ZFS mounting failed with error 2
Hello I have tried to create a GPT partition scheme on my machine. I've created some dataset like that : tank/usr tank/usr/ports tank/usr/src tank/var/ tank/var/log (Please note that is a test on a virtual machine before applying to a real machine). I've tried to generate the zpool.cache like that: zpool import -o cachefile=/tmp/zpool.cache -o altroot=/mnt -f cp /tmp/zpool.cache /mnt/boot/zfs/ And then tried to set mount point to legacy and bootfs with : zfs set bootfs=tank tank zfs set mountpoint=legacy tank The following commands made a lot of warnings : zfs set mountpoint=/usr tank/usr zfs set mountpoint=/var tank/var ... After, the import on the livecd shell generated the error : cannot mount '/mnt/var': failed to create mountpoint. I must say that it is very hard to make a ZFS working machine, there are a lot of pages on the Wiki and most of them are a little bit outdated.. -- Demelier David ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ZFS mounting failed with error 2
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:16+0200, David Demelier wrote: Hello I have tried to create a GPT partition scheme on my machine. I've created some dataset like that : tank/usr tank/usr/ports tank/usr/src tank/var/ tank/var/log (Please note that is a test on a virtual machine before applying to a real machine). I've tried to generate the zpool.cache like that: zpool import -o cachefile=/tmp/zpool.cache -o altroot=/mnt -f cp /tmp/zpool.cache /mnt/boot/zfs/ And then tried to set mount point to legacy and bootfs with : zfs set bootfs=tank tank zfs set mountpoint=legacy tank The following commands made a lot of warnings : zfs set mountpoint=/usr tank/usr zfs set mountpoint=/var tank/var ... After, the import on the livecd shell generated the error : cannot mount '/mnt/var': failed to create mountpoint. I must say that it is very hard to make a ZFS working machine, there are a lot of pages on the Wiki and most of them are a little bit outdated.. Try to use /tmp/mnt as a temporary altroot. /tmp should be writeable. Not sure about / within the livecd env. When you set mountpoints using the above commands, the filesystems are actually being mounted at their specified mountpoint. Unless the filesystems contain some actual files, more to the point, critical files, i.e. libraries and executables, then you are out of luck. My own blog entry is a bit (out)dated, but maybe it's worth a look: http://ximalas.info/2011/10/17/zfs-root-fs-on-freebsd-9-0/ -- +---++ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +---++___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ZFS mounting failed with error 2
2013/4/10 Trond Endrestøl trond.endres...@fagskolen.gjovik.no: On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:16+0200, David Demelier wrote: Hello I have tried to create a GPT partition scheme on my machine. I've created some dataset like that : tank/usr tank/usr/ports tank/usr/src tank/var/ tank/var/log (Please note that is a test on a virtual machine before applying to a real machine). I've tried to generate the zpool.cache like that: zpool import -o cachefile=/tmp/zpool.cache -o altroot=/mnt -f cp /tmp/zpool.cache /mnt/boot/zfs/ And then tried to set mount point to legacy and bootfs with : zfs set bootfs=tank tank zfs set mountpoint=legacy tank The following commands made a lot of warnings : zfs set mountpoint=/usr tank/usr zfs set mountpoint=/var tank/var ... After, the import on the livecd shell generated the error : cannot mount '/mnt/var': failed to create mountpoint. I must say that it is very hard to make a ZFS working machine, there are a lot of pages on the Wiki and most of them are a little bit outdated.. Try to use /tmp/mnt as a temporary altroot. /tmp should be writeable. Not sure about / within the livecd env. But the FreeBSD installer says to mount over /mnt before exiting the shell. When you set mountpoints using the above commands, the filesystems are actually being mounted at their specified mountpoint. Yes that was a probable issue, I will unmount everything before trying a new install. Unless the filesystems contain some actual files, more to the point, critical files, i.e. libraries and executables, then you are out of luck. My own blog entry is a bit (out)dated, but maybe it's worth a look: http://ximalas.info/2011/10/17/zfs-root-fs-on-freebsd-9-0/ Now I currently have 504 Gateway Timeout going to your website, I will try at home maybe my corporate firewall is blocking this. Regards, -- Demelier David ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ZFS mounting failed with error 2
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:05+0200, David Demelier wrote: My own blog entry is a bit (out)dated, but maybe it's worth a look: http://ximalas.info/2011/10/17/zfs-root-fs-on-freebsd-9-0/ Now I currently have 504 Gateway Timeout going to your website, I will try at home maybe my corporate firewall is blocking this. The blog is up running, I assure you. Perhaps my choice of the .info TLD is unacceptable for some reason. It could even be the count of four letters, rather than 2 or 3, or all sorts of other crazy. Anyway, best of luck. ZFS is still a manual install, just pick the shell option in the FreeBSD Installer, and type away. -- +---++ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +---++___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
