, I've been hacking about with my ipfw rules in order to nail this down, but I'm still coming up against a wall here.., I've made this change: # Allow out access to Internet Domain name server $fwcmd add 00617 allow tcp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup keep-state #$fwcmd add 00618 allow udp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup keep-state COMMENTED THIS OUT $fwcmd add 00618 allow udp from any to any 53 out via $oif ^ | PUT THIS IN INSTEAD Now I try to query a root-server, I still get stopped by the firewall: # date Sun Oct 27 18:19:35 GMT 2002 # dig . ns @b.root-servers.net ; DiG 8.3 . ns @b.root-servers.net ; (1 server found) ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; res_nsend to server b.root-servers.net 128.9.0.107: Operation timed out Checking logs: # tail /var/log/security snip Oct 27 18:19:40 Demon /kernel: ipfw: 900 Deny UDP 128.9.0.107:53 192.168.1.8:1642 in via sis0 # The previous posted (see below) informed me that using setup / keep-state with udp is wrong. Given the changes I've made above, what are the magic statements to allow my to query the root servers and allow their responses back in? TIA Stacey On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 16:06, Ruben de Groot wrote: snip Verifying relevant ipfw rules: # Allow out access to Internet Domain name server $fwcmd add 00618 allow tcp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup keep-state $fwcmd add 00619 allow udp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup keep-state This last rule is bogus. From ipfw(8): setup Matches TCP packets that have the SYN bit set but no ACK bit. This is the short form of ``tcpflags syn,!ack''. setup is not supposed to work for UDP packets. there is no handshake as in tcp connections. Checking ipfw rule 910: $fwcmd add 00910 deny log logamount 500 ip from any to any Why am I not able to query root servers, given my rules 00618 00619? I'd appreciate someone helping me out here., (or hitting me over the head if I'm missing something simple and glaringly obvious) TIA Stacey -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Help! WordPerfect can't find /compat/linux/lib/ld-linux.so.1 !
If you can not install via rpm you can do it manually this is a safer method. I use Midnight Commander (misc/mc) and select the rpm and copy to the location. (I do not remember if I used rpm or the manual method) sorry for the confusion On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 11:22, Aaron Siegel wrote: Hello I was able to get older linux binaries to work by install the following rpms from the Red Hat 6.1 distribution: ld.so-1.9.5-13.i386.rpm libc-5.3.12-31.i386.rpm I did this by: # /usr/compat/linux/bin/bash # rpm -ivh ld.so-1.9.5-13.i386.rpm # rpm -ivh libc-5.3.12-31.i386.rpm Then you will need to add the library to the /usr/compat/linux/etc/ld.so.conf file here are the directories listed in my file: /usr/lib /usr/X11R6/lib /usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib I do not know if this is the best method of getting the old libraries to work. It works for me, both Matlab R11 and WordPerfect 8 are working on my computer. On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 10:26, G.E. Rafe wrote: We upgraded our Toshiba Satellite Pro 4600 from 4.6-R to 4.7-R yesterday to try to take advantage of some work on USB devices (specifically, ucom uvisor for our Palm m130). That bit still isn't working, but another, more troubling problem has arisen. Our WordPerfect 8 for Linux installation (which worked perfectly under 4.6-R w/linux_base-6.1) now complains when asked to start: ELF interpreter /compat/linux/lib/ld-linux.so.1 not found Abort Of course, linux_base-7.1_1 doesn't reference ld-linux.so.1, so what's up with that ?! And the 4.7-R distribution come with linux_base-6, so going back isn't an immediate option. I find the same behavior with the Acrobat 3 reader. I won't mind terribly ditching Acrobat 3 for its successors, but we use WordPerfect often enough for this to be a problem. Suggestions, pointers will be appreciated ! -- Gary E. RAFE, PhD [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: openoffice install
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-27 13:16:22 -0500: Does anybody know just what is required to install OpenOffice on FBSD 4.7. I think their message that 4Gb is required is a little naive just where should this 4gb be available. unless you have fiddled with the ports system, it builds all the software under /usr/ports. more specifically, in those /usr/ports/category/port/work/ directories. I have a 10gb disk: ad0s1= ad0s1e (/usr/local - 3.7gb); ad0s2=4gb K(but this includes /,/tmp/,/usr (2.7gb),/var; and ad0s3 = ad0s3e (/usr/ports - 2gb). that looks like you don't have enough free space (anywhere). In my present attempt to install OO on the test machine, the file system became full... Som now what? Q: which filesystem got full? A: the one that is used to build OO, and needs those 4 gigs to complete the process. -- If you cc me or take the list(s) out completely I'll most likely ignore your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: openoffice install
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 07:40:24PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: I have a 10gb disk: ad0s1= ad0s1e (/usr/local - 3.7gb); ad0s2=4gb K(but this includes /,/tmp/,/usr (2.7gb),/var; and ad0s3 = ad0s3e (/usr/ports - 2gb). that looks like you don't have enough free space (anywhere). Note that http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ has binary packages which won't require those 4GB :-) -- Daniel Harris msg06761/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: IPFW Rules for samba PDC? [WAS: samba PDC for WIN2K clients?]
