Re: Enabling acpi_thermal
I've used sysutils/healthd out of ports. Works well, lightweight. Probably not for use with every motherboard. # pkg-descr This is a deamon the uses the LM78/79, WINBond 83781/83782/83783/83626 or the ASUS 991227 hardware monitor chips to warn the operator when something is out of range. ... - David P. Discher * http://davidpdischer.com/ * Cx dpd dpdtech com *AIM: DavidDPD* Hx - Luke Dean wrote: After having a router literally melt during a period of record-high temperatures last week, I've become interested in remotely monitoring the temperature of some of my systems. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.4 NFS install broken?
Well, not broken, but its does not look like it was documented. I was just doing this yesterday, copied ISO #1 completely, then in cd#2 # cd /iso2/packages ; tar -cf - | tar -xvf - -C /nfsinstall/ packages The file packages/INDEX needs to be updated. I don't know how to create this, so I went the ftp servers, and grabbed the INDEX from the combined release. There is a PROBLEM WITH THIS INDEX file. There are TWO entries for perl in it. Perl 5.6.2 and 5.8.2 I do believe. The two CD ISOs only contained perl 5.8.2. Vi and delete the 5.6.2 line, and this seemed to work. (Don't quote me on exact version numbers.) I also did this, not sure if this is needed. # cd /nfsinstall; rm filename.txt # find . -type f | sed -e 's/^\.\///' | sort filename.txt per section 3.4 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/releng/release- build.html btw - sort of related, I posted yesterday: FreeBSD 5.3/5.4 - pxeboot hosting on em0 Intel 82540EM Would love feedback on this. - David P. Discher * http://davidpdischer.com/ * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *AIM: DavidDPD* - On May 28, 2005, at 6:40 PM, Steve Rikli wrote: How does one create the NFS installation directory for FreeBSD-5.4 ? I.e. is it supposed to be as simple as dumping the entire contents of CD#1 CD#2 into a directory on an NFS server, and pointing 'sysinstall' to it? I've been doing 4.x 5.x NFS installs successfully with an NFS server's repositories setup in that manner, but with FreeBSD-5.4 , 'sysinstall' prompted for the next disc, and I had no apparent way of selecting a different media or different source. I'm thinking I must not be getting (parts of?) CD#2 into the right place, and/or need to update a table-of-contents file, or something equally simple. If there's a different/better way (e.g. not using CDs at all) to build a FreeBSD-5.4 repository suitable for NFS installation purposes, advice on that would also be welcome. The Handbook chapter on installations is pretty good, but it sort of glosses over the details in the Advanced Installation (2.13.6.1) section, and I suspect it might not be quite as simple for 5.4 . Thanks, sr. -- || Steve Rikli ||| My group's mission statement - || || Systems Administrator||| You want *what*? By *WHEN*?|| || ||| - Simon Burr, || || [EMAIL PROTECTED] ||| in alt.sysadmin.recovery || ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.4 NFS install broken?