RE: Amazon VPC instances
Thanks for the info... it looks like Apache supports, does anyone out there have first hand experience of using it? What issues, if any does this pose with email services like Dovecot or Exim and providing SSL authentication? What about anonymous FTP? Don't I need multiple IP's for multiple anonymous FTP sites? -Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Sean DuBois Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 8:35 PM To: Don O'Neil Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Amazon VPC instances I don't know about FreeBSD + EC2, but you may be interested to know that you can use multiple SSL certificates with one IP address! So you can have multiple vhosts/server blocks with different certificates on one host. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 06:20:29PM -0700, Don O'Neil wrote: Has anyone used Colin Percival's FreeBSD builds for Amazon EC2 to build an Amazon VPC instance? If so, does it support multiple network interfaces or aliases with multiple IP's so that I can run multiple SSL certs on the same instance? Thanks! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
EC2 Instances Future
Is there anything likely to be available in the future (3 months to a year) to avoid the Windows tax on FreeBSD instances for the smaller (t1.micro, m1.small, m1.medium) types? I understand the problem but don't find anything much online about a possible solution. Probably because I don't understand as much as I think. Thanks. -- Jim Flowers jflow...@ezo.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
When will binary packages be back?
For many years, I've used FreeBSD binary packages to avoid long waits and/or having to set up a special build machine when creating small systems. But even though the development server security breach is now long past, there are no published binary packages for FreeBSD 9.1. When will they be back? --Brett Glass ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: When will binary packages be back?
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Brett Glass br...@lariat.net wrote: For many years, I've used FreeBSD binary packages to avoid long waits and/or having to set up a special build machine when creating small systems. But even though the development server security breach is now long past, there are no published binary packages for FreeBSD 9.1. When will they be back? can't answer for the freebsd project - but the folks at pc-bsd have made a 9.1 pkgng repository available: http://blog.pcbsd.org/2013/04/pc-bsd-announces-package-repository-for-pc-bsd-and-freebsd-9-1-release/ there is also an east coast mirror hosted by NycBUG/NYI: http://lists.nycbug.org/pipermail/talk/2013-March/014741.html -pete ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: When will binary packages be back?
On 04/10/2013 20:39, Brett Glass wrote: For many years, I've used FreeBSD binary packages to avoid long waits and/or having to set up a special build machine when creating small systems. But even though the development server security breach is now long past, there are no published binary packages for FreeBSD 9.1. When will they be back? --Brett Glass ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org There's a recent update on the compromise announcement page that promises the packages coming soon: http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html -Jeff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: When will binary packages be back?
Unfortunately, I've never experimented with pkgng, so will have to come up to speed on this. Might be a temporary workaround. In the meantime, I'm trying to install Apache 2.2 on a small server. So far, just to build the port, the machine has built Perl, Python, m4, Berkeley DB, and an incredible assortment of other stuff that I do not want or need on that machine! And because the make distclean command in the FreeBSD ports system does not remove code for dependencies, I'll have tons of source -- including GPLed code, which I do not want to touch -- on the machine unless I do a painstaking manual search and removal. Aaargh! --Brett Glass At 12:03 PM 4/10/2013, pete wright wrote: can't answer for the freebsd project - but the folks at pc-bsd have made a 9.1 pkgng repository available: http://blog.pcbsd.org/2013/04/pc-bsd-announces-package-repository-for-pc-bsd-and-freebsd-9-1-release/ there is also an east coast mirror hosted by NycBUG/NYI: http://lists.nycbug.org/pipermail/talk/2013-March/014741.html -pete ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: When will binary packages be back?
