Re: Building FreeBSD to install or update in two DESTDIRs

2012-05-15 Thread Polytropon
On Mon, 14 May 2012 20:45:51 -0400, Thomas Mueller wrote:
 I guess after the first installkernel, to default location,
 I should immediately make installkernel again, this time with
 DESTDIR=/mnt?

That should be possible, you only have to make sure that both
install targets are fine with the kernel you just built (e. g.
both i386 _or_ amd64).



 Better to make buildkernel and make installkernel as two
 separate steps, rather than make kernel?

Yes. You only need to make buildkernel once, then make installkernel
for both $DESTDIRs.



 After rebooting single-user, do mergemaster -p,
 then mergemaster -p -D /mnt, and then make installworld and
 immediately following that, make installworld DESTDIR=/mnt ?

Refer to the commend header in /usr/src/Makefile for the
correct procedure. Without having it tested, the following
commands in SUM (after you have successfully installed the
new kernels) should work as intended:

# merpemaster -p
# make installworld
# make delete-old
# mergemaster

# merpemaster -p -D /mnt
# make installworld DESTDIR=/mnt
# make delete-old DESTDIR=/mnt
# mergemaster -D /mnt

# reboot

Also see the comment regarding make delete-old-libs to be
applied after reboot correspondingly.



 After that, I would do mergemaster -i followed by
 mergemaster -i -D /mnt?  And then make delete-old followed
 by DESTDIR=/mnt make delete-old? 

It should be possible to pass DESTDIR= to make instead of prefixing
make with it. The parameter seems to be applied for _any_ of the
targets (as long as it would affect that target). You can add
additional parameters to the mergemaster examples above (such
as -i).



 Would I need to do make distribution?

I don't think so, unless you want to create a distribution media.



 First time, make installkernel DESTDIR=/mnt only installed part. 

What parts (of the kernel set) have been installed? To observe
differences, it might be helpful to save a `ls` or `ls -lR`
output before and after the installation and compare them.



 I installed to USB stick only after fully upgrading on main
 installation, finally copied /boot/kernel directory, and that
 USB stick is now bootable.  So now I know how to make a USB
 stick bootable with GPT.

Maybe kernel modules for GPT have been missing? Check /etc/src.conf
for any strange settings, see man 3 src.conf for details. You
can use this file to customize and tweak your builds.


 
 Maybe some of the files were cleaned out?

I'm not sure in how far the install* targets to remove files.
I suppose they will overwrite files if required...



 It is surely useful to have a rescue backup, considering the
 possibility of an update going awry on the main installation.

That's right. :-)




-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: This does look strange

2012-05-15 Thread Polytropon
On Tue, 15 May 2012 11:11:44 +0200, Bernt Hansson wrote:
 Hello list
 
 After a reinstall of winxp, yes I know but the games.

You like playing with obsoleted OS imitations, that's okay. :-)



 I have a fat32 slice/partition/postcard whatever it's called.

It should be called a slice, because slice refers to a DOS
primary partition, and those are covered with a FAT or NTFS
file system directly (unlike BSD which puts partitions into
a slice to carry more than one file system).

But postcard is also okay. :-)



 Mocking me with:
 
 testbox# fsck -y -t msdosfs /dev/ad4
 ** /dev/ad4
 Invalid signature in fsinfo block
 Fix? yes
 fsck: /dev/ad4: Floating point exception: 8
 testbox#

Very strage. You're not supposed to fsck /dev/ad4 I think,
but you should name the _slice_ where Windows XP is installed
on. That should be something like /dev/ad4s1 (if it's the
1st primary partition on that disk).

Furthermore, -t msdosfs looks strange. As far as I know, the
newer versions of Windows come with NTFS as the primary
file losing system, so -t ntfs should be worth a try.

The command should be something like that:

# fsck -y -t ntfs /dev/ad4s1

or

# fsck -y -t msdosfs /dev/ad4s1

if you have _not_ formatted the postcard using NTFS, but FAT
(which corresponds to msdosfs).



 Anyone know what to do, is there a msdosfs fsck?

Yes, it's a native tool called CHKDSK.EXE. :-)

Really: You should first use the native tools provided by
Windows to fix a problem that seems to be a Windows
problem. If everything fails, you can always relapse to
forensic tools running on FreeBSD, or simply load your
backup sets.

There's also emulators/mtools in the ports collection
which might contain tools useful in this situation.