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 10:50:47AM +, Stacey Roberts wrote: Subject: Re: IPFW Rules for samba PDC? [WAS: samba PDC for WIN2K clients?] From: Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: D. Penev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: FreeBSD Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 27 Oct 2002 10:50:47 + Hi, Here's the relevant lines in my firewall: 00620 allow udp from any to any 137 keep-state out xmit sis0 00621 allow tcp from any to any 137 keep-state out xmit sis0 Add: 00622 allow udp from Win2KBox to any 137,138 keep-state in recv sis0 00623 allow log logamount 10 tcp from Win2KBox to me 137,138 ^^ use any because win2k use broadcast if you don't have wins server keep-state in recv sis0 setup 00624 allow udp from any to any 138 keep-state out xmit sis0 00625 allow tcp from any to any 138 keep-state out xmit sis0 The output from nbtstat -A SAMBA_SERVER_IP: Host not found The output from nbtstat -c: No names in cache After running both commands, no new entries in /var/log/security appear for packets issued from Win2K box. Hope this helps. Stacey On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 07:15, D. Penev wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 10:47:48PM +0100, Stacey Roberts wrote: Subject: Re: IPFW Rules for samba PDC? [WAS: samba PDC for WIN2K clients?] From: Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: D. Penev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: FreeBSD Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 26 Oct 2002 22:47:48 +0100 Hi, Thanks for the reply. I should mention that I've made some progress with my efforts to set up a samba PDC for my Win2K clients. First of all I am now able to successfully complete all tests in the recommended DIAGNOSTICS.TXT at http://hr.uoregon.edu/davidrl/DIAGNOSIS.txt, except:- test 8: On the PC type the command net view \\BIGSERVER Specifically, I am only able to complete this test by using the IP Addr of the samba server in place of its name. Likewise for test 9 that follows. Recapping, I *am* able to serve share dirs to *NIX clients as well as the Win2K boxes, with the caveat that for the Windows boxes, I have to use the IP Addr of the samba server. This is not an issue for other (*NIX) client hosts. Needless to say, I am not as yet able to have the Win2K boxes join the domain as described in Chapter 9. (How to Configure Samba 2.2 as a Primary Domain Controller - 9.4.3. Joining the Client to the Domain.4.3. Joining the Client to the Domain). I still get the MS error when I click OK after entering the domain as defined in smb.conf. Hope this presents somewhat a clearer description of the current status here. Do get back to if you would require more information in assisting me in resolving this. From you description of the problem it's looks like that win2k box can't make resolving of names to ip address. That's why I accent to firewall because according to you logs ipfw block port 137, which is used to resolve NetBIOS names to IP address. I make a little test and block port 137 on my PDC (Samba 2.2.4 on NetBSD) and results are the same as yours. If that is true (blocking of netbios-ns port) you PDC can't register as domain controler, and workstations when is joined to domain can't find who is PDC for this domain. What are you firewall rules? What's show nbtstat -A YOU_SAMBA_SERVER and nbtstat -c on win2k box? Thanks On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 22:26, D. Penev wrote: On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 07:33:58PM +0100, Stacey Roberts wrote: Subject: IPFW Rules for samba PDC? [WAS: samba PDC for WIN2K clients?] From: Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Andrew Boothman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], FreeBSD Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 21 Oct 2002 19:33:58 +0100 Hello, I'd appreciate some help from anyone who's got samba 2.2.6 running on FreeBSD as a PDC for Win2K client wkstations, please. I'm trying to following the SAMBA How-To at: http://samba.epfl.ch/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html#AEN60 but fail at the smbclient -L PDC host stage: # smbclient -L -N Demon added interface ip=192.168.1.8 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Packet send failed to 192.168.1.255(137) ERRNO=Permission denied Connection to -N failed # I get these entries in /var/log/security: Oct 21 19:31:08 Demon /kernel: ipfw: 910 Deny UDP My IP:2308 net.255:137 out via sis0 You firewall blocks packets to port 137 (netbios-ns). That's why you can access samba server with ip address and not by name. Please help me out here. Stacey On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 02:32, Andrew Boothman wrote: Stacey Roberts wrote: Hello, I've got 2 WIN2K Pro workstations on my home lan that I'd like to enable network logon for. I've been banging my head against a wall for the last four hours trying to get this sorted, but to no avail. I keep getting the same error when trying to enter
wu-imap question
Hi all. I'm using wu-imapd and I have a small, but annoying, problem. When I try to add a mailbox in Outlook Express, it of course downloads a list of folders...however, it returns 65k+ folders...most are files in the system. How do I prevent it from searching everywhere, or tell it specifically where to look for mail folders? Any ideas? Thanks, --Brian To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: dig . ns @b.root-servers.net - Connection refused. WHY? [related to FBSD 4.7 reset itself - lots of DENY UDP mess]ages in /var/log/security
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 06:29:16PM +, Stacey Roberts wrote: Subject: Re: dig . ns @b.root-servers.net - Connection refused. WHY? [related to FBSD 4.7 reset itself - lots of DENY UDP mess]ages in /var/log/security From: Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ruben de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], FreeBSD Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 27 Oct 2002 18:29:16 + Okay, I've been hacking about with my ipfw rules in order to nail this down, but I'm still coming up against a wall here.., I've made this change: # Allow out access to Internet Domain name server $fwcmd add 00617 allow tcp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup keep-state #$fwcmd add 00618 allow udp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup keep-state COMMENTED THIS OUT $fwcmd add 00618 allow udp from any to any 53 out via $oif You forget keep-state. You rule should be: $fwcmd add 00618 allow udp from any to any 53 out via $oif keep-state ^ | PUT THIS IN INSTEAD Now I try to query a root-server, I still get stopped by the firewall: # date Sun Oct 27 18:19:35 GMT 2002 # dig . ns @b.root-servers.net ; DiG 8.3 . ns @b.root-servers.net ; (1 server found) ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; res_nsend to server b.root-servers.net 128.9.0.107: Operation timed out Checking logs: # tail /var/log/security snip Oct 27 18:19:40 Demon /kernel: ipfw: 900 Deny UDP 128.9.0.107:53 192.168.1.8:1642 in via sis0 # The previous posted (see below) informed me that using setup / keep-state with udp is wrong. Given the changes I've made above, what are the magic statements to allow my to query the root servers and allow their responses back in? TIA Stacey On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 16:06, Ruben de Groot wrote: snip Verifying relevant ipfw rules: # Allow out access to Internet Domain name server $fwcmd add 00618 allow tcp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup keep-state $fwcmd add 00619 allow udp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup keep-state This last rule is bogus. From ipfw(8): setup Matches TCP packets that have the SYN bit set but no ACK bit. This is the short form of ``tcpflags syn,!ack''. setup is not supposed to work for UDP packets. there is no handshake as in tcp connections. Checking ipfw rule 910: $fwcmd add 00910 deny log logamount 500 ip from any to any Why am I not able to query root servers, given my rules 00618 00619? I'd appreciate someone helping me out here., (or hitting me over the head if I'm missing something simple and glaringly obvious) TIA Stacey -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com -- Regards, D. Penev To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: IPFW Rules for samba PDC? [WAS: samba PDC for WIN2K clients?]