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Brett Glass br...@lariat.net wrote: Unfortunately, I've never experimented with pkgng, so will have to come up to speed on this. Might be a temporary workaround. it is def. where the project is moving towards for binary pkg distribution, so it won't be a wasted effort :) i've been quite happy with it since it first was released, and there is still plenty of active development happening on it as well. -pete -- pete wright www.nycbug.org @nomadlogicLA ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: KDE4 package
On 04/09/2013 19:40, Joshua Lokken wrote: Hello, yesterday, I was happily installing kde4 from packages with: pkg_add -r kde4 with $PACKAGESITE set to: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9-stable/Latest/ I had to kill the install at the end of the work day, and when I attempt to finish installing this morning, I get (and can verify via FTP) 'file not found or no access'. So, the kde4 package(s) was/were moved during the night? Any help is welcome, thanks. JRL ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org The package is still there, of course (I just checked, in case). What is the value of $PACKAGESITE now? # echo $PACKAGESITE -Jeff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: When will binary packages be back?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 4/10/13 2:19 PM, Brett Glass wrote: Unfortunately, I've never experimented with pkgng, so will have to come up to speed on this. Might be a temporary workaround. In the meantime, I'm trying to install Apache 2.2 on a small server. So far, just to build the port, the machine has built Perl, Python, m4, Berkeley DB, and an incredible assortment of other stuff that I do not want or need on that machine! And because the make distclean command in the FreeBSD ports system does not remove code for dependencies, I'll have tons of source -- including GPLed code, which I do not want to touch -- on the machine unless I do a painstaking manual search and removal. Aaargh! --Brett Glass Hi Brett, Here's an easy way to delete all of the distfiles for a port and its dependencies: cd /usr/ports/www/apache22 # Or whatever make distclean make all-depends-list | xargs -n1 -I % sh -c cd % make distclean Hope that helps, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code. http://twitter.com/cpucycle/ - Follow you, follow me -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlFlsXoACgkQ0sRouByUApAG1ACaAgxhsxFkWCiD0TTiCcfjBqEk SVsAoIVnv1XlXlBxwPSIyaRq4gP/kz+d =uB9B -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: When will binary packages be back?
On 4/10/2013 at 11:39 AM Brett Glass wrote: |For many years, I've used FreeBSD binary packages to avoid long |waits and/or having to set up a special build machine when creating |small systems. But even though the development server security |breach is now long past, there are no published binary packages for |FreeBSD 9.1. When will they be back? = Additionally, for me, building from ports for me has tended to pull in many, many X-windows support files when they are not needed. Specifically, I run a non-windowing system using command line tools. When I tried to compile Samba from ports, I finally killed the 'make' stage after three hours of compiling X-windows stuff. Nowhere had I ever spcified that the system was running X or any other windowing system. Yet, there it was, three hours of wasted time. I never had such issues when installing from packages. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: When will binary packages be back?
On 04/10/2013 22:19, Mike. wrote: On 4/10/2013 at 11:39 AM Brett Glass wrote: |For many years, I've used FreeBSD binary packages to avoid long |waits and/or having to set up a special build machine when creating |small systems. But even though the development server security |breach is now long past, there are no published binary packages for |FreeBSD 9.1. When will they be back? = Additionally, for me, building from ports for me has tended to pull in many, many X-windows support files when they are not needed. Specifically, I run a non-windowing system using command line tools. When I tried to compile Samba from ports, I finally killed the 'make' stage after three hours of compiling X-windows stuff. Nowhere had I ever spcified that the system was running X or any other windowing system. Yet, there it was, three hours of wasted time. I never had such issues when installing from packages. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org @Mike Then you must have selected some non-default options that have pulled in those as dependencies. You can remove them by: make rmconfig or, including all dependent ports: make rmconfig-recursive -Jeff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: When will binary packages be back?
Mike. wrote: [snip] Additionally, for me, building from ports for me has tended to pull in many, many X-windows support files when they are not needed. Specifically, I run a non-windowing system using command line tools. When I tried to compile Samba from ports, I finally killed the 'make' stage after three hours of compiling X-windows stuff. Nowhere had I ever spcified that the system was running X or any other windowing system. Yet, there it was, three hours of wasted time. In addition to what Jeff has said, for servers where I do not want any X related stuff I place WITHOUT_X11= yes in /etc/make.conf. In addition to make config option(s), there may also be some default stuff here and there in the Mk files. The make.conf line will short circuit these. IIRC there may be some exceptions where you need some (a handful or less) of some X related packages. Seem to think of things like gd, imagemagick, freetype, etc., for PHP kind of things. In these cases, the make.conf line will blanket cover most of what you don't want and you can choose make config options that will pull in only what you absolutely need without starting down the line to everything X-related. -Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: When will binary packages be back?