If you've just accidentally tried to fsck the wrong device
file, just forget everything I mentioned and use the correct
one. However, I'm not fully sure if FreeBSD's fsck can be
used to _really_ perform file system checks on FAT or NTFS
partitions, erm postcards.



-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Xen/VM?

2012-05-15 Thread Siju George
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
i...@juanfra.info wrote:

 Dfly doesn't support Xen. Some providers support HVM (not Amazon) and
 you can give a try to dfly in this environment. I don't know if dfly
 works on Xen HVM or not. Probably the performance will be poor.


Actually FreeBSD now runs on Amazon using HVM.
http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2012-01-16-FreeBSD-now-on-all-EC2-instance-types.html

I guess something similar can be done with dragonfly as well.

Currently Amazon detects HVM instances as Windows instances and charge
you the MS windows licence fee.

Recently I attended a training by Amazon in Bangalore and I raised
this issue during the Question  Answer session to the Amazon folks.

The reply I got was that this work to get FreeBSD running without the
additional cost is in their to-do list but it is not of high priority.
To make them increase the priority one thing that can be done is for
users to mention or request it in their forums. The discussions
happening in the forums adds to the priority of a task.

So I guess the user group can make this happen fast if the
requirements are made known in their forum.

https://forums.aws.amazon.com/forum.jspa?forumID=30

Thanks

Siju
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: This does look strange

2012-05-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar

After a reinstall of winxp, yes I know but the games.

I have a fat32 slice/partition/postcard whatever it's called.

Mocking me with:

testbox# fsck -y -t msdosfs /dev/ad4
** /dev/ad4
Invalid signature in fsinfo block
Fix? yes
fsck: /dev/ad4: Floating point exception: 8
testbox#



why ad4 not ad4s1 (or s2 etc...)?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: what software can support that UPS ?

2012-05-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
thanks for help. found it non-FreeBSD specific. just this model is not 
supported by available software.

Thanks again

On Mon, 14 May 2012, Robert Huff wrote:



Wojciech Puchar writes:


 /usr/ports/sysutils/apcupsd ?

 ? - so what to give as device? /dev/ugen1.3?
 set

 UPSCABLE usb
 UPSTYPE usb


My BackUPS RS 500 works fine using those and a empty DEVICE field.
It is possible this is a new/redesigned model that Apcupsd does
not handle correctly.  (APC is famous for not having a consistant
interface, even model lines.)  If so, you should post to the apcupsd
mailing list where these kind of things get prompt attention.


Robert Huff




___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: AFS install

2012-05-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar

I am not sure how that plays in it.   I am definitely not a make hacker.

Anyway, is there a good tinker to get past this
or do I have to wait until something gets updated in the port?


8.2 version should work just fine as 8.3 version.
Some simple fixing of makefiles/other files or even symlinks should 
correct it.




Or, did I just do something stupid?


Probably not you but program authors by requiring to change source every 
time new FreeBSD version will go out.


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Maximum number of tun pseudo-devices

2012-05-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
i would rather look at software that uses tun interfaces instead of 
FreeBSD which seems to support more than 128 tuns out of the box:



this:


# x=1;while [ $x -lt 2000 ];do ifconfig tun$x create;x=$[x+1];done

worked fine. ifconfig shows 2000 tun interfaces

# x=1;while [ $x -lt 2000 ];do ifconfig tun$x destroy;x=$[x+1];done

worked fine too.


what software do you use for tun interfaces?

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Maximum number of tun pseudo-devices

2012-05-15 Thread Chris Knipe
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Brett Glass br...@lariat.net wrote:
 I'm running a busy FreeBSD-based that may handle large numbers of
 simultaneous connections. I'm currently using software that creates a tun
 device for each connection. However, after it hits tun127 (128
 pseudo-devices), it doesn't seem to want to create any more. What sets the
 limit on the number of tun devices that can exist in the system, and how
 can the limit be adjusted? Is there a similar limit on, say, ng devices?

You don't say which version of FreeBSD you're using, but older
versions of FreeBSD had the option to specify a maximum number of
pseudo-device to allow.  For example

pseudo-device   tun1   # Tunnel driver(user process ppp)

In your kernel would only allow for 1 tun device to be created.

If you're using an older (5.x / 4.x) version of FreeBSD, I'd say check
your kernel config.  Nut sure whether this is still relevant in newer
versions of FreeBSD, but documentation suggest that it is no longer
the case with newer versions.