Hi, I've got a break-through.., I've been testing with new ipfw options and now I'm able to get past entering the Domain and clicking OK. Now I am getting the Password to log into Domain dialogue box appear. This is the amended rule that appears to make this work: $fwcmd add 00622 allow log udp from $oip to me 137-139 in via $oif $fwcmd add 00624 allow udp from any to any 137-139 out via $oif However, for now, I'm getting: The specified user does not exist when I enter [root] and [root's samba passwd] Any thoughts? Don't think I'm not appreciating your patient efforts to assist me. Cheers! Stacey On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 17:56, D. Penev wrote: On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 10:50:47AM +, Stacey Roberts wrote: Subject: Re: IPFW Rules for samba PDC? [WAS: samba PDC for WIN2K clients?] From: Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: D. Penev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: FreeBSD Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 27 Oct 2002 10:50:47 + Hi, Here's the relevant lines in my firewall: 00620 allow udp from any to any 137 keep-state out xmit sis0 00621 allow tcp from any to any 137 keep-state out xmit sis0 Add: 00622 allow udp from Win2KBox to any 137,138 keep-state in recv sis0 00623 allow log logamount 10 tcp from Win2KBox to me 137,138 ^^ use any because win2k use broadcast if you don't have wins server keep-state in recv sis0 setup 00624 allow udp from any to any 138 keep-state out xmit sis0 00625 allow tcp from any to any 138 keep-state out xmit sis0 The output from nbtstat -A SAMBA_SERVER_IP: Host not found The output from nbtstat -c: No names in cache After running both commands, no new entries in /var/log/security appear for packets issued from Win2K box. Hope this helps. Stacey On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 07:15, D. Penev wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 10:47:48PM +0100, Stacey Roberts wrote: Subject: Re: IPFW Rules for samba PDC? [WAS: samba PDC for WIN2K clients?] From: Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: D. Penev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: FreeBSD Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 26 Oct 2002 22:47:48 +0100 Hi, Thanks for the reply. I should mention that I've made some progress with my efforts to set up a samba PDC for my Win2K clients. First of all I am now able to successfully complete all tests in the recommended DIAGNOSTICS.TXT at http://hr.uoregon.edu/davidrl/DIAGNOSIS.txt, except:- test 8: On the PC type the command net view \\BIGSERVER Specifically, I am only able to complete this test by using the IP Addr of the samba server in place of its name. Likewise for test 9 that follows. Recapping, I *am* able to serve share dirs to *NIX clients as well as the Win2K boxes, with the caveat that for the Windows boxes, I have to use the IP Addr of the samba server. This is not an issue for other (*NIX) client hosts. Needless to say, I am not as yet able to have the Win2K boxes join the domain as described in Chapter 9. (How to Configure Samba 2.2 as a Primary Domain Controller - 9.4.3. Joining the Client to the Domain.4.3. Joining the Client to the Domain). I still get the MS error when I click OK after entering the domain as defined in smb.conf. Hope this presents somewhat a clearer description of the current status here. Do get back to if you would require more information in assisting me in resolving this. From you description of the problem it's looks like that win2k box can't make resolving of names to ip address. That's why I accent to firewall because according to you logs ipfw block port 137, which is used to resolve NetBIOS names to IP address. I make a little test and block port 137 on my PDC (Samba 2.2.4 on NetBSD) and results are the same as yours. If that is true (blocking of netbios-ns port) you PDC can't register as domain controler, and workstations when is joined to domain can't find who is PDC for this domain. What are you firewall rules? What's show nbtstat -A YOU_SAMBA_SERVER and nbtstat -c on win2k box? Thanks On Sat, 2002-10-26 at 22:26, D. Penev wrote: On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 07:33:58PM +0100, Stacey Roberts wrote: Subject: IPFW Rules for samba PDC? [WAS: samba PDC for WIN2K clients?] From: Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Andrew Boothman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], FreeBSD Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 21 Oct 2002 19:33:58 +0100 Hello, I'd appreciate some help from anyone who's got samba 2.2.6 running on FreeBSD as a PDC for Win2K client wkstations, please. I'm trying to following the SAMBA How-To at: http://samba.epfl.ch/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html#AEN60 but fail at the smbclient -L PDC host stage: # smbclient -L -N Demon
res_nmkquery: buffer too small WAS[Re: dig . ns @b.root-servers.net- Connection refused. WHY? [related to FBSD 4.7 reset itself - lots ofDENY UDP mess]ages in /var/log/security]
Hi, I've made the changes to rule 00618 as you've suggested, but now I get a different error: # dig .ns @a.root-servers.net ; DiG 8.3 .ns @a.root-servers.net ; (1 server found) ;; res_nmkquery: buffer too small # dig .ns @b.root-servers.net ; DiG 8.3 .ns @b.root-servers.net ; (1 server found) ;; res_nmkquery: buffer too small # I'll not even pretend to know what that means.., Thanks for the pointer to what I missed out in the rule. Stacey On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 18:09, D. Penev wrote: You forget keep-state. You rule should be: $fwcmd add 00618 allow udp from any to any 53 out via $oif keep-state ^ | PUT THIS IN INSTEAD Now I try to query a root-server, I still get stopped by the firewall: # date Sun Oct 27 18:19:35 GMT 2002 # dig . ns @b.root-servers.net ; DiG 8.3 . ns @b.root-servers.net ; (1 server found) ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; res_nsend to server b.root-servers.net 128.9.0.107: Operation timed out On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 16:06, Ruben de Groot wrote: snip Verifying relevant ipfw rules: # Allow out access to Internet Domain name server $fwcmd add 00618 allow tcp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup keep-state $fwcmd add 00619 allow udp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup keep-state This last rule is bogus. From ipfw(8): setup Matches TCP packets that have the SYN bit set but no ACK bit. This is the short form of ``tcpflags syn,!ack''. setup is not supposed to work for UDP packets. there is no handshake as in tcp connections. Checking ipfw rule 910: $fwcmd add 00910 deny log logamount 500 ip from any to any Why am I not able to query root servers, given my rules 00618 00619? I'd appreciate someone helping me out here., (or hitting me over the head if I'm missing something simple and glaringly obvious) TIA Stacey -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com -- Regards, D. Penev To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Help! WordPerfect can't find /compat/linux/lib/ld-linux.so.1 !