On 4/10/2013 at 3:39 PM Michael Powell wrote: |Mike. wrote: | |[snip] | | | Additionally, for me, building from ports for me has tended to pull in | many, many X-windows support files when they are not needed. | | Specifically, I run a non-windowing system using command line tools. | When I tried to compile Samba from ports, I finally killed the 'make' | stage after three hours of compiling X-windows stuff. | | Nowhere had I ever spcified that the system was running X or any other | windowing system. Yet, there it was, three hours of wasted time. | | |In addition to what Jeff has said, for servers where I do not want any X |related stuff I place WITHOUT_X11= yes in /etc/make.conf. In addition to |make |config option(s), there may also be some default stuff here and there in |the |Mk files. The make.conf line will short circuit these. | |IIRC there may be some exceptions where you need some (a handful or less) |of |some X related packages. Seem to think of things like gd, imagemagick, |freetype, etc., for PHP kind of things. In these cases, the make.conf line |will blanket cover most of what you don't want and you can choose make |config options that will pull in only what you absolutely need without |starting down the line to everything X-related. = Thanks Jeff and Mike for the assist. I'll try both those suggestions. Oddly, I was not presented with the usual port config screen when I ran the make phase in the ports. This is on a new install on a newly formatted disk. I thought it odd that the was no config screen, but I chalked it up to something new in the 9.x versions (it was the first time I installed 9.x). It also was the first time I ever used portsnap to obtain and install the ports tree. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: EC2 Instances Future
I still follow Colin's original pattern of using a minimal Linux grub boot EBS device (1GB), ext2fs, with the root partition being on another (ufs2) EBS device. This works very well, with a couple of caveats - - Install e2fsprogs (pkg or port) - you will need it, on occasion when modifying the boot device (after mounting rw). - Kernel upgrades are tricky, so be careful - Edit /etc/freebsd-update.conf intelligently to prevent unintended consequences Apart from that, I have been running i386 and amd64 instances this way, both 8.3 and 9.1, without difficulty (apart from some Xen clock weirdness in 8.3). No Windoze Tax. ;-) - M On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:05 AM, jflowers jflow...@ezo.net wrote: Is there anything likely to be available in the future (3 months to a year) to avoid the Windows tax on FreeBSD instances for the smaller (t1.micro, m1.small, m1.medium) types? I understand the problem but don't find anything much online about a possible solution. Probably because I don't understand as much as I think. Thanks. -- Jim Flowers jflow...@ezo.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: When will binary packages be back?
Just made that into a batch file for my library. Should be a target in the standard ports Makefile, IMHO. Maybe call it rdistclean. Perhaps this could be submitted as a PR. --Brett Glass At 12:37 PM 4/10/2013, Greg Larkin wrote: Here's an easy way to delete all of the distfiles for a port and its dependencies: cd /usr/ports/www/apache22 # Or whatever make distclean make all-depends-list | xargs -n1 -I % sh -c cd % make distclean ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Install TP-LINK TL-WDN4800 wireless network interface card
Good afternoon, dear FreeBSd enthusiasts. Is there anyone who has attempted to install a TP-LINK TL-WDN4800 p.c.i.-express wireless network interface card? I am using FreeBSD 9.1 on a Hewlett-Packard xw4400 workstation. The card works perfectly under Windows XP. However, it seems that the FreeBSD operating system does not even recognize the existence of the device; at least, I cannot find any mention of it in the dmesg.boot file. Any and all comments or suggestions will be appreciated. Also, many thanks to those of you who have responded to my previous inquiries. Yours truly, Newby Lee ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Install TP-LINK TL-WDN4800 wireless network interface card
You'll need to run -CURRENT instead of 9.1, and all the caveats that apply. You'll also need the special HAL that hasn't yet been commited to -CURRENT. There are instructions on the freebsd-wireless mailing list. I'm using that exact card right now. Run `pciconf -lv` and you should see it, but there's no driver in 9.1. On 4/10/2013 3:39 PM, leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote: Good afternoon, dear FreeBSd enthusiasts. Is there anyone who has attempted to install a TP-LINK TL-WDN4800 p.c.i.-express wireless network interface card? I am using FreeBSD 9.1 on a Hewlett-Packard xw4400 workstation. The card works perfectly under Windows XP. However, it seems that the FreeBSD operating system does not even recognize the existence of the device; at least, I cannot find any mention of it in the dmesg.boot file. Any and all comments or suggestions will be appreciated. Also, many thanks to those of you who have responded to my previous inquiries. Yours truly, Newby Lee ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: When will binary packages be back?