-- 

Regards,
Chris Knipe
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Radeon and DRM crash 9.0-RELEASE.

2012-05-15 Thread Fernando Apesteguía
Hi,

I'm having some system crashes from time to time. I had this before
but until recently I couldn't set my system so I could get crash
dumps.

My video card is a ATI Mobility Radeon 9700. I'm running FreeBSD
9.0-RELEASE for amd64. These are excerpts from two crash dumps text
files:

core.txt.3:

Fatal trap 28: machine check trap while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
instruction pointer = 0x20:0x816480a3
stack pointer   = 0x28:0xff804a5eb970
frame pointer   = 0x28:0xff804a5eb990
code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b
= DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1
processor eflags= interrupt enabled, IOPL = 3
current process = 2254 (Xorg)
trap number = 28
panic: machine check trap
cpuid = 0
KDB: stack backtrace:
#0 0x80869abe at kdb_backtrace+0x5e
#1 0x80833fb7 at panic+0x187
#2 0x80b18b80 at trap_fatal+0x290
#3 0x80b190c0 at trap+0x110
#4 0x80b0396f at calltrap+0x8
#5 0x816a305b at drm_ioctl+0x31b
#6 0x8075597b at devfs_ioctl_f+0x7b
#7 0x8087afb1 at kern_ioctl+0x111
#8 0x8087b1df at sys_ioctl+0xef
#9 0x80b18480 at amd64_syscall+0x450
#10 0x80b03c57 at Xfast_syscall+0xf7


Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
MCA: Bank 4, Status 0xb2070f0f
MCA: Global Cap 0x0105, Status 0x0004
MCA: Vendor AuthenticAMD, ID 0xf4a, APIC ID 0
MCA: CPU 0 UNCOR PCC BUSLG ??? ERR Other timed out

core.txt.4

Fatal trap 28: machine check trap while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
instruction pointer = 0x20:0x816462b6
stack pointer   = 0x28:0xff804a5eb930
frame pointer   = 0x28:0xff804a5eb940
code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b
= DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1
processor eflags= interrupt enabled, IOPL = 3
current process = 2254 (Xorg)
trap number = 28
panic: machine check trap
cpuid = 0
KDB: stack backtrace:
#0 0x80869abe at kdb_backtrace+0x5e
#1 0x80833fb7 at panic+0x187
#2 0x80b18b80 at trap_fatal+0x290
#3 0x80b190c0 at trap+0x110
#4 0x80b0396f at calltrap+0x8
#5 0x8164f3cc at radeon_cp_indirect+0x24c
#6 0x816a305b at drm_ioctl+0x31b
#7 0x8075597b at devfs_ioctl_f+0x7b
#8 0x8087afb1 at kern_ioctl+0x111
#9 0x8087b1df at sys_ioctl+0xef
#10 0x80b18480 at amd64_syscall+0x450
#11 0x80b03c57 at Xfast_syscall+0xf7

dmesg | grep agp
agp0: VIA 8385 host to PCI bridge on hostb0

drm.ko is loaded and agp is included in kernel.

AGP  for the card seems to be properly detected:

dmesg | grep drm
drm0: ATI Radeon RV350 Mobility 9600 M10 NP on vgapci0
info: [drm] AGP at 0xe000 256MB
info: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.31.0 20080613
info: [drm] Setting GART location based on new memory map
info: [drm] Loading R300 Microcode
info: [drm] Num pipes: 1

grep -i Direct rendering /var/log/Xorg.0.log
(II) RADEON(0): Direct rendering enabled

The crash is not easily reproducible but seems to be more likely to
occur the more activity there is in the screen (like when scrolling a
window quite fast).

Any help is appreciated.

Thanks in advance.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


http://localhost/phpmyadmin

2012-05-15 Thread Umbreen Masood
-- 
**Umbreen**
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Article Inquiry

2012-05-15 Thread Lauren Scott
Hello,

I was wondering if you would be able to help me locate a copy of the below
article:

General Commands Manual for RDIST
June 3, 1993
FreeBSD

I appreciate any help you are able to provide.

Best regards,
-- 
Lauren Scott
*Research Analyst*
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Article Inquiry

2012-05-15 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 15/05/2012 21:33, Lauren Scott wrote:
 I was wondering if you would be able to help me locate a copy of the below
 article:
 
 General Commands Manual for RDIST
 June 3, 1993
 FreeBSD
 
 I appreciate any help you are able to provide.