!I was able to get older linux binaries to work by install the following !rpms from the Red Hat 6.1 distribution: ! !ld.so-1.9.5-13.i386.rpm !libc-5.3.12-31.i386.rpm ! !I did this by: !# /usr/compat/linux/bin/bash !# rpm -ivh ld.so-1.9.5-13.i386.rpm !# rpm -ivh libc-5.3.12-31.i386.rpm ! !Then you will need to add the library to the !/usr/compat/linux/etc/ld.so.conf file here are the directories listed in !my file: ! !/usr/lib !/usr/X11R6/lib !/usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib Following your suggestion, I pulled the following files off our other Toshiba still running 4.6-R (and linux_base-6): /compat/linux/lib/ld-linux.so.1 /compat/linux/lib/ld-linux.so.1.9.5 /compat/linux/lib/libdl.so.1.9.5 /compat/linux/lib/libdl.so.1 /compat/linux/usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libc.so.5 /compat/linux/usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libc.so.5.3.12 /compat/linux/usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libm.so.5 /compat/linux/usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libm.so.5.0.6 /compat/linux/usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libXt.so.6 /compat/linux/usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libXt.so.6.0 /compat/linux/usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libX11.so.6 /compat/linux/usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libX11.so.6.1 /compat/linux/usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libXpm.so.4 /compat/linux/usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libXpm.so.4.9 /compat/linux/usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libSM.so.6 /compat/linux/usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libSM.so.6.0 /compat/linux/usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libICE.so.6 /compat/linux/usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libICE.so.6.3 /compat/linux/usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libXext.so.6 /compat/linux/usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libXext.so.6.3 Both Acrobat 3 WordPerfect 8 for Linux are working again. How can we get this information back into linux_base-7 ? Thanks. -- Gary E. RAFE, PhD [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: openoffice install
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Daniel Harris wrote: Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 13:45:41 -0500 From: Daniel Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: openoffice install On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 07:40:24PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: I have a 10gb disk: ad0s1= ad0s1e (/usr/local - 3.7gb); ad0s2=4gb K(but this includes /,/tmp/,/usr (2.7gb),/var; and ad0s3 = ad0s3e (/usr/ports - 2gb). that looks like you don't have enough free space (anywhere). Note that http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ has binary packages which won't require those 4GB :-) -- Daniel Harris Wow! Thanks for the pointer - it runs like a top. JB # John Bleichert # http://vonbek.dhs.org/latest.jpg To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: FBSD doesn't install from CDROM Creative Infra 54
Ivan Sychev wrote: Hello! I have one question. Why FreeBSD don`t installing from my Creative CDROM(infra 54) 36x? Thank you. Hi Ivan, I assume (next time it would be nice you attach a dmesg output or some details 'bout the hardware your question is related to) your CDROM is an ATAPI CDROM, it's attached on the second channel an is jumpered as slave. If this is true, your computer configuration hits the ATAPI standards which say (in other words): an ATAPI slave device is allowed only if there is a master device on the same channel. So FBSD install cannot work right in that case, because your system lacks the standards. If my assumtion is wrong, please re-sent your question using a mail subject and submit a little more details, please. Greeting, Jens WBR, Ivan! To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message -- L i W W W i Jens Rehsack LW W W L i W W W W i nnnLiWing IT-Services L iW W W Wi n n g g i W W i n n g gFriesenstraße 2 06112 Halle g g g Tel.: +49 - 3 45 - 5 17 05 91ggg e-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +49 - 3 45 - 5 17 05 92http://www.liwing.de/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: openoffice install
At 01:45 PM 10/27/2002 -0500, you wrote: Note that http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ has binary packages which won't require those 4GB :-) Thanks for the tip, Daniel. I kind-of liked using portupgrade. It seems silly to need that much space for and installation. And I thought that MicroSlop was overbloated... :(( If you need 4gb for a proggie (alright, it does do a lot - I'll have to find outg just how lot) it would appear that we must now have 80gb disks or greater to function without hassles...:)) PJ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
usb controller not found
hi currently i just installed freebsd 4.5 release, but unfortunately it doesn't detect my NIC, then i realise that it doesn't detect My usb controller, which this error Msg appear, USB CONTROLLER NOT FOUND i tried reading the FAQ and other troubleshooting page, but just couldn't find the answer to solve the problem, i'm sure my usb controller isn't spoiled, as my windows can detect it, i'm doing a dual boot on the harddisk. so i would like to ask, how do i make freebsd able to detect my usb controller, or how do i install the usb NIC, when the USB controller not found. hardwares: intel 82371 AB / EB PCI to USB Universal Host Controller Smartnic USB network card, 1500 __ Do You Yahoo!? Great flight deals, travel info and prizes! http://sg.travel.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: HP scanjet 2200c USB w/sane on current How to Configure
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 09:36:49 -0800 Edwin Culp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have just installed sane 1.0.9, backends and frontends on my laptop running current, cvsuped, built and rebooted this morning. The hp-2200c seems to be recognized on boot up. The dmesg follows: usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uscanner0: Hewlett-Packard HP ScanJet 2200C, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2 I try sane-find-scanner and it says found USB scanner (UNKNOWN vendor and product) at device /dev/uscanner0 rather than the HP2200C that I was expecting. When I try: scanimage -d hp:/dev/uscanner0 /tmp/h.pnm I get: scanimage: open of device hp:/dev/uscanner0 failed: Error during device I/O I'm sure that I need to configure something else but after reading the README.freebsd, README and the man pages for sane, sane-hp, uscanner and others, I can't for the life of me find it. xscanimage gives a similar message: [xscanimage] No scanners were identified. Any help will be greatly appreciated. I did test it under windows, btw, so the hardware is working. Thanks, ed Hi, did you add [usb] 0x03F0 0x0605 device /dev/uscanner0 to plustek.conf in /usr/local/etc/sane.d ? I also had to enable UHCI and OHCI in kernel-config, although I only see OHCI in dmesg. So make sure you didn't comment it out like I did. Holger To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
TCPA / Palladium
Hello there :) I recently came across an article about TCPA and Palladium. I didn't like what I read in it and want to know if *BSD was likely to become overwhelmed by it as I can see a time when the Internet will become divided between the two camps (TCPA and non-TCPA) where services between the two will not be compatible. How can we overcome this and are there any pojects or movements underway to combat it? I don't want Microsoft to get any more power than it already has. Thanks fo your time and I look forward to hearing from you shortly. Adrian. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: dig . ns @b.root-servers.net - Connection refused. WHY?[related to FBSD 4.7 reset itself - lots of DENY UDP mess]ages in/var/log/security