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:14:21 -0600, Brett Glass wrote: Just made that into a batch file for my library. Should be a target in the standard ports Makefile, IMHO. Maybe call it rdistclean. Perhaps this could be submitted as a PR. There are various options in portsclean (provided by ports-mgmt/ portupgrade), but for distfiles I simply do: sudo rm -rvf /usr/ports/distfiles/* after my updates have finished. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Gain Organic Traffic: Hk4U.Com :PS
p style=margin-bottom:12pt span style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serifHi Hk4U.Com Team,/span/pp style=margin-bottom:12pt span style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serifHope you are doing fine./span/pp style=margin-bottom:12pt span style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serifI thought you might like to know some of the reasons why you are not getting enough organic traffic amp; most often you stick to Ad words to get more traffic which is quite expensive and the chances is high of getting a spam traffic as well./span/p p style=margin-bottom:12pt span style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serifLet me tell you that your website still does not organically rank on major search engine’s first page for most of the popular keywords, which means people searching for your products are not able to find your website and you are losing traffic./span/p p style=margin-bottom:12pt span style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serifSome of the major factors which can be overcome for your website to rank well in SERP organically and increase your social media presence are:/span/pp style=margin:5pt 0in 12pt 0.5in span style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif1.span style=font-size:7pt;font-family:#39;Times New Roman#39; /span/spanspan style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serifSeems like your website carries a lot of technical errors which prevents search engine to crawl and index your website properly./span/p p style=margin:5pt 0in 12pt 0.5in span style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif2.span style=font-size:7pt;font-family:#39;Times New Roman#39; /span/spanspan style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serifYour website needs a proper keyword selection and optimization./span/p p style=margin:5pt 0in 12pt 0.5in span style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif3.span style=font-size:7pt;font-family:#39;Times New Roman#39; /span/spanspan style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serifYour website is not well furnished with enough quality and theme based back links./span/p p style=margin:5pt 0in 12pt 0.5in span style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif4.span style=font-size:7pt;font-family:#39;Times New Roman#39; /span/spanspan style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serifYour website should be more inclined towards Social media promotion and a regular updates in major social networks./span/p p style=margin:5pt 0in 12pt 0.5in span style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif5.span style=font-size:7pt;font-family:#39;Times New Roman#39; /span/spanspan style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serifMissing quality web and promotion contents (Article, Blogs etc.) which is preventing your website to gain more authority and ranking in Web Market./span/p p style=margin-bottom:12pt span style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serifIn the present day scenario it’s very essential to take a proper care of your website and keep it updated with fresh and original contents. There are many additional improvements which can help your website to gain more traffic and visibility. If you are interested to learn more and curious to know how we can help you to improve your website to get a higher traffic, then I would be glad to provide you a detailed proposal for your website./span/p p style=margin-bottom:12pt span style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serifOur services include SEO, Reputation management, SMO for websites to make them popular in the web market. We have a dedicated Google Analytics certified team (220+ SEO professionals) who takes care of our campaign process./span/p p style=margin-bottom:12pt span style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serifOur clients#39; consistently tell us that their customers find them because they are on the top of Google. Being on the top of Google is the best thing you can do for your sales and online reputation. This email just tells you the fraction of things we do, our optimization process involves many other technical factors which can be sent to you on your request. If you would like to know more about our services then please write us back else you can give us a call us in our number mentioned below./span/p p style=margin-bottom:12pt bspan style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serifP.S: -/span/bspan style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif /spanspan style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serifThis is our marketing strategy to use a Gmail account. Once you reply us back, we will communicate with you through our corporate Email ID./span/p p style=margin-bottom:12pt span style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serifLet me know your thoughts and looking forward to work together./span/pp span style=font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serifBest Regards, brJustin Taylor |Senior SEO AdvisorbrPH. No: /spanspan
RE: EC2 Instances Future
Have you made any AMI's based on this method? I would love to deploy a medium or large instance that isn't subject to the 'tax', but don't really know where to start to build one like this. -Original Message- From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Michael Sierchio Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 1:05 PM To: jflowers Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: EC2 Instances Future I still follow Colin's original pattern of using a minimal Linux grub boot EBS device (1GB), ext2fs, with the root partition being on another (ufs2) EBS device. This works very well, with a couple of caveats - - Install e2fsprogs (pkg or port) - you will need it, on occasion when modifying the boot device (after mounting rw). - Kernel upgrades are tricky, so be careful - Edit /etc/freebsd-update.conf intelligently to prevent unintended consequences Apart from that, I have been running i386 and amd64 instances this way, both 8.3 and 9.1, without difficulty (apart from some Xen clock weirdness in 8.3). No Windoze Tax. ;-) - M On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:05 AM, jflowers jflow...@ezo.net wrote: Is there anything likely to be available in the future (3 months to a year) to avoid the Windows tax on FreeBSD instances for the smaller (t1.micro, m1.small, m1.medium) types? I understand the problem but don't find anything much online about a possible solution. Probably because I don't understand as much as I think. Thanks. -- Jim Flowers jflow...@ezo.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