Tricky.  The CVS Repo only goes back to 1994, and I can't see any
obvious references to rdist in there.

Of course, I hope you all realise that this means in about 1 month,
FreeBSD will be legally an adult.

There's still some files in the src tree that haven't changed in all
that time.  eg:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/share/doc/psd/05.sysman/

Cheers,

Matthew

PS. To the OP: it might be worth asking on freebsd-hackers@... There's
still a number of people around that were active that far back.

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Article Inquiry

2012-05-15 Thread Polytropon
On Tue, 15 May 2012 12:33:15 -0700, Lauren Scott wrote:
 Hello,
 
 I was wondering if you would be able to help me locate a copy of the below
 article:
 
 General Commands Manual for RDIST
 June 3, 1993
 FreeBSD
 
 I appreciate any help you are able to provide.

Are you sure about the date? If I read /usr/share/misc/bsd-family-tree
correctly, FreeBSD 1.0 is of 1993-11-01 (newer than 1993-06-03, the
date you provided).

The rdist program isn't part of the FreeBSD OS, it is provided
as a port. However, the web manpage collection contains the
following manual:

FreeBSD General Commands Manual for RDIST
March 17, 1994
4.3 Berkeley Distribution

Source:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=44bsd-rdistsektion=1apropos=0manpath=FreeBSD+9.0-RELEASE+and+Ports

Does this help?




-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: avrdude and arduino

2012-05-15 Thread Warren Block

On Sun, 13 May 2012, Colin Barnabas wrote:


Has anyone been able to get the Arduino Uno board working with
avrdude? I keep getting programmer not responding errors.

avrdude: ser_recv(): programmer is not responding
avrdude: stk500_recv(): programmer is not responding


This is the command I'm using:

%sudo avrdude -F -v -v -v -v -c arduino -p ATMEGA328P -P /dev/cuaU0 -U 
flash:w:flash.hex

Any suggestions would be much appreciated.


An easy way might be to install devel/arduino, turn on Preferences/Show 
verbose output during compilation, and copy the command line it uses. 
The catch is that you have to have the IDE set to use the correct board 
and programmer.


I have some scripts I can dig through if that fails.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Article Inquiry

2012-05-15 Thread Warren Block

On Tue, 15 May 2012, Polytropon wrote:


On Tue, 15 May 2012 12:33:15 -0700, Lauren Scott wrote:

Hello,

I was wondering if you would be able to help me locate a copy of the below
article:

General Commands Manual for RDIST
June 3, 1993
FreeBSD

I appreciate any help you are able to provide.


Are you sure about the date? If I read /usr/share/misc/bsd-family-tree
correctly, FreeBSD 1.0 is of 1993-11-01 (newer than 1993-06-03, the
date you provided).

The rdist program isn't part of the FreeBSD OS, it is provided
as a port. However, the web manpage collection contains the
following manual:

FreeBSD General Commands Manual for RDIST
March 17, 1994
4.3 Berkeley Distribution

Source:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=44bsd-rdistsektion=1apropos=0manpath=FreeBSD+9.0-RELEASE+and+Ports


There was an older one with FreeBSD 1.0:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=rdistapropos=0sektion=0manpath=FreeBSD+1.0-RELEASEarch=defaultformat=html
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: dlink dwl-122g e1 on 9-stable, working only partially? (or not at all?)

2012-05-15 Thread PseudoCylon
-

 Message: 8
 Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 19:14:42 +0200
 From: Christopher J. Ruwe c...@cruwe.de
 Subject: Re: dlink dwl-122g e1 on 9-stable, working only partially?
        (or not at all?)
 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Message-ID: 20120514191442.505a0...@dijkstra.cruwe.de
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

 On Sun, 13 May 2012 23:09:34 -0600
 PseudoCylon moonlightak...@yahoo.ca wrote:

  --
 
  Message: 11
  Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 01:21:30 +0200
  From: Christopher J. Ruwe c...@cruwe.de
  Subject: Re: dlink dwl-122g e1 on 9-stable, working only partially?
         (or not at all?)
  To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
  Message-ID: 20120513012130.64d78...@dijkstra.cruwe.de
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
 
  On Sat, 12 May 2012 14:49:18 +0200
  Christopher J. Ruwe c...@cruwe.de wrote:
 
  Currently I am fighting with (against?) a dlink dwl-g122 usb wlan
  dongle. The casing is claiming the thing to be of H/W-version E1,
  F/W-version 5.00, which I interpret as hardware and firmware.
 