Hello, Thought you'd like to know that the amendments you suggested works for me now. Thank you very much for the time and effort! See: $ dig . ns @c.root-servers.net ; DiG 8.3 . ns @c.root-servers.net ; (1 server found) ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; got answer: ;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 4 ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 13, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 13 ;; QUERY SECTION: ;; ., type = NS, class = IN ;; ANSWER SECTION: . 6D IN NSL.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NSM.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NSI.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NSE.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NSD.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NSA.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NSH.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NSC.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NSG.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NSF.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NSB.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NSJ.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. . 6D IN NSK.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A198.32.64.12 M.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A202.12.27.33 I.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A192.36.148.17 E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A192.203.230.10 D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A128.8.10.90 A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A198.41.0.4 H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A128.63.2.53 C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A192.33.4.12 G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A192.112.36.4 F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A192.5.5.241 B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A128.9.0.107 J.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A198.41.0.10 K.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 5w6d16h IN A193.0.14.129 ;; Total query time: 229 msec ;; FROM: Demon.vickiandstacey.com to SERVER: c.root-servers.net 192.33.4.12 ;; WHEN: Sun Oct 27 20:41:04 2002 ;; MSG SIZE sent: 17 rcvd: 436 $ On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 18:09, D. Penev wrote: On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 06:29:16PM +, Stacey Roberts wrote: Subject: Re: dig . ns @b.root-servers.net - Connection refused. WHY? [related to FBSD 4.7 reset itself - lots of DENY UDP mess]ages in /var/log/security From: Stacey Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ruben de Groot [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], FreeBSD Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 27 Oct 2002 18:29:16 + Okay, I've been hacking about with my ipfw rules in order to nail this down, but I'm still coming up against a wall here.., I've made this change: # Allow out access to Internet Domain name server $fwcmd add 00617 allow tcp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup keep-state #$fwcmd add 00618 allow udp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup keep-state COMMENTED THIS OUT $fwcmd add 00618 allow udp from any to any 53 out via $oif You forget keep-state. You rule should be: $fwcmd add 00618 allow udp from any to any 53 out via $oif keep-state ^ | PUT THIS IN INSTEAD Now I try to query a root-server, I still get stopped by the firewall: # date Sun Oct 27 18:19:35 GMT 2002 # dig . ns @b.root-servers.net ; DiG 8.3 . ns @b.root-servers.net ; (1 server found) ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; res_nsend to server b.root-servers.net 128.9.0.107: Operation timed out Checking logs: # tail /var/log/security snip Oct 27 18:19:40 Demon /kernel: ipfw: 900 Deny UDP 128.9.0.107:53 192.168.1.8:1642 in via sis0 # The previous posted (see below) informed me that using setup / keep-state with udp is wrong. Given the changes I've made above, what are the magic statements to allow my to query the root servers and allow their responses back in? TIA Stacey On Sun, 2002-10-27 at 16:06, Ruben de Groot wrote: snip Verifying relevant ipfw rules: # Allow out access to Internet Domain name server $fwcmd add 00618 allow tcp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup keep-state $fwcmd add 00619 allow udp from any to any 53 out via $oif setup keep-state This last rule is bogus. From ipfw(8): setup Matches TCP packets that have the SYN bit set but no ACK bit. This is the short form of ``tcpflags syn,!ack''. setup is not supposed to work for UDP packets. there is no handshake as in tcp connections. Checking ipfw rule 910: $fwcmd add 00910 deny log logamount 500 ip from any to any Why am I not able to query root servers, given my rules 00618 00619? I'd appreciate someone helping me out here., (or hitting me over the head if I'm missing something simple and glaringly obvious) TIA Stacey -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science
instaling a prebuilt kernel
im trying to install a prebuilt kernel om my freebsd 4.6 but im getting premision deny and the kernel i set to 666 and then im trying to change it il get prenision deny again. anyone knowing how to to REGARDS Leo To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
aclocal.m4: AM_CONFIG_HEADER error
What does this mean, and how can one solve it? I'm using automake14 and autoconf213. I know little information is given, but someone must have seen this (and maybe know what's going on), or? aclocal.m4: 4716: `automake requires `AM_CONFIG_ HEADER', not `AC_CONFIG_HEADER' configure.in: 4716: required file `./$@)].in' not found Thanks in advance! Best regards, Paul To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: instaling a prebuilt kernel
Leo De Geer wrote: im trying to install a prebuilt kernel om my freebsd 4.6 but im getting premision deny and the kernel i set to 666 and then im trying to change it il get prenision deny again. anyone knowing how to to For starters, I think you are bumping into the chflags option, which is set on kernel. You can see the setting if you run something like ls -lso from /. You have to turn it off to modify the kernel and turn it back on when you are through. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: openoffice install
At 02:26 PM 10/27/2002 -0500, you wrote: On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Daniel Harris wrote: Note that http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ has binary packages which won't require those 4GB :-) -- Daniel Harris Wow! Thanks for the pointer - it runs like a top. The installation was incredibly simple - none of that portupgrade stuff of waiting eons to install a program. Just One question for now: I am using Cups and it works fine on all counts. But the page that OO printed out was pretty awful. I have an Epson Stylus Color 900 that works very well with Cups and from Win2k through samba. But I don't know how the OO printing system is organized. It uses the default printer bit it seems to be using OO drivers and those are way out of date. The question: what do I do to configure printing from OO for the high quality that I usually get from other programs? Thanks for any help. PJ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: samba PDC for WIN2K clients?
Hi Andrew I've managed to get past the initial problems I posted about. I am now able to enter the Domain and now clicking OK brings up the Domain Username and Password dialogue box. However, entering username: root / passwd: root's samba passwd brings up The specified user does not exist. As a test, I tried it with root and gibberish for a passwd. This returns: Login Failure: unknown username of bad password. This appears in the logs: # tail /var/log/log.nmbd [2002/10/27 21:30:24, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(69) process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.1.6: code = 0x12 # The Win2K machine's name is in /etc/passwd (with the $ at the end) as well as in smbpasswd files. I have added a samba account for root (with a different passwd to that of the system) What could be this problem at this stage? Stacey On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 02:32, Andrew Boothman wrote: Stacey Roberts wrote: Hello, I've got 2 WIN2K Pro workstations on my home lan that I'd like to enable network logon for. I've been banging my head against a wall for the last four hours trying to get this sorted, but to no avail. I keep getting the same error when trying to enter the Domain name into the WORKGROUP field in Win2K network properties: The following error occured validating the name my_domainname, This condition may be caused by a DNS lookup problem. For more information about troubleshooting common DNS lookup problems see the following Microsoft blah., blah.., blah.., The specified domain either does not exist or could not be contacted. Have you added machine accounts to the FreeBSD box for the client boxes? You need machine accounts that look like clientname$ (dollar sign at end) added both as local accounts and then again with smbpasswd passing whatever the appropriate switch is to create a machine account. I have a FreeBSD box here acting as a PDC so we should be able to find the problem. Andrew. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: COmpiling error
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 08:59:16AM +0100, Jack Raats wrote: cisco etc). I've checked and rechecked the hardware. Can anyone give me a clue? So far it sounds exactly like hardware failure. You need to post more details. Kris msg06781/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: port installations failing
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 01:08:04PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote: Hi, since upgrading to 4.7-STABLE, i have some strange behaviour when i try to install or upgrade some ports, for example xchat. The config fails with the message: configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables. Other ports are upgrading without this problem. I've rebuild the entire gcc3.0, but i get the same error. FreeBSD 4.x does not use gcc 3.0. Did you mis-speak, or have you really been playing with the compiler? Kris msg06783/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: openoffice install