What was wrong with the INDEX from the ISO image? Well, maybe its not specifically INDEX, but when combining the two iso images in a single directory, sysinstall isn't aware that there is only a single, combine directory. Sorry ! I also left off I editted the cdrom.inf file, removing the CD_VOLUME line. This isn't a problem, they are two different packages coming from two different ports. Why do you think it was a problem? From what i can tell, both versions of perl were not included on the ISOs I grabbed. Though it may be that on the FTP sites, the INDEX file is correct and there are two versions of perl in packages/ So, what happens, sysinstall errors, though does not fail, in that it can't install perl. And of course without the combined INDEX file, there is a bunch of stuff it can't find, or prompts for disk 2 (actually it says disk 0 is done, and needs disk 1). I have not tried using both CDROMs, I've been trying to do net-boot and installs, and NFS installs. - David P. Discher * http://davidpdischer.com/ * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *AIM: DavidDPD* - ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD 5.3/5.4 - pxeboot hosting on em0 Intel 82540EM
Netboot and Installing FreeBSD over em0 GigE link I am having an issue with pxeboot/BTX loader mounting/contacting a TFTP server or NFS server that is hosted on machine with an Intel GigE em0 ethernet card. pxeboot comes over (via 82540EM bios), loader comes over, but the load says it can figure out what the root disk is. So the loader cannot find /boot/defaults/loader.conf, that is were it stops. Any ideas ? Anyone use the if_em on FreeBSD to perform netboots/ netinstalls ? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:6:0: class=0x02 card=0x002e8086 chip=0x100e8086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82540EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller' class= network subclass = ethernet Two near identical machines using this card in a cross-over (as the private link). I have a third machine that I have networked booted with the same kernel and loader/pxeboot binaries, and mfsboot, but both machines in that configuration are using fxp cards. ( BTW - the pxeboot documentation needs some correction for the 5.4 release. Will post my notes later. ) - David P. Discher * http://davidpdischer.com/ * C: x [EMAIL PROTECTED] *AIM: DavidDPD* H: x - ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rcNG/rc_ng, using rcorder in /usr/local/etc/rc.d
Learn something new every day, just learning the internals of FreeBSD-5.2.1 (have been sticking to the 4.x-STABLEs) and rolling out my first 5.x system. rcNG is really nice, but where is rcorder being kicked off on /usr/local/etc/rc.d to use rcNG... I see that /etc/rc.d/localpkg is still skimming for *.sh and running them, and not doing the rcorder method. -- *** - | David P. Discher * http://davidpdischer.com/ * (314) 518-3795 | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] * AIM: DavidDPD * ICQ:4222899 | -- *** - ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HELP: Exim - SMTP AUTH, STARTTLS, and PAM or pwcheck on FreeBSD
--- Sorry if this gets posted twice, sigh, email issues -
I've been playing with exim for a little bit now, my new server I'm going to
roll out I would like to use exim instead of sendmail. So far, exim is much
nicer to use, however, I am at a loss where to go now.
I figure many would like to have the following ...
SMTP standard receive on port 25
Relaying supported on 25 via STARTTLS + SMTP AUTH
SSL Tunneled on port 485 + SMTP AUTH
I've gotten the tunneled part to work. I got port 25 going. I can't get
AUTH to work, and haven't tried STARTTLS yet.
My authenticators section, I have so far:
fixed_login:
driver = plaintext
public_name = LOGIN
server_prompts = Username:: : Password::
server_condition=${if pam{$1:$2}{1}{0}}
# server_condition = ${if pam{$1:${sg{$2}{:}{::}}}{yes}{no}}
# server_condition = ${if pwcheck{$1:$2}{1}{0}}
server_set_id = $1
Note, the commented sections I have tired each and still generate the errors
below.
2003-03-05 12:28:46 Authentication failed for ([192.168.22.101])
[192.168.22.101]: 435 Unable to authenticate at present (set_id=dpd): cannot
connect to pwcheck daemon
2003-03-05 12:58:00 Authentication failed for ([192.168.22.101])
[192.168.22.101]: 535 Incorrect authentication data (set_id=dpd)
I have not modified /etc/pam.conf yet.
Anyone got some tips, help, advice where to go next - it seems like is a
PAM/pwcheck issue, not exim at this point, or a draft at an HOWTO ?
Specifics on exim and freebsd seem to be few right now.
random rant
Anyone know how to get your IPS out of SPEWS ? My ISP had some spammers
they ditched a while back, but SPEWS has the whole dag IP range listed. The
ISP has tried multiple times, but the WHOIS records still are pointed into
the IP range (which they can't control), even though the co-los have been
kicked out, but SPEWS wouldn't drop the blocks.
/ random rant
-- *** -
| David P. Discher * http://davidpdischer.com/ * (314) 518-3795 |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] * AIM: DavidDPD * ICQ:4222899 |
-- *** -
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