  I am running 9-stable (FreeBSD ritchie.cruwe.de 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD
  9.0-STABLE #8 r235064: Fri May 11 21:32:52 CEST 2012
  c...@ritchie.cruwe.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RITCHIE  amd64) and
  admittedly, dwl-g122 is not included in the hw-compatibility list
  for 9.0.
 
  I am also aware that others have been unsuccessful, though some
  time back, to get dlw-g122 e running
  (http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=27123).
 
  However, I am somewhat successful in getting the dongle recognized
  by if_run.ko, though not to work as I would like to:
 
  dmesg gives then
 
  [...]
  ugen0.3: Ralink at usbus0
  run0: Ralink 11g Adapter, class 0/0, rev 2.00/1.01, addr 3 on
  usbus0 run0: MAC/BBP RT3070 (rev 0x0201), RF RT2020 (MIMO 1T1R),
  address b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec ieee80211_load_module: load the
  wlan_amrr module by hand for now. wlan0: Ethernet address:
  b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec run0: firmware RT2870 ver. 0.236 loaded
  ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_amrr module by hand for now.
  wlan0: Ethernet address: b8:a3:86:97:c1:ec
  I have no explanation for the multiple occurrences, I have been
  trying for some time now, though.
 

 Was wlan_amrr compiled into kernel?

 Nope, using the module. BTW, loading the if_run module gives

 ieee80211_load_module: load the wlan_amrr module by hand for now.

 Did exactly that, i.e., loaded the wlam_amrr by hand. Do you think I
 might fare better by using in-kernel drivers instead of modules?


 
  sudo ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev run0 wlanmode hostap
  sudo ifconfig wlan0 inet 192.168.3.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 ssid
  bsdap channel -
 

 If you want to use WPA, you need to run
 # /etc/rc.d/hostapd onestart

 Amongst other things, I also did that.


  OK, update on the situation: I can get wlan to work in AP-mode, I
  must not enable WPA, though. Having enabled hostapd for one time
  kills my wlan and requires a complete reboot.
 

 Did it panic? Can you post back trace?


 No, it did not panic. After trying to enable wpa, the systems becomes
 very sluggish on the network side and recovers upon pulling the dongle.
 I interpret that as some kind of crashing the driver.

 I would be happy to provide a back trace, I do not know how,
 though. Where do I need to look to learn that?

 Thanks and cheers, Christopher



I saw you have submitted PR. I have replied to it. Please check that out.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=167847


AK
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Combat Flies with Santa Cruz Products

2012-05-15 Thread Santa Cruz Biotechnology


  Are you having trouble viewing this e-mail? [1]Click here to view it
  from our website.
  To ensure that you continue receiving emails from us, please add
  [2]santacruzbiotechnol...@scbt.com to your e-mail address book.


[3][USEMAP:20120514_fly_email.jpg]

Copyright © 2012 Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Santa Cruz
   Biotechnology, Inc. and the Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. logo are
   registered trademarks of Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. All content
contained in this website is property of Santa Cruz Biotechnology,
   Inc.
   and may be used only with the expressed written permission of Santa
  Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. All rights reserved.
Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. is located at 2145 Delaware Avenue,
 Santa Cruz, CA 95060 USA
   Email: [4]webmas...@scbt.com

  If you desire to not receive our e-mail bulletins at
  freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, simply [5]unsubscribe or forward this
  email message to webmas...@scbt.com.
   Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.

References

  1. 
http://www.scbt.com/emails/broadcast.php?lang=enpromo=fly_20120514url=ah_fly.html
  2. mailto:santacruzbiotechnol...@scbt.com
  3. LYNXIMGMAP:file://localhost/tmp/tmplkfe0C.html#ah
  4. mailto:webmas...@scbt.com
  5. http://www.scbt.com/email_bulletin.php?eid=freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: This does look strange

2012-05-15 Thread Thomas Mueller
From Bernt Hansson b...@bananmonarki.se:

 After a reinstall of winxp, yes I know but the games.

 I have a fat32 slice/partition/postcard whatever it's called.