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 01:16:22PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anybody know just what is required to install OpenOffice on FBSD 4.7. I think their message that 4Gb is required is a little naive just where should this 4gb be available. On the partition on which you are building. In my present attempt to install OO on the test machine, the file system became full... Som now what? Free up more space or use the package. Kris msg06784/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Starting natd
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 02:18:21PM -0500, Robert Hall wrote: I'm using kernel ppp (pppd). It is already set up and it runs. I have set up FreeBSD boxes before with this configuration, and natd started automatically and ran without any intervention on my part. For some reason, it doesn't do that this time, and I have to start it manually. I'm hoping someone can tell me why, so I can fix it. I have a dialup workstation with no ethernet card found that starting natd with tun0 down resulted in natd trying to contact ntp servers using a source address of 127.0.0.1. It would not pick up tun0's address when tun0 was brought up. Jeff To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: SMP problems
On Sun Oct 27, 2002; 11:51AM +0100 Roelf Schreurs propagated the following: Top only shows 1 CPU and not 2. Yes. The 'CPU' line is a combination of the activity measured on both CPUs. You should pay more attention to the stuff in your dmesg (namely this stuff quoted here:) FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 1, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 cpu1 (AP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee0 On my SMP machine I have exactly the same behavior. Don't get too worried about it. :) I think you are right (eg don't be worried), although I believe some vendors have modified their proprietary versions of *NIX and TOP so theirs show numbers of CPUs in a special way. I have seen them, but don't remember clearly. Anyway, maybe he was influenced by something like these. jerry -wd -- chip norkus; unix geek and programmer; [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: openoffice install
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 15:34:07 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Daniel Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: openoffice install At 01:45 PM 10/27/2002 -0500, you wrote: Note that http://projects.imp.ch/openoffice/ has binary packages which won't require those 4GB :-) Thanks for the tip, Daniel. I kind-of liked using portupgrade. It seems silly to need that much space for and installation. And I thought that MicroSlop was overbloated... :(( If you need 4gb for a proggie (alright, it does do a lot - I'll have to find outg just how lot) it would appear that we must now have 80gb disks or greater to function without hassles...:)) PJ I think the space requirements for the 'port' are for all the temporary compile-time files. The pre-built package itself is fairly small. 4 GB is a *lot* of space though ... X( JB # John Bleichert # http://vonbek.dhs.org/latest.jpg To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Starting natd
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 02:18:21PM -0500, Robert Hall wrote: Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 14:18:21 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Robert Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Starting natd At 11:41 PM 10/26/2002 +0300, you wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 02:18:01PM -0500, Robert Hall wrote: Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:18:01 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Robert Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Starting natd I'm setting up a FBSD 4.4 box as a gateway. I've got natd_enable=YES natd_interface=ppp0 in rc.config, but I can't get natd to run without entering natd -interface ppp0 at the comand prompt. I assume this is a configuration problem, but I've been through the files several times and can't find an error. Can someone tell me how to get natd to run automatically? If you use user ppp ( ppp(8) not pppd(8)) I suggest you to use build in nat in rc.conf : ppp_nat=YES But if you for some reasons want to use natd, then you must first start ppp or pppd before starting natd. Note if you use ppp set interface to tun0 not to ppp0. I'm using kernel ppp (pppd). It is already set up and it runs. I have set up FreeBSD boxes before with this configuration, and natd started automatically and ran without any intervention on my part. For some reason, it doesn't do that this time, and I have to start it manually. I'm hoping someone can tell me why, so I can fix it. Put in rc.conf: natd_flags=-dynamic Bob Hall To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message -- Regards, D. Penev To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: port installations failing
I had the problem before. I thought maybe some parts of my compiler are broken and installed the port of gcc 3.0. Wich one is the right one? On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 01:08:04PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote: Hi, since upgrading to 4.7-STABLE, i have some strange behaviour when i try to install or upgrade some ports, for example xchat. The config fails with the message: configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables. Other ports are upgrading without this problem. I've rebuild the entire gcc3.0, but i get the same error. FreeBSD 4.x does not use gcc 3.0. Did you mis-speak, or have you really been playing with the compiler? Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Sendmail .forward
On Saturday 26 October 2002 11:23 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I am afraid I don't understand the instructions that I have found on Sendmail. What I want done is for mail that is sent to me to also go to my pager. (which is internet email addressable.) There are two ways you might go about doing this. You can either use a .forward file to forward ALL of your mail to another address, or you can set up an alias that forwards all of its mail to another address, and subscribe the alias to the mailing list. I have tried to figure out how to use forward, but haven't gotten it to work. Where is the forward statement supposed to be and how do I use it? (And can I use the forward command to also forward mail to my pager?) To use .forward, create a file in your home directory and name the file .forward. Don't forget the . at the beginning of the file name. Edit the file so it contains a list of addresses that you want your email forwarded to, one address per line. You don't actually use a command named forward. To set up an alias, become the root user (or use sudo) and edit /etc/mail/aliases. Create an entry that looks something like freddy: [EMAIL PROTECTED],fred After you are done editing the aliases file, run the command newaliases. This will create an alias freddy for whom all mail will be forwarded to the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] and to the local user fred. Then subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the mailing list of interest. The aliases(5) man page will give you a few more details about this. - Bob To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: HP scanjet 2200c USB w/sane on current How to Configure
Quoting Holger Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 09:36:49 -0800 | Edwin Culp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | I have just installed sane 1.0.9, backends and frontends on my laptop | running | current, cvsuped, built and rebooted this morning. | | The hp-2200c seems to be recognized on boot up. The dmesg follows: | | usb0: USB revision 1.0 | uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 | uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered | uscanner0: Hewlett-Packard HP ScanJet 2200C, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2 | | I try sane-find-scanner and it says | | found USB scanner (UNKNOWN vendor and product) at device /dev/uscanner0 | | rather than the HP2200C that I was expecting. | | When I try: scanimage -d hp:/dev/uscanner0 /tmp/h.pnm | | I get: | | scanimage: open of device hp:/dev/uscanner0 failed: Error during device | I/O | | I'm sure that I need to configure something else but after reading the | README.freebsd, README and the man pages for sane, sane-hp, uscanner and | others, I can't for the life of me find it. xscanimage gives a similar | message: | | [xscanimage] No scanners were identified. | | Any help will be greatly appreciated. I did test it under windows, btw, | so | the hardware is working. | | Thanks, | | ed | | Hi, | did you add | [usb] 0x03F0 0x0605 | device /dev/uscanner0 | to plustek.conf in /usr/local/etc/sane.d ? I also had to enable UHCI and | OHCI in kernel-config, although I only see OHCI in dmesg. So make sure you | didn't comment it out like I did. Holger, Thanks. I was using the hp.conf rather than the plustek. With your help it is now working although it is only scanning about 1/8 of a page. I'm much closer and now I am certain it is a configuration thing. I still isn't recognized with sane-find-scanner but I don't care if I can just get it to work.:-) BTW, I have both uhic and ohic compiled in the kernel but it doesn't show in dmesg.??? Can you see both in your dmesg? I had always thought that I didn't see both was because uhic was for one family of controlers and that ohic was for another. Maybe that is part of my very small scaning area. Where did you find the 0x03F0 0x0605 address? Could my scanner be different? Thanks again. ed | | Holger | -- - To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: remote mounting of UNIX directories
