Re: good things to say

2004-03-16 Thread DeadZen
That's a nice list if not a bit over enthusiastic, some of the things that 
you listed as being easy
aren't necessarily easy... postfix, erp, crm, apache... software like that 
needs much configuration.

FreeBSD is a foundation and framework for allowing trusted tools to work 
cooperatively in a stable,
secure fashion and is generally open source. Excluding of course some GPL 
utilities which we
BSD people tolerate mainly since we tend to need them. One of the points I 
agreed with the most
is that it may reduce your staff, but it's a multipart point.
You're
1. going to have trouble finding people who aren't saturated by linux ideology.
2. going to have trouble finding people capable of administering large 
networks.
3. going to have trouble finding people who can maintain work by previous 
maintainers.

that's probably 3 of the most common problems. This is a world where 
software engineer,
point & click happy child and gui dependent tinkerer tend to be classified 
into the same category.

I think the best comparison would be

 FreeBSD x 1000 computers = Cheap
 Windows x 1000 computers = Hahahahah oh ahahah... or how about 1000 
computer virus infection HAHAH whew

Thank You.



At 09:37 AM 3/16/2004 +0100, jsha wrote:

my dear open sourcerers,

i am writing this letter to ask for your assistance in advocating
open source and in particular freebsd for the enterprise.
today i've assembled some information relating to the ever-increasing
benefits of our community, and i was hoping for input from you all
juniors and seniors out there -- again i have a case here where some
microsoft fans is in need of enlightenment -- and along with advanced
visualization (lightwave + flash) i tend to make _the_ open source
advocation which i'll distribute freely to anyone who is or ever will
be in the same situation as me.
please note, i tried making this document as simple as possible.

thank you.

 [begin]

|
|
| WHERE WE ARE
Disadvantages:

- Having a slow network
- Using Microsoft Windows
- Paying for Closed Source software
- Viruses/worms/trojans
Advantages:

- Having a number of computers
- Having access to the Internet
- Being open to new ideas
|
|
| FREEBSD
Disadvantages:

- Might reduce your staff

Advantages:

- Free to anyone
- Created the Internet
- Worldwide development
- Reliable and secure
- Sophisticated
* Contains over 9000 free softwares.

* Easily install any of the services that is critical to
  the Internet: Apache (websites), MySQL (databases), Postfix
  (e-mail), OpenSSL (encryption)
* Comes with powerful and free ERP/CRM solutions, office and
  multimedia tools.
* Because of it's unique architecture, no virus has ever
  successfully penetrated its shields.
* Easily emulate, or "impersonate" Windows, so software
  native to Windows can run in a virtual environment.
* Designed and implemented with remote management in mind.

* Its open source ensures that these development efforts will
  be continued well into the future.
|
|
| COMPARISON
Reliability, FreeBSD:
- Extremely robust
- Servers remain active for years
- Filesystem optimized for high performance
- Excellent memory management
Reliability, Windows:
- The infamous "Blue Screen"
- Uses a lot of system resources
- Servers remain active only for a few months
- Filesystem gets fragmented
- Memory gets corrupt
Performance, FreeBSD:
- Choice for high performance network applications
- Outperforms ANY operating system on equivalent hardware
- The largest server on the Internet runs FreeBSD,
  including Yahoo, Qwest and even Hotmail!
Performance, Windows:
- Adequate for routine desktop apps
- But, it is unable to handle heavy network loads.
Security, FreeBSD:
- Subject to massive auditing
- Completely deny access with kernel security levels
- Packet filtering firewall system
- Network intrusion detection tools
- Extensive other built-in security modules
- Rarely reported on CERT
Security, Windows:
- No guarantee
- Being closed source, there is no way to fix or diagnose
  any of the security compromises regularly published
  about Microsoft systems
Compatibility, FreeBSD:
- Run both BSD and Linux binaries
- Supports network connection with Windows machines
- Emulates virtual Windows environments or Windows binaries
Compatibility, Windows:
- Excellent hardware support
|
|
| WHERE W

Re: Recommend MTA

2004-03-08 Thread DeadZen

   Postfix is just as good, faster and free... without the quotes.
   search daemonnews for some good postfix articles.
   David Benfell wrote:

On Sun, 07 Mar 2004 16:13:31 -0800, Chuck McManis wrote:
  

Actually I'm a bit surprised that things didn't go with Qmail. Not only is 
it everything Postfix aspires to be, it has a zillion hours of runtime 
under its belt. Its been at the 1.03 release forever because there hasn't 
been anything to fix. If I had one complaint it would be to do an 
integration pass over the various pop3/imap/ssl/etc modifications to create 
an integrated pop3/mta that could allow for roaming delivery out of the box.



First, Qmail is available via the port system.  The installation does
everything right.  It is nice.  It is painless.  I run it.  I wouldn't
run anything else.  It is what works for me.

Some people, however, can't get along with Qmail's configuration.  I
don't know why.  But I can't criticize, since I can't grok Postfix's
configuration, let alone Sendmail's.

But the main reason distributions don't offer Qmail as part of their
standard installation, or even as an option on the installation, is
because Dan Bernstein forbids the distribution of binaries or even
patched sources.  (The port fetches the source and then fetches any
patches, separately.)  He has his own license, which is not a "free"
software license.  (Irritating side question: Should this be an FAQ?)

Finally, there are now some recommended patches.  If you look at Life
With Qmail, you'll find that the recommended installation procedure
uses netqmail rather than "vanilla" qmail.

  
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: CPU heat monitor

2004-02-12 Thread DeadZen
George Patterson wrote:

On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 22:04:57 -0500
Jud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 

On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:48:55 -0600, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

   

I'm looking for a small applet that monitors the CPU heat. I did a fast  
search
of the ports and really didn't find much based on descriptions - Is there
something like that that will run under X?
 

xmbmon

Jud
   

or gkrellm has a temperature/voltages plugin.

George
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
 

install healthd and access it with healthdc
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"