 Mocking me with:

 testbox# fsck -y -t msdosfs /dev/ad4
 ** /dev/ad4
 Invalid signature in fsinfo block
 Fix? yes
 fsck: /dev/ad4: Floating point exception: 8
 testbox#

 I've almost expected Haha

 Anyone know what to do, is there a msdosfs fsck?

Yes there is!  I missed this thread from webmail interface, but just found it.

It's in FreeDOS (http://www.freedos.org/) and is part of the new FreeDOS 1.1; 
was also in FreeDOS 1.0:

Files in C:\FDOS\BIN having names beginning with D are


/dosc/fdos/bin/debug.com
/dosc/fdos/bin/defrag.exe
/dosc/fdos/bin/defrag.hlp
/dosc/fdos/bin/deltree.com
/dosc/fdos/bin/devload.com
/dosc/fdos/bin/dhcp.exe
/dosc/fdos/bin/disk_sim.cfg
/dosc/fdos/bin/diskcomp.com
/dosc/fdos/bin/diskcopy.exe
/dosc/fdos/bin/display.exe
/dosc/fdos/bin/dnstest.exe
/dosc/fdos/bin/dosfsck.exe
/dosc/fdos/bin/doslfn.com
/dosc/fdos/bin/dosshell.exe
/dosc/fdos/bin/dosshell.ini
/dosc/fdos/bin/drvon.com
/dosc/fdos/bin/du.exe

I am not in FreeDOS as I put this message together!

Tom

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


FreeBSD on the ASUS P8H67-M LGA1155 H67 motherboard

2012-05-15 Thread Victor Sudakov
Colleagues,

Do you have success stories running FreeBSD on an ASUS P8H67-M LGA1155
H67 motherboard? This will be mostly a desktop system on 9.0-RELEASE.

I am worried especially about the Sandy Bridge video, shall I be able
to use it with xorg at least in VESA modes?

Do also the sound/NIC/etc drivers work well with this motherboard?

TIA.

-- 
Victor Sudakov,  VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
sip:suda...@sibptus.tomsk.ru
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: let's work together

2012-05-15 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Sorry for OT it is funny that such cheat-companies are so common in 
Poland, advertise a lot not even understanding what they are talking 
about.


The funny part is that potential clients believe in this trash instead of 
simply  use google and type webpage promotion, google rank etc.. 
etc.. or equivalent in polish. Anyone that can do it would at first 
promote him/herself.


From my practice doing static webpage using standard HTML, filling 
keyworks, titles and description properly and using HTML tags like H1,H2 
.. properly, and having only one URL to display single contents is just 
enough and result in best google rankings.


Badly designed webpages cannot be promoted.


My name is Brooke Black and I would really love to tell
you how docs.freebsd.org can rank even better in Google.

I'm a SEO expert working at Instant Traffic and while doing
a research for some of my colleagues I found your email address and
decided to contact you immediately.

If you are interested I will be happy to send the additional information
and all the details needed to make it happen.

Thanks a lot,

Brooke
instantraffic.com

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


FW: 5.2.11. Tunnel Mode Fragmentation.zip

2012-05-15 Thread Agarwal Rohit-B39617

Hi,
Trying to execute IPv6 Ready Logo  Phase-2 Interoperability Test Scenario Ipsec 
 test cases 5.2.11

Issue:-
FreeBSD 7.4 not sending icmpv6 too big message
Please check the updated setup  pcap.

Regards,
Rohit

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

FW: Interoperability:-Tunnel mode between two SGWs, ESP=3DES-CBC HMAC-SHA-256

2012-05-15 Thread Agarwal Rohit-B39617
Hi,
Following interoperability is failing:-
IPv6 Ready Logo, Phase-2 Interoperability Test Scenario Ipsec -Test cases 
5.2.12 is failing with FreeBSD.

Observation:-Freebsd 7.4 uses HMAC-SHA-256-96 Algorithm and SGW1 are using 
HMAC-SHA-256-128 Algorithm due to this interoperability is failing.
Did Freebsd 7.4 supports HMAC-SHA-256-128 ?

Purpose:
Interoperability:-Tunnel mode between two SGWs, ESP=3DES-CBC HMAC-SHA-256
Setup:-
H1---net0---SGW1---net1--Router---net2---SGW2(freebsd)---net3---H2
Net0 (2001::/64)
Net1 (2004::/64)
Net2 (2002::/64)
Net3 (2003::/64)

Please find the attached zip folder.

Regards,
Rohit



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org