From: michael sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/10/27 Sun PM 06:15:12 EST To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: remote mounting of UNIX directories Its my understanding a windows box CANNOT mount a /home/user a remote fbsd server, only those on the same local network. Am I correct? Not exactly. If you configure Samba then you can share /home/user so Windows users can see it just like any other shared location. If you configure NFS, and install NFS utils on Windows, then a Windows user can access it like any other Unix box might. Work like you don't need the money Dance like nobody's watching Love like you've never been hurt To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: WWW docs via cvsup
Steve Wingate [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I cvsup'ed the www-supfile, expecting to find basic html docs. I see now that they're .xsl nowadays. I tried to open one of the index.xsl files in Mozilla and it appeared unformatted. What do I have to do read these docs? TIA. Either build them (see the documentation project handbook) or better yet, download them pre-built. As the handbook says, right up front: The latest version of this document is always available from the FreeBSD web site. It may also be downloaded in a variety of formats and compression options from the FreeBSD FTP server or one of the numerous mirror sites. If you would prefer to have a hard copy of the handbook, you can purchase one at the FreeBSD Mall. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Starting natd
At 12:18 AM 10/28/2002 +0200, D. Penev wrote: On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 02:18:21PM -0500, Robert Hall wrote: Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 14:18:21 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Robert Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Starting natd At 11:41 PM 10/26/2002 +0300, you wrote: On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 02:18:01PM -0500, Robert Hall wrote: Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:18:01 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Robert Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Starting natd I'm setting up a FBSD 4.4 box as a gateway. I've got natd_enable=YES natd_interface=ppp0 in rc.config, but I can't get natd to run without entering natd -interface ppp0 at the comand prompt. I assume this is a configuration problem, but I've been through the files several times and can't find an error. Can someone tell me how to get natd to run automatically? If you use user ppp ( ppp(8) not pppd(8)) I suggest you to use build in nat in rc.conf : ppp_nat=YES But if you for some reasons want to use natd, then you must first start ppp or pppd before starting natd. Note if you use ppp set interface to tun0 not to ppp0. I'm using kernel ppp (pppd). It is already set up and it runs. I have set up FreeBSD boxes before with this configuration, and natd started automatically and ran without any intervention on my part. For some reason, it doesn't do that this time, and I have to start it manually. I'm hoping someone can tell me why, so I can fix it. Put in rc.conf: natd_flags=-dynamic Thanks, that did it. But I've never needed that flag before. Bob Hall To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: aclocal.m4: AM_CONFIG_HEADER error
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 09:57:21PM +0100, Paul Everlund wrote: What does this mean, and how can one solve it? I'm using automake14 and autoconf213. I know little information is given, but someone must have seen this (and maybe know what's going on), or? aclocal.m4: 4716: `automake requires `AM_CONFIG_ HEADER', not `AC_CONFIG_HEADER' configure.in: 4716: required file `./$@)].in' not found Paul, install the devel/autobook port, and that should help you a lot. Also, get the full manuals from ftp.gnu.org for the versions of autoconf and automake you are using. This is just a side effect of there being 2 programs where there should be one. -- Alan Eldridge Unix/C(++) IT Pro, 20 yrs, seeking new employment. (http://wwweasel.geeksrus.net/~alane/resume.txt) KDE, KDE-FreeBSD Teams (http://www.kde.org, http://freebsd.kde.org/) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Install FreeBSD 4.4 into EXTENDED Partition
Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just to be clear; it *can* use extended partitions for disk space. It's just that the BIOS can't boot from them, and therefore the standard FreeBSD installer won't *install* into one. In theory, you can get around this, but not with the standard installer. Just to be clear: the BIOS can boot from them, as it does in many people's Linux setups. FreeBSD booting software and utils just don't support it. Probably because there is small reward for anyone who is ABLE to change FreeBSD to DO so. They don't need the capability much. (FreeBSD would either have to be able (like Linux) to use the same secondary-partitioning scheme as IBM did or FreeBSD would have to be able to shoehorn its slices in, supporting a tertiary-partitioning scheme.) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: burncd wierdness
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, Joel Mc Graw wrote: Every time I burn a cd with the following line: burncd -f /dev/acd0c -e file.to.burn fixate ^ Don't you need the data or audio keyword in there? it creates a perfect CD, but upon ejecting (the -e switch), the CD drive dies. The tray stays in the out position, even when pushing the external eject/load button, and the only way I can regain access to the drive is by rebooting. This is an IDE SONY CD-RW on FreeBSD 4.5-R (i386). Any thoughts on what might be wrong? What model of drive? I've used an HP 8X and a Sony 40X (CR195) successfully. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: HP scanjet 2200c USB w/sane on current How to Configure
Quoting Edwin Culp [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | Quoting Holger Bauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | I've got it all working with gimp now. Thanks. ed - To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
KDE does funny things to audio
I normally don't use KDE, just Sawfish and an xterm. But I was setting up an account on this box with KDE for a Windows-using friend. All works well except the sound ... Although starting the KDE session it works okay (system sounds, MP3s, Oggs), after a while something goes funny and all sound comes out as mangled noise. This persists on exiting KDE and returning to the command line (e.g. testing with mpg123). This is KDE 3.0.0 on FreeBSD 4.6.2. Has anyone else had this happen? What's causing it? Is there an easy way to kick the audio driver into behaving, e/g/ unloading and reloading it, in FreeBSD? - d. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
tool for generating pkts with ip precedence
hi, anyone knows of a tool (in ports may be) that would generate ip packets with a predefined ip precedence? I need that to be able to experiment with cisco and QoS. thanks, slava. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: tool for generating pkts with ip precedence
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002, User sl wrote: hi, anyone knows of a tool (in ports may be) that would generate ip packets with a predefined ip precedence? I need that to be able to experiment with cisco and QoS. /net/ipsorc provides a pretty GUI that allows you to set the TOS field. /security/hping is command line, but hping --tos help is helpful Dru To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
IPFW fwd doesn't seem to work
Hello, I run a small ISP in florida, and have decided to implement a squid proxy. I've got everything configured except the ipfw forward rule on the bridge/firewall. The basic layout isrouter --- bridge/firewall -- switch to other servers I've added a rule to allow traffic from the proxy machine, out to the internet. ipfw add pass tcp from 123.123.123.123 to any 80 I then have a rule that is supposed to forward the other port 80 requests to another ip/port. ipfw add fwd 123.123.123.124,3128 log tcp from 123.123.123.0/24 to any 80 Now, /var/log/security shows the rule as matching but the proxy machine never see's the traffic. Any ideas on what I'm doing wrong? Jeff Palmer http://www.pci2.net http://boards.pci2.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
splitting NAT rules with ipfw?
Right now, I have my ipfw rules running every packet through natd very close to the beginning of my firewall rules: 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 00400 deny log logamount 100 ip from INTERNAL to any in recv ed0 00500 deny log logamount 100 ip from EXTERNAL to any in recv xl0 00600 divert 8668 ip from any to any via ed0 (ed0: external interface) (xl0: internal interface) Right now, this sends almost every packet through natd. I'd like to be able to split the natd rules into an outgoing from the internal network rule and an incoming to the internal network rule so that I have something like the following: ipfw divert natd ip from INTERNAL to any via ed0 [ INCOMING FILTERING RULES on ed0 ] and then have incoming packets that get through the rules be passed to natd so they can be sent to the internal network if necessary. But the only setup I can get working is the one I already have. Anyone have any ideas, or does the divert natd have to be just one rule? -- Soren Harward [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
redistribution of 2 .so files
Hi, after reading FreeBSD's license at http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html I want to clearify if this also applies when only two system libraries taken from FreeBSD 4.x should be offered in binary form, to download from a commercial website, included in a tar.gz package. In particular, I am asking to redistribute libc.so.3 and libutil.so.2. Is it sufficient to just include all the text from the license page mentioned above in a ReadMe.txt file or a separate license.txt file? Thank you! -- rob. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Corrupt vinum concatenated drive -- Hardware?
I had something happen to my concatenated vinum drive. Looking at /var/log/messages I think it may be calling out a hardware problem on one of my drives. This configuration has been running for a week or so without complaining. I call myself VERY green with vinum and I would appreciate someone looking over my sholder. From messsages: ad7: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata3: resetting devices .. done ad7: WRITE command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata3: resetting devices .. done ad7: WRITE command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata3: resetting devices .. ad7: removed from configuration vinum: FreeBSD.p0.s2 is stale by force vinum: FreeBSD.p0 is corrupt fatal :FreeBSD.p0.s2 write error, block15846552 for 65536 bytes FreeBSD.p0.s2: user buffer block 120283440 for 65536 bytes vinumdrive2: fatal drive I/O error, block 15846552 for 65536 bytes vinum: drive vinumdrive2 is down I checked the output from disklabel -r for ad5, 6, and 7. The sizes for vinum agree with the values for C: (I'm having problems with cut and paste otherwise I'd provide the actual output.) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Corrupt vinum concatenated drive -- Hardware?
On Sunday, 27 October 2002 at 22:21:34 -0500, Tom Parquette wrote: I had something happen to my concatenated vinum drive. Looking at /var/log/messages I think it may be calling out a hardware problem on one of my drives. This configuration has been running for a week or so without complaining. I call myself VERY green with vinum and I would appreciate someone looking over my sholder. From messsages: ad7: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata3: resetting devices .. done ad7: WRITE command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata3: resetting devices .. done ad7: WRITE command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata3: resetting devices .. ad7: removed from configuration Yup, the disk driver has deleted the drive. It doesn't usually mean that there's much in the way of data corruption. Check your cables and things. vinum: FreeBSD.p0.s2 is stale by force vinum: FreeBSD.p0 is corrupt fatal :FreeBSD.p0.s2 write error, block15846552 for 65536 bytes FreeBSD.p0.s2: user buffer block 120283440 for 65536 bytes vinumdrive2: fatal drive I/O error, block 15846552 for 65536 bytes vinum: drive vinumdrive2 is down And this is Vinum's reaction. I checked the output from disklabel -r for ad5, 6, and 7. The sizes for vinum agree with the values for C: The first thing you need to do is fix the hardware issue. Try doing dd if=/dev/ad7c of=/dev/null bs=64k. That will copy the data to the bit bucket, and if there are any problems, you should see them there. What you do with Vinum depends on the configuration. If you have another plex in an affected volume, you'll need to restart the plex. If it's the only one, you can use maintenance commands like setstate and saveconfig to get it back up again. (I'm having problems with cut and paste otherwise I'd provide the actual output.) Don't cut and past, save the information to a file. Most of that stuff is in the system log file /var/run/messages anyway. Just include it in your message. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: redistribution of 2 .so files
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-28 04:27:19 +0100: after reading FreeBSD's license at http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html I want to clearify if this also applies when only two system libraries taken from FreeBSD 4.x should be offered in binary form, to download from a commercial website, included in a tar.gz package. In particular, I am asking to redistribute libc.so.3 and libutil.so.2. Is it sufficient to just include all the text from the license page mentioned above in a ReadMe.txt file or a separate license.txt file? IANAL, but yes. -- If you cc me or take the list(s) out completely I'll most likely ignore your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Home network design
I have been playing around with different configurations for my home network for some time and while I have learned much of the specifics, I remain dissatisfied with my general concepts. I hope someone can offer some clarity to my designs, and then I should be able to solve the specifics (I hope) with time and study. I have a cable connection through ATTBI (1-5 dynamic IP's available at $5/month a piece after the first, no truly static IP's). I have three registered domains (mynet1.net, mynet2.net, mynet3.net) and can work out dynamic dns using available free resources. I have 4 user pc's (win98se, nt4 workstation, win2k, winxp mix) that need constant connection, a networked ps2 (needed as I'm a beta tester), an occasionally laptop connection needed (win2k or xp), and I'd like to be able to let 1-5 people drop in whenever for lan parties. I also have 4 constant servers built (2 freebsd, 1 will be sol linux when it arrives, 1 linux of oft changing flavor), and I also have one borrowed server which I'm currently using for my Novell training which may eventually join the network (undecided yet). Network hardware currently available: 5 port switch, router w/ 4 port switch, 4 port hub, and I'm picking up an 8 port switch next week sometime. I have 2 public websites to host and one which I use purely for testing and fun. I have had ftp, irc, mail (only for my private domain, not the two others), nntp, and a game server running publicly. I have remote storage (a private fileserver for friends (mostly mp3 and video)) and a mysql server which are not for public use but which DO need to be fully accessible from any location (as well as desiring remote network management just for showing off). I'd like to be moderately secure, although I'm not talking about fortune 500 class sensitive material. If nothing else, I'm doing all this to broaden my skills and experience and have a little fun. Where I start to break down is deciding what to do as far as how many ip's to get and where to assign them. Do I build a full DMZ, or use a 3rd nic DMZ out of a firewall gateway, or just lump them altogether?Should I run the servers each with the public IP's and share the private systems behind NAT, or the other way around, or should everything use NAT behind a single or maybe two public IP's? So far I've compiled about 11 different network designs but don't have enough knowledge to know the pro's and cons each would present. Can anyone suggest an appropriate physical layout and address scheme (and if anyone is feeling REALLY helpful how they would break down the application load across the different machines (ie what services would play together nicely residing on the same server)? _ Unlimited Internet access -- and 2 months free! Try MSN. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: NFS from win to fbsd
On Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:50:47 -0500 (EST) Michael Sharp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone know of a decent, free NFS client for win32 that can access exports from my fbsd nfsd? How about 30 Free Trial? NFS Maestro (http://www.hummingbird.com/) -- Cogeco ergo sum msg06813/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
